IP Library Granted Patent US 12,591,800
Granted Patent B2
US 12,591,800 · App. 18/610,936 · Granted Mar 31, 2026

Performing a calibration process in a quantum computing system

Inventors: Benjamin Jacob Bloom (Oakland, CA); Shane Arthur Caldwell (Oakland, CA); Michael James Curtis (Sacramento, CA); Matthew J. Reagor (San Rafael, CA); Chad Tyler Rigetti (Walnut Creek, CA); Eyob A. Sete (Walnut Creek, CA); William J. Zeng (Berkeley, CA); Peter Jonathan Karalekas (Berkeley, CA); Nikolas Anton Tezak (Oakland, CA); Nasser Alidoust (Berkeley, CA)
Assignee: Rigetti & Co, LLC
G06N10/70G06N10/00G06N10/40H03K19/195
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,591,800
App. No.
18/610,936
Granted
Mar 31, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a general aspect, calibration is performed in a quantum computing system. In some cases, domains of a quantum computing system are identified, where the domains include respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of quantum circuit devices in a quantum processor of the quantum computing system. Sets of measurements are obtained from one of the domains and stored in memory. Device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements, and the device characteristics are stored in a memory of the control system. Quantum logic control parameters for the subset of quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements and stored in memory.

Claims (35)

1 . A method comprising:

identifying domains of a quantum computing system by operation of a control system, the domains comprising respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of quantum circuit devices in a quantum processor of the quantum computing system;

obtaining a first set of measurements from a first domain of the domains, wherein obtaining the first set of measurements comprises performing a continuous wave (CW) bring-up process;

determining, by operation of the control system, device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the first domain based on the first set of measurements,;

storing the device characteristics in a memory of the control system;

obtaining a second set of measurements from the first domain;

determining, by operation of the control system, quantum logic control parameters for the quantum circuit devices of the first domain based on the second set of measurements; and

storing the quantum logic control parameters in a database of the control system for use in operating the first domain.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the domains are defined in part by hardware, control logic, physical connections, or software in the quantum computing system.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum circuit devices of the first domain include qubit devices and readout devices.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the control system comprises a controller, the controller including a cache, signal conversion circuitry, a filter, and an amplifier.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the control system comprises an embedded operating system configured to communicate with the database and the controller.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the device characteristics comprise resonance frequencies and coherence times for qubit devices in the first domain.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW cavity spectroscopy.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW qubit spectroscopy.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) single-tone spectroscopy.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW JPA gain optimization.

11 . A quantum computing system comprising:

a quantum processor comprising quantum circuit devices; and

a control system configured to:

identify domains of the quantum computing system, the domains comprising respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of the quantum circuit devices;

obtain a first set of measurements from a first domain of the domains, wherein obtaining the first set of measurements comprises performing a continuous wave (CW) bring-up process;

determine device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the first domain based on the first set of measurements;

obtain a second set of measurements from the first domain;

determine quantum logic control parameters for the quantum circuit devices of the first domain based on the second set of measurements; and

store the quantum logic control parameters in a database of the control system for use in operating the first domain.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the domains are defined in part by hardware, control logic, physical connections, or software in the quantum computing system.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the quantum circuit devices of the first domain include qubit devices and readout devices.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the control system comprises a controller, the controller including a cache, signal conversion circuitry, a filter, and an amplifier.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the control system comprises an embedded operating system configured to communicate with the database and the controller.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the device characteristics comprise resonance frequencies and coherence times for qubit devices in the first domain.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW cavity spectroscopy.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW qubit spectroscopy.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) single-tone spectroscopy.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the CW bring-up process comprises CW JPA gain optimization.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2024
From: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC
Reel/Frame 069603/0771 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2024
From: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC; RIGETTI INTERMEDIATE LLC; RIGETTI COMPUTING, INC.
Reel/Frame 069603/0831 →
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 8, 2024
From: RIGETTI & CO, LLC; RIGETTI INTERMEDIATE LLC; RIGETTI COMPUTING, INC.
To: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
Reel/Frame 068146/0416 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 12, 2024
From: RIGETTI & CO., INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC
Reel/Frame 067097/0844 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2024
From: BLOOM, BENJAMIN JACOB; SETE, EYOB A.; CURTIS, MICHAEL JAMES; CALDWELL, SHANE ARTHUR; ZENG, WILLIAM J.; REAGOR, MATTHEW J.; RIGETTI, CHAD TYLER; KARALEKAS, PETER; TEZAK, NIKOLAS ANTON; ALIDOUST, NASSER
To: RIGETTI & CO., INC.
Reel/Frame 067080/0393 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 18155903 · Jan 18, 2023
Continuation 17338024 · Jun 3, 2021
Continuation 16841300 · Apr 6, 2020
Continuation 16390964 · Apr 22, 2019
Continuation 15916367 · Mar 9, 2018
Provisional Application 62469648 · Mar 10, 2017
Related Publication 20250045618A1 · Feb 6, 2025
References Cited (106)
US 2653243A · McClellan · 1953 [cited by applicant]
US 3406353A · Mueller · 1968 [cited by applicant]
US 7135701B2 · Amin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8089286B2 · Silva et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9438246B1 · Naaman · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9755133B1 · Nayfeh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9940212B2 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10282675B2 · Bloom et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10552755B2 · Lanting et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10635989B2 · Blais et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10643143B2 · Bloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10956830B1 · Rigetti et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11127893B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164103B2 · Bloom et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11244240B2 · Martinis et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11593698B2 · Bloom et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11875222B1 · Reagor et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20040173792A1 · Blais et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259905A1 · Silva et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110060780A1 · Berkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110133770A1 · Przybysz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110175062A1 · Farinelli et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120319085A1 · Gambetta et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229722A1 · Harris · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267032A1 · Rigetti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160328659A1 · Mohseni et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170083873A1 · Syrichas et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170091649A1 · Clarke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170214410A1 · Hincks et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170255871A1 · Macready et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170330101A1 · Hastings et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351967A1 · Babbush et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364362A1 · Lidar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180090200A1 · Soykal et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180101784A1 · Rolfe et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180225586A1 · Chow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180260732A1 · Bloom et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180330264A1 · Lanting et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180330265A1 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200050958A1 · Bloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200210876A1 · Rolfe et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200234171A1 · Chu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200274554A1 · Aspuru-Guzik et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210035005A1 · Martinis et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220092461A1 · Bloom et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230394342A1 · Bloom et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009143166 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018165500 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EPO, Extended European Search Report issued in Application No. 24211809.9 on Feb. 14, 2025, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Homulle, et al., “A Reconfigurable Cryogenic Platform for the Classical Control of Scalable Quantum Computers”, arXiv:1602.05786v1, 8 pages, Feb. 18, 2016. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 26, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/916,367, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 8, 2023, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/134,177, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/916,367, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/134,177 on Nov. 8, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 17, 2020, in EP 18764972.8, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 14, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/338,024, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2019, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/390,964, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 16, 2018, in PCT/US2018/021652, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 24, 2021, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/841,300, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 23, 2021, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/841,300, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/338,024, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/134,177, 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2021, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/1134,177, 24 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 18/155,903 on Dec. 20, 2023, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
IPAU, Examination Report issued in Application No. 2023200904 on Sep. 13, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
AUIPO, Examination Report No. 1 mailed Oct. 29, 2021, in AU 2018230440, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in Application No. 18764972.8 on May 17, 2023, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Third Party Submission filed Oct. 23, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/916,367, 40 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2021, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/134,177, 47 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 15, 2020, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/390,964, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Martinis, et al., Nonlinear Calibration of a Quantum Computing Apparatus, filed Jan. 26, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 62/525,058, 44 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ahsan, et al., “Designing a Million-Qubit Quantum Computer Using a Resource Performance Simulator”, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2015, 25 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Aspuru-Guzik, et al., “U.S. Appl. No. 62/559,081”, filed Aug. 27, 2020, 82 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Benedetti, et al., “Quantum-assisted Helmholtz machines: A quantum-classical deep learning framework for industrial datasets in near-term devices”, arXiv:1708.09784v1, Aug. 31, 2017, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Castelvecchi, “Quantum cloud goes commercial”, Nature 543, Mar. 9, 2017, 1 pg. [cited by applicant]
Cortez, et al., “Rapid estimation of drifting parameters in continuously measured quantum systems”, arXiv:1606.01407v1, Jun. 4, 2016, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Dicarlo, et al., “Demonstration of Two-Qubit Algorithms with a Superconducting Quantum Processor”, arXiv:0903.2030v2, May 4, 2009, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Dive, et al., “In situ upgrade of quantum simulators to universal computers”, arXiv:1701.01723v1, Jan. 6, 2017, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Dunjko, “Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain”, arXiv:1709.02779v1, Sep. 8, 2017, 106 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Florjanczyk, et al., “In-situ Adaptive Encoding for Asymmetric Quantum Error Correcting Codes”, arXiv:1612.05823v2, May 29, 2017, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fu, et al., “An Experimental Microarchitecture for a Superconducting Quantum Processor”, arXiv:1708.07677v1, Aug. 25, 2017, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Gu, et al., “Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits”, arXiv:1707.02046v1, Jul. 7, 2017, 166 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Haner, et al., “0.5 Petabyte Simulation of a 45-Qubit Quantum Circuit”, arXiv:1704.01127v1, Apr. 4, 2017, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Holton, “Quantum computer—Britannica Online Encyclopedia”, https://www.britannica.com/technology/quantum-computer, 2020, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hu, et al., “Relative quantum coherence, incompatibility, and quantum correlations of states”, May 10, 2017, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kelly, et al., “Scalable in-situ qubit calibration during repetitive error detection”, arXiv:1603.03082v1, Mar. 9, 2016, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kelly, et al., “Scalable in-situ qubit calibration during repetitive error detection”, PhysRevA 94, Sep. 26, 2016, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Koch, Jens, et al., “Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box”, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319, Oct. 12, 2007, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lu, et al., “Universal stabilization of a parametrically coupled qubit”, arXiv:1707.01491v1, Jul. 5, 2017, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
McKay, et al., “Efficient Z-Gates for Quantum Computing”, arXiv:1612.00858v2, Jun. 28, 2017, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
McKay, et al., “Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus”, Phys. Rev. Applied 6, 064007, Dec. 12, 2016, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Menke, Tim, “Realizing a Calibration Program for Superconducting Qubits”, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Laboratory for Solid State Physics Quantum Device Lab, Semester Thesis, Aug. 2013, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Michielsen, et al., “Benchmarking gate-based quantum computers”, arXiv:1706.04341v1, Jun. 14, 2017, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Miller, et al., “Quantum supremacy in constant-time measurement-based computation: A unified architecture for sampling and verification”, arXiv:1703.11002v1, Mar. 31, 2017, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Moran, “Quintuple: a Python 5-qubit quantum computer simulator to facilitate cloud quantum computing”, pre-print submitted to Computer Physics Communications, Jun. 29, 2016, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Newville, M., et al., “Non-Linear Least-Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python”, Release 0.9.3, Mar. 27, 2016, 94 pages. [cited by applicant]
Olson, et al., “Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry”, NSF Workshop Report, 2016, 60 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reagor, et al., “Demonstration of Universal Parametric Entangling Gates on a Multi-Qubit Lattice”, arXiv:1706.06570v2 [quant-ph], Jul. 13, 2017, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reagor, Matthew James, “Superconducting Cavities for Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics”,University, Dec. 2015, 220 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reed, Matthew D., “Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Qubits”, arXiv:1311.6759v1, Nov. 26, 2013, 368 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rocchetto, “Stabiliser states are efficiently PAC-learnable”, arXiv:1705.00345v1, Apr. 30, 2017, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Romero, et al., “Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data”, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, Aug. 18, 2017, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Smith, R. S., et al., “A Practical Quantum Instruction Set Architecture”, arXiv:1608.03355v2 [quant-ph], Feb. 17, 2017, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stenberg, M. P. V., et al., “Characterization of decohering quantum systems: Machine learning approach”, arXiv:1510.05655v1 [quant-ph], Oct. 19, 2015, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ware, “Flux-tunable superconducting transmons for quantum information processing”, retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 8, 2020: https://surface.syr.edu/etd/249?utm_source=surface.syr.edu%2Fetd%2F249&utm_medium=PDF&utm_c… [cited by applicant]
Weber, et al., “Coherent Coupled Qubits for Quantum Annealing”, PhysRevAppl 8, 014004, Jul. 10, 2017, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]