IP Library Granted Patent US 12,269,473
Granted Patent B2
US 12,269,473 · App. 18/492,549 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Navigating multi-way stop intersections with an autonomous vehicle

Inventor: Scott Drew Pendleton (Singapore, SG)
Assignee: Motional AD LLC
B60W30/18159B60W30/18154B60W60/00272B60W2552/53B60W2554/4044B60W2555/60B60W2720/106
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,269,473
App. No.
18/492,549
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The subject matter described in this specification is directed to a system and techniques for operating an autonomous vehicle (AV) at a multi-way stop intersection. After detecting the AV is at a primary stopline of the multi-way stop intersection, a planned travel path though the multi-way stop intersection is obtained. If the planned travel path of the AV through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies a set of one or more clearance criteria, the AV proceeds past the primary stopline. The clearance criteria include a criterion that is satisfied in response to detecting the AV is clear to safely merge into a travel lane corresponding to the planned travel path.

Claims (44)

1. An autonomous vehicle, comprising:

one or more sensors configured to generate data indicative of an environment of the autonomous vehicle;

one or more computer processors; and

one or more non-transitory storage media storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more computer processors, cause performance of operations comprising:

determining that the autonomous vehicle is at a primary stopline of a multi-way stop intersection based on the data generated by the one or more sensors;

detecting one or more other vehicles at one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection based on the data generated by the one or more sensors; and

in accordance with a determination that the autonomous vehicle has a higher precedence than the one or more other vehicles at the one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection, instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection.

2. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

obtaining a planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection,

wherein instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection is further in accordance with a determination that the planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies a set of one or more clearance criteria.

3. The autonomous vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the set of one or more clearance criteria include a criterion stat is satisfied in response to detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into a travel lane corresponding to the planned travel path.

4. The autonomous vehicle of claim 3 , wherein detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into the travel lane includes detecting that the autonomous vehicle does not block an expected travel path of the one or more other vehicles.

5. The autonomous vehicle of claim 4 , wherein the autonomous vehicle does not block the expected travel path of the one or more other vehicles when the one or more other vehicles are not expected to change speed by more than a threshold change in speed.

6. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the secondary stopline corresponds to an edge of the multi-way stop intersection.

7. The autonomous vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

in accordance with a determination that the autonomous vehicle has a higher precedence than the one or more other vehicles at the one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection and in accordance with the determination that the planned travel path of the autonomous vehicle through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies the set of one or more clearance criteria, instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the secondary stopline.

8. The autonomous vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

in accordance with a determination that a first of the one or more other vehicles is moving towards the multi-way stop intersection with an intent to proceed through the multi-way stop intersection after a second of the one or more other vehicles, instructing the autonomous vehicle to remain at the primary stopline until the first other vehicle has initiated proceeding through the multi-way stop intersection.

9. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors; and

one or more non-transitory storage media storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more computer processors, cause performance of operations comprising:

determining that an autonomous vehicle is at a primary stopline of a multi-way stop intersection based on data generated by one or more sensors of the autonomous vehicle;

detecting one or more other vehicles at one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection based on the data generated by the one or more sensors; and

in accordance with a determination that the autonomous vehicle has a higher precedence than the one or more other vehicles at the one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection, instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

obtaining a planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection,

wherein instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection is further in accordance with a determination that the planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies a set of one or more clearance criteria.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the set of one or more clearance criteria include a criterion stat is satisfied in response to detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into a travel lane corresponding to the planned travel path.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into the travel lane includes detecting that the autonomous vehicle does not block an expected travel path of the one or more other vehicles.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the autonomous vehicle does not block the expected travel path of the one or more other vehicles when the one or more other vehicles are not expected to change speed by more than a threshold change in speed.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the secondary stopline corresponds to an edge of the multi-way stop intersection.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

in accordance with a determination that the autonomous vehicle has a higher precedence than the one or more other vehicles at the one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection and in accordance with the determination that the planned travel path of the autonomous vehicle through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies the set of one or more clearance criteria, instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the secondary stopline.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more computer processors, further cause performance of operations comprising:

in accordance with a determination that a first of the one or more other vehicles is moving towards the multi-way stop intersection with an intent to proceed through the multi-way stop intersection after a second of the one or more other vehicles, instructing the autonomous vehicle to remain at the primary stopline until the first other vehicle has initiated proceeding through the multi-way stop intersection.

17. A method, comprising:

determining that an autonomous vehicle is at a primary stopline of a multi-way stop intersection based on data generated by one or more sensors of the autonomous vehicle;

detecting one or more other vehicles at one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection based on the data generated by the one or more sensors; and

in accordance with a determination that the autonomous vehicle has a higher precedence than the one or more other vehicles at the one or more tertiary stoplines of the multi-way stop intersection, instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

obtaining a planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection,

wherein instructing the autonomous vehicle to proceed past the primary stopline and stop at a secondary stopline before entering the multi-way stop intersection is further in accordance with a determination that the planned travel path through the multi-way stop intersection satisfies a set of one or more clearance criteria.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the set of one or more clearance criteria include a criterion stat is satisfied in response to detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into a travel lane corresponding to the planned travel path.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein detecting that the autonomous vehicle is clear to safely merge into the travel lane includes detecting that the autonomous vehicle does not block an expected travel path of the one or more other vehicles.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2024
From: PENDLETON, SCOTT DREW
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 069348/0325 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: MOTIONAL AD LLC
Reel/Frame 069348/0328 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17061438 · Oct 1, 2020
Provisional Application 62912417 · Oct 8, 2019
Related Publication 20240051539A1 · Feb 15, 2024
References Cited (48)
US 9254846B2 · Dolgov et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9459623B1 · Raghu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9616887B2 · Takagi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10073458B2 · Kim · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10268200B2 · Fang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11113973B2 · Wray et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11834045B2 · Pendleton · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20130245877A1 · Ferguson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20170018177A1 · Kurotobi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170057514A1 · Toyoda · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170113665A1 · Mudalige et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180239358A1 · Choi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180251129A1 · Ji et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180370528A1 · Rittger · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190009782A1 · Kanzawa · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190049964A1 · Jang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190156677A1 · Nishimura · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190171211A1 · Jang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190266889A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190278280A1 · Imai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190329782A1 · Shalev-Shwartz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190375430A1 · Emura · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005645A1 · Wray et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200108833A1 · Sim · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200193812A1 · Morris · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200285244A1 · Gier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200310427A1 · Oyama · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200331470A1 · Nanri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200377101A1 · Parasuram · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210053569A1 · Censi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210094547A1 · Garcia · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210101625A1 · Shrestha et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210110484A1 · Shalev-Shwartz et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210139048A1 · Russell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210163008A1 · Ghafouri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210261162A1 · Hiramatsu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210339746A1 · Yatagai · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016094088A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee, “SAE International's Standard J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles”, Jun. 2018, in 35 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued for Application No. CN 202011075049.5 dated Apr. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued for Application No. CN 202011075049.5 dated Feb. 9, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued for Application No. CN 202011075049.5 dated Jun. 12, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Search Report issued for Application No. CN 202011075049.5 dated Aug. 30, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Great Britain Office Action issued for Application No. GB 2015826.7, dated Mar. 18, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Great Britain Office Action issued for Application No. GB 2200715.7, dated Feb. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action issued for Application No. KR 10-2020-0130194, dated Mar. 25, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action issued for Application No. KR 10-2020-0130194, dated Nov. 25, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Korean Notice of Allowance issued for Application No. KR 10-2020-0130194, dated Jun. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]