IP Library Granted Patent US 12,499,770
Granted Patent B2
US 12,499,770 · App. 18/461,224 · Granted Dec 16, 2025

System and method to intuitively represent the separation of aircraft traffic

Inventors: Anoop S (Bangalore, IN); Sadguni Venkataswamy (Bangalore, IN); Gang He (Morris Plains, NJ); David Wright (Phoenix, AZ); Robin Girdhar (Bangalore, IN); Naseeruddin Mohammed (Phoenix, AZ)
Assignee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
G08G5/21B64D43/02G08G5/51
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,499,770
App. No.
18/461,224
Granted
Dec 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for dynamically representing the separation for air traffic has been developed. First, air traffic is detected which requires maintenance of a separation distance from an ownship aircraft. The ground speed of the ownship, the ground speed of the air traffic and the current separation distance is determined. A predicted separation distance is calculated following a specific time interval. The predicted separation distance between the air traffic and the ownship is based on a differential in ground speed between the air traffic and the ownship and the specific time interval. The location of the air traffic, the separation distance and the predicted separation distance are all shown on a graphical display onboard the ownship. The separation distance and the predicted separation distance are represented on a non-linear scale on the graphical display.

Claims (34)

1 . A method for dynamically representing the separation for air traffic, comprising:

detecting air traffic requiring maintenance of a separation distance from an ownship aircraft;

determining a ground speed of the ownship aircraft;

determining a ground speed of the air traffic and a current separation distance from the ownship aircraft;

calculating a predicted separation distance following a specific time interval, where the predicted separation distance between the air traffic and the ownship aircraft is based on a differential in ground speed between the air traffic and the ownship aircraft and the specific time interval; and

displaying the location of the air traffic, the separation distance and the predicted separation distance on a graphical display onboard the ownship aircraft, where the separation distance and the predicted separation distance are represented on a non-linear scale that provides a higher resolution of the separation distance by compressing the non-linear scale as the separation distance increases on the graphical display.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

dynamically adjusting the non-linear scale on the graphical display as the air traffic approaches the predicted separation distance.

3 . The method of claim 1 , where the non-linear scale is broken into multiple separate zones based on a required separation distance.

4 . The method of claim 3 , where the zones are color coded to visually indicate the predicted separation distance.

5 . The method of claim 4 , where the zones are color coded within a background display of the location of the air traffic.

6 . The method of claim 3 , where one of the separate zones is a caution zone where the predicted separation distance is less than an Airborne Surveillance and Separation Assurance Processing (ASSAP) threshold.

7 . The method of claim 6 , where one of the separate zones is a primary advisory zone where the predicted separation distance is between the ASSAP threshold and a required minimum separation distance.

8 . The method of claim 3 , where one of the separate zones is a green zone where the predicted separation distance is between the required minimum separation distance and an efficiency threshold, where the efficiency threshold is a separation distance beyond which the spacing of air traffic becomes inefficient.

9 . The method of claim 3 , where one of the separate zones is a secondary advisory zone where the predicted separation distance is beyond an efficiency threshold.

10 . The method of claim 1 , where the graphical display that displays the location of the air traffic, the separation distance and the predicted separation distance indicates if pilot action is needed.

11 . The method of claim 1 , where the graphical display that displays the location of the air traffic, the separation distance and the predicted separation distance indicates if air traffic is currently out of range.

12 . The method of claim 11 , where the air traffic that is currently out of range is indicated by a hatching icon to deemphasize its display.

13 . A system for dynamically representing the separation for air traffic, comprising:

a control module located onboard the ownship aircraft, where the control module,

detects air traffic requiring maintenance of a separation distance from an ownship aircraft,

determines a ground speed of the ownship aircraft,

determines a ground speed of the air traffic and a current separation distance from the ownship aircraft, and

calculates a predicted separation distance following a specific time interval, where the predicted separation distance between the air traffic and the ownship aircraft is based on a differential in ground speed between the air traffic and the ownship aircraft and the specific time interval; and

a display system located onboard the ownship aircraft, where the display system,

displays the location of the air traffic, the separation distance and the predicted separation distance on a graphical display onboard the ownship aircraft, where the separation distance and the predicted separation distance are represented on a non-linear scale on the graphical display, and

dynamically adjusts the non-linear scale that provides a higher resolution of the separation distance by compressing the non-linear scale as the separation distance increases on the graphical display as the air traffic approaches the predicted separation distance.

14 . The system of claim 13 , where the non-linear scale is broken into multiple separate zones based on the predicted separation distance.

15 . The system of claim 14 , where the zones are color coded to visually indicate the predicted separation distance.

16 . The system of claim 15 , where the zones are color coded within a background display of the location of the air traffic.

17 . The system of claim 14 , where one of the separate zones is a caution zone where the predicted separation distance is less than an Airborne Surveillance and Separation Assurance Processing (ASSAP) threshold.

18 . The system of claim 17 , where one of the separate zones is a primary advisory zone where the predicted separation distance is between the ASSAP threshold and a required minimum separation distance.

19 . The system of claim 14 , where one of the separate zones is a green zone where the predicted separation distance is between the required minimum separation distance and an efficiency threshold, where the efficiency threshold is a separation distance beyond which the spacing of air traffic becomes inefficient.

20 . The system of claim 14 , where one of the separate zones is a secondary advisory zone where the predicted separation distance is beyond an efficiency threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2023
From: S, ANOOP; VENKATASWAMY, SADGUNI; HE, GANG; WRIGHT, DAVID; GIRDHAR, ROBIN; MOHAMMED, NASEERUDDIN
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 064799/0622 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240428691A1 · Dec 26, 2024
References Cited (17)
US 7062364B2 · Maris · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8989998B2 · Le et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9501936B2 · Trefilova et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9520065B2 · Aymeric et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9815567B2 · Fucke · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10741149B2 · Bouda et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10971020B1 · Fannin et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11348469B2 · Manberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20110006918A1 · Shafaat · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140297169A1 · Le et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160318446A1 · Van Steenkist · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170032576A1 · Mazoyer · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170130366A1 · Yasufuku et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190362690A1 · Bouda · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210134164A1 · Bouda et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210375144A1 · Bouda · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 3796287A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]