IP Library Granted Patent US 12,224,072
Granted Patent B2
US 12,224,072 · App. 18/414,296 · Granted Feb 11, 2025

Identification of patient sub-cohorts and corresponding quantitative definitions of subtypes as a classification system for medical conditions

Inventors: Constantinos Ioannis Boussios (Chelsea, MA); Jigar Bandaria (Medford, MA); Richard Gliklich (Weston, MA)
Assignee: OM1, Inc.
G16H50/70G16H10/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,224,072
App. No.
18/414,296
Granted
Feb 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A classification method and system for medical conditions based on the concept of subtypes, which are classes of patients whose medical fact patterns as analyzed in an N-dimensional space places them closer to other patients belonging to the same subtype than to patients who belong to different subtypes and, who share similar likelihood of certain specified outcomes. A computer system processes patient data for a plurality of patients from a set of patients called a cohort. The computer system processes the patient data for the cohort to group patients into sub-cohorts of similar patients, i.e., each sub-cohort includes patients who have similar medical fact patterns in their patient data. Patients in different sub-cohorts generally, but not necessarily, have significant differences in their patient data. The computer system generates quantitative definitions, describing the patients in the sub-cohorts.

Claims (58)

1. A computer system for encoding patient data for a plurality of patients into a respective ordered collection of features representing the medical facts for each patient in the plurality of patients, for input to a computational model, the computer system comprising:

a processing system comprising a processing device and memory, wherein the processing device processes computer program instructions to perform operations;

computer storage connected to the processing system and storing at least:

a. patient data comprising data representing a respective plurality of medical events for each of a plurality of patients, wherein data representing a medical event comprises at least one field and a respective value for each field, and

b. a library of medical instance definitions, wherein each medical instance definition comprises a respective mapping of data representing one or more medical events into data representing a respective medical instance, wherein the respective medical instance is a more general, less granular, more generic, or less specific representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events; and

computer program instructions which, when processed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations to:

access a data structure specifying, for each dimension of an N-dimensional vector, a respective medical instance definition from the library:

for each patient in the plurality of patients, convert the data representing a respective plurality of medical events for the patient into a respective N-dimensional vector of medical instances for the patient, by, for each dimension of the N-dimensional vector, applying the respective medical instance definition specified by the data structure to the data representing medical events for the patient to generate a respective medical instance for the dimension; and

transmitting the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients as the ordered collection of features representing the patients to the computational model for training or classification.

2. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the computer storage further stores a quantitative definition for a subtype characterizing a medically interesting sub-cohort, wherein the quantitative definition comprises data indicative of the data structure specifying the respective medical instance definitions used to generate the N-dimensional vectors for the patients and a subtype definition, wherein the subtype definition comprises a data structure that stores logic indicating:

a. an operation to be performed to process the respective N-dimensional vector for a patient to determine membership of the patient in the subtype, and

b. parameters used by the operation.

3. The computer system of claim 2 , wherein the computational model comprises computer program instructions which, when processed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations to apply the operation and with the parameters specified by a subtype definition to one or more N-dimensional vectors for patients to determine whether the patients are members of the sub-cohort characterized by the subtype.

4. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein data representing a medical event includes a time for the medical event.

5. The computer system of claim 4 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors are generated based on data representing medical events within a specified time period.

6. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein, for at least one medical instance definition applied to one or more medical events, the medical instance is a more general representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events.

7. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein, for at least one medical instance definition applied to one or more medical events, the medical instance is a less granular representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events.

8. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein, for at least one medical instance definition applied to one or more medical events, the medical instance is a more generic representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events.

9. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein, for at least one medical instance definition applied to one or more medical events, the medical instance is a less specific representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events.

10. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein there are fewer medical instances for representing medical facts for patients than medical events.

11. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein medical facts for patients may be represented inconsistently in the patient data.

12. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients have reduced inconsistency with respect to the medical events for the patients.

13. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients have improved consistency with respect to the medical events for the patients.

14. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein medical facts for patients may be represented with high dimensionality in the patient data.

15. The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients have reduced dimensionality with respect to the medical events for the patients.

16. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein medical facts for patients may be represented with high specificity in the patient data.

17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients define an outcome-oriented generality with respect to the medical events for the patients.

18. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the respective N-dimensional vectors representing patients map the patients to respective points in an N-dimensional space.

19. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the library of medical instance definitions comprises an operation that replaces a plurality of medical events with a single medical instance.

20. The computer system of claim 19 , wherein the operation that replaces the plurality of medical events with the single medical instance comprises an operation based on co-occurrence of the plurality of medical events in a patent history.

21. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the library of medical instance definitions comprises an operation that replaces a first medical event with a medical instance representing a second medical event more general than the first medical event.

22. The computer system of claim 21 , wherein the first medical event comprises a first code in a hierarchy of codes and the medical instance comprises a second code more general in the hierarchy of codes than the first code.

23. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein a medical instance definition comprises an operation performed on patient data that maps a medical event to a corresponding medical instance by generalizing specific types of medical events into a more general type of medical instance.

24. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein a medical instance definition comprises an operation performed on patient data that maps a medical event to a corresponding medical instance by replacing different types of medical events that represent a same medical fact into a type of medical instance.

25. The computer system of claim 1 , further comprising:

computer program instructions which, when processed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations to derive medical instances based on the patient data.

26. The computer system of claim 25 , wherein derivation of medical instances is based on co-occurrence relations.

27. The computer system of claim 25 , wherein derivation of medical instances is based on grouping codes which relate to the same condition.

28. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the library comprises data structures specifying, for each medical instance:

a. a set of one or more medical events that are members of the medical instance;

b. one or more operations used to process the set of medical events;

c. a label or a key uniquely identifying the medical instance; and

d. a human-readable description of the medical instance.

29. The computer system of claim 1 , further comprising:

computer program instructions which, when processed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations to characterize a sub-cohort of patients based on the medical instances computed for the patients.

30. A computer system, comprising:

a processing system comprising a processing device and memory, wherein the processing device processes computer program instructions to perform operations;

computer storage connected to the processing system and storing at least:

a. patient data comprising data representing a respective plurality of medical events for each of a plurality of patients, wherein data representing a medical event comprises at least one field and a respective value for each field,

b. a library of medical instance definitions, wherein each medical instance definition comprises a mapping of data representing one or more medical events into data representing a medical instance, wherein the medical instance is a more general, less granular, more generic, or less specific representation of a medical fact about a patient than the one or more medical events, and

c. a quantitative definition for a subtype characterizing a medically interesting sub-cohort of patients, wherein patients within the sub-cohort can receive a medical treatment for the sub-cohort, wherein the quantitative definition comprises:

i. a data structure specifying, for each dimension of an N-dimensional vector, a respective medical instance definition from the library for generating a value for the dimension,

ii. an operation to be performed to process a respective N-dimensional vector for a patient to determine membership of the patient in the sub-cohort, and

iii. parameters used by the operation; and

computer program instructions which, when processed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations to:

access the data structure specifying the respective medical instance definitions,

for each patient in the plurality of patients, apply the medical instance definitions specified by the data structure to the respective data representing medical events for the patient to generate a respective N-dimensional vector of medical instances for the patient, and

process the respective N-dimensional vectors for the patients using the operation and parameters specified by the subtype definition to determine, for each of the patients, whether the patient is a member of the sub-cohort.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2025
From: OM1, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 071997/0292 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 18520664 · Nov 28, 2023
Continuation 16724264 · Dec 21, 2019
Provisional Application 62784434 · Dec 22, 2018
Related Publication 20240153647A1 · May 9, 2024
References Cited (195)
US 5486999A · Mebane · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5508912A · Schneiderman · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5619421A · Venkataraman et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5961332A · Joao · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6101511A · Derose et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6317731B1 · Luciano · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6524241B2 · Iliff · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6687685B1 · Sadeghi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7076437B1 · Levy · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7194301B2 · Jenkins et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7433519B2 · Rynderman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7739126B1 · Cave et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7809660B2 · Friedlander et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7916363B2 · Rynderman · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7930262B2 · Friedlander et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7949620B2 · Otte et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8090590B2 · Fotsch et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8140541B2 · Koss · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8154776B2 · Rynderman · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8165973B2 · Alexe et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8311849B2 · Soto et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8335698B2 · Angell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8392215B2 · Tawil · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8538773B2 · Eddy et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8560281B2 · Soto et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8583586B2 · Ebadollahi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8930223B2 · Friedlander et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9514416B2 · Lee et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9646271B2 · Friedlander et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9690844B2 · Mukherjee et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10061812B2 · Marshall et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10282512B2 · Bennett et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10311363B1 · Florissi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10311975B2 · Young et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10706329B2 · Anushiravani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10731223B2 · Kennedy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10731233B2 · Yamada et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11257574B1 · Boussios et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11527326B2 · McNair et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11594310B1 · Bradley et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11594311B1 · Bradley et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11862346B1 · Boussios et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11967428B1 · Boussios et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12057204B2 · Bradley et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12142355B2 · Bradley et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20030014284A1 · Jones · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040122706A1 · Walker et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040122707A1 · Sabol et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040243362A1 · Liebman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060058384A1 · Hogg · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129427A1 · Wennberg · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129428A1 · Wennberg · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060173663A1 · Langheier et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070021979A1 · Cosentino et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070172907A1 · Volker et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070255113A1 · Grimes · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080171916A1 · Feder et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080208813A1 · Friedlander et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080235049A1 · Morita et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080294459A1 · Angell et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090119337A1 · Biedermann · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090164237A1 · Hunt et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259494A1 · Feder et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090287503A1 · Angell et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100021956A1 · Shearer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100191088A1 · Anderson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100240035A1 · Jablons et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100324927A1 · Tinsley · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110010328A1 · Patel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110071363A1 · Montijo et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110106558A1 · Solito et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125680A1 · Bosworth et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110177956A1 · Korenberg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110288877A1 · Ofek · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120065987A1 · Farooq et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120084064A1 · Dzenis et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120110016A1 · Phillips · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120179478A1 · Ross · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120191640A1 · Ebadollahi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120215560A1 · Ofek · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120254098A1 · Flinn et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296675A1 · Silverman · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185231A1 · Baras et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140006447A1 · Friedlander et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140074510A1 · Mcclung et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140081898A1 · Saigal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140095204A1 · Fung et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140108044A1 · Reddy et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140164022A1 · Reed et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140249834A1 · D'Souza et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140350954A1 · Ellis · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150106109A1 · Crowley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150106115A1 · Hu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150235001A1 · Fouts · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150339442A1 · Oleynik · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347599A1 · McMains et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160004840A1 · Rust et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012202A1 · Hu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015347A1 · Bregman-Amitai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160029919A1 · Hebert et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160078183A1 · Trygstad et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160120481A1 · Li et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160188814A1 · Raghavan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160188834A1 · Erdmann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160196394A1 · Chanthasiriphan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235373A1 · Sharma et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160283679A1 · Hu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160283686A1 · Hu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160354039A1 · Soto et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170046602A1 · Hu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170061093A1 · Amarasingham et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170124263A1 · Crafts et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170124279A1 · Rothman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170147777A1 · Kim et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170235887A1 · Cox · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170262609A1 · Perlroth et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323075A1 · Krause et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180268937A1 · Spetzler et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180330805A1 · Cheung et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180336319A1 · Itu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190079938A1 · Agrawal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190244714A1 · Morra et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200411164A1 · Donner · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210098090A1 · Thomas et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220148695A1 · Boussios et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230197223A1 · Bradley et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230197224A1 · Bradley et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240096500A1 · Boussios et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240290491A1 · Boussios et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 2614480A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 0057310A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 0209004A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 0209580A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 03104939A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006086181A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007050147A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008048662A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008079341A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012019000A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014028541A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015169810A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Awan, et al., “Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Heart Failure Readmission or Death: Implications of Choosing the Right Model and the Right Metrics”, ESC Heart Failure, DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12419, vol. 6, Feb. 27, 2019,… [cited by applicant]
Bertens, et al., “A Nomogram was Developed to Enhance the use of Multinomial Logistic Regression Modeling in Diagnostic Research”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 71, Mar. 2016, pp. 51-57. [cited by applicant]
Bodhe, et al., “A Proposed Mobile Based Health Care System for Patient Diagnosis using Android OS”, International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, vol. 3 Issue.5, May 5, 2014, pp. 422-427. [cited by applicant]
Cheng, et al., “Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records: A Deep Learning Approach”, Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Jun. 2016, pp. 432-440. [cited by applicant]
Clockbackward, “Ordinary Least Squares Linear Regression: Flaws, Problems and Pitfalls”, Jun. 18, 2009, 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Dua, et al., “Machine learning in healthcare informatics”, vol. 56. Berlin: Springer, 2014, 334 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Grossman, et al., “Learning Bayesian Network Classifiers by Maximizing Conditional Likelihood”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2004, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hileman, “Accuracy of Claims-Based Risk Scoring Models”, Society of Actuaries, Oct. 2016, pp. 1-90. [cited by applicant]
McCarthy, et al., “The Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Clustered Binary Data”, Statistics and Data Analysis, SUGI 31, Paper 206-31, 2006, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mojsilovic, et al., “Semantic Based Categorization, Browsing and Retrieval in Medical Image Databases”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, IEEE, 2002, 2002, pp. 145-148. [cited by applicant]
Pearson, et al., “Disease Progression Modeling from Historical Clinical Databases”, Proceedings of the Eleventh Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, Aug. 21-24, 2005, pp. 788-793. [cited by applicant]
Ribeiro, “Why Should I Trust You?”, Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778, Feb. 16, 2016, pp. 1135-1144. [cited by applicant]
Schneider, “Enabling Advanced Analytics to Improve Outcomes”, Truven Health Analytics, Aug. 23, 2012, pp. 1-46. [cited by applicant]
Shen, “Using Cluster Analysis, Cluster Validation, and Consensus Clustering to Identify Subtypes of Pervasive Developmental Disorders”, Queen's University, Nov. 2007, 119 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Soni, et al., “Using Associative Classifiers for Predictive Analysis in Health Care Data Mining”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 4, No. 5, Jul. 2010, pp. 33-37. [cited by applicant]
Su, et al., “Using Bayesian Networks to Discover Relations Between Genes, Environment, and Disease”, Bio Data Mining, http://www.biodatamining.org/content/6/1/6, 2013, 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Suo, et al., “Risk Factor Analysis Based on Deep Learning Models”, Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, Oct. 2-5, 2016, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Tan, et al., “Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts and Algorithms,”, Introduction to Data Mining (Second Edition), Chapter 8, Feb. 2018, pp. 487-568. [cited by applicant]
Truven Health Analytics, “Flexible Analytics for Provider Evaluation”, Solution Spotlight, 2017, 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Truven Health Analytics, “Modeling Studies: Published Articles and Presentations”, 2016, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Truven Health Groups, “Enterprise Decision Support”, Product Spotlight, 2012, 2 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Dec. 30, 2019, 54 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Jan. 4, 2022, 60 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Mar. 21, 2022, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/386,123, filed Mar. 31, 2023, 59 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/724,264, filed Nov. 30, 2022, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/927,766, filed Oct. 6, 2020, 22 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Oct. 14, 2020, 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/927,766, filed Apr. 30, 2020, 19 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Jun. 26, 2019, 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/386,123, filed Jun. 28, 2022, 55 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Mar. 13, 2020, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Mar. 19, 2019, 29 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Apr. 1, 2021, 73 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 31 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,363, filed Jul. 7, 2023, 48 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/724,264, filed Mar. 21, 2022, 20 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Aug. 16, 2022, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Aug. 24, 2022, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/386,123, filed Dec. 13, 2023, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,550, filed Jan. 26, 2023, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/724,264, filed May 22, 2023, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/927,766, filed Oct. 14, 2021, 35 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,542, filed Oct. 28, 2022, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/724,264, filed Sep. 6, 2023, 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/724,264, filed Oct. 7, 2021, 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,372, filed May 8, 2024, 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,363, filed Mar. 27, 2024, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Voshaar, et al., “Calibration of the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank in Dutch Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis”, PLOS ONE, vol. 9, Issue 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Zhong, Yizhen, et al., “Characterizing Design Patterns of EHR-Driven Phenotype Extraction Algorithms,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Madrid, Spain, 2018, pp. 1143-1146, … [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/596,720, filed Sep. 16, 2024, 37 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/573,725, filed Sep. 9, 2024, 27 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , “Notice of Allowability Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,372, filed Oct. 16, 2024, 2 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office , “Notice of Allowance Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/169,372, filed Sep. 25, 2024, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]