IP Library Granted Patent US 12,226,187
Granted Patent B2
US 12,226,187 · App. 18/588,846 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Estimation of source-detector separation in an optical measurement system

Inventors: Ryan Field (Culver City, CA); Katherine Perdue (Los Angeles, CA); Hamid Dehghani (Birmingham, GB)
Assignee: HI LLC
A61B5/0082A61B5/4064A61B5/6803G01B11/14A61B2562/0238A61B2576/026
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,226,187
App. No.
18/588,846
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An optical measurement system includes a light source configured to emit a first light pulse and a second light pulse toward a target, a detector, and a processing unit. The first light pulse has a first wavelength and the second light pulse has a second wavelength different from the first wavelength. The processing unit is configured to determine a plurality of temporal distributions of photons included in the first light pulse and the second light pulse and detected by the detector after the photons are scattered by the target, and determine, based on the plurality of temporal distributions and a source-detector distance estimation model, a distance between the light source and the detector.

Claims (36)

1. An optical measurement system comprising:

a light source configured to emit a first light pulse and a second light pulse toward a target, the first light pulse having a first wavelength and the second light pulse having a second wavelength different from the first wavelength;

a detector; and

a processing unit configured to:

determine a plurality of temporal distributions of photons included in the first light pulse and the second light pulse and detected by the detector after the photons are scattered by the target, and

determine, based on the plurality of temporal distributions and a source-detector distance estimation model, a distance between the light source and the detector.

2. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of temporal distributions comprises:

a first temporal distribution of a first set of photons included in the first light pulse and detected by the detector after the first set of photons are scattered by the target; and

a second temporal distribution of a second set of photons included in the second light pulse and detected by the detector after the second set of photons are scattered by the target.

3. The optical measurement system of claim 2 , wherein:

the processing unit is further configured to determine, based on the first temporal distribution and the second temporal distribution, a difference between a peak arrival time of the first set of photons and a peak arrival time of the second set of photons, and

determine the distance between the light source and the detector based on the difference between the peak arrival time of the first set of photons and the peak arrival time of the second set of photons.

4. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the source-detector distance estimation model is based on a relationship of a source-detector distance to a difference between a peak arrival time of photons detected by the detector and having the first wavelength and photons detected by the detector and having the second wavelength.

5. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the detector is not inline with the light source and an additional light source.

6. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a first wearable module comprising a first housing and the light source housed within the first housing; and

a second wearable module comprising a second housing and the detector housed within the second housing.

7. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , wherein the second wearable module is movable relative to the first wearable module.

8. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , wherein the first wearable module and the second wearable module are included in a head-mountable component configured to be worn on a head of a user.

9. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , wherein the processing unit is housed in one or more of the first housing or the second housing.

10. The optical measurement system of claim 6 , further comprising a third housing separate from the first housing and the second housing,

wherein the processing unit is housed in the third housing and communicatively coupled with the detector by way of a wired or wireless communication link.

11. The optical measurement system of claim 10 , wherein the third housing is wearable by a user.

12. The optical measurement system of claim 1 , wherein the target comprises a brain of a user.

13. A method comprising:

directing, by an optical measurement system, a light source to emit a first light pulse toward a target, the first light pulse having a first wavelength;

directing, by the optical measurement system, the light source to emit a second light pulse toward the target, the second light pulse having a second wavelength that is different from the first wavelength;

determining, by the optical measurement system, a plurality of temporal distributions of photons included in the first light pulse and the second light pulse and detected by a detector after the photons are scattered by the target; and

determining, by the optical measurement system based on the plurality of temporal distributions and a source-detector distance estimation model, a distance between the light source and the detector.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of temporal distributions comprises:

a first temporal distribution of a first set of photons included in the first light pulse and detected by the detector after the first set of photons are scattered by the target; and

a second temporal distribution of a second set of photons included in the second light pulse and detected by the detector after the second set of photons are scattered by the target.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

determining, by the optical measurement system based on the first temporal distribution and the second temporal distribution, a difference between a peak arrival time of the first set of photons and a peak arrival time of the second set of photons,

wherein the determining of the distance between the light source and the detector is based on the difference between the peak arrival time of the first set of photons and the peak arrival time of the second set of photons.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the source-detector distance estimation model is based on a relationship of a source-detector distance to a difference between a peak arrival time of detected photons having the first wavelength and a peak arrival time of detected photons having the second wavelength.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2024
From: FIELD, RYAN; PERDUE, KATHERINE; DEHGHANI, HAMID
To: HI LLC
Reel/Frame 066580/0378 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17176448 · Feb 16, 2021
Provisional Application 63071473 · Aug 28, 2020
Provisional Application 62992543 · Mar 20, 2020
Provisional Application 62979866 · Feb 21, 2020
Related Publication 20240197185A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (116)
US 5853370A · Chance et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6240309B1 · Yamashita et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6291824B1 · Battarbee et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6384663B2 · Cova et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6640133B2 · Yamashita et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6683294B1 · Herbert et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7356365B2 · Schurman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7547872B2 · Niclass et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7774047B2 · Yamashita et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8026471B2 · Itzler · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8078250B2 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8082015B2 · Yodh et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8518029B2 · Birmingham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8633431B2 · Kim · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8817257B2 · Herve · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9058081B2 · Baxter · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9076707B2 · Harmon · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9131861B2 · Ince et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9316735B2 · Baxter · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9401448B2 · Bienfang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9419635B2 · Kumar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9442201B2 · Schmand et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9529079B1 · Droz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9574936B2 · Heinonen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9946344B2 · Ayaz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D817553S · Aaskov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D825112S · Saez · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10158038B1 · Do et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10340408B1 · Katnani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10424683B1 · Valle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515993B2 · Field et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10697829B2 · Delic · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10772561B2 · Donaldson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10809796B2 · Armstrong-Muntner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10912504B2 · Nakaji et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11006876B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11006878B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11903676B2 · Sorgenfrei et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11950879B2 · Field · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020033454A1 · Cheng et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20070083097A1 · Fujiwara et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090012402A1 · Mintz et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100188649A1 · Prahl et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208675A1 · Shoureshi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130342835A1 · Blacksberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140191115A1 · Webster et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140217264A1 · Shepard et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140275891A1 · Muehlemann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140343384A1 · Floyd · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150011848A1 · Ruchti · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150038811A1 · Asaka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150041625A1 · Dutton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150054111A1 · Niclass et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150077279A1 · Song et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150150505A1 · Kaskoun et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150327777A1 · Kostic et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150364635A1 · Bodlovic et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160057369A1 · Wolfe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170030769A1 · Clemens et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170052065A1 · Sharma et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170176596A1 · Shpunt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170179173A1 · Mandai et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170202518A1 · Furman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170281086A1 · Donaldson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170363467A1 · Clemens et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170367650A1 · Wallois et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180014741A1 · Chou · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180027196A1 · Yang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180033751A1 · Ban et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039053A1 · Kremer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180070830A1 · Sutin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180070831A1 · Sutin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089848A1 · Yang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190113385A1 · Fukuchi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175068A1 · Everdell · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190355861A1 · Katnani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190363210A1 · Valle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190388018A1 · Horstmeyer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200022581A1 · Vanegas · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200060542A1 · Alford et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116838A1 · Erdogan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200196932A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200253479A1 · Nurmikko · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200297222A1 · Shiono · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200315510A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337624A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200390358A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
FR 3011932A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012125370A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Alayed, et al., Characterization of a Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy Prototype Using Low-Cost, Compact Single Photon Avalanche Detectors for Tissue Optics Applications, Sensors 2018, 18, 3680; doi:10.3390/s1… [cited by applicant]
Ban, et al., Kernel Flow: a high channel count scalable TD-fNIRS system, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie Proc. of SPIE vol. 11663, 116630B doi: 10.1117/12.2582888, Mar. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ban, et al., Kernel Flow: a high channel count scalable time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Biomedical-Optics on Jan. 18, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Contini, et al., Photon migration through a turbid slab described by a model based on diffusion approximation. I. Theory, Appl. Opt. 36(19), 4587 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Di Sieno, et al., Probe-hosted large area silicon photomultiplier and high-throughput timing electronics for enhanced performance time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(11), 6389 (202… [cited by applicant]
Fishburn, et al., Temporal Derivative Distribution Repair (TDDR): A motion correction method for fNIRS, Neuroimage. Jan. 1, 2019; 184: 171-179. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.025. [cited by applicant]
Huppert, et al., HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain, Appl. Opt. 48(10), D280 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Kienle, et al., Improved solutions of the steady-state and the time-resolved diffusion equations for reflectance from a semi-infinite turbid medium, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(1), 246 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Konugolu, et al., Broadband (600-1350 nm) Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectrometer for Clinical Use, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 22, No. 3, May/Jun. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Lacerenza, et al., Wearable and wireless time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy system for brain and muscle hemodynamic monitoring, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(10), 5934 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Lange, et al., Clinical Brain Monitoring with Time Domain NIRS: A Review and Future Perspectives, Applied Sciences 9(8), 1612 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Lange, et al., Maestros: A Multiwavelength Time-Domain NIRS System to Monitor Changes in Oxygenation and Oxidation State of Cytochrome-C-Oxidase, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 25(1), 1-12 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Martelli, et al., Optimal estimation reconstruction of the optical properties of a two-layered tissue phantom from time-resolved single-distance measurements, Journal of Biomedical Optics 20(11), 115001 (Nov. 2015). [cited by applicant]
Mora, et al., Fast silicon photomultiplier improves signal harvesting and reduces complexity in time-domain diffuse optics, Opt. Express 23(11), 13937 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Pifferi, et al., Performance assessment of photon migration instruments: the MEDPHOT protocol, Applied Optics, 44 (11), 2104-2114, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Prahl, Optical Absorption of Hemoglobin, http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/index.html, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Re, et al., Multi-channel medical device for time domain functional near infrared spectroscopy based on wavelength space multiplexing, Biomed. Opt. Express 4(10), 2231 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Renna, et al., Eight-Wavelength, Dual Detection Channel Instrument for Near-Infrared Time-Resolved Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 25(1), 1-11 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Torricelli, et al., Time domain functional NIRS imaging for human brain mapping, NeuroImage 85, 28-50 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Depth-selective data analysis for time-domain fNIRS: moments vs. time windows, Biomed. Opt. Express 11(8), 4224 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Performance assessment of time-domain optical brain imagers, part 1: basic instrumental performance protocol, Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(8), 086010 (Aug. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wabnitz, et al., Performance assessment of time-domain optical brain imagers, part 2: nEUROPt protocol, Journal of Biomedical Optics 19(8), 086012 (Aug. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wojtkiewicz, et al., Self-calibrating time-resolved near infrared spectroscopy, Biomed. Opt. Express 10(5), 2657 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Zucchelli, et al., Method for the discrimination of superficial and deep absorption variations by time domain fNIRS, 2013 OSA Dec. 1, 2013 | vol. 4, No. 12 | DOI:10.1364/BOE.4.002893 | Biomedical Optics Express 2893, 20… [cited by applicant]
“What are the advantages of multiplexing,” Blog, FiberWDM, Mar. 28, 2023. Retrieved on May 9, 2014 from https://www.fiberwdm.com/blog/what-are-the-advantages-of-multiplexing_b101. [cited by applicant]
Blair, Seraphine. “Multiplexing in modern communication: what it is & advantages,” Blog, JAK Electronics, Mar. 12, 2024. Retrieved on May 9, 2024 from https://www.jakelectronics.com/blog/multiplexing. [cited by applicant]
Nandalal, et al., “Multiplexing,” IntechOpen, Sep. 4, 2019. Retrieved on May 9, 2014 from https://www.jakelectronics.com/blog/multiplexing. [cited by applicant]