IP Library Granted Patent US 12,148,411
Granted Patent B2
US 12,148,411 · App. 18/540,515 · Granted Nov 19, 2024

System and method for providing a quiet zone

Inventors: Bradley M. Starobin (Baltimore, MD); Matthew Lyons (York, PA); Stuart W. Lumsden (Ruxton, MD); Michael DiTullo (Encinitas, CA)
Assignee: SOUND UNITED, LLC.
G10K11/17821G08B19/00G10K11/17817G10K11/17823G10K11/1783G10K11/17853G10K11/17857G10K11/17875G10K11/17881G10K11/17885H04L12/2832H04L12/4625H04R27/00H04S7/303H04L2012/2849H04R2227/003H04R2227/005H04S2400/13
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,148,411
App. No.
18/540,515
Granted
Nov 19, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for quieting unwanted sound. As a non-limiting example, various aspects of this disclosure provide a system and method, for example implemented in a premises-based or home audio system, for quieting unwanted sound at a particular location.

Claims (54)

1. A system comprising:

a microphone configured to receive an unwanted audio signal;

a processor configured to generate a cancellation signal; and

a speaker configured to output the cancellation signal to counteract, at least in part, the unwanted sound, wherein:

the unwanted audio signal corresponds to a predetermined frequency band,

the source of the unwanted audio signal is at a distance away from the microphone,

a length of the distance is at least one fourth of a wavelength of a lowest frequency of the predetermined frequency band, and

to generate the cancellation signal, the processor is configured to:

filter the unwanted audio signal to pass the predetermined frequency band,

determine a relationship between a local audio signal and the filtered unwanted audio signal, and

generate the cancellation signal according to the local audio signal and the relationship.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein to determine the relationship, the processor is configured to:

generate a test stimulus signal to cause the speaker to output a test sound; and

analyze the test stimulus signal and a test sound, received by the microphone, to determine a functional relationship between the test stimulus signal and the received test sound.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a pseudo-random noise signal comprising a pink noise signal.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a swept frequency signal comprising frequencies in a range up to at least twice a quieting passband of the system.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein a magnitude of the cancellation signal is set 6-10 dB lower than a level determined for an ideal cancellation.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is operable to determine the relationship between the local audio signal and the filtered unwanted audio signal according to sound received by a plurality of microphones where each of the plurality of microphones is positioned at a respective fixed geographical location.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein each of the respective fixed geographical locations is within a same room of a premises.

8. A system comprising:

a plurality of microphones configured to receive a plurality of unwanted audio signals;

a processor configured to generate a cancellation signal; and

a speaker configured to output the cancellation signal to counteract, at least in part, the unwanted sound, wherein:

the plurality of unwanted audio signals corresponds to a predetermined frequency band,

the source of the plurality of unwanted audio signals is at a distance away from the microphone,

a length of the distance is at least one fourth of a wavelength of a lowest frequency of the predetermined frequency band, and

to generate the cancellation signal, the processor is configured to:

filter the plurality of unwanted audio signals to pass the predetermined frequency band,

determine a relationship between a local audio signal and the filtered plurality of unwanted audio signals, and

generate the cancellation signal according to the local audio signal and the relationship.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein each of the plurality of microphone is positioned within a same room of a premises.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is operable to determine the relationship by, at least in part, operating to:

generate a test stimulus signal to cause the speaker to output a test sound; and

analyze the test stimulus signal and a plurality of test sounds, received by the plurality of microphones, to determine a functional relationship between the test stimulus signal and the received plurality of test sounds.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a pseudo-random noise signal comprising a pink noise signal.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a swept frequency signal comprising frequencies in a range up to at least twice a quieting passband of the system.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein a magnitude of the cancellation signal is set 6-10 dB lower than a level determined for an ideal cancellation.

14. A system comprising:

a microphone;

a speaker; and

processor operable to:

receive, via the microphone, a unwanted sound, wherein the microphone is positioned at least one fourth of a particular wavelength away from a particular location;

filter the unwanted sound to pass a frequency band to be counteracted, wherein a lower frequency of the frequency band is determined by the particular wavelength;

determine a relationship between a local audio signal, at the particular location, and the filtered unwanted sound; and

generate, according to the local audio signal and the determined relationship, a cancellation signal that, when output by the speaker, will counteract, at least in part, the unwanted sound.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the processor is operable to determine the relationship by, at least in part, operating to:

generate a test stimulus signal to cause the speaker to output a test sound;

receive the test sound at the location; and

analyze the test stimulus signal and the received test sound to determine a functional relationship between the test stimulus signal and the received test sound.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a pseudo-random noise signal comprising a pink noise signal.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the test stimulus signal comprises a swept frequency signal comprising frequencies in a range up to at least twice a quieting passband of the audio system.

18. The system of claim 14 , wherein a magnitude of the cancellation signal is set 6-10 dB lower than a level determined for an ideal cancellation.

19. The system of claim 14 , wherein the processor is operable to determine the relationship according to sound received by a microphone that is outside a target zone of sound cancellation.

20. The system of claim 14 , wherein the processor is operable to determine the relationship according to sound received by a plurality of microphones positioned at fixed geographical locations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2024
From: STAROBIN, BRADLEY M.; LYONS, MATTHEW; LUMSDEN, STUART W.; DITULLO, MICHAEL
To: SOUND UNITED, LLC
Reel/Frame 067876/0658 →