IP Library Granted Patent US 12,669,479
Granted Patent B2
US 12,669,479 · App. 18/483,228 · Granted Jun 30, 2026

Ultrasonic system and method for detecting and characterizing contact delaminations

Inventors: Trevor Fleck (Waco, TX); Khaled Matalgah (Waco, TX); Daniel Pulipati (Waco, TX); Pruthul Kokkada Ravindranath (Waco, TX); David A. Jack (Waco, TX)
Assignee: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
G01N29/069G01N29/12G01N29/40G01N2291/0231G01N2291/0289
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,669,479
App. No.
18/483,228
Granted
Jun 30, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a system and method for real-time visualization of a material during ultrasonic non-destructive testing. The system includes a graphical user interface (GUI) capable of showing a three-dimensional (3-D) image of a composite laminate constructed of a series of two-dimensional (2-D) cross sections. The GUI is capable of displaying the 3-D image as each additional 2-D cross section is scanned by an ultrasonic testing apparatus in real time or near real time, including probable defect regions that contain a flaw such as a hole, crack, wrinkle, or foreign object within the composite. Furthermore, in one embodiment, the system includes an artificial intelligence capable of highlighting defect areas within the 3-D image in real time or near real time and providing data regarding each defect area, such as the depth, size, and/or type of each defect.

Claims (29)

1 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

at least one ultrasonic transducer in communication with a processor;

wherein the at least one ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object including at least one delamination to produce scan data;

wherein the scan data includes a plurality of A-scans gathered at different positions along a surface of the test object;

wherein at least one of the plurality of A-scans comprises an entire waveform of at least one ultrasonic wave reflected at a particular position along the surface of the test object;

wherein the processor generates at least one C-scan based on the plurality of A-scans;

wherein the processor automatically analyzes the at least one C-scan and designates and displays at least one delamination area;

wherein the at least one delamination area includes areas of the at least one C-scan having amplitude values above a threshold number of standard deviations greater or less than a known baseline amplitude value or frequency shifts above a threshold number of standard deviations greater or less than a known baseline frequency shift for the at least one C-scan; and

wherein the processor automatically determines a size of the at least one delamination area based on a number of pixels in the at least one C-scan that are included in the at least one delamination area and a size represented by each pixel.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor automatically filters the at least one C-scan such that areas exceeding the threshold number of standard deviations greater or less than the known baseline amplitude that are smaller than a known minimum size of the at least one delamination are automatically excluded from the at least one delamination area.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor automatically determines a depth of the at least one delamination based on the plurality of A-scans.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the depth of the at least one delamination is determined based on comparative waveform analysis with at least one A-scan corresponding to a region of the test object without damage.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one delamination is closed, such that material adjacent to the at least one delamination is not coupled but is in intimate contact.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor automatically defines a perimeter of the at least one delamination area based on the at least one C-scan.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor displays the at least one C-scan, and wherein the processor applies color coding to a visualization of the at least one C-scan, designating which parts of the at least one C-scan are in the at least one delamination area and which parts of the at least one C-scan are not in the at least one delamination area.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one ultrasonic transducer includes at least one spherically focused transducer.

9 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

at least one ultrasonic transducer in communication with a processor;

wherein the at least one ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object including at least one delamination to produce scan data;

wherein the scan data includes a plurality of A-scans gathered at different positions along a surface of the test object;

wherein at least one of the plurality of A-scans comprises an entire waveform of at least one ultrasonic wave reflected at a particular position along the surface of the test object;

wherein the processor generates at least one C-scan constructed from amplitude data from the plurality of A-scans;

wherein the processor automatically analyzes the at least one C-scan and designates and displays at least one delamination area;

wherein the at least one delamination area includes areas of the at least one C-scan having amplitude values above a threshold number of standard deviations greater than a known baseline amplitude value for the at least one C-scan;

wherein the processor calculates and displays a size of the at least one delamination area based on analysis of the at least one C-scan; and

wherein the processor automatically defines a perimeter of the at least one delamination area based on the at least one C-scan.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the processor automatically determines a size of the at least one delamination area based on a number of pixels in the at least one C-scan that are included in the at least one delamination area and a size represented by each pixel.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the processor automatically determines a depth of the at least one delamination based on the plurality of A-scans.

12 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the processor displays the at least one C-scan, and wherein the processor applies a color coding to a visualization of the at least one C-scan, designating which parts of the at least one C-scan are in the at least one delamination area and which parts of the at least one C-scan are not in the at least one delamination area.

Assignments (3)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Mar 12, 2026
From: VERIFI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 074060/0593 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: FLECK, TREVOR; PULIPATI, DANIEL; MATALGAH, KHALED; RAVINDRANATH, PRUTHUL KOKKADA; JACK, DAVID A.
To: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 065624/0216 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
To: VERIFI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 065624/0230 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation In Part 17336937 · Jun 2, 2021
Continuation In Part 17188559 · Mar 1, 2021
Continuation In Part 17184061 · Feb 24, 2021
Continuation In Part 17172723 · Feb 10, 2021
Continuation In Part 17149320 · Jan 14, 2021
Continuation In Part 17148205 · Jan 13, 2021
Continuation In Part 17123970 · Dec 16, 2020
Continuation In Part 17122410 · Dec 15, 2020
Continuation In Part 17108472 · Dec 1, 2020
Continuation In Part 17091774 · Nov 6, 2020
Provisional Application 63001608 · Mar 30, 2020
Related Publication 20240044845A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (77)
US 3239801A · Mcgaughey · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 4184373A · Evans et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4215583A · Botsco et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5009104A · Johnson · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5088327A · Gammell · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5408882A · McKinley et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5494038A · Wang et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5631425A · Wang et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6490501B1 · Saunders · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6945111B2 · Georgeson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6959602B2 · Peterson, Jr. et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7010980B2 · Meier · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7017422B2 · Heyman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7574915B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7895895B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7975549B2 · Fetzer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8234924B2 · Saxena et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8265886B2 · Bisiaux et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8347723B2 · Questo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8522615B1 · Brady et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9121817B1 · Roach et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9207639B2 · Ratering · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9297789B2 · Djordjevic et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9360418B2 · Georgeson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9494562B2 · Lin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10161910B2 · Niri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10302600B2 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10330645B2 · Huang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10345272B2 · Holmes et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10444195B2 · Bingham · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10605781B2 · Grewal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10697941B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10761067B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10801998B2 · Giurgiutiu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11346816B2 · Ashrafi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030089171A1 · Kenefick et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040020296A1 · Moles et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040031337A1 · Masaniello et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060225508A1 · Sfeir · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070175282A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070258858A1 · Rasnow et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080000299A1 · Georgeson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100251822A1 · Isobe et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110118991A1 · Lepage · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110274369A1 · Smith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120250970A1 · Tsubaki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130031979A1 · Bergman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130228015A1 · Wimplinger · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140216158A1 · Martin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160320344A1 · Spencer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170199160A1 · Dehghan Niri · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170284971A1 · Hall · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170299381A1 · Bingham · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180101944A1 · Sakai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180120268A1 · Georgeson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180231502A1 · Kahmann et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190004013A1 · Choi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187107A1 · Asadollahi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190257799A1 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293610A1 · Campbell et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200047425A1 · Jahanbin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200072796A1 · Fiseni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200173964A1 · Hudson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200230899A1 · Tyson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200232951A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210078177A1 · Troy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210128102A1 · Negishi · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302374A1 · Jack · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302375A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302376A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302385A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210349058A1 · Jack · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372969A1 · Giurgiutiu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220107290A1 · Jin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Beatriz Larrañaga-Valsero, Robert A. Smith, Rostand B. Tayong, Antonio Fernández-López, Alfredo Güemes, Wrinkle measurement in glass-carbon hybrid laminates comparing ultrasonic techniques: A case study, Aug. 15, 2018, … [cited by applicant]
Full 3D characterisation of composite laminates using ultrasonic analytic signals by Smith et al. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Nelson Luke, Smith Robert, Fibre Direction and Stacking Sequence Measurement in Carbon Fibre Composites using Radon Transforms of Ultrasonic Data, Mar. 2019, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 11… [cited by applicant]