IP Library Granted Patent US 12,328,334
Granted Patent B2
US 12,328,334 · App. 18/427,778 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Entity IP mapping

Inventors: Aleksandr Yampolskiy (New York, NY); Rob Blackin (New York, NY); Samuel Kassoumeh (New York, NY); Nick Matviko (New York, NY)
Assignee: SecurityScorecard, Inc.
H04L63/1433G06F21/56G06F21/57G06F21/577G06N20/00G06Q10/0635G06Q10/06393H04L43/065H04L61/25H04L61/2503H04L61/4511H04L61/5007H04L61/5076H04L63/08H04L63/1425H04L63/1458H04L67/10H04W84/12G06F2221/034
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,328,334
App. No.
18/427,778
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for mapping IP addresses to an entity include receiving at least one domain name associated with the entity. Embodiments may further include determining one or more variations of the at least one domain name based on analysis of domain name data collected from a plurality of domain name data sources that mention a variation of the at least one domain name. Some embodiments may also include identifying one or more IP addresses pointed to by the one or more variations of the entity's domain name based on analysis of IP address data collected from a plurality of IP address data sources. Additional embodiments include assigning weights to each of the identified one or more IP addresses and creating a mapping of IP addresses to associate with the entity based on analysis of the weighted one or more IP addresses.

Claims (44)

1. A method for mapping Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to an entity, the method comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors, one or more domain names associated with the entity;

and

mapping one or more IP addresses to the entity based on a reliability weighting of one or more variations of the one or more domain names; where the reliability weighting is based on:

assigning a larger weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that relates to a first number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names; and

assigning a smaller weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that relates to a second number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names;

wherein the first number is larger than the second number.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the mapping one or more IP addresses comprises collecting the one or more IP addresses that map to the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

updating the mapping based on user input.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

re-mapping at least one of the one or more IP addresses to the entity based on an updated correlation between the one or more IP addresses and the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

associating IP addresses with networks other than the entity's network based on at least one of user input and detection of IP addresses not having access to data internal to the entity.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the networks other than the entity's network comprise at least one of a Wi-Fi, third-party hosting, guest network, or security network.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more variations of the one or more domain names comprise at least one of a subdomain, a parent domain, or a domain alias of the one or more domain names.

8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that are executable and when executed cause a computing system to map Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to an entity by:

receiving, by one or more processors, one or more domain names associated with the entity;

mapping one or more IP addresses to the entity based on a reliability weighting of one or more variations of the one or more domain names; where the reliability weighting is based on:

assigning a larger weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that relates to a first number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names; and

assigning a smaller weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that relates to a second number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names;

wherein the first number is larger than the second number.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8

wherein the mapping one or more IP addresses comprises collecting the one or more IP addresses that map to the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 further comprising the instructions that, when executed, cause the computing system to map the one or more IP addresses to the entity by updating the mapping based on user input.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 further comprising the instructions that, when executed, cause the computing system to map the one or more IP addresses to the entity by:

mapping at least one of the one or more IP addresses to the entity based on an updated correlation between the one or more IP addresses and the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 further comprising the instructions that, when executed, cause the computing system to map the one or more IP addresses to the entity by:

associating IP addresses with networks other than the entity's network based on at least one of user input and detection of IP addresses not having access to data internal to the entity.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 where the networks other than the entity's network comprise at least one of a Wi-Fi, third-party hosting, guest network, or security network.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 wherein the reliability weighting is further based on a frequency of occurrence of each IP address across the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

15. An apparatus that maps Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to an entity, the apparatus comprising:

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory computer-readable memory communicatively coupled to the one or more processors and containing program code configured to cause the one or more processors to perform operations including:

receiving, by the one or more processors, one or more domain names associated with the entity; and

mapping one or more IP addresses to the entity based on a reliability weighting of one or more variations of the one or more domain names, wherein the reliability weighting is determined by:

assigning a larger weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that related to a first number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names; and

assigning a smaller weight to an IP address of the one or more IP addresses that related to a second number of the one or more variations of the one or more domain names,

where the first number is larger than the second number.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the mapping one or more IP addresses comprises collecting the one or more IP addresses that map to the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 where the one or more processors is further configured to perform updating the mapping based on user input.

18. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the one or more processors is further configured to perform re-mapping at least one of the one or more IP addresses to the entity based on an updated correlation between the one or more IP addresses and the one or more variations of the one or more domain names.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the one or more processors is further configured to perform associating IP addresses with networks other than the entity's network based on at least one of user input and detection of IP addresses not having access to data internal to the entity.

20. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the one or more processors is further configured to perform filtering the one or more IP addresses based on a threshold of the reliability weighting before mapping the one or more IP addresses to the entity.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: SECURITYSCORECARD, INC.
To: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 072261/0012 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2024
From: YAMPOLSKIY, ALEKSANDR; BLACKIN, ROB; KASSOUMEH, SAMUEL
To: SECURITYSCORECARD, INC.
Reel/Frame 068161/0024 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2024
From: YAMPOLSKIY, ALEKSANDR; BLACKIN, ROB; HEID, ALEXANDER
To: SECURITYSCORECARD, INC.
Reel/Frame 068161/0154 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2024
From: MATVIKO, NICK
To: SECURITYSCORECARD, INC.
Reel/Frame 068161/0162 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2024
From: SECURITYSCORECARD, INC.
To: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067711/0635 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17493592 · Oct 4, 2021
Continuation 16723452 · Dec 20, 2019
Continuation 16299040 · Mar 11, 2019
Continuation 15443700 · Feb 27, 2017
Continuation 14702667 · May 1, 2015
Provisional Application 62091477 · Dec 13, 2014
Provisional Application 62091478 · Dec 13, 2014
Related Publication 20240171604A1 · May 23, 2024
References Cited (33)
US 5917997A · Bell et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6601093B1 · Peters · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7178166B1 · Taylor et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7237264B1 · Graham et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7574740B1 · Kennis · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7634800B2 · Ide et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7913303B1 · Rouland et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7934254B2 · Graham · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8825662B1 · Kingman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9015318B1 · Batz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9372994B1 · Yampolskiy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9509764B1 · Kolam · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9641547B2 · Yampolskiy et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10230753B2 · Yampolskiy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20040073707A1 · Dillon · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050204039A1 · Douglis · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050286518A1 · Park et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060265589A1 · Murtza et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20110035437A1 · Toumura · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270964A1 · Huang · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110282988A1 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130173791A1 · Longo · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130203023A1 · Sadeh-Koniecpol et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204997A1 · Eggleston · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130268675A1 · Tsai · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130311677A1 · Coulson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140098955A1 · Hughes et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140189860A1 · Hull Roskos · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140199663A1 · Sadeh-Koniecpol et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140199664A1 · Sadeh-Koniecpol et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150074579A1 · Gladstone · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160212204A1 · Huang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160259945A1 · Yampolskiy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]