IP Library Granted Patent US 12,344,049
Granted Patent B2
US 12,344,049 · App. 18/503,607 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

System for auto-location of tires employing footprint length

Inventors: Kanwar Bharat Singh (Copley, OH); Sparsh Sharma (Luxembourg, LU)
Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
B60C23/0416G07C5/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,344,049
App. No.
18/503,607
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An auto-location system locates a position of a tire. A tire sensor unit is mounted on the tire and measures a length of a footprint of the tire, and electronic memory capacity stores identification information for the tire sensor unit. A vehicle sensor unit is mounted on the vehicle and measures a lateral acceleration and a longitudinal acceleration. A processor is in electronic communication with the tire sensor unit and the vehicle sensor unit, and receives the measured footprint length, the identification information, the lateral acceleration, and the longitudinal acceleration. A virtual footprint length estimator employs the lateral acceleration and the longitudinal acceleration to estimate a virtual footprint length of the tire. A correlation module receives the virtual footprint length and the measured footprint length to generate correlation values. A decision arbitrator applies a set of decision rules to the correlation values to generate a wheel position indication.

Claims (26)

1. An auto-location system, the system locating a position of a tire supporting a vehicle, the system comprising:

a tire sensor unit being mounted on the tire, the tire sensor unit including a footprint length measurement sensor to measure a length of a footprint of the tire, and electronic memory capacity to store identification information for the tire sensor unit;

a vehicle sensor unit being mounted on the vehicle, the vehicle sensor unit measuring a lateral acceleration of the vehicle and a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle;

a processor in electronic communication with the tire sensor unit and the vehicle sensor unit, the processor receiving the measured footprint length, the identification information, the lateral acceleration, and the longitudinal acceleration;

a virtual footprint length estimator executed on the processor, the footprint length estimator employing the lateral acceleration and the longitudinal acceleration to estimate a virtual footprint length of the tire;

a correlation module executed on the processor, the correlation module receiving the virtual footprint length and the measured footprint length to generate correlation values; and

a decision arbitrator executed on the processor, the decision arbitrator applying a set of decision rules to the correlation values to generate a wheel position indication that correlates the tire sensor unit to a position of the tire on the vehicle.

2. The auto-location system of claim 1 , wherein the virtual footprint length estimator executes a vehicle dynamics model in which the model receives the lateral acceleration and the longitudinal acceleration as inputs and generates an estimate of lateral and longitudinal load transfer of the vehicle and an estimate of tire load.

3. The auto-location system of claim 2 , wherein the virtual footprint length of the tire is estimated with a regression model once the estimate of tire load is generated.

4. The auto-location system of claim 1 , wherein the correlation module correlates a set of virtual footprint lengths with a corresponding set of measured footprint lengths for each tire on the vehicle.

5. The auto-location system of claim 1 , wherein the correlation values are stored in a correlation matrix.

6. The auto-location system of claim 1 , wherein the decision rules include a plurality of rules, and the decision arbitrator applies the decision rules in sequence.

7. The auto-location system of claim 6 , wherein the decision rules include a first rule that identifies left side positions on the vehicle and right side positions on the vehicle.

8. The auto-location system of claim 7 , wherein the decision arbitrator compares a virtual footprint length for a front left position and a virtual footprint length for a rear left position to measured footprint lengths in the correlation values.

9. The auto-location system of claim 8 , wherein tire sensor units generating measured footprint lengths that yield a positive correlation with the virtual footprint length for the front left position and the virtual footprint length for the rear left position are designated as left side positions.

10. The auto-location system of claim 7 , wherein the decision arbitrator compares a virtual footprint length for a front right position and a virtual footprint length for a rear right position to measured footprint lengths in the correlation values.

11. The auto-location system of claim 10 , wherein tire sensor units generating measured footprint lengths that yield a positive correlation with the virtual footprint length for the front right position and the virtual footprint length for the rear right position are designated as right side positions.

12. The auto-location system of claim 7 , wherein the decision rules include a second rule that differentiates between a front left position and a rear left position.

13. The auto-location system of claim 12 , wherein the decision arbitrator compares a virtual footprint length for the front left position and a virtual footprint length for the rear left position to measured footprint lengths of the left side positions.

14. The auto-location system of claim 13 , wherein the decision arbitrator executes a first estimate among the correlation values to identify the tire mounted in at least one of the front left position and the rear left position.

15. The auto-location system of claim 14 , wherein the decision arbitrator executes a second estimate among the correlation values to identify the tire mounted in at least one of the front left position and the rear left position.

16. The auto-location system of claim 7 , wherein the decision rules include a third rule that differentiates between a front right position and a rear right position.

17. The auto-location system of claim 16 , wherein the decision arbitrator compares a virtual footprint length for the front right position and a virtual footprint length for the rear right position to measured footprint lengths of the right side positions.

18. The auto-location system of claim 17 , wherein the decision arbitrator executes a first estimate among the correlation values to identify the tire mounted in at least one of the front right position and the rear right position.

19. The auto-location system of claim 18 , wherein the decision arbitrator executes a second estimate among the correlation values to identify the tire mounted in at least one of the front right position and the rear right position.

20. The auto-location system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is located in at least one of the vehicle and a cloud-based server.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2025
From: SINGH, KANWAR BHARAT; SHARMA, SPARSH
To: THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Reel/Frame 070472/0916 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63382749 · Nov 8, 2022
Related Publication 20240149622A1 · May 9, 2024
References Cited (123)
US 4157530A · Merz · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4361202A · Minovitch · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4936138A · Cushman et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 6434399B1 · Kamperschroer · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6463798B2 · Niekerk et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6489888B1 · Honeck et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6725712B1 · King et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6750761B1 · Newman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6879252B2 · Dezorzi et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6885282B2 · Desai et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6885296B2 · Hardman et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6941803B2 · Hirohama et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6952160B1 · Bennie et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7010968B2 · Stewart et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7131323B2 · Hirota · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7177739B2 · Kuchler · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7355509B2 · Rennie et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7367227B2 · Stewart · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7385485B2 · Thomas et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7423532B2 · Stewart et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7425892B2 · Mori et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7506540B1 · Job · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7750798B2 · Mori · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7768383B2 · Fink · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7839273B2 · Tabe · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7948364B2 · Lin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8188848B2 · Lange et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8204645B2 · Weston · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8217776B2 · Hyde · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8332103B2 · Greer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8380460B2 · Miller et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8396629B1 · Kim et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8463491B2 · Weston · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8498759B1 · Juzswik · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8498785B2 · Juzswik · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8577643B2 · Kuchler · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8584517B2 · Strahan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8626413B2 · Kammann · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8659411B2 · Fink · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8843267B2 · Park et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9162542B2 · Shima et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9180742B2 · Kosugi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248708B2 · Fink · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9259978B2 · Patel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9278589B2 · Laifenfeld et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9399376B2 · Lickfelt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9440501B2 · Huang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9463673B2 · Huang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9469166B2 · Mcintyre et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9584881B2 · Taki · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9769305B2 · Banerjee et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9783011B2 · Taki · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9802447B2 · Petrucelli · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9851227B2 · Lammers · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9937759B2 · Terada et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9950577B1 · Marlett et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9973831B2 · Mejegård et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10006799B2 · Hanson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10046608B2 · Haas · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10075819B2 · Santavicca et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10081317B2 · Naboulsi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10082381B2 · McMillen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10093138B2 · Decia et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10131320B2 · Schmotzer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10132719B2 · Fudulea · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10237690B2 · Thakur et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10442253B2 · Werner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10479300B2 · Wheeler et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10549587B2 · Kollmitzer · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10685510B2 · Linsmeier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10717330B2 · Cyllik · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10726714B2 · Sekizawa et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10780749B2 · Hassani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11173757B2 · Cyllik · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20020092345A1 · Van et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050179530A1 · Stewart · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080143507A1 · Cotton et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080150712A1 · Cooprider et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090002146A1 · Lin · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090066498A1 · Jongsma et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299570A1 · Kammann · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100063669A1 · Fink et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100191409A1 · Weston · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110071737A1 · Greer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110282548A1 · Haas · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110308310A1 · Strahan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110313623A1 · Greer · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120022801A1 · Miller · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120029767A1 · Bailie · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120112899A1 · Hannon · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120133498A1 · Nah et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120242502A1 · Steiner · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120259507A1 · Fink · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140002257A1 · Han et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379231A1 · Hawes et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150352912A1 · Lehmann · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160039365A1 · Vanderwall · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129736A1 · Peine et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170106706A1 · Bettecken et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170174014A1 · Stewart et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180074490A1 · Park · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190126694A1 · Stewart et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190244301A1 · Seth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200101802A1 · Nasser et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200346500A1 · Zeng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200369100A1 · Pierre et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200398617A1 · Kandler et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210208028A1 · Boisset et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220176968A1 · Brooks · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220230481A1 · Singh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 0494763B1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
EP 2586633A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2002057097A3 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006100577A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006104484A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008116683A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013139977A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017018700A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019092052A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019243374A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020053901A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020123812A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Bonnie et al., Method and Device for determining the position of pressure sensors in a tire pressure monitoring system, Clarivate Analytics, 2008, 49 pages, 2008. [cited by applicant]