IP Library Granted Patent US 12,359,598
Granted Patent B2
US 12,359,598 · App. 18/400,612 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

NO

Inventors: Cynthia Chaffin Webb (Sedro-Woolley, WA); Charles Wayne Reinhardt Swart (Bellingham, WA); Maarten Meijer (Anacortes, WA); Varun Ramesh (Bellingham, WA)
Assignee: PACCAR Inc
F01N3/208F01N11/00F02D41/1441F02D41/1463F02D41/222F01N2390/02F01N2550/05F01N2560/026F01N2560/14F01N2590/08F01N2610/02F01N2610/1453F01N2900/1402
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,359,598
App. No.
18/400,612
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A heavy-duty truck has a diesel engine, an exhaust after-treatment system, and an engine control unit. The exhaust after-treatment system includes a close-coupled selective catalytic reduction system and an underbody selective catalytic reduction system, a first NO x sensor upstream of the close-coupled selective catalytic reduction system, a second NO x sensor between the two selective catalytic reduction systems, and a third NO x sensor downstream of the underbody selective catalytic reduction system. The engine control unit may perform methods allowing intrusive diagnostics to be performed on exhaust gas NO x sensors using the selective catalytic reduction systems during normal operation of the heavy-duty truck.

Claims (56)

1. A method, comprising:

operating a diesel engine of a heavy-duty truck such that the diesel engine generates an exhaust gas flow and the exhaust gas flow flows into an exhaust after-treatment system of the heavy-duty truck, the exhaust after-treatment system including an upstream selective catalytic reduction system and a downstream selective catalytic reduction system downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system with respect to the exhaust gas flow;

controlling a DEF injector upstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system to increase a rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF into the exhaust gas flow;

measuring a first level of NO x gases with a first NO x sensor upstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system and a second level of NO x gases with a second NO x sensor downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases;

using the measurements of the first and second levels of NO x gases to determine a level of error in measurements provided by the first NO x sensor;

adjusting a subsequent measurement provided by the first NO x sensor based on the determined level of error in measurements provided by the first NO x sensor; and

controlling the first DEF injector to inject DEF at a first adjusted rate based on the adjusted measurement provided by the first NO x sensor.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling NO x tailpipe emissions using the downstream selective catalytic reduction system.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting future measurements provided by the first NO x sensor based on the determined level of error.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein operating the diesel engine includes controlling the diesel engine such that the exhaust gas flow has a constant flow rate, a constant level of NO x gases, and a constant temperature as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the level of error includes:

determining measured ammonia-to-NO x ratios in the upstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases based on the measurements provided by the first NO x sensor; and

determining measured reduction in NO x levels by the upstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases based on the measurements provided by the first and second NO x sensors.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein determining the level of error further includes determining a difference between a measured ammonia-to-NO x ratio at a peak in the measured reductions in NO x levels and a known ammonia-to-NO x ratio at a peak in efficiency of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

while operating the diesel engine, operating the exhaust after-treatment system to eliminate ammonia present in the upstream selective catalytic reduction system;

after operating the exhaust after-treatment system to eliminate ammonia present in the upstream selective catalytic reduction system, controlling the diesel engine such that the exhaust gas flow has a variable level of NO x gases as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system;

measuring NO x gases with the first NO x sensor and the second NO x sensor as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system varies; and

using the measurements taken as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system varies to determine a level of error in measurements provided by the second NO x sensor.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising adjusting future measurements provided by the second NO x sensor based on the determined level of error in measurements provided by the second NO x sensor.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein operating the exhaust after-treatment system of the heavy-duty truck to eliminate ammonia present in the upstream selective catalytic reduction system includes controlling the DEF injector to stop injecting DEF into the exhaust after-treatment system upstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system with respect to the exhaust gas flow.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein controlling the diesel engine such that the exhaust gas flow has a variable level of NO x gases as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system includes adjusting an injection timing of the diesel engine.

11. The method of claim 7 wherein controlling the diesel engine such that the exhaust gas flow has a variable level of NO x gases as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system includes adjusting an exhaust gas recirculation through the diesel engine.

12. The method of claim 7 wherein determining a level of error in measurements provided by the second NO x sensor includes performing a linear regression using the measurements taken by the first and second NO x sensors as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system varies.

13. A method, comprising:

operating a diesel engine of a heavy-duty truck such that the diesel engine generates an exhaust gas flow and the exhaust gas flow flows into an exhaust after-treatment system including an upstream selective catalytic reduction system and a downstream selective catalytic reduction system downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system with respect to the exhaust gas flow;

controlling a DEF injector downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system and upstream of the downstream selective catalytic reduction system to increase a rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF into the exhaust gas flow;

measuring a first level of NO x gases with a first NO x sensor downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system and upstream of the downstream selective catalytic reduction system and a second level of NO x gases with a second NO x sensor downstream of the downstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases;

using the measurements of the first and second levels of NO x gases to determine a level of error in measurements provided by the first NO x sensor;

adjusting a subsequent measurement provided by the first NO x sensor based on the determined level of error in measurements provided by the first NO x sensor; and

controlling the first DEF injector to inject DEF at a first adjusted rate based on the adjusted measurement provided by the first NO x sensor.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising controlling NO x tailpipe emissions using the upstream selective catalytic reduction system.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein determining the level of error includes:

determining measured ammonia-to-NO x ratios in the downstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases based on the measurements provided by the first NO x sensor; and

determining measured reductions in NO x levels by the downstream selective catalytic reduction system as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases based on the measurements provided by the first and second NO x sensors.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein determining the level of error further includes determining a difference between a measured ammonia-to-NO x ratio at a peak in the measured reductions in NO x levels and a known ammonia-to-NO x ratio at a peak in efficiency of the downstream selective catalytic reduction system.

17. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

while operating the diesel engine, operating the exhaust after-treatment system to eliminate ammonia present in the downstream selective catalytic reduction system;

after operating the exhaust after-treatment system to eliminate ammonia present in the downstream selective catalytic reduction system, controlling the diesel engine and the upstream selective catalytic reduction system such that the exhaust gas flow has a variable level of NO x gases as it enters the downstream selective catalytic reduction system;

measuring NO x gases with the first NO x sensor and the second NO x sensor as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the downstream selective catalytic reduction system varies; and

using the measurements taken as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the downstream selective catalytic reductions system varies to determine a level of error in measurements provided by the second NO x sensor.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein determining a level of error in measurements provided by the second NO x sensor includes performing a linear regression using the measurements taken by the first and second NO x sensors as the level of NO x gases in the exhaust gas flow as it enters the downstream selective catalytic reduction system varies.

19. A heavy-duty truck, comprising:

a diesel engine;

an exhaust after-treatment system having an upstream end and a downstream end opposite the upstream end, the upstream end coupled to the diesel engine, the exhaust after-treatment system including:

a first NO x sensor;

an upstream selective catalytic reduction system downstream of the first NO x sensor;

a second NO x sensor downstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system;

a downstream selective catalytic reduction system downstream of the second NO x sensor; and

a third NO x sensor downstream of the downstream selective catalytic reduction system, and

an engine control unit configured to:

operate the diesel engine such that the diesel engine generates an exhaust gas flow;

control the diesel engine such that the exhaust gas flow has a constant level of NO x gases as it enters the exhaust after-treatment system;

control a DEF injector upstream of the upstream selective catalytic reduction system to increase a rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF into the exhaust gas flow;

measure a first level of NO x gases with the first NO x sensor and a second level of NO x gases with the second NO x sensor as the rate at which the DEF injector injects DEF increases; and

use the measurements of the first and second levels of NO x gases to determine a level of error in measurements provided by the first NO x sensor.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 17002570 · Aug 25, 2020
Provisional Application 63057113 · Jul 27, 2020
Provisional Application 63056131 · Jul 24, 2020
Provisional Application 63054468 · Jul 21, 2020
Related Publication 20240209763A1 · Jun 27, 2024
References Cited (93)
US 5570576A · Ament et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5588291A · Maus et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5600947A · Cullen · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5787705A · Thoreson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 8778290B1 · Ren et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8818691B2 · Douglas et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10161276B2 · Miao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10690033B1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10753255B2 · Schweizer · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10760513B1 · Huhn et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10808594B2 · Dimoski et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10920641B2 · Kinnaird et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11035274B2 · Johansson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11181026B1 · Webb et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040128983A1 · Okada et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060153761A1 · Bandl-Konrad et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070079605A1 · Hu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070082783A1 · Hu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070122317A1 · Driscoll et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070193253A1 · Tsumagari · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080072575A1 · Yan · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080243358A1 · Kojima et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080295493A1 · Applegate et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090035194A1 · Robel et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090158706A1 · Sun · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090183501A1 · Gonze et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100242440A1 · Garimella et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110000194A1 · Gonze et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110047964A1 · Yezerets et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110061372A1 · Levijoki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110265452A1 · Geveci · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110271660A1 · Gonze et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120085082A1 · Levijoki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130146024A1 · Cunningham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130232958A1 · Ancimer et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130311065A1 · Sun et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140033683A1 · Wei et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140363358A1 · Udd et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150023853A1 · Wittrock et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150040540A1 · Hulser et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150040543A1 · Shetney et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150096287A1 · Qi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150151251A1 · Gaudin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150247435A1 · Garimella et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150275730A1 · Gupta et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150276694A1 · Lahr · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150314239A1 · Kawaguchi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150337702A1 · Ettireddy et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160032803A1 · Ettireddy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160186629A1 · Osburn et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160186630A1 · Osburn · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160346732A1 · Schmitt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170051654A1 · Gupta et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170114690A1 · Gupta et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170122159A1 · Bahrami · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170130629A1 · Nagel · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170167342A1 · Balthes · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170175604A1 · Devarakonda et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170234199A1 · Sun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170306819A1 · Alfieri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180080359A1 · Price et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180087426A1 · Dou et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180163589A1 · David et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180230879A1 · Saitoh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180252136A1 · Concetto Pesce et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180274420A1 · Kleinknecht et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180274421A1 · Smith et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180334939A1 · Mital et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180345217A1 · Goffe · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180345218A1 · Goffe · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190078481A1 · Schweizer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190136732A1 · Lauritano · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190155230A1 · Culbertson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190234367A1 · Pursifull et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190345861A1 · Johansson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190353071A1 · Camuglia · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190360415A1 · Romanato · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383189A1 · Dou et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200063634A1 · Smith et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200316571A1 · Goffe · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200332691A1 · Soeger et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210079826A1 · Voss et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210095590A1 · Bastoreala et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220010713A1 · McCarthy, Jr. et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 106246301B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102010034707A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018101929A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018205132A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3009622A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3581773A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009031030A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009123633A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014032686A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]