IP Library Granted Patent US 12,248,740
Granted Patent B2
US 12,248,740 · App. 18/531,167 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Interconnected digital engineering and certification ecosystem

Inventors: William Roper, Jr. (Charleston, SC); Christopher Benson (Charleston, SC); Long N. Phan (Charleston, SC); Alethea Duhon (Orlando, FL); Baha Abu Nojaim (Roslindale, MA); Sriram Krishnan (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Istari Digital, Inc.
G06F30/20G06F30/12G06F30/15G06F30/27G06F2221/2141
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,248,740
App. No.
18/531,167
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method includes receiving design and/or engineering data (D/E data) corresponding to a prototype representation of a product and transmitting one or more inputs derived from the D/E data to one or more digital engineering tools for processing. The method also includes receiving engineering-related data outputs from the one or more digital engineering tools and receiving data corresponding to one or more common validation and verification (V&V products). The method further includes identifying one or more requirements for the product based on the data corresponding to the one or more common V&V products; determining whether or not the one or more requirements have been satisfied; and presenting information corresponding to the engineering-related data outputs and/or the data corresponding to the one or more common V&V products. The method also includes receiving instructions from the user device, and performing one or more manipulations of the D/E data.

Claims (44)

1. A computer system-implemented method comprising:

receiving, from a user device, design and/or engineering data (D/E data) corresponding to a prototype representation of a first product;

transmitting, via an application programming interface (API) or software development kit (SDK), one or more inputs derived from the D/E data to two or more digital engineering tools for processing,

wherein the two or more digital engineering tools are provided by at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers,

wherein a first portion of the two or more digital engineering tools provided by a first provider of the at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers is not directly interoperable with a second portion of the two or more digital engineering tools provided by a second provider of the at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers, and

wherein the API or SDK is configured to interface with each of the two or more digital engineering tools to automatically enable interoperable use of multiple digital engineering tools in parallel;

receiving engineering-related data outputs from the two or more digital engineering tools;

storing, on a storage device, usage data representing the received D/E data, the one or more inputs transmitted to the two or more digital engineering tools for processing, and/or the engineering-related data outputs from the two or more digital engineering tools;

incorporating at least a portion of the usage data in a training dataset;

training a machine learning model based on the training dataset to generate an output; and

utilizing the output generated by the machine learning model to provide automated assistance to an individual for development of a second product.

2. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving data corresponding to one or more validation and verification (V&V) products associated with the first product, wherein the one or more V&V products are stored in a data resource that is external to the computer system;

identifying one or more requirements for the first product based on the data corresponding to the one or more V&V products; and

determining, based on the engineering-related data outputs and the data corresponding to the one or more V&V products, whether or not the one or more requirements have been satisfied.

3. The computer system-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the usage data further represents the received data corresponding to the one or more V&V products and/or the indication of whether or not the one or more requirements have been satisfied.

4. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises (i) an identification of a particular digital engineering tool of the two or more digital engineering tools for satisfying or assessing satisfaction of one or more requirements associated with the second product and/or (ii) an identification of one or more validation and verification (V&V) products relevant to the second product.

5. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises (i) one or more suggested inputs and/or parameters for running a model or simulation, and/or (ii) estimated results of a sensitivity analysis.

6. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises forecasted time requirements and/or cost requirements for developing the second product.

7. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises an identification of one or more previously designed solutions relevant to the second product.

8. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises an AI-generated design, model, task, and/or validation and verification (V&V) product.

9. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein at least a subset of the two or more digital engineering tools comprises model-based systems engineering (MBSE) tools, augmented reality (AR) tools, computer aided design (CAD) tools, data analytics tools, modeling and simulation (M&S) tools, product lifecycle management (PLM) tools, simulation engines, requirements models, electronics models, test-plan models, cost-models, schedule models, software modeling, supply-chain models, manufacturing models, cyber security models, multi-attribute trade-space tools, or mission effects models.

10. The computer system-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein both the first product and the second product are at least one of an aircraft, an automobile, a drug, a medical device, an industrial system, or a manufacturing process.

11. A computer system-implemented method comprising:

receiving, from a user device, design and/or engineering data (D/E data) corresponding to a prototype representation of a product;

applying a machine learning model to at least a portion of the received D/E data to generate an output;

utilizing the output generated by the machine learning model to provide automated assistance to an individual for development of the product, wherein the machine learning model is trained on usage data representing previously received D/E data, and/or previously received engineering-related digital engineering tool data outputs;

transmitting, via an application programming interface (API) or software development kit (SDK), one or more inputs derived from the D/E data and the output generated by the machine learning model to two or more digital engineering tools for processing,

wherein the two or more digital engineering tools are provided by at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers,

wherein a first portion of the two or more digital engineering tools provided by a first provider of the at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers is not directly interoperable with a second portion of the two or more digital engineering tools provided by a second provider of the at least two distinct digital engineering tool providers, and

wherein the API or SDK is configured to interface with each of the two or more digital engineering tools to automatically enable interoperable use of multiple digital engineering tools in parallel; and

receiving engineering-related data outputs from the two or more digital engineering tools.

12. A computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , comprising:

receiving data corresponding to one or more validation and verification (V&V) products associated with the product, wherein the one or more V&V products are stored in a data resource that is external to the computer system;

identifying one or more requirements for the product based on the data corresponding to the one or more V&V products; and

determining, based on the engineering-related data outputs and the data corresponding to the one or more V&V products, whether or not the one or more requirements have been satisfied.

13. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the usage data further represents previously received data corresponding to one or more validation and verification (V&V) products and/or an indication of whether or not one or more previously determined requirements have been satisfied.

14. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises (i) an identification of a particular digital engineering tool of the two or more digital engineering tools for satisfying or assessing satisfaction of one or more requirements associated with the product and/or (ii) an identification of one or more validation and verification (V&V) products relevant to the product.

15. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises (i) one or more suggested inputs and/or parameters for running a model or simulation, and/or (ii) estimated results of a sensitivity analysis.

16. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises forecasted time requirements and/or cost requirements for developing the product.

17. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises an identification of one or more previously designed solutions relevant to the product.

18. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the output generated by the machine learning model comprises an AI-generated design, model, task, and/or validation and verification (V&V) product.

19. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein at least a subset of the two or more digital engineering tools comprises model-based systems engineering (MBSE) tools, augmented reality (AR) tools, computer aided design (CAD) tools, data analytics tools, modeling and simulation (M&S) tools, product lifecycle management (PLM) tools, simulation engines, requirements models, electronics models, test-plan models, cost-models, schedule models, software modeling, supply-chain models, manufacturing models, cyber security models, multi-attribute trade-space tools, or mission effects models.

20. The computer system-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the product is at least one of an aircraft, an automobile, a drug, a medical device, an industrial system, or a manufacturing process.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 25, 2024
From: ISTARI, INC.
To: ISTARI DIGITAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 067055/0822 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 21, 2023
From: ROPER, WILLIAM, JR.; BENSON, CHRISTOPHER; PHAN, LONG N.; DUHON, ALETHEA; NOJAIM, BAHA ABU; KRISHNAN, SRIRAM
To: ISTARI, INC.
Reel/Frame 065930/0551 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 18459860 · Sep 1, 2023
Continuation 17973142 · Oct 25, 2022
Provisional Application 63419051 · Oct 25, 2022
Related Publication 20240135063A1 · Apr 25, 2024
References Cited (111)
US 9439072B2 · Moon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9751625B2 · Phan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9751626B2 · Phan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9764837B2 · Phan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9902495B2 · Phan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10017266B2 · Phan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10035596B2 · Phan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10065726B1 · Phan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10198011B2 · DeBitetto et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10266262B2 · Phan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10308358B2 · Phan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10400840B2 · Davis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10469007B2 · Nayfeh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10571932B2 · DeBitetto et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10853536B1 · Steingrimsson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11775707B1 · Roper, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20080228521A1 · Wilmering · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20120201477A1 · Jesneck et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130011078A1 · Phan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140044340A1 · Phan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140142881A1 · Storm · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20200226220A1 · Eck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220067249A1 · Steingrimsson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230028912A1 · Steingrimsson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240135058A1 · Roper, Jr. et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240135059A1 · Roper, Jr. et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240135061A1 · Roper, Jr. et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240135071A1 · Roper, Jr. et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Palau CE, Fortino G, Montesinos M, Giménez P, Markarian G, Castay V, Fuart F, Pawłowski W, Mortara M, Bassi A, Gevers F. Introduction to interoperability for heterogeneous IoT platforms. Interoperability of Heterogeneou… [cited by examiner]
Oertel M, Josko B. Interoperable requirements engineering: tool independent specification, validation and impact analysis. InEmbedded World 2012 Exhibition and Conference 2012 (pp. 3-7). (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Aaf.dau.edu [online], “Major Capability Acquisition (MCA),” available on or before Dec. 7, 2020, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://aaf.dau.edu/aaf/mca>, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aaf.dau.edu [online], “Technical Reviews and Risk Assessments,” available on or before Jan. 21, 2021, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://aaf.dau.edu/aaf/mca/tech-reviews/>, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Binance.com [online], “logo Algorand (ALGO),” Jun. 21, 2019, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://research.binance.com/en/projects/algorand>, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
coinbureau.com [online], “Algorand Review: Is Algo the Future of Finance?,” Jan. 23, 2024, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://www.coinbureau.com/review/algorand>, 53 pages. [cited by applicant]
Daytonaero.com [online], “Airworthiness Circular, SUAS AW Assessments,” Jul. 31, 2020, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://daytonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/AC-20-02.pdf>, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Daytonaero.com [online], “United States Air Force (USAF) Airworthiness Bulletin (AWB)-350,” Jul. 31, 2020, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://daytonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/AWB-350.pdf>, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Defense Acquisition University [online], “Technical Reviews Across the Acquisition Lifecycle,” Sep. 3, 2021, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hplD891ZYuE>, 147 pages. [cited by applicant]
Developer.apple.com [online], “App Sandbox,” available on or before Apr. 5, 2020, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/app_sandbox>, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Euromoney.com [online], “What is blockchain?” Feb. 29, 2020, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://www.euromoney.com/learning/blockchain-explained/what-is-blockchain>, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
La Rocca, “Knowledge based engineering: Between AI and CAD. Review of a language based technology to support engineering design,” Advanced engineering informatics, Apr. 2012, 26(2):159-179 (Abstract Only). [cited by applicant]
Macstories.net [online], “The Initial iphone SDK,” Mar. 15, 2018, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://www.macstories.net/stories/the-initial-iphone-sdk/>, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Medium.com [online], “K-Scripts: The fastest and most flexible way to articulate a user experience,” Oct. 6, 2016, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://medium.com/@bladekotelly/k-scripts-the-fastest-and… [cited by applicant]
Pergatory.mit.edu [online], “FUNdaMENTALS of Design Topic 2 Creating Ideas,” Jan. 1, 2008, retrieved on May 28, 2024, retrieved from URL<https://pergatory.mit.edu/resources/FUNdaMENTALs%20Book%20pdf/FUNdaMENTALs%20Topic… [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Chapter II in International Appln. No. PCT/US2023/077750, mailed on Nov. 7, 2024, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
[No Author Listed], “Advisory Circular,” U.S. Dept. of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, Oct. 2014, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ansys [online], “Ansys Systems Tool Kit (STK),” retrieved online Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.ansys.com/products/missions/ansys-stk#tab 1-2>, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ansys [online], “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.ansys.com/technology-trends/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-deep-learni… [cited by applicant]
Benson et al., “Data-Driven Investment Decision-Making: Applying Moore's Law and S-Curves to Business Strategies,” White Paper, May 2018, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]
Benson et al., “On Improvement Rates for Renewable Energy Technologies: Solar PV, Wind Turbines, Capacitors, and Batteries,” Renewable Energy, Aug. 2014, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Benson et al., “Quantitative Determination of Technological Improvement from Patent Data,” PLoS One, Apr. 2015, 10(4), 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Central Drugs Standard Control Organization [online], “About CDSCO,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/opencms/en/Home/>, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Part 25, “Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes,” Federal Aviation Administration, DOT, Jan. 2021, 276 pages. [cited by applicant]
Construction Products Regulation (CPR) [online], “CPR / EN 1090,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.eco-cert.it/en/servizi/en-1090-certification-for-steel-or-aluminium-structural-components/>, … [cited by applicant]
Dassault Systèmes [online], “Cameo Systems Modeler,” retrieved on Nov. 11, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/no-magic/cameo-systems-modeler/>, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dassault Systèmes [online], “Solidworks 3D CAD Software,” retrieved on Nov. 16, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.solidworks.com/product/solidworks-3d-cad>, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Defense Acquisition University, “Defense Acquisition System: DoD 5000 Policies,” retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://aaf.dau.edu/aaf/policies/>, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Department of Defense, “Military Handbook 516C: Airworthiness Certification Criteria,” Department of Defense Handbook, Dec. 12, 2014, 527 pages. [cited by applicant]
Doyle et al., “LLIMAS: Revolutionizing Integrating Modeling and Analysis at MIT Lincoln Laboratory,” Optomechanical Engineering 2017, Aug. 2017, 10371(1), 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Federal Aviation Administration, “Aeroelastic Stability Substantiation of Transport Category Airplanes,” Advisory Circular, AC No. 25.629-18, Oct. 27, 2014, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Federal Communications Commission [online], “Equipment Authorization Procedures,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.fcc.gov/general/equipment-authorization-procedures-0#:˜:text=A%20Declaration%… [cited by applicant]
Ferguson, “Seven Ways in Which Artificial Intelligence Will Change Engineering Forever,” Siemens, Feb. 14, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Flaherty et al., “Solid geometry morphing for specialized optomechanical design using LLIMAS,” Optomechanics and Optical Alignment, Aug. 20121, 11816(1), 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fox et al., “Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons,” Rand Project Air Force, 2004, 233 pages. [cited by applicant]
Garrick et al., “Historical development of aircraft flutter,” J. Aircr., Nov. 1981, 18(11):897-912. [cited by applicant]
Goatboy29 [online], “MachUp—Free Online Aircraft Design Program,” FliteTest.com, retrieved on Nov. 16, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.flitetest.com/articles/machup-free-online-aircraft-design-program>, May 25, 20… [cited by applicant]
Goodwins, “114 Billion Transistors, One Big Meh. Apple's M1 Ultra Wake-up Call,” The Register, Mar. 14, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
GovInfo.gov [online], “Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes,” 2021, retrieved on Jul. 19, 2023, retrieved from URL<https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2021-title14-vol1/pdf/CFR-2021-title14-vol1-par… [cited by applicant]
Hart, “Introduction to Model-Based System Engineering (MBSE) and SysML,” Delaware Valley INCOSE Chapter Meeting, Jul. 30, 2015, 43 pages. [cited by applicant]
IBM [online], “IBM Doors,” retrieved online Nov. 16, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.ibm.com/products/requirements-management>, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) [online], “About IECEE,” IEC System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components (IECEE), retrieved online Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from … [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “IEC 60601-1-11:2015; Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1-11: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance—Collateral Standard: Requirements for Medical… [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “IEC 62304:2006; Medical Device Software—Software Life Cycle Processes,” First Edition, May 2006, 10 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 10204:2017; Iron Ores—Determination of Magnesium—Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Method,” Fourth Edition, Jul. 2017, 2 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 10993-1:2018; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process,” Fifth Edition, Aug. 2018, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 11135:2014; Sterilization of Health-Care products—Ethylene oxide—Requirements for the Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medic… [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 11137-3:2017; Sterilization of Health Care Products—Radiation—Part 3: Guidance on Dosimetric Aspects of Development, Validation and Routine Control,” Second Edition, … [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 11607-1:2019; Packaging for Terminally Sterilized Medical Devices—Part 1: Requirements for Materials, Sterile Barrier Systems and Packaging Systems,” Second Edition, … [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 13485:2016; Medical devices—Quality management Systems - Requirements for Regulatory Purposes,” 3rd Edition, Mar. 2016, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 14004:2016; Environmental Management Systems—General Guidelines on Implementation,” Third Edition, Mar. 2016, 9 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 14971:2019; Medical Devices—Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices,” Third Edition, Dec. 2019, 18 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 15223-1:2021; Medical Devices—Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the Manufacturer—Part 1: General Requirements,” Fourth Edition, Jul. 2021, 8 pages… [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 9001:2015; Quality Management Systems—Requirements,” Fifth Edition, Sep. 2015, 6 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Organization for Standardization, “ISO 9013:2017; Thermal Cutting—Classification of Thermal Cuts—Geometrical Product Specification and Quality Tolerances,” Third Edition, Feb. 2017, 6 pages (partial copy). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2023/77750, mailed on Mar. 1, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Trade Administration [online], “Certifying Your Product with CE Marking,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.trade.gov/ce-marking, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kevan [online], “Can AI Take Simulation to a New Level?” Digital Engineering 247, retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.digitalengineering247.com/article/can-ai-take-simulation-to-a-new-level/>, No… [cited by applicant]
Leonardo R. [online], “ANSYS and NVIDIA: Closing the Gap between CAE and GAMES,” Linkedin.com, retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/early-guess-breaking-boundary-between-cae-gam… [cited by applicant]
Light et al., “Trends in U.S. Air Force Aircraft Mishap Rates (1950-2018), ” Rand Corporation, Jan. 2020, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
ll.mit.edu [online], “Air, Missile, And Maritime Defense Technology,” 2022, retrieved on Jul. 19, 2023, retrieved from URL<https://www.ll.mit.edu/r-d/air-missile-and-maritime-defense-technology>, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
ll.mit.edu [online], “Flight Test Facility, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,” 2022, retrieved on Jul. 19, 2023, retrieved from URL<https://www.ll.mit.edu/about/facilities/flight-test-facility>,… [cited by applicant]
ll.mit.edu [online], “Lincoln Laboratory Supercomputing Center,” 2022, retrieved on Jul. 19, 2023, retrieved from URL <https://www.ll.mit.edu/about/facilities/lincoln-laboratory-supercomputing-center>, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mitre.org [online], “Systems Engineerings Innovation Center,” retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL: <https://www.mitre.org/publications/systems-engineering-guide/se-lifecycle-building-blocks/test-and-evaluatio… [cited by applicant]
Mobin et al., “An approach for design Verification and Validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Oct. 2019, 190: 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, “Final Report,” Mar. 2021, 756 pages. [cited by applicant]
NVIDIA.Developer [online], “CUDA Toolkit,” retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit>, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oertel et al., “Paper: Interoperable Requirements Engineering: Tool Independent Specification, Validation and Impact Analysis,” Paper, Presented at Proceedings of the Embedded World 2012 Exhibition and Conference, Nurem… [cited by applicant]
OSLC [online], “Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration,” retrieved online Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://open-services.net/>, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Palau et al., “Introduction to Interoperability for Heterogeneous IoT Platforms,” Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Dec. 2021, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT [online], “ThingWorx IIOT Platform,” retrieved on Nov. 16, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.ptc.com/en/resources/iiot/product-brief/thingworx-platform>, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
PTC [online], “Vuforia: Market-Leading Enterprise AR,” retrieved on Nov. 11, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.ptc.com/en/products/vuforia>, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Roper [online], “Exclusive: AI Just Controlled a Military Plane for the First Time Ever,” Popular Mechanics, retrieved Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a34978872/arti… [cited by applicant]
Roper, “Bending the Spoon: Guidebook for Digital Engineering,” Jan. 19, 2021, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Roper, “There is No Spoon: The New Digital Acquisition Reality,” Oct. 7, 2020, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Siemens [online], “TeamCenter Software,” retrieved on Nov. 16, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/products/teamcenter/>, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Dept. of Commerce, “Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations,” NIST Special Publication 800-53, Revision 5, Sep. 2020, 492 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Food and Drug Administration [online], “Development & Approval Process | Drugs,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs>, Aug. 8, 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission [online], “General Certificate of Conformity,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/Testing-Certification/General-… [cited by applicant]
Unreal Engine 5 [online], “Unreal Engine API Reference,” Unreal Engine 5 Early Access Documentation, retrieved on Nov. 10, 2022, retrieved from <https://docs.unrealengine.com/5.0/en-US/API/>, 67 pages. [cited by applicant]
Voss et al., “Investigation on flutter stability of the DLR-F19/SACCON configuration,” Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 93:105320, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia [online], “Systems Modeling Language,” Wikipedia reference, retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems Modeling Language>, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
WSO2 [online], “WSO2 API Manager,” retrieved on Nov. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://wso2.com/api-manager/, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]