IP Library Granted Patent US 12,293,265
Granted Patent B1
US 12,293,265 · App. 18/409,666 · Granted May 6, 2025

Apparatus and method for model optimization

Inventors: Barbara Sue Smith (Toronto, CA); Daniel J. Sullivan (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: The Strategic Coach Inc.
G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,293,265
App. No.
18/409,666
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

An apparatus and method for model optimization. is disclosed. The apparatus comprises at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. The memory instructs the processor to generate a positive feedback function of an optimal measurement, wherein generating the positive feedback function further comprises identifying, using an optimal machine-learning model, a first set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the optimal measurement, and generate a negative feedback function of the suboptimal measurement, wherein generating the negative feedback function comprises identifying, using a suboptimal machine-learning model, a second set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the suboptimal measurement.

Claims (42)

1. A method for identifying model optimization, the method comprising:

measuring, by a computing device, a plurality of subsystems, wherein the plurality of subsystems includes at least one remote device, and wherein measuring the plurality of subsystems produces a plurality of measurements;

comparing, by the computing device, each measurement of the plurality of measurements to a predetermined continuum range, wherein the predetermined continuum range comprises a lower threshold and an upper threshold;

identifying, by the computing device, an optimal measurement of the plurality of measurements and a suboptimal measurement of the plurality of measurements as a function of each of the comparisons;

generating, by the computing device, a positive feedback function of the optimal measurement, wherein generating the positive feedback function further comprises identifying, using an optimal machine-learning model, a first set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the optimal measurement, wherein the optimal machine-learning model is generated by updating a previous optimal machine learning model, wherein updating the previous optimal machine learning model comprises:

receiving optimal training data, wherein the optimal training data comprises a plurality of data entries containing a plurality of optimal measurements as inputs correlated to a plurality of positive feedbacks as outputs;

training the previous machine-learning model using the optimal training data;

sanitizing the optimal training data using a dedicated hardware unit comprising circuitry configured to perform signal processing operations, wherein sanitizing the optimal training data comprises:

determining by the dedicated hardware unit that a training data entry has a signal to noise ratio below a threshold value; and

removing the training data entry from the optimal training data;

retraining the previous machine-learning model using the sanitized training data; and

generating the positive feedback function as a function of the optimal measurement using the retrained optimal machine-learning model;

generating, by the computing device, a negative feedback function of the suboptimal measurement, wherein generating the negative feedback function comprises identifying, using a suboptimal machine-learning model, a second set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the suboptimal measurement; and

configuring the at least one remote device using the positive feedback function and the negative feedback function.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein configuring the at least a remote device further comprises configuring the at least a remote device to display the first set of parameter changes and the second set of parameter changes.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subsystem of the plurality of subsystems comprises a plurality of data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subsystems include sets of activity and categories of actions that are performed by individuals and business entities.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of parameter changes is configured to move the optimal measurement further up the predetermined continuum range.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second set of parameter changes is configured to move the suboptimal measurement further up the predetermined continuum range using an error function.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying a data structure related to the configuration.

8. An apparatus for model optimization, wherein the apparatus comprises:

at least a processor; and

a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, wherein the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to:

measure a plurality of subsystems, wherein the plurality of subsystems includes at least one remote device, and wherein measuring the plurality of subsystems produces a plurality of measurements;

compare each measurement of the plurality of measurements to a predetermined continuum range, wherein the predetermined continuum range comprises a lower threshold and an upper threshold;

identify an optimal measurement of the plurality of measurements and a suboptimal measurement of the plurality of measurements as a function of each of the comparisons;

generate a positive feedback function of the optimal measurement, wherein generating the positive feedback function further comprises identifying, using an optimal machine-learning model, a first set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the optimal measurement, wherein the optimal machine-learning model is generated by updating a previous optimal machine learning model, wherein updating the previous optimal machine learning model comprises:

receiving optimal training data, wherein the optimal training data comprises a plurality of data entries containing a plurality of optimal measurements as inputs correlated to a plurality of positive feedbacks as outputs;

training the previous machine-learning model using the optimal training data;

sanitizing the optimal training data using a dedicated hardware unit comprising circuitry configured to perform signal processing operations, wherein sanitizing the optimal training data comprises:

determining by the dedicated hardware unit that a training data entry has a signal to noise ratio below a threshold value; and

removing the training data entry from the optimal training data;

retraining the previous machine-learning model using the sanitized training data; and

generating the positive feedback function as a function of the optimal measurement using the retrained optimal machine-learning model;

generate a negative feedback function of the suboptimal measurement, wherein generating the negative feedback function comprises identifying, using a suboptimal machine-learning model, a second set of parameter changes to a subsystem corresponding to the suboptimal measurement; and

configure the at least one remote device using the positive feedback function and the negative feedback function.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , further comprising configuring a remote device configured to display the first set of parameter changes and the second set of parameter changes.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the subsystem of the plurality of subsystems comprises a plurality of data.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the subsystems include sets of activity and categories of actions that are performed by individuals and business entities.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the measurements comprise ratios of one parameter to another, including a rate of productivity measured in output per hour, a duration, including total time spent on a process, and total time that a person remains employed, and/or differences including gains minus losses.

13. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the second set of parameter changes moves the suboptimal measurement further up the predetermined continuum range using an error function.

14. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the first set of parameter changes and the second set of parameters comprise instructions to modify parameters of the subsystems.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2024
From: SMITH, BARBARA SUE; SULLIVAN, DANIEL J.
To: THE STRATEGIC COACH INC.
Reel/Frame 067098/0831 →
References Cited (11)
US 11625626B2 · Zaslavsky · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20200065702A1 · Nag · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200125586A1 · Rezaeian · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200126167A1 · Meerkov · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210304074A1 · Zaremoodi · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210319887A1 · Derrick, Jr. · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210398666A1 · Maslik · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20240203438A1 · Karadagur Ananda Reddy · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Womelsdorf T, Watson MR, Tiesinga P. Learning at variable attentional load requires cooperation of working memory, meta-learning, and attention-augmented reinforcement learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Dec. 1… [cited by examiner]
Xu H, Liu X, Yu W, Griffith D, Golmie N. Reinforcement learning-based control and networking co-design for industrial internet of things. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. Mar. 23, 2020;38(5):885-98. (Ye… [cited by examiner]
Apps, Matthew AJ, Elise Lesage, and Narender Ramnani. “Vicarious reinforcement learning signals when instructing others.” Journal of Neuroscience 35.7 (2015): 2904-2913. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]