Security management on a mobile device
Example mobile devices disclosed herein include a camera, memory including computer-executable instructions, and a processor to execute the instructions to at least associate a location of the mobile device with picture data obtained with the camera. The processor is also to assign a first data tag to the picture data when the location of the mobile device corresponds to a first area, the first data tag to identify a first security level for the picture data, or assign a second data tag to the picture data when the location of the mobile device does not correspond to the first area, the second data tag to identify a second security level for the picture data. The processor is further to determine whether to permit an application to access the picture data based on whether the first data tag or the second data tag is assigned to the picture data.
1. A method, comprising:
in response to receipt from a first application of a first request to access content, permitting, by a computing system, the first application to access the content based at least in part on a match between a first tag associated with the content and a second tag associated with the first application; and
in response to receipt from a second application of a second request to access the content, prohibiting, by the computing system, the second application from accessing the content based at least in part on a mismatch between the first tag and a third tag associated with the second application.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
storing, by the computing system, the first tag in association with the content;
storing, by the computing system, the second tag in association with the first application; and
storing, by the computing system, the third tag in association with the second application.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
in response to receipt from the second application of a third request to access other content, permitting, by the computing system, the second application to access the other content based at least in part on a match between a fourth tag associated with the other content and the third tag.
4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:
in response to receipt from the first application of a fourth request to access the other content, prohibiting, by the computing system, the first application from accessing the other content based at least in part on a mismatch between the fourth tag and the second tag.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
in response to receipt from the first application of a third request to access other content, prohibiting, by the computing system, the first application from accessing the other content based at least in part on a mismatch between a fourth tag associated with the other content and the second tag.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content includes at least one image.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content includes video.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, by a third application running at an operating system level of the computing system, that the first tag matches the second tag; and
determining, by the third application, that the first tag does not match the third tag.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, by a third application running at an application runtime level of the computing system, that the first tag matches the second tag; and
determining, by the third application, that the first tag does not match the third tag.
10. A system, comprising:
one or more processors; and
one or more computer-readable mediums encoded with instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to:
in response to receipt from a first application of a first request to access content, permit the first application to access the content based at least in part on a match between a first tag associated with the content and a second tag associated with the first application; and
in response to receipt from a second application of a second request to access the content, prohibit the second application from accessing the content based at least in part on a mismatch between the first tag and a third tag associated with the second application.
11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
store the first tag in association with the content;
store the second tag in association with the first application; and
store the third tag in association with the second application.
12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
in response to receipt from the second application of a third request to access other content, permit the second application to access the other content based at least in part on a match between a fourth tag associated with the other content and the third tag.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
in response to receipt from the first application of a fourth request to access the other content, prohibit the first application from accessing the other content based at least in part on a mismatch between the fourth tag and the second tag.
14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
in response to receipt from the first application of a third request to access other content, prohibit the first application from accessing the other content based at least in part on a mismatch between a fourth tag associated with the other content and the second tag.
15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the content includes at least one image.
16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the content includes video.
17. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
determine, by a third application running at an operating system level of the system, that the first tag matches the second tag; and
determine, by the third application, that the first tag does not match the third tag.
18. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computer-readable mediums are further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
determine, by a third application running at an application runtime level of the system, that the first tag matches the second tag; and
determine, by the third application, that the first tag does not match the third tag.
19. One or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums encoded with instructions which, when executed by one or more processors of a system, cause the system to:
in response to receipt from a first application of a first request to access content, permit the first application to access the content based at least in part on a match between a first tag associated with the content and a second tag associated with the first application; and
in response to receipt from a second application of a second request to access the content, prohibit the second application from accessing the content based at least in part on a mismatch between the first tag and a third tag associated with the second application.
20. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums of claim 19 , further encoded with additional instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:
store the first tag in association with the content;
store the second tag in association with the first application; and
store the third tag in association with the second application.