IP Library Granted Patent US 12,265,390
Granted Patent B2
US 12,265,390 · App. 18/490,940 · Granted Apr 1, 2025

Autonomous vehicle safe stop

Inventors: Moslem Kazemi (Allison Park, PA); Sameer Bardapurkar (Pittsburgh, PA)
Assignee: AURORA OPERATIONS, INC.
G05D1/0088B60T7/22B60W30/09B60W30/0953B60W30/0956B62D1/286G05D1/0061G05D1/024G05D1/0246
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,265,390
App. No.
18/490,940
Granted
Apr 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, tangible non-transitory computer-readable media, and devices for operating an autonomous vehicle are provided. For example, the disclosed technology can include receiving state data that includes information associated with states of an autonomous vehicle and an environment external to the autonomous vehicle. Responsive to the state data satisfying vehicle stoppage criteria, vehicle stoppage conditions can be determined to have occurred. A severity level of the vehicle stoppage conditions can be selected from a plurality of available severity levels respectively associated with a plurality of different sets of constraints. A motion plan can be generated based on the state data. The motion plan can include information associated with locations for the autonomous vehicle to traverse at time intervals corresponding to the locations. Further, the locations can include a current location of the autonomous vehicle and a destination location at which the autonomous vehicle stops traveling.

Claims (63)

1. An autonomous vehicle, comprising:

a human-machine interface, wherein the human-machine interface comprises a display device or a microphone;

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory memory device storing computer-readable instructions that are executable by the one or more processors cause the autonomous vehicle to perform operations comprising:

obtaining state data comprising information associated with at least one of:

one or more states of the autonomous vehicle or

one or more states of an environment external to the autonomous vehicle;

determining, using data from the human-machine interface, that at least one condition of the following conditions is satisfied:

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request that the autonomous vehicle stop, or

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request for remote operator assistance;

responsive to determining that the at least one condition is satisfied, determining, based at least in part on the state data and using a machine-learned model, a severity level for the at least one condition, the severity level indicating an immediacy with which the autonomous vehicle is to respond to the at least one condition;

controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle to respond to the at least one condition.

2. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the machine-learned model is configured to distinguish between emergency situations and non-emergency situations.

3. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

generating a motion plan using one or more constraints associated with the severity level.

4. The autonomous vehicle of claim 3 , wherein the one or more constraints comprise a time constraint.

5. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

responsive to determining that the human-machine interface received the request for remote operator assistance:

opening a communication channel for one or more passengers of the vehicle to communicate with a remote operator.

6. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

responsive to determining that the human-machine interface received a request that the autonomous vehicle stop:

determining a stopping location within a distance constraint associated with the severity level.

7. The autonomous vehicle of claim 5 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

operating in a semi-autonomous operational mode with at least some interaction from the remote operator.

8. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the machine-learned model processes the state data to generate data descriptive of the severity level.

9. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the operations comprise:

activating a vehicle notification system to indicate that the vehicle is stopping.

10. The autonomous vehicle of claim 9 , wherein the operations comprise:

activating a vehicle notification system to indicate why the vehicle is stopping.

11. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

obtaining state data comprising information associated with at least one of:

one or more states of an autonomous vehicle or

one or more states of an environment external to the autonomous vehicle;

determining, using data from a human-machine interface of the autonomous vehicle, wherein the human-machine interface comprises a display device or a microphone, that at least one condition of the following conditions is satisfied:

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request that the autonomous vehicle stop, or

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request for remote operator assistance;

responsive to determining that the at least one condition is satisfied, determining, based at least in part on the state data and using a machine-learned model, a severity level for the at least one condition, the severity level indicating an immediacy with which the autonomous vehicle is to respond to the at least one condition;

controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle to respond to the at least one condition.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the machine-learned model is configured to distinguish between emergency situations and non-emergency situations.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

generating a motion plan using one or more constraints associated with the severity level.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the one or more constraints comprise a time constraint.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

responsive to determining that the human-machine interface received the request for remote operator assistance:

opening a communication channel for one or more passengers of the vehicle to communicate with a remote operator.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle comprises:

responsive to determining that the human-machine interface received a request that the autonomous vehicle stop:

determining a stopping location within a distance constraint associated with the severity level.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, the autonomous vehicle comprises:

operating in a semi-autonomous operational mode with at least some interaction from the remote operator.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the machine-learned model processes the state data to generate data descriptive of the severity level.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , comprising:

activating a vehicle notification system to indicate that the vehicle is stopping; or

activating the vehicle notification system to indicate why the vehicle is stopping.

20. A non-transitory memory device storing computer-readable instructions that are executable by one or more processors cause an autonomous vehicle computing system to perform operations comprising:

obtaining state data comprising information associated with at least one of:

one or more states of the autonomous vehicle or

one or more states of an environment external to the autonomous vehicle;

determining, using data from a human-machine interface of the autonomous vehicle wherein the human-machine interface comprises a display device or a microphone, that at least one condition of the following conditions is satisfied:

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request that the autonomous vehicle stop, or

the human-machine interface received, via the display device or the microphone, a request for remote operator assistance;

responsive to determining that the at least one condition is satisfied, determining, based at least in part on the state data and using a machine-learned model, a severity level for the at least one condition, the severity level indicating an immediacy with which the autonomous vehicle is to respond to the at least one condition;

controlling, based at least in part on the severity level, driving of the autonomous vehicle to respond to the at least one condition.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2024
From: UATC, LLC
To: AURORA OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067733/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2024
From: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: UATC, LLC
Reel/Frame 067077/0243 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2024
From: KAZEMI, MOSLEM; BARDAPURKAR, SAMEER
To: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 066928/0786 →