IP Library Granted Patent US 12,295,639
Granted Patent B2
US 12,295,639 · App. 18/647,890 · Granted May 13, 2025

Estimating state of ultrasonic end effector and control system therefor

Inventors: Cameron R. Nott (Fairfield, OH); Foster B. Stulen (Johns Island, SC); Fergus P. Quigley (Mason, OH); John E. Brady (Cincinnati, OH); Gregory A. Trees (Loveland, OH); Amrita Singh Sawhney (Pittsburgh, PA); Rafael J. Ruiz Ortiz (Mason, OH); Patrick J. Scoggins (Loveland, OH); Kristen G. Denzinger (Cincinnati, OH); Craig N. Faller (Batavia, OH); Madeleine C. Jayme (Cincinnati, OH); Alexander R. Cuti (Pittsburgh, PA); Matthew S. Schneider (Blue Ash, OH); Chad P. Boudreaux (Cincinnati, OH); Brian D. Black (Loveland, OH); Maxwell T. Rockman (Cincinnati, OH); Gregory D. Bishop (Hamilton, OH); Frederick E. Shelton, IV (Hillsboro, OH); David C. Yates (Morrow, OH)
Assignee: Cilag GmbH International
A61B18/1206A61B8/4483A61B17/320068A61B17/320092A61B18/12A61B18/14A61B34/30A61B90/37G06F1/022A61B2017/00017A61B2017/00022A61B2017/00026A61B2017/0003A61B2017/00075A61B2017/00084A61B2017/00106A61B2017/00115A61B2017/00199A61B2017/00221A61B2017/00398A61B2017/00464A61B2017/07285A61B2018/00994A61B2090/064A61B2090/066A61B2090/0809A61B2090/0811A61B2217/005A61B2217/007
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,295,639
App. No.
18/647,890
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3794
USPC
606/33
Abstract

Various aspects of a generator, ultrasonic device, and method for estimating a state of an end effector of an ultrasonic device are disclosed. The ultrasonic device includes an electromechanical ultrasonic system defined by a predetermined resonant frequency, including an ultrasonic transducer coupled to an ultrasonic blade. A control circuit measures a complex impedance of an ultrasonic transducer, wherein the complex impedance is defined as Z g (t)=V g (t)/I g (t). The control circuit receives a complex impedance measurement data point and compares the complex impedance measurement data point to a data point in a reference complex impedance characteristic pattern. The control circuit then classifies the complex impedance measurement data point based on a result of the comparison analysis and assigns a state or condition of the end effector based on the result of the comparison analysis.

Claims (54)

1. A surgical system comprising:

an ultrasonic device comprising a jaw clamp and an electromechanical ultrasonic system defined by a predetermined resonant frequency,

wherein the electromechanical ultrasonic system comprises an ultrasonic transducer coupled to an ultrasonic blade via an ultrasonic waveguide;

a surgical hub system comprising a communication circuit, wherein the surgical hub system is in communication with the ultrasonic device;

a generator configured to supply power to the ultrasonic transducer, wherein the generator comprises a control circuit to:

cause a drive circuit to apply a drive signal to the ultrasonic transducer, wherein the drive signal is defined by a magnitude and a frequency;

sweep the frequency of the drive signal from below the predetermined resonant frequency to above the predetermined resonant frequency;

measure and record impedance circle variables R e and X e , and admittance circle variables G e and B e ;

compare the measured impedance circle variables R e and X e and the measured admittance circle variables Ge and Be to reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref , respectively; and

determine a state or condition of an end effector of the ultrasonic device based on the result of the comparison.

2. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref are stored in a database of the ultrasonic device.

3. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref correspond to an open and unloaded jaw clamp.

4. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref correspond to the jaw clamp fully clamped on a moist chamois.

5. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref are accessible to the surgical hub system from a cloud-based memory storage unit.

6. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the drive signal is a periodic signal.

7. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the control circuit is further configured to:

plot real resistance values R e and imaginary impedance values X e on a two-dimensional graph; and

fit the real resistance values R e and the imaginary impedance values X e to a circle having a radius and offset values.

8. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the control circuit is further configured to:

plot real conductance values G e and imaginary susceptance values B e on a second two-dimensional graph; and

fit the real conductance values G e and the imaginary susceptance values B e to a second circle having a second radius and second offset values.

9. The surgical system of claim 1 , wherein the generator is disposed within a generator module of the surgical hub system.

10. A surgical system comprising:

a smart surgical device;

a surgical hub system comprising a communication circuit, wherein the surgical hub system is in communication with the smart surgical device;

a generator configured to supply power to the smart surgical device, wherein the generator comprises a control circuit to:

cause a drive circuit to apply a drive signal to the smart surgical device, wherein the drive signal is defined by a magnitude and a frequency;

sweep the frequency of the drive signal from below a predetermined resonant frequency of the smart surgical device to above the predetermined resonant frequency;

measure and record impedance circle variables R e and X e , and admittance circle variables G e and B e ;

compare the measured impedance circle variables R e and X e and the measured admittance circle variables G e and B e to reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref , respectively; and

determine a state or condition of an end effector of the smart surgical device based on the result of the comparison.

11. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref are stored in a database of the ultrasonic smart surgical device instrument.

12. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref are accessible to the surgical hub system from a cloud-based memory storage unit.

13. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the drive signal is a periodic signal.

14. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the control circuit is further configured to:

plot real resistance values R e and imaginary impedance values X e on a two-dimensional graph; and

fit the real resistance values R e and the imaginary impedance values X e to a circle having a radius and offset values.

15. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the control circuit is further configured to:

plot real conductance values G e and imaginary susceptance values B e on a second two-dimensional graph; and

fit the real conductance values G e and the imaginary susceptance values B e to a second circle having a second radius and second offset values.

16. The surgical system of claim 10 , wherein the generator is disposed within a generator module of the surgical hub system.

17. A method of controlling a surgical system comprising:

applying, by a control circuit, a drive signal to an ultrasonic transducer of an electromechanical ultrasonic system, wherein the drive signal is defined by a magnitude and a frequency;

sweeping, by the control circuit, the frequency of the drive signal from below a predetermined resonant frequency of the electromechanical ultrasonic system to above the predetermined resonant frequency of the electromechanical ultrasonic system;

measuring and recording, by the control circuit, impedance circle variables R e and X e , and admittance circle variables G e and B e ;

obtaining, by a surgical hub system comprising a communication circuit, reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref , from a cloud-based memory storage unit;

comparing, by the control circuit, the measured impedance circle variables R e and X e and the measured admittance circle variables G e and B e to the reference impedance circle variables R ref and X ref , and the reference admittance circle variables G ref and B ref , respectively; and

determining, by the control circuit, a state or condition of an end effector of the electromechanical ultrasonic system based on the result of the comparison.

18. The method of controlling the surgical system of claim 17 , further comprising:

plotting, by the control circuit, real resistance values R e and imaginary impedance values X e on a two-dimensional graph; and

fitting, by the control circuit, the real resistance values R e and the imaginary impedance values X e to a circle having a radius and offset values.

19. The method of controlling the surgical system of claim 17 , further comprising:

plotting, by the control circuit, real conductance values G e and imaginary susceptance values B e on a second two-dimensional graph; and

fitting, by the control circuit, the real conductance values G e and the imaginary susceptance values B e to a second circle having a second radius and second offset values.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2024
From: ROCKMAN, MAXWELL
To: ETHICON LLC
Reel/Frame 067999/0766 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2024
From: NOTT, CAMERON R.; STULEN, FOSTER B.; QUIGLEY, FERGUS P.; BRADY, JOHN E.; TREES, GREGORY A.; SAWHNEY, AMRITA SINGH; RUIZ ORTIZ, RAFAEL J.; SCOGGINS, PATRICK J.; DENZINGER, KRISTEN G.; FALLER, CRAIG N.; JAYME, MADELEINE C.; CUTI, ALEXANDER R.; SCHNEIDER, MATTHEW S.; BOUDREAUX, CHAD P.; BLACK, BRIAN D.; BISHOP, GREGORY D.; SHELTON, FREDERICK E., IV; YATES, DAVID C.
To: ETHICON LLC
Reel/Frame 068384/0762 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2024
From: ETHICON LLC
To: CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 068419/0914 →