IP Library Granted Patent US 12,480,914
Granted Patent B2
US 12,480,914 · App. 18/555,613 · Granted Nov 25, 2025

Adaptive ultrasonic inspection for volumetric flaws

Inventors: Benoit Lepage (L'Ancienne-Lorette, CA); Jinchi Zhang (Quebec, CA)
Assignee: Evident Canada, Inc.
G01N29/069G01N29/043G01N29/221G01N29/223G01N29/4463G01N29/262G01N2291/0289G01N2291/106G01N2291/2626
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,480,914
App. No.
18/555,613
Granted
Nov 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Acoustic evaluation of a target can be performed using an array of electro-acoustic transducers. For example, a technique for such evaluation can include generating acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures, the apertures defined by corresponding zones along the array, the zones including multiple electro-acoustic transducer elements. In response to the respective acoustic transmission events. respective acoustic echo signals are received. Representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals are coherently summed. The coherently summing includes applying determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a virtual probe normal to a nominal shape of a surface of a structure being inspected. A pixel or voxel value is corresponding to a specified spatial location within the structure being inspected is generated using the coherently summed representations.

Claims (47)

1 . A machine-implemented method for acoustic evaluation of a target using an array of electro-acoustic transducers, the method comprising:

generating respective acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures, the apertures defined by corresponding zones along the array, the zones including multiple electro-acoustic transducer elements;

in response to the respective acoustic transmission events, receiving respective acoustic echo signals, using receiving ones of the electro-acoustic transducer elements, to form a group of received acoustic echo signals, the group indexed by transmit-receive pairs including a respective transmit zone and a respective one of the receiving elements;

coherently summing representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals, the representations corresponding to the respective transmit-receive pairs, the coherently summing including applying determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a virtual probe normal to a nominal shape of a surface of a structure being inspected, and applying respective delay factor corrections to compensate for variation from the nominal shape or a nominal alignment of the surface of the structure with respect to the array of electro-acoustic transducers; and

generating a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location within the structure being inspected using the coherently summed representations.

2 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein generating the respective acoustic transmission events comprises generating at least three acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures corresponding to different zones.

3 . The machine-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the zones partially overlap.

4 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising determining the respective delay factor corrections using a single iteration.

5 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising determining the respective delay factors using respective apertures comprising two or more electro-acoustic transducer elements.

6 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals comprise A-scan representations.

7 . The machine-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein generating a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location on or within the structure being inspected includes generating an image of multiple spatial locations using respective coherent summations, the respective coherent summations including applying the determined nominal element delay factors and applying the respective delay factor corrections.

8 . The machine-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the structure under test is a bar.

9 . The machine-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the image represents a sector within a volume of the bar.

10 . The machine-implemented method of claim 9 , comprising performing another acquisition to form another group of received acoustic echo signals, the group indexed by transmit-receive pairs including the respective transmit zone and a respective one of the receiving elements, to generate another image of a different sector within the volume of the bar.

11 . The machine-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the performing another acquisition includes re-positioning the array or the structure under test to allow insonification of a different portion of a surface of the structure under test by the array.

12 . The machine-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the performing another acquisition includes using a second array configured to insonify a different portion of a surface of the structure under test.

13 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising generating an acoustic transmission event to excite a shear wave for imaging of a surface of the structure under test; and

wherein imaging the surface of the structure under test comprises coherently summing representations of respective received acoustic echo signals, and applying the determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a beam normal to the nominal shape of the surface of the structure being inspected, and applying respective delay factor corrections to compensate for variation from the nominal shape or the nominal alignment of the surface of the structure with respect to the array of electro-acoustic transducers; and

generating a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location on the structure being inspected using the coherently summed representations.

14 . An ultrasonic inspection system for acoustic evaluation of a target using an array of electro-acoustic transducers, the system comprising:

an analog front end comprising transmit and receive circuitry coupled to the array of electro-acoustic transducer elements;

a processor circuit communicatively coupled with the analog front end; an

a memory circuit comprising instructions that, when executed by the processor circuit, cause the system to:

generate respective acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures, the apertures defined by corresponding zones along the array, the zones including multiple electro-acoustic transducer elements;

in response to the respective acoustic transmission events, receive respective acoustic echo signals, using receiving ones of the electro-acoustic transducer elements, to form a group of received acoustic echo signals, the group indexed by transmit-receive pairs including a respective transmit zone and a respective one of the receiving elements;

coherently sum representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals, the representations corresponding to the respective transmit-receive pairs, the coherently summing including applying determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a beam normal to a nominal shape of a surface of a structure being inspected, and applying respective delay factor corrections to compensate for variation from the nominal shape or a nominal alignment of the surface of the structure with respect to the array of electro-acoustic transducers; and

generate a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location within the structure being inspected using the coherently summed representations.

15 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 14 , wherein the instructions to generate the respective acoustic transmission events comprises instructions to generate at least three acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures corresponding to different zones.

16 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 15 , wherein the zones partially overlap.

17 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 14 , further comprising instructions to determine the respective delay factor corrections using a single iteration.

18 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 14 , comprising determining the respective delay factors using respective apertures comprising two or more electro-acoustic transducer elements.

19 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 14 , wherein the representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals comprise A-scan representations.

20 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 19 , wherein the instructions to generate a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location on or within the structure being inspected includes instructions to generate an image of multiple spatial locations using respective coherent summations, the respective coherent summations including applying the determined nominal element delay factors and applying the respective delay factor corrections.

21 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 20 , wherein the structure under test is a bar.

22 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 21 , wherein the image represents a sector within a volume of the bar.

23 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 22 , comprising instructions to perform another acquisition to form another group of received acoustic echo signals, the group indexed by transmit-receive pairs including the respective transmit zone and a respective one of the receiving elements, to generate another image of a different sector within the volume of the bar.

24 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 23 , wherein the instructions to perform another acquisition includes instructions to re-position the array or the structure under test to allow insonification of a different portion of a surface of the structure under test by the array.

25 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 24 , wherein the instructions to perform another acquisition includes instructions to use a second array configured to insonify a different portion of a surface of the structure under test.

26 . The ultrasonic inspection system of claim 14 , comprising:

instructions to generate an acoustic transmission event to excite a shear wave for imaging of a surface of the structure under test; and

wherein imaging the surface of the structure under test comprises coherently summing representations of respective received acoustic echo signals, and applying the determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a beam normal to the nominal shape of the surface of the structure being inspected, and applying respective delay factor corrections to compensate for variation from the nominal shape or the nominal alignment of the surface of the structure with respect to the array of electro-acoustic transducers; and

instructions to generate a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location on the structure being inspected using the coherently summed representations.

27 . An ultrasonic inspection system for acoustic evaluation of a target using an array of electro-acoustic transducers, comprising:

a means for generating respective acoustic transmission events using different transmitting apertures, the apertures defined by corresponding zones along the array, the zones including multiple electro-acoustic transducer elements;

in response to the respective acoustic transmission events, means for receiving respective acoustic echo signals, using receiving ones of the electro-acoustic transducer elements, to form a group of received acoustic echo signals, the group indexed by transmit-receive pairs including a respective transmit zone and a respective one of the receiving elements;

a means for coherently summing representations of the respective received acoustic echo signals, the representations corresponding to the respective transmit-receive pairs, the coherently summing including applying determined nominal element delay factors to the respective representations to approximate a beam normal to a nominal shape of a surface of a structure being inspected, and applying respective delay factor corrections to compensate for variation from the nominal shape or a nominal alignment of the surface of the structure with respect to the array of electro-acoustic transducers; and

a means for generating a pixel or voxel value corresponding to a specified spatial location within the structure being inspected using the coherently summed representations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2023
From: LEPAGE, BENOIT; ZHANG, JINCHI
To: EVIDENT CANADA, INC.
Reel/Frame 065573/0717 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63201485 · Apr 30, 2021
Related Publication 20240369515A1 · Nov 7, 2024
References Cited (30)
US 7581444B2 · Maurer et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8596127B2 · Falter et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8767510B2 · Robert et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20130144170A1 · Chang et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20180055486A1 · Tsushima · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200046323A1 · Tanaka · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220155440A1 · Kruse · 2022 [cited by examiner]
JP 2004109129 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007147544 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007216003 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010145114 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012239813 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013156277 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019039902 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 7730923 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022226638A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 22794138.2, Response filed Dec. 29, 2023 to Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EP”, 1 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 22794138.2, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 9, 2024”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-566679, Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Nov. 18, 2024”, w English Translation, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-566679, Response filed Feb. 14, 2025 to Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Nov. 18, 2024”, W English Claims, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,217,829, Examiners Rule 86(2) Report mailed Jan. 31, 2025”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2022/050633, International Search Report mailed Jun. 30, 2022”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2022/050633, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 30, 2022”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Video images for Inspect Complex Geometry with the FOCUS PX System and Coherent Adaptive Focusing Technology”, youtube.com, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkdkblmHT5Q&featu… [cited by applicant]
Beardsley, B, et al., “A Simple Scheme for Self-Focusing of an Array, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation”, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 14, No. 4, (1995), 169-179. [cited by applicant]
Lamarre, Andre, et al., “Coherent Adaptive Focusing Technology for the Inspection of Variable Geometry Composite Material”, 10th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: … [cited by applicant]
Mahaut, “Development of phased array techniques to improve characterization of defect located in a component of complex geometry”, Ultrasonics, vol. 40, Issues 1-8, (2002), 165-169. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,217,829, Response filed May 13, 2025 to Examiners Rule 86(2) Report mailed Jan. 31, 2025”, w English Claims, 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-566679, Final Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed May 27, 2025”, w English translation, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-566679, Response filed Jul. 2, 2025 to Final Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed May 27, 2025”, w english claims, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]