IP Library Granted Patent US 12,409,013
Granted Patent B2
US 12,409,013 · App. 18/435,193 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Standard orthodontic appliances with semi-custom bases

Inventor: Richard E. Raby (Lino Lakes, MN)
Assignee: Solventum Intellectual Properties Company
A61C7/002A61C7/145A61C7/282
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,409,013
App. No.
18/435,193
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining orthodontic brackets in order to use standard brackets or a combination of standard and custom brackets. The method determines which teeth in a digital 3D model of teeth have surfaces that will virtually fit to a base of a standard bracket within a tolerance. For those teeth that will virtually fit to one of the standard brackets, each of the teeth are associated with the corresponding standard bracket for later placement of the brackets on the surfaces of the patient's teeth. The method also identifies the teeth in the digital 3D model of teeth that will not virtually fit to a standard bracket, and brackets with custom bases can be designed and made for those teeth.

Claims (30)

1. A computer-implemented method of selecting an orthodontic appliance, comprising:

generating, using a machine learning model, a series of standard appliances each including a base having a different geometry, the generating comprising:

receiving digital 3D models of at least a portion of teeth from a sample group;

classifying the digital 3D models into classes of similar shapes; and

creating digital 3D model representatives for each of the classes, each digital 3D model representative comprising an average shape of the similar shapes in a corresponding class;

manufacturing each of the standard appliances to build an inventory, wherein each appliance has a different base geometry corresponding to the average shape of a corresponding digital 3D model representative;

storing 3D digital model representatives of each appliance of the inventory in a virtual library;

receiving a set of user constraints for a base orientation corresponding to at least one appliance of the virtual library;

selecting a first portion of a base of a first appliance from the virtual library that best fits within the set of user constraints;

virtually fitting the first portion of the base to a 3D digital model of at least one tooth surface at a first position and a first orientation on the tooth surface based at least in part on the set of user constraints;

evaluating a fit of the first appliance to the tooth surface based at least in part on the virtual fitting;

determining whether the fit is within a tolerance, wherein when the fit is not within a tolerance:

selecting a second portion of a base of a second appliance from the virtual library, wherein the second appliance has a base designed for a different tooth type, designed for a different position on a tooth than the first portion, or designed for a different orientation on a tooth than the first orientation;

virtually fitting the second portion of the base to the at least one tooth surface at the first position and the first orientation; and

evaluating the fit of the second appliance to determine whether the fit is better or worse than the fit of the first appliance; and

selecting either the first appliance or the second appliance for bonding a base of the selected appliance to a portion of a dental anatomy, and obtaining the selected appliance from the inventory.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating the fit of the first appliance includes defining a first set of rays extending between the base of the first appliance and the tooth, and determining a first distance along each ray between the base of the first appliance and the tooth,

wherein evaluating the fit of the second appliance includes defining a second set of rays extending between the base of the second appliance and the tooth, and determining a second distance along each ray between the base of the second appliance and the tooth; and

wherein determining whether the fit is better or worse than the fit of the first appliance includes quantifying a difference between the first distance and the second distance.

3. A method for manufacturing a set of orthodontic appliances, the method comprising:

generating, using a machine learning model, a series of standard appliances each including a bonding base having a different geometry, the generating comprising:

receiving digital 3D models of at least a portion of teeth from a sample group;

classifying the digital 3D models into classes of similar shapes;

creating digital 3D model representatives for each of the classes, each digital 3D model representative comprising an average shape of the similar shapes in a corresponding class; and

designing an appliance base geometry for each digital 3D model representative, the appliance base geometry reflecting a corresponding average shape;

receiving a set of user constraints corresponding to: a position constraint of at least one bonding base of at least one standard appliance from the series, and an orientation constraint of the at least one bonding base;

selecting at least a portion of the at least one bonding base from the series that best fits within the set of user constraints;

virtually fitting the portion of the at least one bonding base to at least one of the received digital 3D models of at least one tooth surface at a first position and a first orientation on the tooth surface based on the set of user constraints to determine whether the at least one bonding base fits within a tolerance; and

manufacturing the at least one standard appliance based at least in part on whether the at least one bonding base fits within the tolerance.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of user constraints includes: a position constraint of the at least one appliance, and an orientation constraint for the base orientation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2024
From: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
To: SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066781/0787 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16954313
Provisional Application 62627270 · Feb 7, 2018
Related Publication 20240173101A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (26)
US 5431562A · Andreiko et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6971873B2 · Sachdeva · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7210929B2 · Raby et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7605817B2 · Zhang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7940258B2 · Stark et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7956862B2 · Zhang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8517727B2 · Raby et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8807999B2 · Kuo · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9503282B2 · Kody et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20020156652A1 · Sachdeva · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030021453A1 · Weise et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030163291A1 · Jordan · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050043837A1 · Rubbert · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090017410A1 · Raby · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120027272A1 · Akinyemi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130275107A1 · Alpern et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379356A1 · Sachdeva et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150342545A1 · Bergersen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170086943A1 · Mah · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170169562A1 · Somasundaram · 2017 [cited by examiner]
EP 1844730B1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 0180761A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017139194A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Blantz et al., A Morphable Model for The Synthesis of 3D Faces, Computer Graphics Proceedings (Aug. 1999) [retrieved from the internet Aug. 24, 2022: <https://www.facerec.org/algorithms/3d_morph/morphmod2.pdf>]. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT International Application No. PCT IB2019/050603, dated May 20, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. EP197505993 dated Sep. 22, 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]