IP Library Granted Patent US 12,244,157
Granted Patent B2
US 12,244,157 · App. 18/489,658 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Antenna array element by element power tracking

Inventors: Donald Felt Kimball (El Cajon, CA); Mark James O'Leary (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd
H02J50/402H01Q21/0025
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,244,157
App. No.
18/489,658
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and devices addressing power tracking of transmission systems using antenna arrays are disclosed. The disclosed teachings may be implemented on a channel element to channel element basis, are adaptive and can be implemented on short time durations such as time slots. Power efficiency can be improved when applying the described methods to the design of systems with antenna arrays.

Claims (41)

1. An amplification method in a transmission system with an antenna array and a plurality of amplifiers, the method comprising:

connecting each amplifier to a corresponding antenna of the antenna array;

selecting the power amplifiers such that a power-handling capability of each amplifier is a function of a location of the corresponding antenna within the antenna array;

supplying selectively each power amplifier either by a first supply voltage or by a second supply voltage, and

wherein, for each power amplifier:

supplying the power amplifier with the first supply voltage comprises providing the power amplifier with a first normalized power level, and

supplying the power amplifier with the second supply voltage comprises providing the power amplifier with a second normalized power level.

2. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein the power-handling capability of the amplifiers is in accordance with a spatially-based amplitude tapering of the antenna array.

3. The amplification method of claim 2 , wherein the spatially-based amplitude comprises a peak at a center of the antenna array.

4. The amplification method of claim 3 , where in the spatially-based amplitude tapers down from the center away and towards edges of the antenna array.

5. The amplification method of claim 4 , wherein the spatially-based amplitude tapering configuration is symmetrical in one or more dimensions with respect to the center of the antenna array.

6. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein the supplying each said power amplifier is such that at least one power amplifier has a bias point different from bias points of all other power amplifiers.

7. The amplification method of claim 1 , further comprising setting a transmitted power of each power amplifier to be substantially equal to or less than a maximum of the power-handling capability of said each power amplifier.

8. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein, for each power amplifier:

selection between the first supply voltage and the second supply voltage occurs by comparing an adjusted transmitted power level of the power amplifier with the first normalized power level and the second normalized power level and selecting the lowest normalized power level among the first level and the second level that is at least equal to the adjusted transmitted power level.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the maximum power handled by the power amplifier is selected from ‘n’ different power levels, wherein ‘n’ is an integer larger or equal to 2 and smaller than or equal to a number of array elements of the antenna array.

10. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein the spatially-based amplitude tapering configuration occurs in one or more spatial dimensions according to a Taylor window with a set ratio of a main lobe to a first side-lobe in spatial domain.

11. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein the antenna array comprises N 2 array elements arranged as an N×N array, N being an integer equal to at least 2.

12. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein:

the antenna array is divided into a plurality of sub-arrays; and

the method is applied to each sub-array of the plurality of the sub-arrays.

13. The amplification method of claim 1 , wherein the supplying the power amplifier is dynamically performed in a range of 100 us to 10 ns and in correspondence with set operational conditions.

14. A wireless communication system comprising:

an antenna array;

a plurality of amplifiers, each amplifier being connected to a corresponding antenna of the antenna array;

wherein

a power-handling capability of each amplifier is a function of a location of the corresponding antenna within the antenna array;

each power amplifier is configured to receive either a first supply voltage equal to a first normalized power level, or a second supply voltage equal to a second normalized power level.

15. The wireless communication system of claim 14 , wherein the power-handling capability of the amplifiers is in accordance with a spatially-based amplitude tapering of the antenna array.

16. The wireless communication system of claim 15 , where in the spatially-based amplitude tapers down from the center away and towards edges of the antenna array.

17. The wireless communication system of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of amplifiers are configured such that a bias points of at least one amplifier of the plurality of amplifiers is different from bias points of all other amplifiers of the plurality of amplifiers.

18. An amplification method in a transmission system with an antenna array and a plurality of amplifiers, the method comprising:

connecting each amplifier to a corresponding antenna of the antenna array;

selecting the power amplifiers such that a power-handling capability of each amplifier is a function of a location of the corresponding antenna within the antenna array, and

supplying selectively each power amplifier either by a first supply voltage or by a second supply voltage, the first and the second supply voltages being sourced from at least two separate power supply sources.

19. An amplification method in a transmission system with an antenna array and a plurality of amplifiers, the method comprising:

connecting each amplifier to a corresponding antenna of the antenna array;

selecting the power amplifiers such that a power-handling capability of each amplifier is a function of a location of the corresponding antenna within the antenna array;

wherein:

the antenna array is divided into a plurality of sub-arrays; and

the method is applied to each sub-array of the plurality of the sub-arrays.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2025
From: PSEMI CORPORATION
To: MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 072102/0645 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2024
From: PSEMI CORPORATION
To: MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 066597/0427 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2024
From: KIMBALL, DONALD FELT; O'LEARY, MARK JAMES
To: PSEMI CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 065996/0803 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17741964 · May 11, 2022
Continuation 17150645 · Jan 15, 2021
Continuation 16383187 · Apr 12, 2019
Related Publication 20240128801A1 · Apr 18, 2024
References Cited (28)
US 7081851B1 · Lewis · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8836578B2 · Kenington · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9712191B2 · Johansson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10541733B1 · Mitsuyuki · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10897162B2 · Kimball · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11336125B2 · Kimball · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11804734B2 · Kimball · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20110148705A1 · Kenington · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140079096A1 · Afsahi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140248843A1 · Johansson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170163217A1 · Bonebright · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190089070A1 · Zihir · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190221947A1 · Zihir · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190386565A1 · Rosolowski · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200328623A1 · Kimball et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200343859A1 · Khlat · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210210987A1 · Kimball et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220045438A1 · Mahanfar · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220265743A1 · Lecht · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220344977A1 · Kimball et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,187, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,187, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kimball, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,187, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kimball, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Sep. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/383,187, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,645, 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,645, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/741,964, 25 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Blane J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/741,964, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]