IP Library Granted Patent US 12,428,044
Granted Patent B2
US 12,428,044 · App. 18/651,859 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Intelligent railroad at-grade crossings

Inventors: Mathew O'Sullivan (Evanston, IL); David Kiley (Washington, DC)
Assignee: Cavnue Technology, LLC
B61L29/08B61L25/023G08G1/04G08G1/056G08G1/22G06F2218/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,428,044
App. No.
18/651,859
Filed
May 1, 2024
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3664
USPC
701/117
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for monitoring vehicles traversing a dedicated roadway that includes an at-grade crossing. In some implementations, a system includes a central server, a gate system, and sensors. The gate system provides access to an at-grade crossing for vehicles. The sensors are positioned in a fixed location relative to a roadway, the roadway including the at-grade crossing. Each sensor can detect vehicles on the roadway. For each vehicle, each sensor can generate sensor data and observational data from the generated sensor data. Each sensor can determine a likelihood that the detected vehicle will approach the at-grade crossing by comparing the likelihood to a threshold. In response, each sensor can transmit data to the gate system that causes the gate system to allow the autonomous vehicle access to the at-grade crossing prior to the autonomous vehicle reaching the gate system.

Claims (41)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by a first sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a first location along a roadway, a received feature set from a second sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a different location along the roadway, the received feature set indicating one or more characteristics of a vehicle as sensed by the second sensor device;

generating, by the first sensor device, a generated feature set, the generated feature set indicating one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by the first sensor device;

determining, by the first sensor device, that the received feature set matches the generated feature set;

after determining that the received feature set matches the generated feature set, by the first sensor device, that a model indicates that vehicle, determining, by the first sensor device, that the vehicle is likely to approach an intersection; and

in response to determining that the vehicle is likely to approach the intersection, transmitting, by the first sensor device, a message to an access control device that controls access to the intersection.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the access control device comprises a gate.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the intersection comprises an intersection of two roadways.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining that the vehicle is likely to approach the intersection comprises inputting the received feature set or the generated feature set to a machine learning model.

5. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining whether the vehicle actually approached the intersection; and

updating a machine learning model based on determining whether the vehicle actually approached the intersection.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a LIDAR unit or a radar unit of the second sensor device.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a microphone of the second sensor device.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a camera of the second sensor device.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the received feature set matches the generated feature set comprises comparing an identity product of the received feature set with an identity product of the generated feature set.

10. The method of claim 1 , comprising, after determining that the received feature set matches the generated feature set, transmitting, by the first sensor device, a message to the second sensor device.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein a field of view of the first sensor device at the first location along the roadway is non-overlapping with a field of view of the second sensor device at the different location along the roadway.

12. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media that store instructions which, when executed by one or more computer processors, cause the one or more computer processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by a first sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a first location along a roadway, a received feature set from a second sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a different location along the roadway, the received feature set indicating one or more characteristics of a vehicle as sensed by the second sensor device;

generating, by the first sensor device, a generated feature set, the generated feature set indicating one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by the first sensor device;

determining, by the first sensor device, that the received feature set matches the generated feature set;

after determining that the received feature set matches the generated feature set, by the first sensor device, that a model indicates that vehicle, determining, by the first sensor device, that the vehicle is likely to approach an intersection; and

in response to determining that the vehicle is likely to approach the intersection, transmitting, by the first sensor device, a message to an access control device that controls access to the intersection.

13. The media of claim 12 , wherein the access control device comprises a gate.

14. The media of claim 12 , wherein the intersection comprises an intersection of two roadways.

15. The media of claim 12 , wherein the determining that the vehicle is likely to approach the intersection comprises inputting the received feature set or the generated feature set to a machine learning model.

16. The media of claim 12 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining whether the vehicle actually approached the intersection; and

updating a machine learning model based on determining whether the vehicle actually approached the intersection.

17. The media of claim 12 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a LIDAR unit or a radar unit of the second sensor device.

18. The media of claim 12 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a microphone of the second sensor device.

19. The media of claim 12 , wherein the received feature set indicates one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by a camera of the second sensor device.

20. A system comprising:

one or more computer processors; and

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media that store instructions which, when executed by the one or more computer processors, cause the one or more computer processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by a first sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a first location along a roadway, a received feature set from a second sensor device that is positioned to observe vehicles at a different location along the roadway, the received feature set indicating one or more characteristics of a vehicle as sensed by the second sensor device;

generating, by the first sensor device, a generated feature set, the generated feature set indicating one or more characteristics of the vehicle as sensed by the first sensor device;

determining, by the first sensor device, that the received feature set matches the generated feature set;

after determining that the received feature set matches the generated feature set, by the first sensor device, that a model indicates that vehicle, determining, by the first sensor device, that the vehicle is likely to approach an intersection; and

in response to determining that the vehicle is likely to approach the intersection, transmitting, by the first sensor device, a message to an access control device that controls access to the intersection.

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2026
From: CAVNUE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: GOLUB CAPITAL MARKETS LLC
Reel/Frame 074328/0202 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT R/F 71278/0907 Recorded Jan 30, 2026
From: SIP MOBILITYCO PLATFORMCO, LLC
To: CAVNUE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 074536/0444 →
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 29, 2026
From: CAVNUE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: SIP MOBILITYCO PLATFORMCO, LLC
Reel/Frame 074533/0139 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2025
From: CAVNUE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: SIP MOBILITY PLATFORMCO, LLC
Reel/Frame 071278/0907 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2024
From: O'SULLIVAN, MATHEW; KILEY, DAVID
To: CAVNUE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 067279/0530 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18179103 · Mar 6, 2023
Continuation 18047901 · Oct 19, 2022
Related Publication 20240351624A1 · Oct 24, 2024
References Cited (26)
US 6263799B1 · Pardes · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7302319B2 · Wu · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7832691B2 · Reibeling et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8157219B2 · Ashraf et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9415783B2 · Kissel · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9802630B2 · Bartolotti · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10453352B1 · Hayward · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10899350B2 · Schoenly · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10899374B2 · Hilleary · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11138873B1 · Clifford · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11623675B1 · O'Sullivan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11999399B2 · O'Sullivan · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20080185482A1 · Ghigliotti · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130194423A1 · Baines et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130200223A1 · Alexander et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130289805A1 · Makkinejad · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160231746A1 · Hazelton et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180018888A1 · Townsend · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180208223A1 · Israelsson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190145791A1 · Rempel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200377128A1 · Marczuk · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200398877A1 · White · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210041877A1 · Lacaze et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210142684A1 · Hilleary · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Cavnue LLC, “Autonomous Trucking on Rail Rights of Way,” Jul. 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dot.alaska.gov [online], “Enjoy the unique experience of a trip to Whittier, Alaska, driving the longest combined vehicle-railroad tunnel in North America!” Sep. 28, 2013, retrieved on Aug. 9, 2022, retrieved from URL<h… [cited by applicant]