IP Library Granted Patent US 12,591,850
Granted Patent B1
US 12,591,850 · App. 18/662,490 · Granted Mar 31, 2026

System and method of reverse sourcing of product returns based on restorage cost models

Inventors: Abhijeet Sharma (Khandwa, IN); Mayank Tiwari (Serilingampalle, IN); Pankaj Rathoure (Shajapur, IN); Priyanka Koushik (Irving, TX); Raghuveer Prasad Nagar (Kota, IN)
Assignee: Blue Yonder Group, Inc.
G06Q10/087
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,591,850
App. No.
18/662,490
Granted
Mar 31, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system and method are disclosed for modeling restorage cost for reverse sourcing of regular items. The method includes detecting a return request from a customer for an item, identifying a supply type for the item, predicting a demand for the item at potential restorage sites in a supply chain network, deriving a likelihood of potential restorage sites meeting service level agreements, and calculating a restorage cost for each of the potential restorage sites, and based on the calculated restorage costs, recommend a restorage plan to a user, where the recommended restorage plan is based, at least in part, on a threshold value of the item. The method further includes identifying the potential restorage sites based, at least in part, on a geographic range and assigning a manual quality check to verify a condition of the item.

Claims (50)

1 . A system for modeling restorage cost for reverse sourcing of regular items, comprising:

a computer, comprising a processor and a memory, the computer configured to:

detect a return request from a customer for an item;

identify a supply type for the item;

predict a demand for the item at one or more potential restorage sites in a supply chain network;

derive a likelihood of one or more potential restorage sites meeting one or more respective service level agreements; and

calculate a restorage cost for each of the one or more potential restorage sites and, based on the calculated restorage costs, recommend a restorage plan to a user; and

automated robotic production machinery configured to:

produce products based, at least in part, on the restorage plan.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the likelihood is based, at least in part, on an inventory level.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer is further configured to:

assign a manual quality check to verify a condition of the item.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the supply type comprises one or more of:

items ready for immediate resale, items requiring repair or servicing and items that may be split into multiple saleable products.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the supply type is based on a usage level of the item.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the computer is further configured to:

identify the one or more potential restorage sites based, at least in part, on a geographic range.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the recommended restorage plan is based, at least in part, on a threshold value of the item.

8 . A computer-implemented method for modeling restorage cost for reverse sourcing of regular items, comprising:

detecting, by a computer comprising a processor and a memory, a return request from a customer for an item;

identifying, by the computer, a supply type for the item;

predicting, by the computer, a demand for the item at one or more potential restorage sites in a supply chain network;

deriving, by the computer, a likelihood of one or more potential restorage sites meeting one or more respective service level agreements;

calculating, by the computer, a restorage cost for each of the one or more potential restorage sites and, based on the calculated restorage costs, recommend a restorage plan to a user; and

producing, by automated robotic production machinery, products based, at least in part, on the restorage plan.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

wherein the likelihood is based, at least in part, on an inventory level.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

assigning, by the computer, a manual quality check to verify a condition of the item.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the supply type comprises one or more of:

items ready for immediate resale, items requiring repair or servicing and items that may be split into multiple saleable products.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the supply type is based on a usage level of the item.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

identifying, by the computer, the one or more potential restorage sites based, at least in part, on a geographic range.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the recommended restorage plan is based, at least in part, on a threshold value of the item.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium embodied with software for modeling restorage cost for reverse sourcing of regular items, the software when executed is configured to:

detect, by a computer comprising a processor and a memory, a return request from a customer for an item;

identify a supply type for the item;

predict a demand for the item at one or more potential restorage sites in a supply chain network;

derive a likelihood of one or more potential restorage sites meeting one or more respective service level agreements;

calculate a restorage cost for each of the one or more potential restorage sites and, based on the calculated restorage costs, recommend a restorage plan to a user; and

produce, by automated robotic production machinery, products based, at least in part, on the restorage plan.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the likelihood is based, at least in part, on an inventory level.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the software when executed is further configured to:

assign a manual quality check to verify a condition of the item.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the supply type comprises one or more of:

items ready for immediate resale, items requiring repair or servicing and items that may be split into multiple saleable products.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the supply type is based on a usage level of the item.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the software when executed is further configured to:

identify the one or more potential restorage sites based, at least in part, on a geographic range.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2024
From: SHARMA, ABHIJEET; TIWARI, MAYANK; RATHOURE, PANKAJ; KOUSHIK, PRIYANKA; NAGAR, RAGHUVEER PRASAD
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 068343/0941 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63531135 · Aug 7, 2023
Provisional Application 63529568 · Jul 28, 2023
Provisional Application 63529068 · Jul 26, 2023
References Cited (19)
US 9652732B1 · Barstad · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10318921B1 · Tilly · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11030674B2 · Nair · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11205181B2 · Agasti · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20040117384A1 · Ray · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050171827A1 · Denton · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060149577A1 · Stashluk, Jr. · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060271422A1 · Rakesh · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20100318207A1 · Yee · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20140129391A1 · Kreuels · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170293886A1 · Bostick · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20210042699A1 · Lee · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210150616A1 · Kentris · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220012677A1 · Rongley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220198377A1 · Cho · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230237425A1 · Puthiyapurayil · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230419244A1 · Sood · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2001057613A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021169553A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]