IP Library Granted Patent US 12,680,042
Granted Patent B2
US 12,680,042 · App. 18/495,381 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

Process of converting hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide to methane and solid sulfur on carbon-based catalysts under milder conditions with reduced carbon footprint

Inventors: Xiao Jiang (Stoneham, MA); Ke Zhang (Stoneham, MA); Michael J. Forte (Cambridge, MA); Elizabeth Q. Contreras (Houston, TX); Sampath Bommareddy (Sugarland, TX)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
C10L3/103B01J21/18C01B17/0404
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,680,042
App. No.
18/495,381
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for producing methane and sulfur. A first system includes a condensate separation system to separate a feed stream of mixed hydrocarbons, an acid gas removal system to produce a methane product stream and a reactant gas stream of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and a catalytic reactor configured to react the carbon dioxide and the hydrogen sulfide from the reactant gas stream using a carbon-based catalyst and produce an effluent methane stream, an effluent sulfur stream, and a waste stream. Another system for producing methane and sulfur includes a first separation system to separate water vapor and oxygen to produce a hydrogen sulfide stream, a catalytic reactor configured to react a separated carbon dioxide stream and the hydrogen sulfide stream using a carbon-based catalyst and produce a methane stream and a sulfur stream.

Claims (37)

1 . A system for producing methane and sulfur, comprising:

a condensate separation system configured to separate a feed stream comprising mixed hydrocarbons to produce a liquid stream comprising liquid mixed hydrocarbons and a gas mixture stream comprising carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrogen sulfide;

an acid gas removal system configured to separate the gas mixture stream and produce a methane product stream and a reactant gas stream comprising carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide;

a catalytic reactor configured to react the carbon dioxide and the hydrogen sulfide from the reactant gas stream using a carbon-based catalyst and produce an effluent methane stream, an effluent sulfur stream, and a waste stream comprising sulfur dioxide, unreacted carbon dioxide, and unreacted hydrogen sulfide;

a sulfur recovery system downstream of the catalytic reactor configured to receive the waste stream and produce an effluent stream comprising hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and a recovered sulfur stream;

a tail gas treatment system downstream of the sulfur recovery system configured to receive the effluent stream comprising hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and produce a recycle stream comprising hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide and a residual sulfur dioxide stream;

an incinerator unit downstream of the tail gas treatment system configured to incinerate the residual sulfur dioxide stream before venting to atmosphere; and

a hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming system downstream of the catalytic reactor configured to receive the methane product stream and a portion of the waste stream comprising sulfur dioxide, unreacted carbon dioxide, and unreacted hydrogen sulfide.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the sulfur recovery system comprises a Claus unit.

3 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a dehydration unit downstream of the acid gas removal system configured to dehydrate the methane product stream and the effluent methane stream to produce a dehydrated methane stream.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the acid gas removal system comprises an amine scrubbing unit.

5 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a liquid treatment system configured to receive and treat the liquid stream.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the acid gas removal system and the catalytic reactor are part of a natural gas refining system.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the carbon-based catalyst comprises activated carbon.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a temperature in a range from 50° C. to 150° C.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a pressure in a range from 100 kPa to 5,000 kPa.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a ratio of 1:2 CO 2 to H 2 S from the reactant gas stream.

11 . A method for producing methane gas and solid sulfur, comprising:

separating a feed stream comprising mixed hydrocarbons to produce a liquid stream comprising liquid mixed hydrocarbons and a gas mixture stream comprising carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrogen sulfide;

separating the gas mixture stream using an acid gas removal system to produce a methane product stream and a reactant gas stream, wherein the reactant gas stream comprises carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide;

reacting the carbon dioxide and the hydrogen sulfide from the reactant gas stream in a catalytic reactor using a carbon-based catalyst, producing an effluent methane stream, an effluent sulfur stream, and a waste stream, wherein the waste stream comprises produced sulfur dioxide, and unreacted carbon dioxide and unreacted hydrogen sulfide;

producing an effluent stream comprising hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and a recovered sulfur stream using a sulfur recovery system downstream of the catalytic reactor configured to receive the waste stream;

receiving the effluent stream comprising hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and producing a recycle stream comprising hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide and a residual sulfur dioxide stream using a tail gas treatment system downstream of the sulfur recovery system;

incinerating the residual sulfur dioxide stream before venting to atmosphere using an incinerator unit downstream of the tail gas treatment system; and

receiving, with a hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming system downstream of the catalytic reactor, the methane product stream and a portion of the waste stream comprising sulfur dioxide, unreacted carbon dioxide, and unreacted hydrogen sulfide.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

dehydrating the methane product stream and the effluent methane stream using a dehydration unit downstream of the acid gas removal system to produce a dehydrated methane stream.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving and treating the liquid stream using a liquid treatment system.

14 . A system for producing methane and sulfur, comprising:

a first separation system configured to receive an inlet gas stream comprising methane, hydrogen sulfide, water vapor, and oxygen and separate the water vapor and the oxygen to produce a separated hydrogen sulfide stream comprising a first portion of separated hydrogen sulfide and a second portion of separated hydrogen sulfide, a separated methane stream, and a separated carbon dioxide stream;

a catalytic reactor configured to react the separated carbon dioxide stream and the first portion of separated hydrogen sulfide using a carbon-based catalyst, producing a produced methane stream and a produced sulfur stream; and

a hydrogen sulfide-methane reforming system downstream of the catalytic reactor configured to receive the produced methane stream, and the second portion of separated hydrogen sulfide.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the carbon-based catalyst comprises activated carbon.

16 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a temperature in a range from 50° C. to 150° C.

17 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a pressure in a range from 20 kPa to 100 kPa.

18 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the catalytic reactor is operated at a ratio of 1:2 CO 2 to H 2 S from the inlet gas stream.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2025
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 070418/0329 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2025
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 070418/0366 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2024
From: JIANG, XIAO; ZHANG, KE; FORTE, MICHAEL J.; CONTRERAS, ELIZABETH Q.; BOMMAREDDY, SAMPATH
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066882/0908 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250136885A1 · May 1, 2025
References Cited (48)
US 3730694A · Wunderlich · 1973 [cited by examiner]
US 3870481A · Hegarty · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4432960A · Herrington et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4999178A · Bowman · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 10144878B1 · Kuhn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11472924B2 · Stanis · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020098132A1 · Vidalin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20120279728A1 · Northrop · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140072488A1 · Cooper · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150144840A1 · Valenzuela · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160296878A1 · Zhou · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180282159A1 · Polster et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210339189A1 · Winkler · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210402368A1 · Baek et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220212924A1 · Shahverdi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 0112117A2 · 1984 [cited by applicant]
EP 4101815A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
IN 470392 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
JP H08188402A · 1996 [cited by applicant]
NO 840523A · 1985 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010102653A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010150063A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018127852A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019002803A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Tollini et al. Methane Reforming with H2S and Sulfur for Hydrogen Production: Thermodynamic Assessment, Jul. 2023, Energy & Fuels, 37, 11197-11208 (Year: 2023). [cited by examiner]
S. Sunkara, et al., “Valorization of refinery flue gas through tri-reforming and direct hydrogenization routes,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 102, No. 6, pp. 2136-2150, 2024 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued for corresponding international application No. PCT/US2025/019523, mailed Jun. 16, 2025 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion issued for corresponding international application No. PCT/US2025/019523, mailed Jun. 16, 2025 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
J. Liu, et al., “Carbon-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis,” Review Article, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021 (31 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued for corresponding international patent application No. PCT/US2024/050717, mailed Mar. 3, 2025 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion issued for corresponding international patent application No. PCT/US2024/050717, mailed Mar. 3, 2025 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
El-Melih, A.M. et al., “Hydrogen sulfide reformation in the presence of methane”; Applied Energy; vol. 178; pp. 609-615; Sep. 15, 2016 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Huang, Cunping et al., “Liquid hydrogen production via hydrogen sulfide methane reformation”; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 175, Issue 1; pp. 464-472; Jan. 3, 2008 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Song, Chunshan et al., “Tri-reforming of methane: a novel concept for catalytic production of industrially useful synthesis gas with desired H2/CO ratios”; Catalysis Today; vol. 98, Issue 4; pp. 463-484; Dec. 14, 2004 (… [cited by applicant]
Kong, V.C.Y. et al., “Development of hydrogen storage for fuel cell generators. I: Hydrogen generation using hydrolysis hydrides”; International Journal of Hydrogen Energy; vol. 24, Issue 7; pp. 665-675; Jul. 1, 1999 (1… [cited by applicant]
Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes et al., “Environmental Challenges and Greenhouse Gas Control for Fossil Fuel Utilization in the 21st Century”; SpringerLink; Chapter 18: Tri-reforming of Natural Gas Using CO2 in Flue Gas of Po… [cited by applicant]
Song, Chunshan et al., “Tri-reforming of Methane over Ni Catalysts for CO2 Conversion to Syngas With Desired H2/CO Ratios Using Flue Gas of Power Plants Without CO2 Separation”; Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis … [cited by applicant]
Bandosz, T. et al. “Effect of Pore Structure and Surface Chemistry of Virgin Activated Carbons on Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide.” Carbon, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 483-491 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Bagreev, A. et al. “On the Mechanism of Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Moist Air on Catalytic Carbonaceous Adsorbents”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, vol. 44, pp. 530-538 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Adib, F. et al., “Effect of Surface Characteristics of Wood-Based Activated Carbons on Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1999, vol. 214, pp. 407-415 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Quan, W. et al., “Influence of Loading a Tertiary Amine on Activated Carbons and Effect of CO2 on Adsorptive H2S Removal from Biogas”, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, vol. 8, pp. 9998-10008 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ma, W, et al., “Achieving simultaneous CO2 and H2S conversion via a coupled solar-driven electrochemical approach on non-precious-metal catalysts”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, vol. 57, pp. 3473-3477 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Song, S. “Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing”, Catalysis Today, 2006, vol. 115, pp… [cited by applicant]
Li. Y, et al., “Kinetic study of decomposition of H2S and CH4 for H2 production using detailed mechanism”, ScienceDirect, Energy Procedia, 2017, vol. 142, pp. 1065-1070 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Martínez-Salazar, A.L., et al., “Hydrogen production by methane reforming with H2S using Mo,Cr/ZrO2eSBA15 and Mo,Cr/ZrO2eLa2O3 catalysts”, Elsevier, ScienceDirect, n t e rna t i onal journal of hydrogen energy, 2015, vo… [cited by applicant]
Shah, M.S., et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide Capture: From Absorption in Polar Liquids to Oxide, Zeolite, and Metal?Organic Framework Adsorbents and Membranes”, Chemical Reviews, 2017, vol. 117, pp. 9755-9803 (49 pages). [cited by applicant]
Xiao, J. et al., “Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation to Methanol via Heterogeneous Catalysis”, Chemical Reviews, 2020, vol. 120, pp. 7984-8034 (51 pages). [cited by applicant]
Loeppke, G. E., et al., “Development and Evaluation of a Meter for Measuring Return Line Fluid Flow Rates During Drilling” Sandia Report, SAND 91-2607, Printed Jun. 1992 (131 pages). [cited by applicant]