IP Library Granted Patent US 12,213,765
Granted Patent B2
US 12,213,765 · App. 18/524,743 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Photodetector calibration of an optical measurement system

Inventors: Sebastian Sorgenfrei (Playa Vista, CA); Ryan Field (Culver City, CA); Bruno Do Valle (Brighton, MA); Isai Olvera (South Portland, ME); Jacob Dahle (Arlington, MA); Husam Katnani (Braintree, MA)
Assignee: HI LLC
A61B5/0082A61B5/4064A61B5/6803A61B5/7217A61B2560/0223A61B2560/0443A61B2562/046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,213,765
App. No.
18/524,743
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An illustrative optical measurement system includes a light source configured to emit light directed at a target, an array of photodetectors configured to detect photons of the light after the light is scattered by the target, and a processing unit configured to measure a noise level of a photodetector included in the array of photodetectors, the noise level comprising a dark count rate that measures a dark count divided by a time period, determine that the noise level meets a predetermined threshold comprising a dark count rate threshold, and prevent, based on the determining that the noise level meets the predetermined threshold, an output of the photodetector from being used in generating a histogram based on a temporal distribution of photons detected by the array of photodetectors, the preventing comprising switching the output to a monitoring circuit that monitors a characteristic of the optical measurement system separate from the photodetector.

Claims (45)

1. An optical measurement system comprising:

a light source configured to emit light directed at a target;

an array of photodetectors configured to detect photons of the light after the light is scattered by the target; and

a processing unit configured to:

measure a noise level of a photodetector included in the array of photodetectors, the noise level comprising a dark count rate that measures a dark count divided by a time period;

determine that the noise level meets a predetermined threshold comprising a dark count rate threshold; and

prevent, based on the determining that the noise level meets the predetermined threshold, an output of the photodetector from being used in generating a histogram based on a temporal distribution of photons detected by the array of photodetectors, the preventing comprising switching the output to a monitoring circuit that monitors a characteristic of the optical measurement system separate from the photodetector.

2. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a plurality of counting circuits each corresponding to a different photodetector of the array of photodetectors, the plurality of counting circuits including a counting circuit for the photodetector;

wherein the measuring of the dark count rate of the photodetector comprises directing the counting circuit to count output signals from the photodetector during a predetermined period of time while the light source is not emitting the light.

3. The optical measurement system of claim 2 , wherein the processing unit is further configured to:

measure a dark count rate for each photodetector of the array of photodetectors using the plurality of counting circuits during the predetermined period of time; and

prevent an output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has a dark count rate above the predetermined threshold from being used in generating the histogram.

4. The optical measurement system of claim 3 , further comprising:

a one-time programmable memory configured to store data representative of each photodetector having a dark count rate that is above the predetermined threshold;

wherein the processing unit is further configured to periodically measure the dark count rate for each photodetector not represented in the one-time programmable memory as having the dark count rate that is above the predetermined threshold.

5. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the measuring of the noise level of the photodetector comprises measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the photodetector.

6. The optical measurement system of claim 5 , further comprising a plurality of counting circuits each corresponding to a different photodetector of the array of photodetectors, the plurality of counting circuits including a counting circuit for the photodetector;

wherein the measuring of the SNR of the photodetector comprises directing the counting circuit to:

count output signals from the photodetector for a first predetermined period of time while the light source is not emitting light, and

count output signals from the photodetector for a second predetermined period of time while the light source is emitting a uniform light.

7. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , wherein the determining that the noise level meets the predetermined threshold comprises determining that the SNR is below the predetermined threshold.

8. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , wherein the processing unit is further configured to:

measure an SNR for each photodetector of the array of photodetectors using the plurality of counting circuits during the first and second predetermined periods of time; and

prevent an output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has an SNR below the predetermined threshold from being used in generating the histogram.

9. The optical measurement system of claim 8 , wherein the preventing the output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has an SNR below the predetermined threshold from being used in generating the histogram comprises switching the output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has an SNR below the predetermined threshold to the monitoring circuit.

10. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring circuit is configured to determine a temperature associated with the optical measurement system based on the noise level of the photodetector.

11. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring circuit is configured to determine a peak location of a light pulse emitted by the light source.

12. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring circuit is configured to determine an excess bias voltage of the photodetector.

13. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein each photodetector of the array of photodetectors comprises:

a single photon avalanche diode (SPAD); and

a fast gating circuit configured to arm and disarm the SPAD.

14. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the array of photodetectors is included in a wearable device configured to be worn by a user.

15. The optical measurement system of claim 14 , wherein the wearable device includes a head-mountable component configured to be worn on a head of a user.

16. A method comprising:

measuring a noise level of a photodetector of an optical measurement system, the noise level comprising a dark count rate that measures a dark count divided by a time period;

determining that the noise level meets a predetermined threshold comprising a dark count rate threshold; and

preventing, based on the determining that the noise level meets the predetermined threshold, an output of the photodetector from being used to determine a histogram based on a temporal distribution of photons detected by an array of photodetectors, the preventing comprising switching the output to a monitoring circuit that monitors a characteristic of the optical measurement system separate from the photodetector.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

measuring a dark count rate for each photodetector of the array of photodetectors using a plurality of counting circuits during the predetermined period of time; and

preventing an output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has a dark count rate above the predetermined threshold from being used in generating the histogram.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

measuring, periodically, the dark count rate for each photodetector not represented in a one-time programmable memory as having the dark count rate that is above the predetermined threshold, the one-time programmable memory configured to store data representative of each photodetector having a dark count rate that is above the predetermined threshold.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the preventing the output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has a dark count rate above the predetermined threshold from being used in generating the histogram comprises switching the output of each photodetector included in the array of photodetectors that has a dark count rate above the predetermined threshold to the monitoring circuit.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the monitoring circuit is configured to determine a temperature associated with the optical measurement system based on the noise level of the photodetector.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2023
From: SORGENFREI, SEBASTIAN; FIELD, RYAN; DO VALLE, BRUNO; OLVERA, ISAI; DAHLE, JACOB; KATNANI, HUSAM
To: HI LLC
Reel/Frame 065718/0713 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17202668 · Mar 16, 2021
Provisional Application 63070123 · Aug 25, 2020
Provisional Application 62992536 · Mar 20, 2020
Related Publication 20240099587A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (130)
US 5853370A · Chance et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5924982A · Chin · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6195580B1 · Grable · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6240309B1 · Yamashita et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6384663B2 · Cova et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6640133B2 · Yamashita et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6683294B1 · Herbert et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7356365B2 · Schurman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7547872B2 · Niclass et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7774047B2 · Yamashita et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7888973B1 · Rezzi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8026471B2 · Itzler · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8078250B2 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8082015B2 · Yodh et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8269563B2 · Ballantyne · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8518029B2 · Birmingham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8633431B2 · Kim · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8817257B2 · Herve · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9058081B2 · Baxter · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9076707B2 · Harmon · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9131861B2 · Ince et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9316735B2 · Baxter · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9401448B2 · Bienfang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9419635B2 · Kumar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9442201B2 · Schmand et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9529079B1 · Droz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9554738B1 · Gulati et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9574936B2 · Heinonen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9946344B2 · Ayaz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D817553S · Aaskov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9983670B2 · Coleman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D825112S · Saez · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10158038B1 · Do et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10340408B1 · Katnani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10424683B1 · Valle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515993B2 · Field et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10697829B2 · Delic · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10772561B2 · Donaldson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10809796B2 · Armstrong-Muntner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10912504B2 · Nakaji et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11006876B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11006878B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11213245B2 · Horstmeyer et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11903676B2 · Sorgenfrei · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20050059869A1 · Scharf et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070083097A1 · Fujiwara et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090012402A1 · Mintz et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100007413A1 · Herleikson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208675A1 · Shoureshi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120016635A1 · Brodsky et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130015331A1 · Birk · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130090541A1 · MacFarlane · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130300838A1 · Borowski et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130342835A1 · Blacksberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140191115A1 · Webster et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140217264A1 · Shepard · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140275891A1 · Muehlemann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150038811A1 · Asaka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150041625A1 · Dutton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150054111A1 · Niclass et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150077279A1 · Song et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150150505A1 · Kaskoun et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150327777A1 · Kostic et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150364635A1 · Bodlovic · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160057369A1 · Wolfe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160182902A1 · Guo et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160296168A1 · Abreu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160349368A1 · Stutz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170030769A1 · Clemens et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170052065A1 · Sharma et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170176596A1 · Shpunt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170179173A1 · Mandai et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170202518A1 · Furman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170281086A1 · Donaldson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170363467A1 · Clemens et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170367650A1 · Wallois et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180014741A1 · Chou · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180027196A1 · Yang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180033751A1 · Ban et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039053A1 · Kremer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180066986A1 · Kasai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180070830A1 · Sutin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180070831A1 · Sutin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089848A1 · Yang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180090536A1 · Mandai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180120152A1 · Leonardo · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180180473A1 · Clemens et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180192931A1 · Linden et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190113385A1 · Fukuchi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190120975A1 · Ouvrier-Buffet · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175068A1 · Everdell · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190355861A1 · Katnani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190363210A1 · Valle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190388018A1 · Horstmeyer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200060542A1 · Alford et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116838A1 · Erdogan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200196932A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200253479A1 · Nurmikko · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200315510A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337624A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200379095A1 · Kappel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200390358A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210186138A1 · Bartels et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Alayed, et al., Characterization of a Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy Prototype Using Low-Cost, Compact Single Photon Avalanche Detectors for Tissue Optics Applications, Sensors 2018, 18, 3680; doi:10.3390/s1… [cited by applicant]
Ban, et al., Kernel Flow: a high channel count scalable TD-fNIRS system, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie Proc. of SPIE vol. 11663, 116630B doi: 10.1117/12.2582888, Mar. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ban, et al., Kernel Flow: a high channel count scalable time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Biomedical-Optics on Jan. 18, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Contini, et al., Photon migration through a turbid slab described by a model based on diffusion approximation. I. Theory, Appl. Opt. 36(19), 4587 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Di Sieno, et al., Probe-hosted large area silicon photomultiplier and high-throughput timing electronics for enhanced performance time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(11), 6389 (202… [cited by applicant]
Fishburn, et al., Temporal Derivative Distribution Repair (TDDR): A motion correction method for fNIRS, Neuroimage. Jan. 1, 2019; 184: 171-179. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.025. [cited by applicant]
Huppert, et al., HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain, Appl. Opt. 48(10), D280 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Kienle, et al., Improved solutions of the steady-state and the time-resolved diffusion equations for reflectance from a semi-infinite turbid medium, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(1), 246 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Konugolu, et al., Broadband (600-1350 nm) Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectrometer for Clinical Use, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 22, No. 3, May/Jun. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Lacerenza, et al., Wearable and wireless time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy system for brain and muscle hemodynamic monitoring, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(10), 5934 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Lange, et al., Clinical Brain Monitoring with Time Domain Nirs: A Review and Future Perspectives, Applied Sciences 9(8), 1612 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Lange, et al., MAESTROS: A Multiwavelength Time-Domain NIRS System to Monitor Changes in Oxygenation and Oxidation State of Cytochrome-C-Oxidase, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 25(1), 1-12 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Martelli, et al., Optimal estimation reconstruction of the optical properties of a two-layered tissue phantom from time-resolved single-distance measurements, Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(11), 115001 (Nov. 2015). [cited by applicant]
Mora, et al., Fast silicon photomultiplier improves signal harvesting and reduces complexity in time-domain diffuse optics, Opt. Express 23(11), 13937 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Pifferi, et al., Performance assessment of photon migration instruments: the MEDPHOT protocol, Applied Optics, 44 (11), 2104-2114, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Prahl, Optical Absorption of Hemoglobin, http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/index.html, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Re, et al., Multi-channel medical device for time domain functional near infrared spectroscopy based on wavelength space multiplexing, Biomed. Opt. Express 4(10), 2231 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Renna, et al., Eight-Wavelength, Dual Detection Channel Instrument for Near-Infrared Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 25(1), 1-11 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Torricelli, et al., Time domain functional NIRS imaging for human brain mapping, Neurolmage 85, 28-50 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Depth-selective data analysis for time-domain fNIRS: moments vs. time windows, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(8), 4224 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Performance assessment of time-domain optical brain imagers, part 1: basic instrumental performance protocol, Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(8), 086010 (Aug. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Performance assessment of time-domain optical brain imagers, part 2: nEUROPt protocol, Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(8), 086012 (Aug. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wojtkiewicz, et al., Self-calibrating time-resolved near infrared spectroscopy, Biomed. Opt. Express 10(5), 2657 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Zucchelli, et al., Method for the discrimination of superficial and deep absorption variations by time domain fNIRS, 2013 OSA Dec. 1, 2013 | vol. 4, No. 12 | DOI:10.1364/BOE.4.002893 | Biomedical Optics Express 2893, 20… [cited by applicant]
“What are the advantages of multiplexing,” Blog, FiberWDM, Mar. 28, 2023. Retrieved on May 9, 2014 from https://www.fiberwdm.com/blog/what-are-the-advantages-of-multiplexing_b101. [cited by applicant]
Blair, Seraphine. “Multiplexing in modern communication: what it is & advantages,” Blog, JAK Electronics, Mar. 12, 2024. Retrieved on May 9, 2024 from https://www.jakelectronics.com/blog/multiplexing. [cited by applicant]
Nandalal, et al., “Multiplexing,” IntechOpen, Sep. 4, 2019. Retrieved on May 9, 2014 from https://www.jakelectronics.com/blog/multiplexing. [cited by applicant]