IP Library Granted Patent US 12,359,346
Granted Patent B2
US 12,359,346 · App. 18/592,456 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Antibody libraries with maximized antibody developability characteristics

Inventors: Andrew Raymon Morton Bradbury (Santa Fe, NM); Michael Frank Erasmus (Santa Fe, NM); Andre Teixeira (Santa Fe, NM)
Assignee: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
C40B40/10C12N15/1037C12N15/81C40B40/08C40B50/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,359,346
App. No.
18/592,456
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Antibody libraries comprising a plurality of heavy chain variable domains and/or a plurality of light chain variable domains, which comprise complementary determining regions (CDRs) found in naturally-occurring human antibodies, and methods of making such antibody libraries. The antibody libraries are free of members that comprise one or more liabilities affecting one or more features of such members. Further, the antibody libraries comprise members having heavy chain and/or light chain CDRs not found in the same naturally-occurring human antibody.

Claims (32)

1. A method for producing an antibody library, the method comprising: providing:

(a) a first plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody heavy chain CDR1 fragments,

(b) a second plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody heavy chain CDR2 fragments,

(c) a third plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody heavy chain CDR3 fragments,

(d) a nucleic acid gene encoding amino acid sequences of an antibody heavy chain variable domain comprising a heavy chain CDR1 region, a heavy chain CDR2 region, and a heavy chain CDR3 region,

(e) a fourth plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody light chain CDR1 fragments,

(f) a fifth plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody light chain CDR2 fragments,

(g) a sixth plurality of nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of one or more naturally occurring human antibody light chain CDR3 fragments, and

(h) a nucleic acid gene encoding amino acid sequences of an antibody light chain variable domain comprising a light chain CDR1 region, a light chain CDR2 region, and a light chain CDR3 region;

inserting the first plurality of nucleic acids, the second plurality of nucleic acids, and the third plurality of nucleic acids into the heavy chain CDR1 region, the heavy chain CDR2 region, and the heavy chain CDR3 region, respectively, of the gene encoding the antibody heavy chain variable domain, thereby producing a population of nucleic acids encoding an antibody heavy chain variable domain library;

inserting the fourth plurality of nucleic acids, the fifth plurality of nucleic acids, and the sixth plurality of nucleic acids into the light chain CDR1 region, the light chain CDR2 region, and the light chain CDR3 region, respectively, of the gene encoding the antibody light chain variable domain, thereby producing a population of nucleic acids encoding an antibody light chain variable domain library; and

combining the population of nucleic acids encoding the antibody heavy chain variable domain library to the population of nucleic acids encoding an antibody light chain variable domain library, thereby producing an antibody library;

wherein the library comprises nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of a heavy chain framework region 1, a heavy chain framework region 2, a heavy chain framework region 3, and a heavy chain framework region 4;

wherein the library comprises nucleic acids encoding amino acid sequences of a light chain framework region 1, a light chain framework region 2, a light chain framework region 3, and a light chain framework region 4; and

a plurality of nucleic acids encoding a population of heavy chain domains comprising one or more CDR1s, one or more CDR2s, and one or more CDR3s located at the CDR1 region, the CDR2 region, and the CDR3 region of a heavy chain gene, respectively;

wherein at least 90% of the one or more heavy chain CDR1s and at least 90% of the one or more heavy chain CDR2s are free of amino acid sequence liabilities, wherein the amino acid sequence liabilities are: (i) a glycosylation site comprising the motif NXS, NXT, or NXC, in which X represents any naturally occurring amino acid residue except for proline; (ii) a deamidation site comprising the motif of NG, NS, NT, NN, NA, NH, ND, NQ, NF, NW or NY; (iii) an isomerization site comprising the motif of DT, DH, DS, DG, DN, DR, DY or DD; (iv) any cysteines; (v) net charge greater than 1; (vi) a tripeptide motif containing at least two residues with aromatic side chains comprising F, H, W or Y; (vii) a poly specificity site comprising the motif GG, GGG, RR, VG, W, WV, WW, WWW, YY, or WXW, in which X represents any amino acid residue; (viii) a protease sensitive or hydrolysis prone site comprising the motif of DX, in which X is P, G, S, V, Y, F, Q, K, L, or D; (ix) an integrin binding site comprising RGD, RYD, LDV, or KGD; (x) a lysine glycation site comprising KE, EK, or ED; (xi) a metal catalyzed fragmentation site comprising the motif of HS, SH, KT, HXS, or SXH, in which X represents any amino acid residue; (xii) a polyspecificity aggregation site comprising a motif of X.sub.1X.sub.2X.sub.3, wherein each of X.sub.1, X.sub.2, and X.sub.3 is independently selected from the group consisting of F, I, L, V, W and Y; (xiii) a streptavidin binding motif comprises the motif HPQ, EPDW (SEQ ID NO: 49), PWXWL (SEQ ID NO: 50), in which X represents any amino acid residue, GDWVFI (SEQ ID NO: 51), or PWPWLG (SEQ ID NO: 52); (xiv) one or more arginine residues; (xv) a hydrophobic CDR sequence; and/or (xvi) a CDR mutation that reduces binding to protein A said CDR mutation comprising any mutation in the last amino acid of the CDR2, according to the IMGT definition, to A, G, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, P, Q, S, V, W or Y;

wherein at least 90% of the one or more heavy chain CDR1s, at least 90% of the one or more heavy chain CDR2s, and at least 90% of the one or more heavy chain CDR3s are free of non-functional members; wherein functional members are well folded and can form well folded scFvs or Fabs;

wherein at least two of the heavy chain framework regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 are from a human, humanized or partially humanized heavy chain germline sequence;

wherein each heavy chain framework region and/or light chain framework region can contain up to five amino acid substitutions, and

wherein the nucleic acid sequences encoding the amino acid sequences of the one or more heavy chain CDR3s are from heavy chain CDR3s of human donor lymphocytes.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody heavy chain variable domain framework 1, framework 2, framework 3, framework 4 are from a human or humanized VH3-23 (DP-47) sequence.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody light chain variable domain framework 1, framework 2, framework 3, framework 4 are from a human or humanized kappa VK1-39 sequence.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody library is a fragment antigen-binding (Fab) library.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody library is a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) library.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first plurality of nucleic acids, the second plurality of nucleic acids, the third plurality of nucleic acids, the fourth plurality of nucleic acids, the fifth plurality of nucleic acids and the sixth plurality of nucleic acids is produced by a process comprising:

(a) obtaining amino acid sequences of the heavy chain CDR1 regions, heavy chain CDR2 regions, light chain CDR1 regions, light chain CDR2 regions, and light chain CDR3 regions of a population of naturally-occurring human antibodies,

(b) excluding from (a) the heavy chain CDR1 amino acid sequences, the heavy chain CDR2 amino acid sequences, the light chain CDR1 amino acid sequences, light chain CDR2 amino acid sequences, and the light chain CDR3 amino acid sequences that comprise any one or all of (i) to (xiv) to obtain sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 sequences, sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR2 sequences, sequence liability-free light chain CDR1 sequences, sequence liability-free light chain CDR2 sequences, and sequence liability-free light chain CDR3 sequences; and

(c) synthesizing the first plurality of nucleic acids that encode the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 regions, the second plurality of nucleic acids that encode the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR2 regions, the fourth plurality of nucleic acids that encode the sequence liability-free light chain CDR1 regions, the fifth plurality of nucleic acids that encode the sequence liability-free light chain CDR2 regions, and the sixth plurality of nucleic acids that encode the sequence liability-free light chain CDR3 regions.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the third plurality of nucleic acids is produced by a process comprising: (a) amplifying the heavy chain CDR3 regions from a population of human B cells; and (b) combining the third plurality of nucleic acids that encode the human heavy chain CDR3 regions obtained in (a) with the remaining CDRs.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the processes for producing the first plurality of nucleic acids, the second plurality of nucleic acids, and the third plurality of nucleic acids further comprise isolating functional members from the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 and CDR2 regions, and from the CDR3 regions, wherein:

(i) the functional members of the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 and CDR2 regions or the functional members of the CDR3 regions are isolated by expressing antibodies comprising the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 and CDR2 regions, and the CDR3 regions in host cells in a manner that the antibodies are displayed on surface of the host cells, isolating the host cells that display antibodies on their surfaces, and isolating the CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3 regions in the displayed antibodies, which are functional members of the CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3 regions; or

(ii) the functional members of the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 and CDR2 regions, and the CDR3 regions are isolated by expressing human antibodies comprising the sequence liability-free heavy chain CDR1 and CDR2 regions, and the CDR3 regions in fusion with a folding reporter, which optionally is B lactamase or green fluorescent protein, or fragments thereof, to obtain members with improved folding.

Assignments (9)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2026
From: IMS SOFTWARE SERVICES LTD.; IQVIA INC.; IQVIA RDS INC.; RULES-BASED MEDICINE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 075047/0061 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: SPECIFICA INC.
To: SPECIFICA LLC
Reel/Frame 069134/0007 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: SPECIFICA LLC
To: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
Reel/Frame 068805/0837 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2024
From: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 067867/0359 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2024
From: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 067859/0401 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2024
From: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 067859/0449 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 2, 2024
From: SPECIFICA INC.
To: SPECIFICA LLC
Reel/Frame 066986/0645 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2024
From: BRADBURY, ANDREW RAYMON MORTON; ERASMUS, MICHAEL FRANK; TEIXEIRA, ANDRE
To: SPECIFICA INC.
Reel/Frame 066982/0846 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 2, 2024
From: SPECIFICA LLC; RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
To: RULES-BASED MEDICINE INC.
Reel/Frame 066984/0855 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17163170 · Jan 29, 2021
Continuation 16505358 · Jul 8, 2019
Provisional Application 62822671 · Mar 22, 2019
Provisional Application 62695065 · Jul 8, 2018
Related Publication 20240240360A1 · Jul 18, 2024
References Cited (116)
US 5888732A · Hartley et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 20030153038A1 · Ohlin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060160178A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20120077710A1 · Ohlin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160194627A1 · Smider et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170362306A1 · Shim et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0070023A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO02083872A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009036379A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019126227A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Knappik et al. (Feb. 11, 2000) Journal of Molecular Biology vol. 296 pp. 57 to 86 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Akerstrom et al. “On the interaction between single chain Fv antibodies and bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins” J. Immunol. Methods, 177(1-2):151-63, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Al-Iazikani et al. “Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins” J. Mol. Biol. 273:927-948 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Almagro, J., “Identification of differences in the specificity-determining residues of antibodies that recognize antigens of different size: implications for the rational design of antibody repertoires” Mol. Recognit. 1… [cited by applicant]
Alves et al. “Small-molecule-based affinity chromatography method for antibody purification via nucleotide binding site targeting” Anal. Chem. 84(18):7721-8, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Alves et al. “Conjugation of a reactive thiol at the nucleotide binding site for site-specific antibody functionalization” Bioconjug. Chem. 25(7):1198-202, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Alves et al. “Oriented surface immobilization of antibodies at the conserved nucleotide binding site for enhanced antigen detection” Langmuir, 28(25):9640-8, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Ayriss et al.“High-throughput screening of single-chain antibodies using multiplexed flow cytometry” J Proteome Res. 6(3):1072-82, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Boder et al. “Engineering antibodies by yeast display” Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 526(2):99-106, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Boder et al. “Yeast surface display for directed evolution of protein expression, affinity, and stability” Methods Enzymol. 192(2):243-248, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Briney, B. et al. “Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire” Nature 566(7744):393-97 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Cabantous et al. “Recent Advances in GFP Folding Reporter and Split-GFP Solubility Reporter Technologies. Application to Improving the Folding and Solubility of Recalcitrant Proteins from [cited by applicant]
Cabantous et al, “New molecular reporters for rapid protein folding assays” PLoS One. 3(6):e2387; 2008. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al. “Comparison of the efficiency of antibody selection from semi-synthetic scFv and non-immune Fab phage display libraries against protein targets for rapid development of diagnostic immunoassays” Journal of im… [cited by applicant]
Charbit et al. “Versatility of a vector for expressing foreign polypeptides at the surface of Gram-negative bacteria” Gene, 70(1):181-9, 1988. [cited by applicant]
Cherf et al. “Applications of Yeast Surface Display for Protein Engineering” Methods Mol. Biol. 1319: 155-175 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Cho et al.“A yeast surface display system for the discovery of ligands that trigger cell activation” J. Immunol. Methods, 220(1-2):179-188, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Chothia et al, “Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions” (1989) Nature 342:877-883. [cited by applicant]
Chothia, C. et al. “Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins” (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 196:901-917. [cited by applicant]
Clackson et al. “Making Antibody Fragments Using Phage Display Libraries” (1991) Nature 352:624-628. [cited by applicant]
Close et al. “Using phage display selected antibodies to dissect microbiomes for complete de novo genome sequencing of low abundance microbes” BMC Microbiol. 13:270, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Corrie, B. D. et al. “iReceptor: a platform for querying and analyzing antibody/B-cell and T-cell receptor repertoire data across federated repositories” Immunol. Rev. 284, 24-41 (2018). [cited by applicant]
D'Angelo et al. “Filtering “genic” open reading frames from genomic DNA samples for advanced annotation” BMC genomics 12, suppl. 1, S1-S5; 2011. [cited by applicant]
D'Angelo et al. “The antibody mining toolbox” MAbs. 6(1):160-72, 2014. [cited by applicant]
De Haard et al. “A large non-immunized human Fab fragment phage library that permits rapid isolation and kinetic analysis of high affinity antibodies” (1999) J. Biol. Chem 274:18218-30. [cited by applicant]
Enever et al. “Engineering High Affinity Superantigens by Phage Display” Journal of molecular biology, 347(1):107-20, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Fantini et al. “Assessment of antibody library diversity through next generation sequencing and technical error compensation” PLoS One. 12(5):e0177574, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Ferrara et al. “Recombinant renewable polyclonal antibodies” MAbs, 7(1):32-41, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Ferrara et al. “Using Phage and Yeast Display to Select Hundreds of Monoclonal Antibodies: Application to Antigen 85, a Tuberculosis Biomarker” PLoS One, 7(11):e49535, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Fuchs et al. “Targeting Recombinant Antibodies to the Surface of [cited by applicant]
Garrard et al. “FAB Assembly and enrichment in a monovalent phage display system” (1991) Bio/Technology 9:1373-1377. [cited by applicant]
Glanville et al. “Deep sequencing in library selection projects: what insight does it bring?” Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 33:146-60, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Glanville et al. “Precise determination of the diversity of acombinatorial antibody library gives insight into the human immunoglobulin repertoire” PNAS 106(48):20216-21, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Graille et al. “Complex between [cited by applicant]
Gram et al. “In vitro selection and affinity maturation of antibodies from a naïve combinatorial immunoglobulin library” (1992) PNAS 89:3576-3580. [cited by applicant]
Griffiths et al. “Human anti-self antibodies with high specificity from phage display libraries” (1993) EMBO J 12:725-734. [cited by applicant]
Griffiths et al. “Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires” EMBOJ 13(14):3245-3260, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Hasenhindl et al. “Stability assessment on a library scale: a rapid method for the evaluation of the commutability and insertion of residues in C-terminal loops of the CH3 domains of IgG1-Fc” Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 26(1… [cited by applicant]
Hawkins et al. “Selection of phage antibodies by binding affinity. Mimicking affinity maturation”(1992) J. Mol. Biol. 226:889-896. [cited by applicant]
Hay et al. (1992) “Bacteriophage cloning and [cited by applicant]
Hillson et al. “The Structural Basis of Germline-encoded V,3 Immunoglobulin Binding to Staphylococcal Protein A” The Journal of experimental medicine. 178(1):331-6, 1993. [cited by applicant]
Hoogenboom et al. “Multi-subunit proteins on the surface of filamentous phage: methodologies for displaying antibody (Fab) heavy and light chains” (1991) Nuc. Acid Res. 19:4133-4137. [cited by applicant]
Hoogenboom et al. “Antibody phage display technology and its applications” (1998) Immunotechnology 4:1-20. [cited by applicant]
Hoogenboom et al. (2000) “Natural and designer binding sites made by phage display technology” Immunol Today 2:371-8. [cited by applicant]
Hotzel, I. et al. “A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance” MAbs 4, 753-760 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Hugo et al. “VL position 34 is a key determinant for the engineering of stable antibodies with fast dissociation rates” Protein Eng. 16(5):381-6, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Huse et al. (1989) “Generation of a large combinatorial library of the immunoglobulin repertoire in phage lambda” Science 246:1275-1281. [cited by applicant]
Jackson et al. “Identifying highly mutated IGHD genes in the junctions of rearranged human immunoglobulin heavy chain genes” J. Immunol. Methods, 324:26-37, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Jain, T. et al. “Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape” PNAS 114, 944-949 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kehoe et al. “Using phage display to select antibodies recognizing post-translational modifications independently of sequence context.” Mol. Cell Proteomics, 5(12):2350-63, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al. “High throughput cross-interaction measures for human IgG1 antibodies correlate with clearance rates in mice” MAbs, 7(4):770-7, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al. “Chaperone proteins as single component reagents to assess antibody monospecificity” MAbs. 9(7):1036-40, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Kohli et al. “A novel screening method to assess developability of antibody-like molecules” MAbs. 7(4):752-8, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Kovaltsuk, A. et al. “Observed Antibody Space: A Resource for Data Mining Next-Generation Sequencing of Antibody Repertoires” J. Immunol. (2018) 201 (8): 2502-2509. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al. “Reconsidering the human immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: 1. An evaluation of the expressed human IGHD gene repertoire” Immunogenetics, 57:917-25, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Lefranc, M. P. et al. “IMGT unique numbering for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor variable domains and Ig superfamily V-like domains” Dev. Comp. Immunol. 27, 55-77 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Lillo et al. “Development of Phage-Based Single Chain Fv Antibody Reagents for Detection of Yersinia pestis” PLoS One, 6(12):e27756, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Lou et al. “Antibodies in haystacks: how selection strategy influences the outcome of selection from molecular diversity libraries” Journal of immunological methods; 253(1-2):233-42, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Mustafaoglu et al. “Site-specific fab fragment biotinylation at the conserved nucleotide binding site for enhanced ebola detection” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112(7):1327-34, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Obrezanova et al. “Aggregation risk prediction for antibodies and its application to biotherapeutic development” MAbs. 7(2):352-63, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Pavoor, T. V. et al. “An enhanced approach for engineering thermally stable proteins using yeast display” Peds 25(10): 625-630 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Pepper, L. R. et al. “A decade of yeast surface display technology: Where are we now?” Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 11(2):127-134 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Perelson et al. “Theoretical studies of clonal selection: Minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination” J. Theor. Biol. 81(4):645-70, 1979. [cited by applicant]
Rajagopalan et al. “Novel unconventional binding site in the variable region of immunoglobulins” PNAS, 93(12):6019-24, 1993. [cited by applicant]
Roben et al. “VH3 family antibodies bind domain D of staphylococcal protein A” J. Immunology 154(12):6437-45, 1995). [cited by applicant]
Saunders et al. “An in vivo platform for identifying inhibitors of protein aggregation” Nat. Chem. Biol. 12:94-101; 1988. [cited by applicant]
Sblattero et al. “Exploiting recombination in single bacteria to make large phage antibody libraries” Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 75-80 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Shusta et al. “Yeast polypeptide fusion surface display levels predict thermal stability and soluble secretion efficiency” J. Mol. Biol. 292(5):949-56, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Smith, “Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface” (1985) Science 228:1315-1317. [cited by applicant]
Traxlmayr et al. “Directed evolution of Her2/neu-binding IgG1-Fc for improved stability and resistance to aggregation by using yeast surface display” Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 26(4):255-65, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Traxlmayr et al. “Directed evolution of proteins for increased stability and expression using yeast display” Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 526(2):174-80, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Traxlmayr et al. “Directed evolution of stabilized IgG1-Fc scaffolds by application of strong heat shock to libraries displayed on yeast” Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1824(4):542-9, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Van den Beucken et al. “Affinity maturation of Fab antibody fragments by fuorescent-activated cell sorting of yeast-displayed libraries” FEBS Lett. 546(2-3):288-294, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Velappan et al. Selection and characterization of scFv antibodies against the Sin Nombre hantavirus nucleocapsid protein Journal of immunological methods, 321(1-2):60-9, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Vincke et al. “Introduction to Heavy Chain Antibodies and Derived Nanobodies” Methods Mol. Biol. 911:15-26 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Waldo et al. “Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein” Nat. Biotechnol. 17:691-5; 1999. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Increasing stability of antibody via antibody engineering: Stability engineering on an anti-hVEGF” Proteins, 82(10):2620-30, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al, “Discovery of highly soluble antibodies prior to purification using affinity-capture self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy” Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 28(10):403-14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. “Addressing polyspecificity of antibodies selected from an in vitro yeast presentation system: a FACS-based, high-throughput selection and analytical tool” Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 26(10):663-70, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Xu, L. et al. “Rapid optimization and prototyping for therapeutic antibody-like molecules” MAbs 5(2): 237-254 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Van Blarcom et al. Productive common light chain libraries yield diverse panels of high affinity bispecific antibodies. MAbs. Feb./Mar. 2018;10(2):256-268. Epub Dec. 14, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “Developability studies before initiation of process development” MAbs 5(5):787-94, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “Rapid assessment of oxidation via middle-down LCMS correlates with methionine side-chain solvent-accessible surface area for 121 clinical stage monoclonal antibodies” MAbs 9(4):646-53, 2017. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report PCT/US19/40843 dated Oct. 11, 2019, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Soderlind, E. et al. “Recombining germline-derived CDR sequences for creating diverse single-framework antibody libraries” Nature 18(8):852-856, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Bai, X. et al. “A Novel Human scFv Library with Non-Combinatorial Synthetic CDR Diversity” PLoS One. vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 1-18, Oct. 20, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Waterhouse, Peter et al. “Combinatorial infection and in vivo recombination: a strategy for making large phage antibody repertoires” Nucleic Acids Research. vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 2265-2266, May 11, 1993. [cited by applicant]
Palazzolo, Michael J. et al. “Phage lambda cDNA cloning vectors for subtractive hybridization, fusion-protein synthesis and Cre-loxP automatic plasmid subcloning” Gene vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 25-36, Mar. 30, 1990. [cited by applicant]
D'Angelo, Sara et al. “Many Routes To An Antibody Heavy-Chain CDR3: Necessary, Yet Insufficient, For Specific Binding” Frontiers in Immunology. vol. 9, pp. 1-13, Mar. 8, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Barbas et al. “Assembly of combinatorial antibody libraries on phage surfaces: the gene III site” PNAS vol. 88, No. 18, pp. 7978-7982, Sep. 15, 1991. [cited by applicant]
Boldicke, Antibody Engineering “2.3.2 Case study of synthetic antibody libraries: n-CoDeR”. Feb. 1, 2018. 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frenzel et al. Phage display-derived human antibodies in clinical development and therapy. MAbs. Oct. 2016; 8(7):1177-1194. [cited by applicant]
Ponsel et al. High affinity, developability and functional size: the holy grail of combinatorial antibody library generation. Molecules. May 3, 2011;16(5):3675-700. [cited by applicant]
Urlinger, Ylanthia—A New Antibody Library Concept. Dec. 1, 2011. 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/505,358, Patented, Jul. 8, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/163,170, Patented, Jan. 29, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/208,877, Patented, Mar. 22, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/430,601, Pending, Feb. 1, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/592,473, Published, Feb. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/592,484, Pending, Feb. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/592,499, Pending, Feb. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/860,041, Published, Jul. 7, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/577,398, Pending, Jan. 8, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/171,063, Published, Feb. 17, 2023. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/807,409, Pending, Aug. 16, 2024. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/839,070, Pending, Aug. 16, 2024. [cited by applicant]