IP Library Granted Patent US 12,373,552
Granted Patent B2
US 12,373,552 · App. 18/622,553 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Apparatus, method and article to facilitate automatic detection and removal of fraudulent user information in a network environment

Inventors: Thomas Levi (Vancouver, CA); Steve Oldridge (Vancouver, CA)
Assignee: PLENTYOFFISH MEDIA ULC
G06F21/552G06F21/577
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,373,552
App. No.
18/622,553
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A fraud detection system obtains a number of known fraudulent end-user profiles and/or otherwise undesirable end-user profiles. Using statistical analysis techniques that include clustering the end-user profiles by attributes and attribute values and/or combinations of attributes and attribute values, the fraud detection system identifies on a continuous, periodic, or aperiodic basis those attribute values and/or attribute value combinations that appear in fraudulent or otherwise undesirable end-user profiles. Using this data, the fraud detection system generates one or more queries to identify those end-user profiles having attribute values or combinations of attribute values that likely indicate a fraudulent or otherwise undesirable end-user profile. The fraud detection system runs these queries against incoming registrations to identify and screen fraudulent end-user profiles from entering the system and also runs these queries against stored end-user profile databases to identify and remove fraudulent or otherwise undesirable end-user profiles from the end-user database.

Claims (245)

1. A method of detecting suspected fraudulently generated user identity profiles in an online network environment using a fraud detection system that includes at least one processor and at least one non-transitory processor-readable medium that stores processor-executable instructions, the online network environment including an attribute value for an attribute associated with the user identity profiles, and including an additional attribute value that occurs frequently in the set of profiles, the method comprising:

determining, via the at least one processor, whether the attribute value is linked to a high conditional probability based on the attribute value that a profile is fraudulently generated or undesirable;

identifying, via the at least one processor, a set of profiles likely to be fraudulently generated or undesirable based on the attribute value and the high conditional probability;

querying, using the fraud detection system having at least one processor and at least one non-transitory processor-readable medium that stores processor-executable instructions, a data store containing profile information to identify profiles suspected of being fraudulently generated based at least in part on the attribute value and the additional attribute value;

screening, using the fraud detection system having at least one processor and at least one non-transitory processor-readable medium that stores processor-executable instructions, the identified profiles suspected of being fraudulently generated or undesirable; and

quarantining the identified profiles.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the attribute value is linked to a high conditional probability of being a fraudulent or undesirable profile includes computing the initial probabilities of a profile being a fraudulent profile [p(S)] or a valid profile [p(V)].

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the attribute value is linked to a high conditional probability includes computing the value indicative of a conditional probability that the respective profile is fraudulent according to:

p

(

S

{

x

i

}

)

=

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

+

p

(

V

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

V

)

.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the attribute value includes one or more of:

a Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (http) referrer associated with the respective profile;

an Internet Protocol (IP) of signup and last logins associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies used to track individual computers associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies that contain a user identifier of the most recent users to log in on using a given instance of a processor-based device; and

IP blocks of signup and at least two most recent logins associated with the respective profile.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

ranking the profiles into groups.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: providing the designated profiles to a front end system for possible deletion.

7. A user identity profile detection system in an online network environment to detect at least one of accounts or related profiles suspected of being undesirable, the online network environment including an initial probability value based at least in part on historical profile data, and including an additional attribute value that occurs frequently in the set of profiles, the system comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one non-transitory processor-readable medium that stores processor-executable instructions, wherein the at least one processor:

determine whether the initial probability value is linked to a value indicative of a high conditional probability based on the initial probability value that a profile is undesirable;

identify a set of profiles likely to be undesirable based on the initial probability value and the high conditional probability;

query a data store containing profile information to identify profiles suspected of being undesirable based at least in part on the initial probability value and the additional attribute value;

screen the identified profiles suspected of being undesirable; and

quarantine the identified profiles.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one processor computes a value indicative of the initial probabilities of a profiles being at least one of an undesirable-profile [p(S)] or a valid profile [p(V)].

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one processor computes a value indicative of a conditional probability that the respective profile is undesirable includes computing the value indicative of a conditional probability that the respective profile is undesirable according to:

p

(

S

{

x

i

}

)

=

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

+

p

(

V

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

V

)

.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one processor ranks the profiles into groups using the high conditional probability based on the initial probability value that the profile is undesirable.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the attribute value includes one or more of:

a Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (http) referrer associated with the respective profile;

an Internet Protocol (IP) of signup and last logins associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies used to track individual computers associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies that contain a user identifier of the most recent users to log in on using a given instance of a processor-based device; and

IP blocks of signup and at least two most recent logins associated with the respective profile.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one processor generates at least one output logically associated with each profile, the at least one output indicative of at least one of the following: a deletion indicator, a clearance indicator, or a further investigation indicator.

13. A fraudulent user identity profile detection system in an online network environment to detect at least one of accounts or related profiles suspected of being fraudulently generated, the online network environment including an attribute value for an attribute associated with the user identity profiles, and including an additional attribute value that occurs frequently in the set of profiles, the system comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one nontransitory processor-readable medium that stores processor-executable instructions, wherein the at least one processor:

determine whether the attribute value is linked to a high conditional probability based on the attribute value that a profile is fraudulently generated;

identify a set of profiles likely to be fraudulently generated based on the attribute value and the conditional probability;

query a data store containing profile information to identify profiles suspected of being fraudulently generated based at least in part on the attribute value and the additional attribute value;

screen the identified profiles suspected of being fraudulently generated; and

quarantine the identified profiles.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor computes a value indicative of an initial probabilities of a profiles being at least one of a fraudulent profile [p(S)] or a valid profile [p(V)].

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor computes a value indicative of a conditional probability that the respective profile is fraudulent includes computing the value indicative of a conditional probability that the respective profile is fraudulent according to:

p

(

S

{

x

i

}

)

=

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

p

(

S

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

S

)

+

p

(

V

)

i

M

p

(

x

i

V

)

.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor ranks the profiles into groups using the high conditional probability based on the initial probability value that the profile is one of either fraudulent.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the attribute value includes one or more of:

a Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (http) referrer associated with the respective profile;

an Internet Protocol (IP) of signup and last logins associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies used to track individual computers associated with the respective profile;

one or more cookies that contain a user identifier of the most recent users to log in on using a given instance of a processor-based device; and

IP blocks of signup and at least two most recent logins associated with the respective profile.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor generates at least one output logically associated with each profile, the at least one output indicative of at least one of the following: a deletion indicator, a clearance indicator, or a further investigation indicator.

Continuity (6)
Continuation 18069866 · Dec 21, 2022
Continuation 16833427 · Mar 27, 2020
Continuation 15782576 · Oct 12, 2017
Division 14561004 · Dec 4, 2014
Provisional Application 61911908 · Dec 4, 2013
Related Publication 20240333807A1 · Oct 3, 2024
References Cited (317)
US 5583763A · Atcheson et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5724521A · Dedrick · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5749091A · Ishida et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5812992A · de Vries · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5963951A · Collins · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6006225A · Bowman et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6018738A · Breese et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6029195A · Herz · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6038295A · Mattes · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6041311A · Chislenko et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6049777A · Sheena et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6058367A · Sutcliffe et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6061681A · Collins · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6064980A · Jacobi et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6134532A · Lazarus et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6169986B1 · Bowman et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6199067B1 · Geller · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6266649B1 · Linden et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6356879B2 · Aggerwal et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6542749B2 · Tanaka et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6681232B1 · Sistanizadeh et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6735568B1 · Buckwalter et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6772150B1 · Whitman et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6782370B1 · Stack · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6783065B2 · Spitz et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6853982B2 · Smith et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6912505B2 · Linden et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7113917B2 · Jacobi et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7240353B2 · Lau et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7313536B2 · Westphal · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7324998B2 · Beres et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7562814B1 · Shao et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7617164B2 · Burges et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7873695B2 · Clegg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8122142B1 · Svendsen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8180765B2 · Nicolov · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8225413B1 · De et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8499247B2 · Niyogi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8566938B1 · Prakash et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8577874B2 · Svendsen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8620790B2 · Priebatsch · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8626663B2 · Nightengale et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8712943B1 · Kim · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8745083B1 · Ruiz · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8775284B1 · Crook et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8825802B2 · Pearce · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8856922B2 · Rubinstein et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8930398B1 · Kishore et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8943047B1 · Carpio et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9047611B2 · Krishnamoorthy et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9069945B2 · Singh · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9076125B2 · Manolescu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9160742B1 · Ackerman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9218468B1 · Rappaport · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9219704B2 · Hamlin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9536221B2 · Frind · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9537706B2 · Frind et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9537814B2 · Rubinstein et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9672289B1 · Frind et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9679259B1 · Frind et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9733811B2 · Rad et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9830669B1 · Frind · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9836533B1 · Levi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9870465B1 · Levi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10108968B1 · Tekle et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11908001B2 · Frind et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020091972A1 · Harris et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020095303A1 · Asayama et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020103625A1 · Card et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020156632A1 · Haynes et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020184080A1 · Murad et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030014491A1 · Horvitz et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030065632A1 · Hubey · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030065635A1 · Sahami et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030093405A1 · Mayer · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030176931A1 · Pednault et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030177110A1 · Okamoto et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030234519A1 · Farmer · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040012638A1 · Donnelli et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040107283A1 · Paddon · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040210640A1 · Chadwick et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040230527A1 · Hansen et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040260781A1 · Shostack et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050003799A1 · Kang · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050027707A1 · Syed · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050080857A1 · Kirsch et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050108227A1 · Russell-Falla et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050108344A1 · Tafoya et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050223020A1 · Cutlip et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050240608A1 · Jones et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060018522A1 · Sunzeri et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060059142A1 · Zvinyatskovsky et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060059159A1 · Truong et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149766A1 · Ghoting et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060206574A1 · Bellegarda et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060251339A1 · Gokturk et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060256959A1 · Hymes · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070005587A1 · Johnson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070061334A1 · Ramer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070106659A1 · Lu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070112792A1 · Majumder · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070129999A1 · Zhou · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070156664A1 · Norton et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070189272A1 · Hutchinson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070206917A1 · Ono et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233603A1 · Schmidgall et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070253031A1 · Fan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070265962A1 · Bowe, Jr. et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070282621A1 · Altman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080039121A1 · Muller et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080086534A1 · Bardak et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080103971A1 · Lukose et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080140576A1 · Lewis et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080140681A1 · Ajibade · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080184129A1 · Cancel et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080189122A1 · Coletrane et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090016507A1 · Altberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090043805A1 · Masonis et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090044279A1 · Crawford et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090049036A1 · Juan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090066722A1 · Kriger et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090094048A1 · Wallace et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090106043A1 · Buckwalter et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090144329A1 · Marlow · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090150330A1 · Gobeyn et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090164464A1 · Carrico et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216734A1 · Aghajanyan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090248599A1 · Hueter et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299645A1 · Colby et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090319466A1 · Liu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100002920A1 · Cosatto et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100036806A1 · Lam et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100042471A1 · Chang · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070350A1 · Paunikar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100077032A1 · Drennan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094767A1 · Miltonberger · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100114614A1 · Sharpe · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100145869A1 · Brown · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100169262A1 · Kenedy et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100169376A1 · Chu · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100262611A1 · Frind · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312713A1 · Keltner · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100318544A1 · Nicolov · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110045801A1 · Parker, II · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110055210A1 · Meredith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110082824A1 · Allison et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110107260A1 · Park et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125509A1 · Lidstrom et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110131085A1 · Wey · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110145238A1 · Stork · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110167059A1 · Fallah · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178881A1 · Pulletikurty · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110184958A1 · Krishnamoorthy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110191768A1 · Smith · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208737A1 · Shmueli et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110209068A1 · Vemuri · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110219310A1 · Robson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110231396A1 · Dhara et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270813A1 · Cok et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110306028A1 · Galimore · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120005204A1 · Diaz et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120023566A1 · Waterson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120023567A1 · Hammad · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120028230A1 · Devereux · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120059850A1 · Bent et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120088524A1 · Moldavsky et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120089618A1 · Anschutz et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120102410A1 · Gewecke et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109959A1 · Benhadda · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120110085A1 · Malik et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123828A1 · Pahls et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120151417A1 · Wong et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120155296A1 · Kashanian · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120158586A1 · Ganti et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120166285A1 · Shapiro et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120190386A1 · Anderson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120197802A1 · Smith et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120198002A1 · Goulart et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120278262A1 · Morgenstern et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120284212A1 · Lin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120284341A1 · Masood et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120290978A1 · Devecka · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130013541A1 · Juan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130028521A1 · Yabu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130097246A1 · Zifroni et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130135451A1 · Hou · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138741A1 · Redstone et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130139236A1 · Rubinstein · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130179504A1 · Adams et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204710A1 · Boland et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130212680A1 · Winn et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130247149A1 · Sanft et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130262984A1 · Mehr et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130282745A1 · Mishra et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130297590A1 · Zukovsky et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130325923A1 · Jin · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130325948A1 · Chen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140025702A1 · Curtiss et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140052861A1 · Frind et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140058763A1 · Zizzamia et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140079297A1 · Tadayon et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140095598A1 · Schornack et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140095603A1 · Bhardwaj et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140122628A1 · Yao et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140136933A1 · Berger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140137004A1 · Berger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140152773A1 · Ohba et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156750A1 · De Cristofaro et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140207637A1 · Groarke · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140258366A1 · L'Heureux et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140317736A1 · Cao et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150026027A1 · Priess et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100530A1 · Mnih et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150120583A1 · Zarrella · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150127590A1 · Gay et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150161649A1 · Eggleston et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150199010A1 · Coleman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150348208A1 · Nordyke et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150379574A1 · Pattan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160292688A1 · Barton et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170242569A1 · Frind et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039773A1 · Levi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180052991A1 · Levi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200233854A1 · Kuchka et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006094228A2 · 2006 [cited by examiner]
WO 2008030670A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Soumya Purohit · Roshan Neupane · Naga Ramya Bhamidipati · Varsha Vakkavanthula · Songjie Wang · Matthew Rockey · Prasad Calyam; Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing for Co-Operative Defense in Multi-Domain Entities; IEEE … [cited by examiner]
Runnan Tan · Qingfeng Tan · Peng Zhang · Zhao Li; Graph Neural Network for Ethereum Fraud Detection; 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK) (2021, pp. 78-85); (Year: 2022). [cited by examiner]
Dirk Hoffstadt · Erwin Rathgeb · Matthias Liebig · Ralf Meister · Yacine Rebahi · Tran Quang Thanh; A comprehensive framework for detecting and preventing VoIP fraud and misuse; 2014 International Conference on Computin… [cited by examiner]
Alsaleh, “Improving Matching . . . ” Computer Sci Discipline 313-320, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Arbelaitz et al., “Web usage and content mining to extract knowledge for modelling the users of the Bidasoa Turismo website and to adapt it,” [cited by applicant]
Artzi et al., “Predicting Responses to Microblog Posts”. [cited by applicant]
Avrahami et al., “Responsiveness in Instant Messaging: Predictive Models Supporting Inter-Personal Communication”. [cited by applicant]
“Binary Search Tree” Wikipedia—Feb. 24, 2015—11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brammer, “Who Commits Online Advertising Fraud and How to Stop It,” published online on Sep. 21, 2015, downloaded from http://blog.ezanga.com/blog/who-commits-online-advertising-fraud-and-how-to-stop-it on Jun. 16, 2018… [cited by applicant]
Caldeira et al., “Fraud Analysis and Prevention in e-Commerce Transactions,” 2014 9 [cited by applicant]
“Chargeback” Wikipedia—Feb. 24, 2015—4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dokoohaki et al., “Mining Divergent Opinion Trust Networks through Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” [cited by applicant]
Eastwood et al., “Risk Profiler in Automated Human Authentication,” 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Engineering Solutions (CIES), pp. 140-147, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Fiore et al., “Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles” CHI Friends, Foe, and Family, 2998, pp. 797-806. [cited by applicant]
Gehani et al., “PAST : Probabilistic Authentication of Sensor Timestamps,” [cited by applicant]
Grüner et al., “Using Probabilistic Attribute Aggregation for Increasing Trust in Attribute Assurance,” 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Dec. 6-9, 2019, Xiamen, China, pp. 633-640, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kapourniotis et al., “Scam and Fraud Detection in VoIP Networks: Analysis and Countermeasures Using User Profiling,” IEEE, 2011, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Khadangi et al., “Measuring Relationship Strength in Online Social Networks based on users' activities and profile information,” [cited by applicant]
Kononenko “Semi-Naïve Bayesian Classifier”. [cited by applicant]
“Merchant Account” Wikipedia—Feb. 24, 2015—10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moulin et al., “Support Vector Machines for Transient Stability Analysis of Large-Scale Power Systems,” [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 2, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/668,808, Levi et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect User Interest-Based Matching in a Network Environment,” 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Dec. 29, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/575,888, MacKinnon, “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Exchange of Messages in a Network Environment,” 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Feb. 1, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,225, Tekle et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent Advertising Accounts in a Network Environment,” … [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,792, Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Predict and Prevent Chargebacks in a Network Environment,” 64 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Mar. 20, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/737,121, Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate User Behavioral Based Determination of User Values in a Network Environment,” 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jul. 26, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/575,888, MacKinnon, “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Exchange of Messages in a Network Environment,” 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Oct. 11, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” 66 p… [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/782,354, Levi et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent User Information in a Network Environment,” 9 pa… [cited by applicant]
Geroimenko (Ed.) et al., [cited by applicant]
Parimi et al., “Predicting Friendship Links in Social Networks Using a Topic Modeling Approach,” [cited by applicant]
Peled et al., “Entity Matching in Online Social Networks,” [cited by applicant]
Sharma et al., “A Neural Network based Approach for Predicting Customer Churn in Cellular Network Services,” [cited by applicant]
“Understanding Chargebacks . . .” DalPay—Feb. 24, 2015—6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Therneau et al., Mayo Clinic—Feb. 24, 2015—62 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., “Relationship strength estimation for online social networks with the study on Facebook,” Neurocomputing 95:89-97, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,328, filed Jul. 23, 2014, 135 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 23, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,328, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,849, filed Jan. 24, 2014, 75 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Jan. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,849, Frind et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” 61 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” Amendment filed May 27, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,849, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Aug. 16, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,849, Frind et al. “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” 60 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, mailed Feb. 10, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,849, Frind et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “System and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Evaluating Entity Pairs,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/756,912, filed Jan. 25, 2013, 75 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Preliminary Amendment filed May 24, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendment filed Nov. 16, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012, For U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendmend, dated May 24, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed May 19, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendment filed Aug. 12, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Nov. 18, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Response Under 37 CFR 1.116 filed Jan. 6, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 12… [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendment filed Feb. 13, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Jun. 24, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendment filed Sep. 24, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” Amendment filed Mar. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, mailed Aug. 24, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/488,512, Frind, “System and Method for Adaptive Matching of User Profiles Based on Viewing and Contact Activity for Social Relationship Services,” 20 page… [cited by applicant]
Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, filed Mar. 11, 2014, 92 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Apr. 4, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” 80 p… [cited by applicant]
Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” Amendment, Filed Aug. 4, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Sep. 8, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” 104 p… [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated May 17, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,939, Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” 82 Pa… [cited by applicant]
Levi et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect User Interest-Based Matching in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/668,808, filed Mar. 25, 2015, 111 pages. [cited by applicant]
Levi et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect User Interest-Based Matching in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/976,296, filed Apr. 7, 2014, 111 pages. [cited by applicant]
MacKinnon, “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Exchange of Messages in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/575,888, filed Dec. 18, 2014, 83 pages. [cited by applicant]
MacKinnon, “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Exchange of Messages in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/918,466, filed Dec. 19, 2013, 83 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect Electronic Message Reply Rate Matching in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/563,504, filed Dec. 8, 2014, 55 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jul. 5, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/563,504, Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect Electronic Message Reply Rate Matching in a Network Environment,” 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate User Behavioral Based Dertermination of User Values in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/013,849, filed Jun. 18, 2014, 68 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al. “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Providing Service Level Upgrade Offers,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/974,129, filed Apr. 2, 2014, 95 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Providing Service Level Upgrade Offers,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,749, filed Mar. 30, 2015, 95 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tekle et al. “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent Advertising Accounts in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/948,159, filed Mar. 5, 2014, 79 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tekle et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent Advertising Accounts in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,225, filed Mar. 4, 2015, 79 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,225, Tekle et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent Advertising Accounts in a Network Environment,”… [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Sep. 21, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,483, Frind et al. “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” Amendment filed Dec. 8, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,483, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Apr. 6, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,483, Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” Response Under 37 CFR 1.116, filed Jul. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,483, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Notice of Allowability, mailed Oct. 28, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,483, Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/691,082, filed Aug. 20, 2012, 131 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate User Behavioral Based Determination of User Values in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/737,121, filed Jun. 11, 2015, 68 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Predict and Prevent Chargebacks in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,792, filed Apr. 6, 2015, 69 pages. [cited by applicant]
Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/857,617, filed Jul. 23, 2013,138 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oldridge et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Effect Electronic Message Reply Rate Matching in a Network Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/914,154, filed Dec. 10, 2013, 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kuchka et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Identify Discrepancies Between Clients and in Response Prompt Clients in a Networked Environment,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/780,391, filed Mar. 13, 2013, 92 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, mailed Sep. 20, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,328, Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, mailed Feb. 3, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,328, Frind et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Matching of Clients in a Networked Environment,” 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jul. 10, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/672,749, Oldridge et al., “Systems and Methods for Training and Employing a Machine Learning System in Providing Service Level Upgrade Offers,” 66 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, mailed Jun. 20, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,225, Tekle et al., “Apparatus, Method and Article to Facilitate Automatic Detection and Removal of Fraudulent Advertising Accounts in a Network Enviro… [cited by applicant]
Srivastava et al., “Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Hidden Markov Model,” [cited by applicant]