IP Library Granted Patent US 12,284,087
Granted Patent B2
US 12,284,087 · App. 18/414,493 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Correlation score based commonness indication associated with a point anomaly pertinent to data pattern changes in a cloud-based application acceleration as a service environment

Inventors: Shyamtanu Majumder (Bangalore, IN); Justin Joseph (Bangalore, IN); Johny Nainwani (Kota, IN); Parth Arvindbhai Patel (Surat, IN)
Assignee: Aryaka Networks, Inc.
H04L41/147H04L41/06H04L41/145H04L43/04H04L43/08H04L67/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,284,087
App. No.
18/414,493
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method implemented through a data processing device of a computing network including includes detecting a point anomaly in real-time data associated with each network entity based on determining whether the real-time data falls outside a threshold expected value thereof, and representing the detected point anomaly in a full mesh Q node graph, with Q being a number of features applicable for the each network entity. The method also includes capturing a transition in the point anomaly associated with a newly detected anomaly or non-anomaly in the real-time data associated with one or more of the Q number of features via the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and deriving a current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition via the representation of the full mesh Q node graph.

Claims (108)

1. A method of a computing network implemented in a data processing device comprising a processor communicatively coupled to a memory, comprising:

detecting real-time data associated with each network entity of a plurality of network entities of the computing network for each feature thereof sequentially in time;

detecting a point anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on determining whether the real-time data falls outside a threshold expected value thereof;

representing the detected point anomaly in a full mesh Q node graph, wherein Q is a number of features applicable for the each network entity;

capturing a transition in the point anomaly associated with a newly detected one of: anomaly and non-anomaly in the real-time data associated with at least one feature of the Q number of features via the representation of the full mesh Q node graph; and

deriving a current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition as:

CS

=

i

=

1

APC

(

1

-

EWP

i

TSAC

)

APC

,

 wherein CS is the current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition, APC is a count of a total number of pairs of Y current anomalous features in the Q number of features and is given by Y C 2 + Y C 1 , EWP i is a weight of an edge of the i th pair of the Y current anomalous features in the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and TSAC is a total number of time samples of the point anomaly comprising the captured transition, and

wherein the current data correlation score is indicative of a commonness of a combination of the Y current anomalous features contributing to the point anomaly with respect to an equivalent Y anomalous features contributing to another previously detected point anomaly associated with the each network entity.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprising the threshold expected value being one of: a maximum expected value and a minimum expected value.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting at least one anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity for the each feature thereof including the point anomaly in accordance with computing a score for the at least one anomaly indicative of anomalousness thereof, the computation of the score involving both relative scoring and absolute deviation scoring, and the absolute deviation scoring being based on previous data deviations from reference data bands.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising determining an event associated with a pattern of change of the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on executing an optimization algorithm to determine, among all features of the each network entity, a series of anomalies comprising the detected at least one anomaly that constitutes a sequence of patterned anomalies in accordance with scanning detected anomalies associated with the real-time data associated with the each network entity including the detected at least one anomaly.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the event based on executing the optimization algorithm further comprises finding, based on at least one dynamic programming technique, a longest occurring sequence of anomalies as the series of anomalies among all the features of the each network entity that is capable of being interleaved for a specific duration.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising enabling predictive classification of a future event associated with the each network entity into a category of determined problems based on the determined event associated with the pattern of change of the real-time data associated with the each network entity.

7. The method of claim 4 , further comprising at least one of:

collecting feedback from another data processing device of the computing network communicatively coupled to the data processing device via the computing network;

determining a severity indicator for the determined event based on the feedback from the another data processing device;

generating, utilizing the determined severity indicator, an event score for the determined event into which the current data correlation score is factored; and

ranking the determined event with respect to a plurality of events based on the generated event score.

8. A data processing device comprising:

a memory; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the processor executing instructions to:

detect real-time data associated with each network entity of a plurality of network entities of a computing network for each feature thereof sequentially in time,

detect a point anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on determining whether the real-time data falls outside a threshold expected value thereof,

represent the detected point anomaly in a full mesh Q node graph, wherein Q is a number of features applicable for the each network entity,

capture a transition in the point anomaly associated with a newly detected one of: anomaly and non-anomaly in the real-time data associated with at least one feature of the Q number of features via the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and

derive a current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition as:

CS

=

i

=

1

APC

(

1

-

EWP

i

TSAC

)

APC

,

 wherein CS is the current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition, APC is a count of a total number of pairs of Y current anomalous features in the Q number of features and is given by Y C 2 + Y C 1 , EWP i is a weight of an edge of the i th pair of the Y current anomalous features in the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and TSAC is a total number of time samples of the point anomaly comprising the captured transition, and

wherein the current data correlation score is indicative of a commonness of a combination of the Y current anomalous features contributing to the point anomaly with respect to an equivalent Y anomalous features contributing to another previously detected point anomaly associated with the each network entity.

9. The data processing device of claim 8 , wherein the threshold expected value is one of: a maximum expected value and a minimum expected value.

10. The data processing device of claim 8 , wherein the processor further executes instructions to detect at least one anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity for the each feature thereof including the point anomaly in accordance with computing a score for the at least one anomaly indicative of anomalousness thereof, the computation of the score involving both relative scoring and absolute deviation scoring, and the absolute deviation scoring being based on previous data deviations from reference data bands.

11. The data processing device of claim 10 , wherein the processor further executes instructions to determine an event associated with a pattern of change of the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on executing an optimization algorithm to determine, among all features of the each network entity, a series of anomalies comprising the detected at least one anomaly that constitutes a sequence of patterned anomalies in accordance with scanning detected anomalies associated with the real-time data associated with the each network entity including the detected at least one anomaly.

12. The data processing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor executes instructions to determine the event based on executing the optimization algorithm in accordance with finding, based on at least one dynamic programming technique, a longest occurring sequence of anomalies as the series of anomalies among all the features of the each network entity that is capable of being interleaved for a specific duration.

13. The data processing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor further executes instructions to enable predictive classification of a future event associated with the each network entity into a category of determined problems based on the determined event associated with the pattern of change of the real-time data associated with the each network entity.

14. The data processing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor further executes instructions to at least one of:

collect feedback from another data processing device of the computing network communicatively coupled to the data processing device via the computing network,

determine a severity indicator for the determined event based on the feedback from the another data processing device,

generate, utilizing the determined severity indicator, an event score for the determined event into which the current data correlation score is factored, and

rank the determined event with respect to a plurality of events based on the generated event score.

15. A computing system comprising:

a plurality of network entities of a computer network; and

a data processing device executing instructions to:

detect real-time data associated with each network entity of the plurality of network entities for each feature thereof sequentially in time,

detect a point anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on determining whether the real-time data falls outside a threshold expected value thereof,

represent the detected point anomaly in a full mesh Q node graph, wherein Q is a number of features applicable for the each network entity,

capture a transition in the point anomaly associated with a newly detected one of: anomaly and non-anomaly in the real-time data associated with at least one feature of the Q number of features via the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and

derive a current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition as:

CS

=

i

=

1

APC

(

1

-

EWP

i

TSAC

)

APC

,

 wherein CS is the current data correlation score for the point anomaly across the captured transition, APC is a count of a total number of pairs of Y current anomalous features in the Q number of features and is given by Y C 2 + Y C 1 , EWP i is a weight of an edge of the i th pair of the Y current anomalous features in the representation of the full mesh Q node graph, and TSAC is a total number of time samples of the point anomaly comprising the captured transition, and

wherein the current data correlation score is indicative of a commonness of a combination of the Y current anomalous features contributing to the point anomaly with respect to an equivalent Y anomalous features contributing to another previously detected point anomaly associated with the each network entity.

16. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein the threshold expected value is one of: a maximum expected value and a minimum expected value.

17. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein the data processing device further executes instructions to detect at least one anomaly in the real-time data associated with the each network entity for the each feature thereof including the point anomaly in accordance with computing a score for the at least one anomaly indicative of anomalousness thereof, the computation of the score involving both relative scoring and absolute deviation scoring, and the absolute deviation scoring being based on previous data deviations from reference data bands.

18. The computing system of claim 17 , wherein the data processing device further executes instructions to determine an event associated with a pattern of change of the real-time data associated with the each network entity based on executing an optimization algorithm to determine, among all features of the each network entity, a series of anomalies comprising the detected at least one anomaly that constitutes a sequence of patterned anomalies in accordance with scanning detected anomalies associated with the real-time data associated with the each network entity including the detected at least one anomaly.

19. The computing system of claim 18 , wherein the data processing device executes instructions to determine the event based on executing the optimization algorithm in accordance with finding, based on at least one dynamic programming technique, a longest occurring sequence of anomalies as the series of anomalies among all the features of the each network entity that is capable of being interleaved for a specific duration.

20. The computing system of claim 18 , wherein the data processing device further executes instructions to at least one of:

collect feedback from another data processing device of the computer network communicatively coupled to the data processing device via the computer network,

determine a severity indicator for the determined event based on the feedback from the another data processing device,

generate, utilizing the determined severity indicator, an event score for the determined event into which the current data correlation score is factored, and

rank the determined event with respect to a plurality of events based on the generated event score.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2024
From: ARKAYA NETWORKS, INC.
To: HERCULES CAPITAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 069572/0601 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2024
From: MAJUMDER, SHYAMTANU; JOSEPH, JUSTIN; NAINWANI, JOHNY; PATEL, PARTH ARVINDBHAI
To: ARYAKA NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 066191/0578 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 18104310 · Feb 1, 2023
Continuation In Part 18088806 · Dec 27, 2022
Continuation In Part 17348746 · Jun 15, 2021
Continuation 17348746 · Jun 15, 2021
Continuation In Part 16660813 · Oct 23, 2019
Related Publication 20240154888A1 · May 9, 2024
References Cited (261)
US 6742124B1 · Kilpatrick et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7797406B2 · Patel et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7930752B2 · Hertzog et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8365019B2 · Sailer et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8396954B2 · Nagaraj et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8457928B2 · Dang et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8489685B2 · Bharadhwaj et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8504879B2 · Poletto et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8543642B2 · Corbett et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8601564B2 · Wahl et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8601575B2 · Mullarkey et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8688620B2 · Viswanathan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8719447B2 · Gupta et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8862728B2 · Jayachandran et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903593B1 · Addepalli et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8949677B1 · Brundage et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8959155B1 · Kwok et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8966392B2 · Antony et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8966503B1 · Dyer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9083740B1 · Ma et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9117076B2 · Devost · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9166993B1 · Liu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9195563B2 · Scarpelli · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9224163B2 · Padmanabhan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9292408B2 · Bernstein et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9367421B2 · Gilbao et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9378079B2 · Ivanova et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9379951B2 · Mihnev · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9483049B2 · Maeda et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9558347B2 · Chari et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9602389B1 · Maveli et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9628362B2 · Vasseur et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9652354B2 · Filimonov et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9832170B2 · Bharadhwaj et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9876612B1 · Maveli et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9942117B1 · Saini et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9983092B2 · Howitt · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10009366B2 · Lefebvre et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10045218B1 · Stapleton et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10116521B2 · Kokkula et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10116674B2 · Baradaran et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10129274B2 · Sheth et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10154053B2 · Yadav et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10220167B2 · Mermoud et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10223403B2 · Malhotra et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10326787B2 · Wolkov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10333958B2 · Huang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10355730B1 · Zalewski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10375098B2 · Oliner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10404525B2 · Larsson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10419463B2 · Muddu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10419470B1 · Segev et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10438124B2 · Kirk · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10459827B1 · Aghdale et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10505819B2 · Yadav et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10511545B2 · Patil et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10530795B2 · Pande et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10581977B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10592324B2 · Puri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10595175B2 · Ramalho De Oliveira · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10599506B2 · Cohen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10609059B2 · Apostolopoulos · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10635563B2 · Salunke et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10652254B2 · Kuperman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10692004B1 · Segev · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10693896B2 · Kune et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10713109B2 · Tarlano et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10721239B2 · Koottayi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10728263B1 · Neumann · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10740358B2 · Chan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10749884B2 · Bailey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10853161B2 · Ahad · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10855548B2 · Garvey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10855712B2 · Oliner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10902062B1 · Guha et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10902468B2 · Abrol et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10904270B2 · Muddu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10904276B2 · Phadke et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10909241B2 · Puri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10917419B2 · Crotinger et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10949283B2 · Yang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10964011B2 · Cosatto et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10972482B2 · Schmidtler et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10999325B1 · Chandana et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11023353B2 · Poghosyan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11036715B2 · Jain et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11055405B1 · Jin et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11070440B2 · Patel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11106789B2 · Kraus et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11157782B2 · Bathen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11165800B2 · Thampy · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11169514B2 · Song et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11181930B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11201882B2 · Mirsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11275643B2 · McCann et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11277420B2 · Cote et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11288111B2 · Xu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11294756B1 · Sadrieh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11308221B2 · Biswas et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11308366B2 · Kim · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11321210B2 · Huang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11343268B2 · Apostolopoulos · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11362910B2 · Lin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11386075B2 · Schierz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11388072B2 · Wu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11409628B2 · Dang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11409869B2 · Schmidtler et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11410061B2 · Dang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11425019B2 · Gal et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11442429B2 · Laftchiev et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11463464B2 · Zadeh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11483328B2 · Kirti et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11487879B2 · Doyle et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11501189B2 · Tiwari et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11632383B2 · Oliner et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11675646B2 · Gasthaus et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11743275B2 · Tambuluri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11777786B2 · Elsakhawy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11824646B1 · Muddu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11863921B2 · Kulshreshtha et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11876821B1 · Pratt et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11882145B2 · Colquhoun et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11902322B2 · Hutchinson et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11916765B2 · Majumder · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20040205374A1 · Poletto et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070150949A1 · Futamura et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070289013A1 · Lim · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070294768A1 · Moskovitch et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080208526A1 · Thibaux et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130167232A1 · Weber et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130198119A1 · Eberhardt, III et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140165207A1 · Engel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150294002A1 · Corbett et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160179993A1 · Maturana et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160182309A1 · Maturana et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160219066A1 · Vasseur et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160226985A1 · Yoon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160261482A1 · Mixer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160342805A1 · Lim · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160358065A1 · Gedge et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160359695A1 · Yadav · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170012813A1 · Skaaksrud et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170235808A1 · Salame · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039555A1 · Salunke et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180234443A1 · Wolkov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180239906A1 · Aguayo Gonzalez et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180241764A1 · Nadolski et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180268015A1 · Sugaberry · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180270261A1 · Pande et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180302291A1 · Srinivasan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180316707A1 · Dodson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190098037A1 · Shenoy, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190101924A1 · Styler et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138938A1 · Vasseur et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190179300A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272470A1 · Bandi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324441A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339688A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200053108A1 · Cili et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200097810A1 · Hetherington et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103886A1 · Gandenberger · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200272864A1 · Faust et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200272973A1 · Sun et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200285997A1 · Bhattacharyya et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200336502A1 · Xu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200336503A1 · Xu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337631A1 · Sahin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200351283A1 · Salunke et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200374306A1 · Dai · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200387797A1 · Ryan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004682A1 · Gong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210081293A1 · Sahni et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210126836A1 · Patel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210194751A1 · Bates et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210197720A1 · Houston et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210273961A1 · Humphrey et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210314242A1 · Majumder et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210320939A1 · Salunke et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210334656A1 · Sjögren et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210350113A1 · Sjögren et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210365643A1 · Agrawal et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220020188A1 · Garvey et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220078098A1 · Padfield et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220174097A1 · Biswas et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220237102A1 · Bugdayci et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220263870A1 · Kossey et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220358124A1 · Sriharsha · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230126571A1 · Kirti et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230140793A1 · Joseph et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230155884A1 · Goehring et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230179488A1 · Nainwani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230344841A1 · Tambuluri et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240022595A1 · Humphrey et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
AU 2018200016B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 106685746A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 110084165A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111813928A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 109327453B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113079129A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 108765373B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 114298240A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 111527478B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 115169430A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 117156442A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 117201355A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 1772993A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2400693A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3037901A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3388941A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3304315B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2984567B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 6457693B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019096339A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 6896111B2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021192155A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 102015753B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 20210035296A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 102325629B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 102471165B1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011008419A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011101691A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018140556A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018144234A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142446A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020180887A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021234586A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022160902A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“A Systematic Review on Anomaly Detection for Cloud Computing Environments”, Published at AICCC 2020: 2020 3rd Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, Published Online On [Dec. 2020] https://dl.acm.org/d… [cited by applicant]
“Real-time big data processing for anomaly detection: A Survey”, by Riyaz Ahamed et al., Published at International Journal of Information Management, Published Online On [Aug. 24, 2018] https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.10… [cited by applicant]
“A Cloud Based Automated Anomaly Detection Framework”, Published at the University of Texas at Arlington, Published Online On [Dec. 2014] https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/24888/DattaKumar_uta_250… [cited by applicant]
“A Review of Anomaly Detection Systems in Cloud Networks and Survey of Cloud Security Measures in Cloud Storage Applications”, Published at Journal of Information Security, Published Online On [Mar. 12, 2015] https://ww… [cited by applicant]
“Cloud-based multiclass anomaly detection and categorization using ensemble learning”, Published at Journal of Cloud Computing:Advances, Systems and Applications, Published Online On [Nov. 3, 2022] https://journalofclou… [cited by applicant]
“Efficient Approaches for Intrusion Detection in Cloud Environment”, Published at International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA2016), Published Online On [Jan. 16, 2017] https://ieeexplore.i… [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection and Trust Authority in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing”, Published at Computer Networks,Published Online On [Oct. 23, 2020] https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107647. [cited by applicant]
“Survey: Anomaly Detection in Cloud BasedNetworks and Security Measures in Cloud Date Storage Applications”, by Dr. Chinthagunta Mukundha, Published at International Journal of Science and Research, Published Online On … [cited by applicant]
“Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection and Categorization in Multi-cloud Environments”, Published at Washington University in St. Louis, by Tara Salman et al., Published Online On [Jun. 28, 2017] https://www.cse.wustl.… [cited by applicant]
“A Novel Anomaly Detection Scheme Based on Principal Component Classifier”, by Mei-Ling Shyu et al., Published at Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Miami Coral Gables, FL, USA, Published On… [cited by applicant]
“Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Data”, Published at School of Computer Science and Engineering the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, by Liron Bergman et al., Published Online On [May 5, 2020] h… [cited by applicant]
“Machine Learning: Anomaly Detection”, Published at University of Maryland, Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering, by Myeongsu Kang, Published In [2018] https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1002/9781119515326.ch6. [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly detection as-a-Service for Predictive Maintenance”, Published at Computer Science and Engineering—Ingegneria Informatica, by Daniele De Dominicis, Found Online On [Apr. 11, 2023] https://www.politesi.polimi.it/… [cited by applicant]
“Experience Report: Anomaly Detection of Cloud Application Operations Using Log and Cloud Metric Correlation Analysis”, by Mostafa Farshchi et al., Published at IEEE, Published Online On [Nov. 2015] https://sci-hub.3800… [cited by applicant]
“Correlation-Based Anomaly Detection Method for Multi-sensor System”, by Han Li et al., Published at Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience vol. 2022, Published Online On [May 31, 2022] https://www.researchgate.net… [cited by applicant]
“Performance Issue Identification in Cloud Systems with Relational-Temporal Anomaly Detection”, by Wenwei Gu., Published at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Found Online On [Feb. 28, 2024] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307… [cited by applicant]
“A Systematic Review on Anomaly Detection for Cloud Computing Environments”, by Tanja Hagemann et al., Published at AICCC '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, Publishe… [cited by applicant]
“Correlated Anomaly Detection from Large Streaming Data”, by Zheng Chen et al., Published at IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Published Online On [Dec. 1, 2018] https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1812/1812.093… [cited by applicant]
“Fault Detection for Cloud Computing Systems with Correlation Analysis”, by Tao Wang et al., Published at IEEE, Published In [2015] https://dl.ifip.org/db/conf/im/im2015m/134446.pdf. [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems with Dynamic Spatiotemporal Learning”, by Mingguang Yu et al., Published at Tech Science Press, Published Online On [Jun. 21, 2023] https://cdn.techscience.cn/files/lasc/2023/37-2/TS… [cited by applicant]
“A Correlation-Change Based Feature Selection Method for IoT Equipment Anomaly Detection”, by Shen Su et al., Published at Applied Sciences, Published Online On [Jan. 28, 2019] https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/3/437. [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection Analysis Based on Correlation of Features in Graph Neural Network”, by Hoon Ko., Published at Multimedia Tools and Applications, Published Online On [Aug. 21, 2023] https://link.springer.com/content/p… [cited by applicant]
“Intrusion Detection in Cloud Computing Based on Time Series Anomalies Utilizing Machine Learning”, by Abdel-Rahman Al-Ghuwair et al., Published at Journal of Cloud Computing, Published Online On [Aug. 29, 2023] https:/… [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection for Fault Detection in Wireless Community Networks Using Machine Learning”, by Llorenç Cerda-Alabern et al., Published at Elsevier, Published Online On [Feb. 23, 2023] https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstr… [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection In Cloud Network Data”, by Tharindu Lakshan Yasarathna et al., Published at IEEE, Published Online On [Jan. 12, 2021] http://repository.kln.ac.lk/bitstream/handle/123456789/23075/10.pdf?sequence=1. [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection in the Services Provided by Multi Cloud Architectures: a Survey”, by Mahendra Kumar Ahirwar et al., Published at International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Found Online On [Feb. … [cited by applicant]
“Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Comprehensive Evaluation”, by Sebastian Schmidl et al., Published at Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment vol. 15, Published Online On [May 1, 2022] https://www.vidb.org/pvldb/vol15/p17… [cited by applicant]
“Performance Anomaly Detection and Resolution for Autonomous Clouds”, by Olumuyiwa Ibidunmoye, Published at Umeå University, Found Online On [Feb. 28, 2024] https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1157924/FULLTEXT03… [cited by applicant]
“An Edge-Cloud Collaboration Architecture for Pattern Anomaly Detection of Time Series in Wireless Sensor Networks”, by Cong Gao et al., Published at Complex & Intelligent Systems, Published Online on [Jun. 17, 2021] ht… [cited by applicant]
“Detecting Performance Degradation in Cloud Systems Using LSTM Autoencoders”, by Spyridon Chouliaras et al., Published at International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Published Online On… [cited by applicant]
“A Security Monitoring Method Based on Autonomic Computing for the Cloud Platform”, by Jingjie Zhang et al., Published at Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Published Online On [Mar. 5, 2018] https://downlo… [cited by applicant]
“An Enterprise Time Series Forecasting System for Cloud Applications Using Transfer Learning”, by Arnak Poghosyan et al., Published at Sensors, Published Online On [Feb. 25, 2021] https://sci-hub.3800808.com/10.3390/s21… [cited by applicant]
“Deep Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection: A Survey”, by Zahra Zamanzadeh Darban et al., Published at arxiv, Found Online On [Feb. 28, 2024] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.05244.pdf. [cited by applicant]
“Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Data: Review, Analysis, and Guidelines”, by Kukjin Choi et al., Published at IEEE Access, Published Online On [Aug. 26, 2021] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.j… [cited by applicant]