IP Library Granted Patent US 12,303,707
Granted Patent B2
US 12,303,707 · App. 18/484,559 · Granted May 20, 2025

Monitoring and detecting magnetic stimulation

Inventors: Kenneth Marc Ghiron (Malvern, PA); Ian Maxwell Shipway (Bryn Mawr, PA); Mark Edward Riehl (Doylestown, PA); Ravi Pillutla (Audubon, PA)
Assignee: Neuronetics, Inc.
A61N2/006A61N2/02G01R33/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,303,707
App. No.
18/484,559
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system, and apparatus for monitoring a magnetic field related to magnetic stimulation may be provided. A system for monitoring a pulsing magnetic field related to magnetic stimulation therapy may include a magnetic stimulation component, a sensor, and a processor. The magnetic stimulation component may be configured to generate the pulsing magnetic field for the magnetic stimulation therapy. The sensor may be configured to generate a signal associated with the pulsing magnetic field. The processor may be configured to estimate a first characteristic associated with a first peak of the signal, estimate a second characteristic associated with a second peak of the signal, and determine a third characteristic of the signal based on the first characteristic and the second characteristic. The processor may be configured to determine whether a failure occurred based on the third characteristic of the signal.

Claims (56)

1. A method for monitoring a pulsing magnetic field related to magnetic stimulation therapy, the method comprising:

receiving a signal from a sensor in response to a pulse burst generated by a magnetic stimulation component, wherein the signal comprises a plurality of pulses, and wherein each pulse of the signal comprises a plurality of peaks, and each pulse of the signal was generated in response to a pulse of the pulse burst;

estimating a characteristic of a first peak for two or more pulses of the pulse burst;

determining that a failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

performing at least one action based on the determination that a failure has occurred, the at least one action comprising one or more of shutting down a system that comprises the magnetic stimulation component, stopping the magnetic stimulation therapy, alerting a user of the system, or altering a current applied to the magnetic stimulation component.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating the characteristic of the first peak for the two or more pulses by determining one or more of a rolling average value or a weighted average value for the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic comprises a maximum amplitude of the first peak; and

wherein the method further comprises:

determining an average maximum amplitude of the two or more pulses of the pulse burst, and determine that the failure occurred when the average maximum amplitude is outside of an amplitude acceptance window.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic comprises a time value of the first peak; and

wherein the method further comprises:

determining a pulse interval based a time difference between a time value of the first peak of a first pulse of the plurality of pulses and a time value of the first peak of a subsequent pulse of the plurality of pulses; and

determining that the failure occurred when the pulse interval is outside of a pulse interval acceptance window.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic comprises a time value of the first peak; and

wherein the method further comprises:

determining a stimulation time of the pulse burst based a time difference between a time value of the first peak of a first pulse of the plurality of pulses and a time value of the first peak of a last pulse of the plurality of pulses; and

determining that the failure occurred when the stimulation time of the pulse burst is outside of a stimulation time acceptance window.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises:

estimating a characteristic of a second peak for the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

determining that the failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak and the characteristic of the second peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the characteristic of the first peak comprises a voltage or current value of the first peak, and the characteristic of the second peak comprises a voltage or current value of the second peak.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining a decay rate of the pulse burst based on a ratio between the voltage or current value of the first peak and the voltage or current value of the second peak; and

determining that the failure has occurred when the ratio is outside of a ratio acceptance window.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining a difference between the peaks of the two or more pulses of the pulse burst based on a difference between the voltage or current value of the first peak and the voltage or current value of the second peak; and

determining that the failure has occurred when the difference is outside of a peak-to-peak acceptance window.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the characteristic of the first peak comprises a time value of the first peak, and the characteristic of the second peak comprises a time value of the second peak; and

wherein the method further comprises:

determining a pulse duration of the two or more pulses of the pulse burst based on a difference between the time value of the first peak and the time value of the second peak; and

determining that the failure has occurred when the pulse duration is outside of a pulse duration acceptance window.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pulse burst comprises one or more test pulses, and wherein the pulse burst is generated as part of a test procedure.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the method further comprises:

performing a treatment procedure using the magnetic stimulation component, wherein the treatment procedure is performed subsequent to the test procedure.

13. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium residing on a device, wherein the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprises computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor of the device cause the processor of the device to:

receive a signal from a sensor in response to a pulse burst generated by a magnetic stimulation component, wherein the signal comprises a plurality of pulses, and wherein each pulse of the signal comprises a plurality of peaks, and each pulse of the signal was generated in response to a pulse of the pulse burst;

estimate a characteristic of a first peak for two or more pulses of the pulse burst;

determine that a failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

perform at least one action based on the determination that a failure has occurred, the at least one action comprising one or more of shutting down a system that comprises the magnetic stimulation component, stopping the magnetic stimulation therapy, alerting a user of the system, or altering a current applied to the magnetic stimulation component.

14. The transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprises computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor of the device cause the processor of the device to:

estimate the characteristic of the first peak for the two or more pulses by determining one or more of a rolling average value or a weighted average value for the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses.

15. The transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprises computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor of the device cause the processor of the device to:

estimate a characteristic of a second peak for the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

determine that the failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak and the characteristic of the second peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst.

16. The transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the characteristic of the first peak comprises a voltage or current value of the first peak, and the characteristic of the second peak comprises a voltage or current value of the second peak.

17. An apparatus for monitoring a pulsing magnetic field related to magnetic stimulation therapy, the system comprising:

a processor configured to:

receive a signal from a sensor in response to a pulse burst generated by a of the magnetic stimulation component, wherein the signal comprises a plurality of pulses, and wherein each pulse of the signal comprises a plurality of peaks, and each pulse of the signal was generated in response to a pulse of the pulse burst;

estimate a characteristic of a first peak for two or more pulses of the pulse burst;

determine that a failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

perform at least one action based on the determination that a failure has occurred, the at least one action comprising one or more of shutting down a system that comprises the magnetic stimulation component, stopping the magnetic stimulation therapy, alerting a user of the system that comprises the magnetic stimulation component, or altering a current applied to the magnetic stimulation component.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate the characteristic of the first peak for the two or more pulses by determining one or more of a rolling average value or a weighted average value for the characteristic of the first peak across the two or more pulses.

19. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to estimate a characteristic of a second peak for the two or more pulses of the pulse burst, and determine that the failure has occurred based on the characteristic of the first peak and the characteristic of the second peak across the two or more pulses of the pulse burst; and

wherein the characteristic of the first peak comprises a voltage or current value of the first peak, and the characteristic of the second peak comprises a voltage or current value of the second peak.

20. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the pulse burst comprises one or more test pulses, and wherein the pulse burst is generated as part of a test procedure.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: NEURONETICS, INC.
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068174/0177 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17208828 · Mar 22, 2021
Continuation 16215356 · Dec 10, 2018
Continuation 14076975 · Nov 11, 2013
Related Publication 20240042228A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (31)
US 5058582A · Thaler · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5192263A · Kraus et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5441495A · Liboff et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6169963B1 · Markov · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6561968B1 · Dissing et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7422555B2 · Zabara · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7601115B2 · Riehl · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8376925B1 · Dennis et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20030073899A1 · Ruohonen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070078292A1 · Markov et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070142886A1 · Fischell et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070213783A1 · Pless · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287730A1 · Spiegel et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090105520A1 · Sotiriou et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120157752A1 · Nishikawa et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130137918A1 · Phillips et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130335069A1 · Vig et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266176A1 · Fernandez et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018692A1 · Neuvonen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150133717A1 · Pillutla et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CA 2295134A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
EP 3068486A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 0767972A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP H1012549A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007526798A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008500100A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008237692A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008051790A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008070001A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010147064A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015070259A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]