IP Library Granted Patent US 12,475,822
Granted Patent B2
US 12,475,822 · App. 18/469,993 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Changing a display input channel based on a fail state determination

Inventor: Shane Paul Springer (Oregon City, OR)
Assignee: Zoom Communications, Inc.
G09G3/006G09G2320/062
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,475,822
App. No.
18/469,993
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Illumination testing is performed to passively check the health of a display of a shared device within a physical space, such as a conference room. A test pattern is output to the display within the physical space. Using a camera within the physical space, a test image of the physical space is captured while the test pattern is output to the display. A determination is then made as to whether the display is in a fail state by comparing the test image against a reference image depicting an expected illumination of the physical space according to the test pattern. Where the device is determined to be in a fail state, a notification indicating the fail state is transmitted to an administrator device to alert an administrator associated therewith of the fail state.

Claims (41)

1 . A method, comprising:

causing, based on a fail state of a display within a physical space, the display to change from a first input channel to a second input channel, wherein the fail state indicates that a test pattern output to the display via the second input channel is not output at the display while the display is on the first input channel;

capturing, using a camera within the physical space, a test image of the physical space while the test pattern remains output to the display via the second input channel and while the display is on the second input channel;

determining that the display is in an operational state by comparing the test image against a reference image depicting an expected illumination of the physical space according to the test pattern; and

transmitting a notification indicating the operational state to an administrator device.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining that the display is in the fail state by comparing a previous test image of the physical space against the reference image.

3 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining that the display is in the fail state while the display is on the first input channel.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first input channel corresponds to a first set of video input capabilities for the display and the second input channel corresponds to a second set of video input capabilities for the display.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the notification indicating the operational state to the administrator device comprises:

indicating, within the notification, a previous determination of the fail state and a resolution of the fail state based on the change to the second input channel.

6 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

selecting the test pattern based on an association with the physical space.

7 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

scheduling the outputting of the test pattern to the display for a time during which the physical space is unoccupied.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the display is in the operational state comprises:

comparing pixels of the test image with co-located pixels of the reference image to determine a percentage of the pixels of the test image that match respective ones of the co-located pixels of the reference image.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the notification includes one or more audit images depicting the display.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physical space is a conference room and the display is a shared device display configured for use with video conferencing.

11 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions operable to cause one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

causing, based on a fail state of a display within a physical space, the display to change from a first input channel to a second input channel, wherein the fail state indicates that a test pattern output to the display via the second input channel is not output at the display while the display is on the first input channel;

capturing, using a camera within the physical space, a test image of the physical space while the test pattern remains output to the display via the second input channel and while the display is on the second input channel;

determining that the display is in an operational state by comparing the test image against a reference image depicting an expected illumination of the physical space according to the test pattern; and

transmitting a notification indicating the operational state to an administrator device.

12 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the display is on the first input channel when the fail state is determined.

13 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the notification indicates the fail state and the operational state.

14 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the fail state indicates that the display is incapable of video content display and the operational state indicates that the display is capable of video content display.

15 . A system, comprising:

one or more memories; and

one or more processors configured to execute instructions stored in the one or more memories to:

cause, based on a fail state of a display within a physical space, the display to change from a first input channel to a second input channel, wherein the fail state indicates that a test pattern output to the display via the second input channel is not output at the display while the display is on the first input channel;

capture, using a camera within the physical space, a test image of the physical space while the test pattern remains output to the display via the second input channel and while the display is on the second input channel;

determine that the display is in an operational state by comparing the test image against a reference image depicting an expected illumination of the physical space according to the test pattern; and

transmit a notification indicating the operational state to an administrator device.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein, to determine that the display is in the operational state, the one or more processors are configured to execute the instructions to:

determine that a difference between the test image and the reference image meets a threshold.

17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the fail state is based on a comparison between a previous test image of the physical space, captured using the camera, against the reference image.

18 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the test pattern is selected based on the physical space.

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the test pattern is generated for use with the physical space.

20 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the display is within a field of view of the camera.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 7, 2025
From: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069839/0593 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2023
From: SPRINGER, SHANE PAUL
To: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064955/0331 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17877775 · Jul 29, 2022
Related Publication 20240038111A1 · Feb 1, 2024
References Cited (20)
US 5175722A · Minami et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5294989A · Moore · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 6950548B1 · Bachelder · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7092572B2 · Huang · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 8466859B1 · Herz · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20020157033A1 · Cox · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20040032280A1 · Clark · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20100188653A1 · McGarry et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130155085A1 · Fergason · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140119600A1 · Maruyama · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160366369A1 · Balasaygun · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170094268A1 · Gulati · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170134723A1 · Mandel · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170357917A1 · Holmes · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20200251032A1 · Nakamura · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200342668A1 · Chojnacka · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210281829A1 · Kimpe · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220006701A1 · Patel · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Using Screen Patterns, Imaste, <https://www.imatest.com/docs/screenpatterns/>, May 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Appearance-Based Visual Learning and Object Recognition with Illumination Invariance, Ohba et al., Dec. 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]