IP Library Granted Patent US 12,379,188
Granted Patent B2
US 12,379,188 · App. 18/521,357 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Interactive weapon targeting system displaying remote sensed image of target area

Inventors: John C. McNeil (Tujunga, CA); Earl Clyde Cox (La Cresenta, CA); Makoto Ueno (Simi Valley, CA); Jon Andrew Ross (Moorpark, CA)
Assignee: AeroVironment, Inc.
F41G5/14F41G3/02F41G3/142F41G3/165
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,379,188
App. No.
18/521,357
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, devices, and methods for determining a predicted impact point of a selected weapon and associated round based on stored ballistic information, provided elevation data, provided azimuth data, and provided position data.

Claims (35)

1. A system comprising:

a fire control controller configured to determine a predicted impact point of a weapon; and

a weapon display configured to display at least one of: a first viewed area of a first remote sensor of a first aerial vehicle and a second viewed area of a second remote sensor of a second aerial vehicle when at least one of: the predicted impact point is within the first viewed area of the first remote sensor and the predicted impact point is within the second viewed area of the second remote sensor.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the weapon comprises an associated round.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the fire control controller further comprises:

a data store having ballistic information associated with the weapon and the associated round.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the fire control controller determines the predicted impact point of the weapon and the associated round based on at least one of: the ballistic information, elevation data received from an inertial measurement unit, azimuth data received from a magnetic compass, and position data received from a position determining component, wherein the inertial measurement unit is in communication with the fire control controller, wherein the magnetic compass is in communication with the fire control controller, wherein the position determining component is in communication with the fire control controller, and wherein the position determining component is a navigation unit.

5. The system of claim 3 , wherein the fire control controller determines the predicted impact point of the weapon and the associated round based on the ballistic information, elevation data received from an inertial measurement unit, azimuth data received from a magnetic compass, and position data received from a position determining component.

6. The system of claim 2 , wherein the fire control controller determines a position and orientation of the weapon and further uses a ballistic lookup table to determine the predicted impact point of the weapon and the associated round.

7. The system of claim 2 further comprising:

a ballistic range determiner in communication with the fire control controller, wherein the ballistic range determiner is configured to determine the predicted impact point based on the weapon position, azimuth, elevation, and type of the associated round.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the fire control controller is configured to transmit information on the predicted impact point to a first sensor controller on the first aerial vehicle, and wherein the first sensor controller directs a pointing of the first remote sensor of the first aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the first viewed area of the first remote sensor.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the fire control controller transmits information on the predicted impact point to a second sensor controller on the second aerial vehicle, and wherein the second sensor controller directs a pointing of the second remote sensor of the second aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the second viewed area of the second remote sensor.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first viewed area of the first remote sensor is a first field of view of the first remote sensor, and wherein the second viewed area of the second remote sensor is a second field of view of the second remote sensor.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the weapon display is configured to display a third viewed area of a third remote sensor of a third aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within a third viewed area of the third remote sensor.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first aerial vehicle is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and wherein the second aerial vehicle is a UAV.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first remote sensor is an optical camera, wherein the second remote sensor is an optical camera, wherein the first optical camera is configured to provide video images for display on the weapon display, and wherein the second optical camera is configured to provide video images for display on the weapon display.

14. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

an environmental condition determiner configured to provide information related to environmental conditions of the surrounding areas of the predicted impact point in order for the fire control controller to determine the predicted impact point.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the fire control controller receives image metadata from the first remote sensor and the second remote sensor, and wherein the image metadata comprises a ground position of a Center Field of View (CFOV) of the first remote sensor and the second remote sensor, and wherein the CFOV is directed at the determined predicted impact point.

16. A method comprising:

determining, by a fire control controller, a predicted impact point of a weapon; and

displaying, by a weapon display of the weapon, a first viewed area of a first remote sensor of a first aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the first viewed area of the first remote sensor; and

displaying, by the weapon display of the weapon, a second viewed area of a second remote sensor of a second aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the second viewed area of the second remote sensor.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

transmitting, by the fire control controller, information on the predicted impact point to a first sensor controller on the first aerial vehicle;

directing, by the first sensor controller, a pointing of the first remote sensor of the first aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the first viewed area of the first remote sensor;

transmitting, by the fire control controller, information on the predicted impact point to a second sensor controller on the second aerial vehicle; and

directing, by the second sensor controller, a pointing of the second remote sensor of the second aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within the second viewed area of the second remote sensor.

18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

displaying, by the weapon display of the weapon, a third viewed area of a third remote sensor of a third aerial vehicle when the predicted impact point is within a third viewed area of the third remote sensor.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the predicted impact point of the weapon is based on at least one of: a ballistic information in a data store associated with the weapon, elevation data received from an inertial measurement unit, azimuth data received from a magnetic compass, and position data received from a position determining component.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the predicted impact point of the weapon further comprises:

determining, by the fire control controller, a position and orientation of the weapon; and

utilizing, by the fire control controller, a ballistic lookup table based on the determined position and orientation of the weapon.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 069113/0683 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 28, 2023
From: MCNEIL, JOHN C.; COX, EARL CLYDE; UENO, MAKOTO; ROSS, JON ANDREW
To: AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 065685/0285 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 18104718 · Feb 1, 2023
Continuation 17399273 · Aug 11, 2021
Continuation 16728324 · Dec 27, 2019
Continuation 16279876 · Feb 19, 2019
Continuation 15730250 · Oct 11, 2017
Continuation 14530486 · Oct 31, 2014
Provisional Application 61898342 · Oct 31, 2013
Related Publication 20240093966A1 · Mar 21, 2024
References Cited (39)
US 6037899A · Weber · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7623676B2 · Zhao · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7746391B2 · Kinney · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8275544B1 · Wells · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8408115B2 · Barger · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8660338B2 · Ma · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8788121B2 · Klinger · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8939081B1 · Smith · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9022324B1 · Abhyanker · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9508263B1 · Teng · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9696430B2 · Park · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10539394B1 · McNeil et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11592267B2 · McNeil et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040092258A1 · Hibbs · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050118952A1 · Cox · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070242135A1 · Rosenblum · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080207209A1 · Katori · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080290164A1 · Papale · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090320585A1 · Cohen · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100017046A1 · Cheung · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100228406A1 · Hamke et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110144828A1 · Chengalva · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110204145A1 · Odhner · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110315817A1 · Miralles · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120105634A1 · Meidan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120145786A1 · Weaver · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130021475A1 · Canant · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130248647A1 · Ell et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012730A1 · Jarrell · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160216072A1 · McNeil · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160252325A1 · Sammut · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160305745A1 · Peebles · 2016 [cited by examiner]
CA 2928840C · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009173263A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012121735A1 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
Document received of “Potential Prior Art for AV” on Dec. 9, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT/US14/63537, mailed Mar. 11, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Li Bing, Liu Rongyuan, Liu Suhong, eta!. Monitoring vegetation coverage variation of winter wheat by low-altitude UAVremotesensing system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions… [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 11201603140W mailed Mar. 1, 2017. [cited by applicant]