IP Library Patent Application 18504861
Patent Application
App. No. 18/504,861

Differential Communication With Robots in a Fleet and Related Technology

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/504,861
Abstract

Disclosed is a method of identifying at least one deployed robot in a group of robots, differentially commanding the identified robot, and initiating a remote shutdown or disablement of at least one robot selected from a group of robots.

Claims (35)

1 - 116 . (canceled)

117 . A method of identifying a subset of a group of deployed legged robots for purposes of communicating instructions to only the subset, wherein the method comprises:

transmitting a first-signal to the group of deployed legged robots;

receiving and processing the first-signal at the group;

transmitting a response-signal from each legged robot of the group;

detecting the response-signal; and

identifying each legged robot of the subset.

118 . The method of claim 117 , wherein transmitting the first-signal is by a first device and wherein the first device is one of a remote device and a fleet management system.

119 . The method of claim 117 , wherein the response-signal comprises at least a unique robot ID and a robot status identifier.

120 . The method of claim 119 , wherein the unique robot ID is used to determine the identity of each legged robot that belongs in the subset.

121 . The method of claim 120 , wherein each robot of the subset receives a further communication based on its robot status identifier, wherein the further communication is a safety-related instruction.

122 . The method of claim 121 , wherein the safety-related instruction comprises a command to perform a remote shutdown.

123 . The method of claim 122 , wherein the remote shutdown comprises a hard shutdown, wherein electrical power to the robot is immediately discontinued.

124 . The method of claim 122 , wherein the remote shutdown is a soft shutdown, wherein the robot is brought to a safe position, and then electrically powered off.

125 . The method of claim 124 , wherein the safe position is one of a standing position, a crouching position, a squatting position, a sitting position, and a controlled collapsed position.

126 . The method of claim 117 , wherein the group of legged robots further comprises a second-subset of legged robots that do not return a response-signal.

127 . The method of claim 126 , further comprising identifying the legged robots that do not return a response-signal and sending them a command to perform a remote shutdown.

128 . A method of identifying a subset of a group of deployed legged robots for purposes of communicating safety-related instructions to only the subset, wherein the method comprises:

receiving a notification of a safety-related issue requiring communication with the subset;

transmitting by a processor, a first-signal to a first location, wherein the subset of legged robots are located; receiving at the processor, a response-signal comprising a unique robot ID from each legged robot of the subset; identifying at the processor, each legged robot of the subset; and

communicating by the processor, a safety-related instruction to the first subset.

129 . The method of claim 128 , wherein the safety-related issue is a robot performing an unauthorized behavior.

130 . The method of claim 128 , wherein the safety-related instructions comprise an instruction to perform a remote shutdown, wherein the remote shutdown is one of a hard shutdown and a soft shutdown.

131 . A method of polling a group of deployed legged robots to identify potentially malfunctioning robots comprising:

transmitting a first-signal to each of the deployed legged robots of the group;

detecting response-signals associated with one or more of the deployed legged robots, wherein the response-signals comprise at least a unique robot ID and a status identifier for each deployed legged robot; and

comparing each status identifier with an expected status to identify potentially malfunctioning robots; and flagging robots that provide a status identifier that does not match the expected status as potentially malfunctioning.

132 . The method of claim 131 , wherein the status identifier indicates that the robot is not fully operative, and wherein the robot is requiring shutdown.

133 . The method of claim 131 , wherein the group comprises all legged robots at a first location, wherein the first location is a first zone, and wherein the first zone comprises a range of the first-signal, and wherein the range of the first signal is modifiable in order to change a size of the first zone.

134 . The method of claim 131 , wherein the step of flagging robots further comprises flagging robots that did not provide a response-signal as potentially malfunctioning.

135 . The method of claim 131 , further comprising the step of transmitting a safety-related instruction to the robots that have been flagged, wherein the safety-related instruction is an instruction to perform one of a soft shutdown and a hard shutdown.

136 . A method of identifying a subset of a group of deployed bipedal robots that require a remote shutdown because of a safety-related issue, and communicating a remote shutdown command only to the subset, wherein the method comprises:

transmitting by a processor, a first-signal to the group of deployed bipedal robots;

transmitting to the processor, a response-signal from each bipedal robot of the group, wherein the response-signal comprises at least a unique robot ID and a robot status identifier, and wherein the unique robot ID is used to determine the identity of each bipedal robot that belongs in the subset; and

transmitting by the processor, based on the robot status identifier, a command to perform a remote shutdown of at least one bipedal robot, wherein the remote shutdown places the bipedal robot in a safe recovery position.

Assignments (11)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2024
From: BREWER, BAMBI
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069182/0425 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: HURST, JONATHAN
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068869/0021 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: HUNTER, SEAN
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068864/0939 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: BENNETT, DANIEL
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068865/0028 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: DOMRES, RYAN
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068866/0191 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: LANGE, BRAIN
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068868/0973 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2024
From: ABATE, ANDREW
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068863/0035 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: KIRBY, BRIAN
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068853/0364 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: HAMNER, BRADLEY
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068853/0455 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: PATEL, KRUPAL
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068852/0454 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: PEREZ, ALEJANDRO
To: AGILITY ROBOTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 068853/0154 →