IP Library Granted Patent US 12,433,528
Granted Patent B2
US 12,433,528 · App. 18/490,698 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Neural stimulation for reduced artefact

Inventors: Dean Michael Karantonis (Macquarie Park, AU); Peter Scott Vallack Single (Macquarie Park, AU); Kai Huang (Macquarie Park, AU)
Assignee: Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
A61B5/377A61B5/05A61B5/24A61B5/291A61B5/686A61B5/7225A61N1/18A61N1/36A61N1/36067A61N1/36071A61N1/36075A61N1/37264A61N1/3787A61B2562/063
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,433,528
App. No.
18/490,698
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A neural stimulus comprises at least three stimulus components, each comprising at least one of a temporal stimulus phase and a spatial stimulus pole. A first stimulus component delivers a first charge which is unequal to a third charge delivered by a third stimulus component, and the first charge and third charge are selected so as to give rise to reduced artefact at recording electrodes. In turn this may be exploited to independently control a correlation delay of a vector detector and an artefact vector to be non-parallel or orthogonal.

Claims (54)

1. An implantable device for delivering a neural stimulus, the device comprising:

an array of electrodes; and

a processor configured to:

cause a first electrode of the array to deliver a first stimulus component of the neural stimulus and a third electrode of the array to deliver a third stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the first stimulus component, the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component being of a first polarity, and

cause a second electrode of the array in between the first electrode and the third electrode to deliver a second stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component being of a second polarity opposite the first polarity,

wherein the first, second, and third stimulus components are charge balanced, and

wherein the first stimulus component delivers a first charge which is unequal to a third charge delivered by the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component delivers a second charge, and the first charge and the third charge are selected so as to give rise to reduced artefact.

2. The implantable device of claim 1 , further comprising:

measurement circuitry configured to obtain a recording of a response to the neural stimulus at at least one sense electrode of the array;

wherein the processor is further configured to detect a neural response in the recording with a vector detector; and

wherein the first charge and the third charge of the neural stimulus have values that cause an artefact vector produced by the vector detector to be non-parallel to an evoked neural response vector produced by the vector detector.

3. The implantable device of claim 2 , wherein the inequality between the first charge and the third charge causes the artefact vector to be substantially orthogonal to the evoked neural response vector.

4. The implantable device of claim 2 , wherein a correlation delay of the vector detector and a stimulus duty ratio of the first charge to the second charge of the neural stimulus have values which cause the artefact vector to be non-parallel to the evoked neural response vector.

5. The implantable device of claim 4 , wherein the processor is further configured to adaptively adjust the stimulus duty ratio and/or the correlation delay in order to seek out a zero at the at least one sense electrode in a contribution of artefact to the recording of the response.

6. The implantable device of claim 5 , wherein the adjusting comprises adjusting the correlation delay so as to desirably align the evoked neural response vector.

7. The implantable device of claim 4 , wherein the processor is further configured to adaptively adjust the stimulus duty ratio in order to seek out a zero at the sense electrode in a contribution of artefact to the recording of the response.

8. The implantable device of claim 1 , wherein the first charge is between 0.6 times the second charge and 0.9 times the second charge.

9. The implantable device of claim 8 , wherein the first charge is 0.75 times the second charge.

10. The implantable device of claim 1 , wherein the first stimulus component, second stimulus component and third stimulus component are delivered in a first stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, and wherein the processor is further configured to deliver a second stimulus phase of the neural stimulus after the first stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, by:

delivering a fourth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the first electrode and a sixth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the third electrode simultaneously with the fourth stimulus component, the fourth stimulus component and the sixth stimulus component being of the second polarity; and

delivering a fifth stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the fourth stimulus component and the sixth stimulus component at the second electrode, the fifth stimulus component being of the first polarity.

11. The implantable device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

deliver a third stimulus phase of the neural stimulus after the second stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, by:

delivering a seventh stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the first electrode and a ninth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the third electrode simultaneously with the seventh stimulus component, the seventh stimulus component and the ninth stimulus component being of the first polarity; and

delivering an eighth stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the seventh stimulus component and the ninth stimulus component at the second electrode, the eighth stimulus component being of the second polarity.

12. A method of delivering a neural stimulus, the method comprising:

delivering a first stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a first electrode of an array of electrodes and a third stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a third electrode of the array simultaneously with the first stimulus component, the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component being of a first polarity; and

delivering a second stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a second electrode of the array in between the first electrode and the third electrode simultaneously with the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component being of a second polarity opposite the first polarity;

wherein the first, second, and third stimulus components are charge balanced; and

wherein the first stimulus component delivers a first charge which is unequal to a third charge delivered by the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component delivers a second charge, and the first charge and the third charge are selected so as to give rise to reduced artefact.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

obtaining a recording of a response to the neural stimulus at at least one sense electrode of the array; and

detecting a neural response in the recording with a vector detector,

wherein the first charge and the third charge of the neural stimulus have values that cause an artefact vector produced by the vector detector to be non-parallel to an evoked neural response vector produced by the vector detector.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the inequality between the first charge and the third charge causes the artefact vector to be substantially orthogonal to the evoked neural response vector.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein a correlation delay of the vector detector and a stimulus duty ratio of the first charge to the second charge of the neural stimulus have values which cause the artefact vector to be non-parallel to the evoked neural response vector.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising adaptively adjusting the stimulus duty ratio and/or the correlation delay in order to seek out a zero at the at least one sense electrode in a contribution of artefact to the recording of the response.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the adjusting comprises adjusting the correlation delay so as to desirably align the evoked neural response vector.

18. The method of claim 15 , further comprising adaptively adjusting the stimulus duty ratio in order to seek out a zero at the sense electrode in a contribution of artefact to the recording of the neural response.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first charge is between 0.6 times the second charge and 0 . 9 times the second charge.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first charge is 0.75 times the second charge.

21. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first stimulus component, second stimulus component and third stimulus component are delivered in a first stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, the method further comprising:

delivering a second stimulus phase of the neural stimulus after the first stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, by:

delivering a fourth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the first electrode and a sixth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the third electrode simultaneously with the fourth stimulus component, the fourth stimulus component and the sixth stimulus component being of the second polarity; and

delivering a fifth stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the fourth stimulus component and the sixth stimulus component at the second electrode, the fifth stimulus component being of the first polarity.

22. The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

delivering a third stimulus phase of the neural stimulus after the second stimulus phase of the neural stimulus, by:

delivering a seventh stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the first electrode and a ninth stimulus component of the neural stimulus at the third electrode simultaneously with the seventh stimulus component, the seventh stimulus component and the ninth stimulus component being of the first polarity; and

delivering an eighth stimulus component of the neural stimulus simultaneously with the seventh stimulus component and the ninth stimulus component at the second electrode, the eighth stimulus component being of the second polarity.

23. A non-transitory computer readable medium for delivering a neural stimulus, comprising instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes performance of the following:

delivering a first stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a first electrode of an array of electrodes and a third stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a third electrode of the array simultaneously with the first stimulus component, the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component being of a first polarity; and

delivering a second stimulus component of the neural stimulus at a second electrode of the array in between the first electrode and the third electrode simultaneously with the first stimulus component and the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component being of a second polarity opposite the first polarity,

wherein the first, second, and third stimulus components are charge balanced; and

wherein the first stimulus component delivers a first charge which is unequal to a third charge delivered by the third stimulus component, the second stimulus component delivers a second charge, and the first charge and the third charge are selected so as to give rise to reduced artefact.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070518/0710 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: KARANTONIS, DEAN; SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK; HUANG, KAI
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 066162/0907 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2016902492 · Jun 24, 2016 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17510264 · Oct 25, 2021
Continuation 16311526
Related Publication 20240172985A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (78)
US 5143081A · Young et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 6246912B1 · Sluijter et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6892097B2 · Holsheimer · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7171261B1 · Litvak et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7634315B2 · Cholette · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8060208B2 · Kilgore et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8195287B2 · Dacey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9079018B2 · Olsen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9254386B2 · Lee et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9333339B2 · Weiner · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9511231B1 · Kent et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9737713B2 · Parramon et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10518089B2 · Lee et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10537740B2 · Carbunaru et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10576286B1 · Park · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10716937B2 · Feldman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11071861B2 · Gerber et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11247057B1 · Gliner · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11259732B2 · Parramon et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11318310B1 · Bradley · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11497917B2 · Bradley et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030135247A1 · Zierhofer · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060173493A1 · Armstrong · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20100331921A1 · Bornzin et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110093042A1 · Torgerson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20160158551A1 · Kent et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190015663A1 · Bennett et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210106829A1 · Bennett et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230028428A1 · Grill et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230226355A1 · De Ridder · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230241397A1 · Parker et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230248975A1 · Bennett et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230414944A1 · De Ridder · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2021202187B2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2023237038A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2023248130A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002082982A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2003101533A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004007018A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002058782A8 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004052451A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004087256A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006073393A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006047291A3 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006019764A3 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007038200A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008121891A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008150348A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009015005A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009056107A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009061813A9 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009139968A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010056580A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010032132A4 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010065146A9 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010124128A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010124144A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011041191A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012155187A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013036880A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014005075A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014159896A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015031136A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015179177A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016014624A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016168485A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017106539A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017096152A3 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017142948A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
De Ridder et al., Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation toward Paresthesia-Free Pain Suppression, Neurosurgery-online.com, May 2010, vol. 66, No. 8, pp. 986-990. [cited by applicant]
Schmidt et al., Gating of tactile input from the hand, Exp Brain Res, 1990, 79, pp. 97-102. [cited by applicant]
Ridder et al., Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Limb and Back Pain, World Neurosurgery, 2013, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fuentes et al., Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Locomotion in Animal Models of Parkinson's Disease, Science, vol. 323, No. 5921, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1578-1582. [cited by applicant]
Brown et al., Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Upper Limb Akinesia in Parkinson's Disease, Annals of Neurology, 45, No. 4, 1999, pp. 473-488. [cited by applicant]
Bahmer et al., Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase, Hearing Research, 2013, vol. 306, pp. 123-130. [cited by applicant]
Bahmer et al., Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. Amplitude growth functions, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Clinical Neuroscience, 2012, vol. 2… [cited by applicant]
Shepherd et al., Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties, Hearing Research, 1999, 130, 171-188. [cited by applicant]
Mens, Lucas, Advances in Cochlear Implant Telemetry: Evoked Neural Responses, Electrical Field Imaging, and Technical Integrity, Trends in Amplification, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 2007 143-159. [cited by applicant]