IP Library Patent Application 18600039
Patent Application
App. No. 18/600,039

OPTIMIZATIONS FOR OVERLOAD CONTROL IN O-RAN NETWORKS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/600,039
Filed
Mar 8, 2024
Art Unit
2477
USPC
370/329
Abstract

A method of implementing data traffic overload control utilizing an E2 node for i) a stand-alone (SA) 4G or 5G architecture wireless network, and a non-stand-alone (NSA) architecture wireless network, the method including: detecting an overload condition at the E2 node; and performing an overload control action including: i) reducing a number of UEs for which corresponding scheduling metric is computed in each transmission time interval (TTI); ii) reducing a number of UEs for which UL grant is given; iii) reducing a size of UL grant given to each UE; (iv) reducing the amount of radio resource the E2 node provides to each cell; (v) dynamically allocating increased buffer spaces to radio link control (RLC) queues in the DU; (vi) reducing an activity factor for selected data radio bearers (DRBs); and (vii) adjusting relative data transmission rates between a 4G leg and a 5G leg of data transmission.

Claims (51)

1 . A method of implementing at least one of downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) data traffic overload control utilizing an E2 node comprising at least one of a distributed unit (DU) and a centralized unit (CU) for at least one of 1) a stand-alone (SA) 4G architecture or a SA 5G architecture wireless network, and 2) a non-stand-alone (NSA) architecture wireless network serving user equipments (UEs), comprising:

detecting, by utilizing at least the E2 node, an overload condition at the E2 node; and

performing an overload control action utilizing at least the E2 node, wherein the overload control action comprises at least one of: i) reducing a number of UEs for which corresponding scheduling metric is computed in each transmission time interval (TTI); ii) reducing a number of UEs for which UL grant is given; iii) reducing a size of UL grant given to each UE; (iv) reducing the amount of radio resource the E2 node provides to each cell of the wireless network; (v) dynamically allocating increased buffer spaces to radio link control (RLC) queues in the DU; (vi) reducing an activity factor for selected data radio bearers (DRBs); (vii) changing scheduling metrics for delay-sensitive applications; and (viii) in the case of the NSA architecture wireless network, adjusting relative data transmission rates between a 4G leg of data transmission and a 5G leg of data transmission to a served UE.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the overload control utilizes at least the DU.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the overload control action comprises:

computing scheduling metrics for only a subset of UEs among active UEs in each TTI within a time window of W number of TTIs, wherein W>1, and wherein the scheduling metric for each active UE is computed only once within the time window of W number of TTIs.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein:

in the case of i) additional UEs becoming active during the time window of W number of TTIs, and ii) W is less than a specified minimum threshold, computing scheduling metrics of the additional UEs in the subsequent time window.

5 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein:

in the case of i) additional UEs becoming active during the time window of W number of TTIs, and ii) the number of additional UEs is less than a specified threshold, computing scheduling metrics of the additional UEs in remaining TTIs within the time window.

6 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein:

the overload control further utilizes a near-real-time radio intelligent controller (near-RT RIC); and

the near-RT RIC utilizes at least one of the following measurement parameters sent by the DU to detect the overload condition: DU processing load, the number of active UEs, physical resource block (PRB) utilization, and the number of packets per TTI.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the overload control action comprises:

requesting, by the near-RT RIC to the DU, to compute scheduling metrics for only a subset of active UEs in every TTI within a transmission window.

8 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the overload control action comprises:

sending, by the near-RT RIC to the DU, at least one policy to enable the DU to identify a subset of active UEs for which scheduling metrics need to be computed in a given TTI within a transmission window.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the overload control utilizes at least a centralized unit user plane (CU-UP).

10 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the CU-UP detects the overload condition based on at least one of the following parameters:

1) the number of data radio bearers (DRBs) for which the CU-UP is carrying traffic;

2) DL and UL processing load at the CU-UP;

3) Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) service data unit (SDU) or Protocol Data Unit (PDU) drops in PDCP queues at the CU-UP due to non-availability of buffer space in corresponding Radio Link Control (RLC) queues in a DU;

4) identity of DRBs for which PDCP SDUs or PDUs are being dropped at the CU-UP due to non-availability of space in CU-UP queues; and

5) available buffer space in PDCP queues at the CU-UP.

11 . The method according to claim 10 , wherein the overload control action comprises:

instructing, by the CU-UP to the DU, to one of i) dynamically allocate more buffer space to the corresponding RLC queues in the DU, or ii) adjust scheduler weights to give higher preference to the corresponding DRBs.

12 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein:

the overload control further utilizes a near-real-time radio intelligent controller (near-RT RIC); and

the near-RT RIC utilizes at least one of the following measurement parameters sent by the CU-UP to detect the overload condition:

1) the number of data radio bearers (DRBs) for which the CU-UP is carrying traffic;

2) DL and UL processing load at the CU-UP;

3) Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) service data unit (SDU) or Protocol Data Unit (PDU) drops in PDCP queues at the CU-UP due to non-availability of buffer space in corresponding Radio Link Control (RLC) queues in a DU;

4) identity of DRBs for which PDCP SDUs or PDUs are being dropped at the CU-UP due to non-availability of space in CU-UP queues; and

5) available buffer space in PDCP queues at the CU-UP.

13 . The method according to claim 12 , wherein the overload control action comprises:

instructing, by the near-RT RIC to the DU, to one of i) dynamically allocate more buffer space to the corresponding RLC queues in the DU, or ii) adjust scheduler weights to give higher preference to the corresponding DRBs.

14 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein:

the overload control is performed in the non-stand-alone (NSA) architecture wireless network;

an overload condition is detected by one of a 4G DU or a 5G DU of the NSA architecture wireless network based on utilization of central processing unit (CPU) of the one the 4G DU or the 5G DU exceeding a specified threshold.

15 . The method according to claim 14 , wherein:

the one the 4G DU or the 5G DU indicates the overload condition to a CU-UP in the NSA architecture wireless network by sending an enhanced DL Data Delivery Status (DDDS) message including a DU overload extension field for a DRB.

16 . The method according to claim 15 , wherein:

i) in the case the 5G DU is overloaded, the CU-UP implements the overload control action by increasing the data transmission rate over the 4G leg in comparison to the data transmission rate over the 5G leg; and

ii) in the case the 4G DU is overloaded, the CU-UP implements the overload control action by increasing the data transmission rate over the 5G leg in comparison to the data transmission rate over the 4G leg.

17 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein:

DL overload condition is detected based on one of processing load or DL packet rate at the DU exceeding a specified threshold; and

implementing, by the DU, a DL overload control action comprising a change in at least one of a desired buffer size (DBS) and a desired data rate (DDR) which is sent as part of DL Data Delivery Status (DDDS) message from the DU to a centralized unit user plane (CU-UP) for each selected DRB.

18 . The method according to claim 17 , wherein a reduced value of DBS is sent as part of the DDDS message for each selected DRB from the DU to the CU-UP.

19 . The method according to claim 17 , wherein a reduced DDR is sent as part of the DDDS message for each selected DRB from the DU to the CU-UP.

20 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein:

the overload control action comprises, in a given TTI, changing scheduling metrics for delay-sensitive applications whose radio link control (RLC) packets have been in the DU's RLC queues for longer duration compared to UEs in a subsequent TTI.

Assignments (16)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2026
From: MAVENIR US INC.
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 073728/0317 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN COLLATERAL RECORDED AT REEL 069113 AND FRAME 0558 Recorded Jul 31, 2025
From: GLAS USA LLC
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072308/0172 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN COLLATERAL RECORDED AT REEL 067565 AND FRAME 0678 Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072263/0421 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS (SYNDICATED) Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072263/0121 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS (SIDECAR) Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072263/0041 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST - PATENTS Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: MAVENIR NETWORKS, INC.; MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.; ARGYLE DATA, INC.; MAVENIR, INC.; AQUTO CORPORATION; MAVENIR IPA UK LIMITED; MAVENIR SYSTEMS UK LIMITED; MAVENIR LTD.; MAVENIR US INC.
To: GLAS USA LLC
Reel/Frame 072245/0764 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2025
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: MAVENIR US INC.
Reel/Frame 072245/0580 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2025
From: MAVENIR NETWORKS, INC.; MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.; ARGYLE DATA, INC.; MAVENIR, INC.; AQUTO CORPORATION; MAVENIR IPA UK LIMITED; MAVENIR SYSTEMS UK LIMITED; MAVENIR LTD.; MAVENIR US INC.
To: BLUE TORCH FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 072268/0439 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 27, 2025
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: MAVENIR US, INC.
Reel/Frame 072245/0419 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2024
From: TANEJA, MUKESH; SEN, MOUSHUMI; KAIMALETTU, SUNIL
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069491/0648 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: GLAS USA LLC
Reel/Frame 069113/0558 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
To: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069113/0596 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 068822/0966 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Jul 18, 2024
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068425/0209 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Jul 18, 2024
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068425/0126 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 29, 2024
From: MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 067565/0678 →