IP Library Granted Patent US 12,456,385
Granted Patent B2
US 12,456,385 · App. 18/675,427 · Granted Oct 28, 2025

Method and systems for modifying content of an electronic learning system for vision deficient users

Inventors: Sebastian Mihai (Kitchener, CA); Philip Brown (Kitchener, CA); Chantal Jandard (Kitchener, CA); Mark Cowan (Kitchener, CA)
Assignee: D2L Corporation
G09B5/02A61B3/066G06F40/151G06F40/197G06T11/001G09B7/00G09B21/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,456,385
App. No.
18/675,427
Granted
Oct 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for modifying one or more contents of an electronic learning system for a user impaired by a colour vision deficiency. The method includes: generating a vision profile for the user, the vision profile indicating at least a type of the colour vision deficiency, identifying, from the one or more contents, a content to be modified, the content including at least two portions formed of a first colour and a second colour, respectively, the first colour being different from the second colour but the first colour being at least partially indistinguishable from the second colour by the user due to the colour vision deficiency, identifying a content transformation to be applied to the content based on the vision profile, the content transformation including one or more adjustments of the content to accommodate the colour vision deficiency impairing the user; and applying the content transformation to the content.

Claims (29)

1 . A computer-implemented method for assessing content for an electronic learning system, the method comprising:

receiving content data from a content creator, the content data being used to generate the content;

determining whether the content is deficient, the content being deficient when at least two portions of the content are formed of a first colour and a second colour, respectively, the first colour being different from the second colour but, to an individual impaired by a colour vision deficiency, the first colour being at least partially indistinguishable from the second colour, wherein determining whether the content is deficient comprises generating a vision profile of a user based on a weighted evaluation of results from at least two different vision tests, wherein a test result is assigned a weight according to a reliability factor for detecting a distinct colour vision deficiency; and

in response to determining the content is deficient, advising the content creator of the deficient content.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein advising the content creator of the deficient content comprises:

providing a replacement content for the deficient content, the replacement content being formed of one or more colours distinguishable by the individual impaired by the colour vision deficiency.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the replacement content is selected from one of an alternative content and a modified content.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein advising the content creator of the deficient content comprises:

providing a version of the content, the version of the content representing how the content is perceived by the individual impaired by the colour vision deficiency.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the content comprises, at least, course content for a course being provided to a group of students, the group of students including one or more students; and

the step of determining whether the content is deficient comprises:

identifying, from the group of students, any student impaired by the colour vision deficiency; and

in response to identifying at least one student is impaired by the colour vision deficiency, indicating the content is deficient if the content is deficient for the at least one student but otherwise, indicating the content is not deficient.

6 . A system for assessing content for an electronic learning system, the system comprising:

an interface module for receiving content data from a content creator, the content data being used to generate the content; and

a hardware processor in electronic communication with the interface module, the hardware processor being configured to:

determine whether the content is deficient, the content being deficient when at least two portions of the content are formed of a first colour and a second colour, respectively, the first colour being different from the second colour but, to an individual impaired by a colour vision deficiency, the first colour being at least partially indistinguishable from the second colour, wherein determining whether the content is deficient comprises generating a vision profile of a user based on a weighted evaluation of results from at least two different vision tests, wherein a test result is assigned a weight according to a reliability factor for detecting a distinct colour vision deficiency; and

in response to determining the content is deficient, advise the content creator of the deficient content.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein advising the content creator of the deficient content comprises:

providing a replacement content for the deficient content, the replacement content being formed of one or more colours distinguishable by the individual impaired by the colour vision deficiency.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the replacement content is selected from one of an alternative content and a modified content.

9 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the hardware processor is configured to:

provide a version of the content, the version of the content representing how the content is perceived by the individual impaired by the colour vision deficiency.

10 . The system of claim 6 , wherein:

the content comprises, at least, course content for a course being provided to a group of students, the group of students including one or more students; and

the hardware processor is configured to:

identify, from the group of students, any student impaired by the colour vision deficiency; and

in response to identifying at least one student is impaired by the colour vision deficiency, indicate the content is deficient if the content is deficient for the at least one student but otherwise, indicate the content is not deficient.

Assignments (1)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Nov 18, 2024
From: MIHAI, SEBASTIAN; BROWN, PHILIP; JANDARD, CHANTAL; COWAN, MARK
To: D2L CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069298/0200 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16150840 · Oct 3, 2018
Continuation 14555834 · Nov 28, 2014
Related Publication 20250029507A1 · Jan 23, 2025
References Cited (45)
US 5442375A · Wojaczynski · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 5589898A · Atkinson · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6309117B1 · Bunce · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6362830B1 · Walraven · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6757428B1 · Lin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6851809B1 · Sachtler · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 6985524B1 · Borchers · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7272785B2 · Fukuda et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7333117B2 · Kim · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7737992B2 · Hong et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10078988B2 · Kim et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102763B2 · Mihai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10314477B1 · Goodsitt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11600197B2 · Anantha et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20030174866A1 · Poynter · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040085327A1 · Jones · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050007449A1 · Ikado · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050105796A1 · Hong · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050213039A1 · Ohashi · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060061586A1 · Brulle-Drews et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060250669A1 · Beretta · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060256612A1 · Cho · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090003578A1 · Jain et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090066720A1 · Hong · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090115835A1 · Shaffer · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090128871A1 · Patton et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090263016A1 · Kuo · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100033679A1 · Kodama · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110090237A1 · Shimamura · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120147163A1 · Kaminsky · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120170840A1 · Caruso · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130096892A1 · Essa et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130201496A1 · Boggs et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130335435A1 · Ambrus · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140055506A1 · Chandel · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140270498A1 · Chester · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140282285A1 · Sadhvani et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140320516A1 · Son · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140335497A1 · Gal · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150072330A1 · Rosenberg · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150120293A1 · Wohlert · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150149902A1 · Zavesky et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150287043A1 · Michaelis et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150287345A1 · Tanuwidjaja · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170116885A1 · Wilczek · 2017 [cited by examiner]