IP Library Granted Patent US 12,654,549
Granted Patent B2
US 12,654,549 · App. 18/702,210 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Inverse tyre model boost function for a heavy-duty vehicle

Inventors: Leon Henderson (Härryda, SE); Ramadan Salif (Gothenburg, SE)
Assignee: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
B60K28/16B60T8/1708B60T8/172B60T8/175B60T8/17552B60T8/17616B60W10/04B60W10/18B60W30/18172B60T2220/04B60T2230/02B60T2240/06B60W2050/0031B60W2050/0037B60W2300/125B60W2520/26B60W2540/103B60W2540/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,654,549
App. No.
18/702,210
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer implemented method for controlling at least one driven and/or braked wheel of a heavy-duty vehicle includes configuring a default inverse tire model and a boost inverse tire model, where each inverse tire model represents a respective relationship between longitudinal wheel slip and longitudinal wheel force at the wheel, where the boost inverse tire model is associated with a higher maximum obtainable wheel slip value for the wheel compared to the default inverse tire model, obtaining a motion request indicative of a desired longitudinal force to be generated by the wheel, selecting the boost inverse tire model as active inverse tire model in response to detecting a boost signal and selecting the default inverse tire model as active inverse tire model otherwise, and controlling the at least one driven and/or braked wheel in dependence of the motion request and based on the active inverse tire model.

Claims (16)

1 . A computer implemented method for controlling at least one driven and/or braked wheel of a heavy-duty vehicle, the method comprising

configuring a default inverse tire model and a boost inverse tire model, where each inverse tire model represents a respective relationship between longitudinal wheel slip and longitudinal wheel force at the wheel, where the boost inverse tire model is associated with a higher maximum obtainable wheel slip value for the wheel compared to the default inverse tire model, obtaining a motion request indicative of a desired longitudinal force to be generated by the wheel,

selecting the boost inverse tire model as active inverse tire model in response to detecting a boost signal and selecting the default inverse tire model as active inverse tire model otherwise, wherein the boost signal is arranged to be manually triggered by operation of a trigger device, and controlling the at least one driven and/or braked wheel in dependence of the motion request and based on the active inverse tire model.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising configuring the boost inverse tire model with a peak longitudinal wheel force that corresponds to a higher wheel slip value compared to the default inverse tire model peak longitudinal wheel force.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising configuring the boost inverse tire model with a smaller slip stiffness value compared to the default inverse tire model.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising configuring the boost inverse tire model with a higher wheel slip limit compared to the default inverse tire model.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising obtaining the motion request as function of an accelerator pedal position or a brake pedal position of the heavy-duty vehicle.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising obtaining the motion request from a motion support device coordination function of a vehicle motion management system comprised in the heavy-duty vehicle or from an autonomous or semi-autonomous drive function comprised in the vehicle.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the trigger device comprises an accelerator pedal and/or a brake pedal, and wherein the boost signal is triggered by an accelerator pedal position or brake pedal position exceeding a pre-determined threshold value.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the boost signal is conditioned on that the vehicle is operating at a velocity below a vehicle velocity acceptance threshold.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the boost signal is conditioned on that the vehicle is operating at a yaw motion below a vehicle yaw motion acceptance threshold.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising determining a lateral force requirement of the at least driven and/or braked wheel, wherein the boost signal is conditioned on that the lateral force requirement is below a lateral force requirement threshold.

11 . The method according to claim 1 , comprising updating the default inverse tire model in response to detecting the boost signal.

12 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program comprising program code for performing the steps of claim 1 when the program is run on a computer.

13 . A control unit for controlling at least one driven and/or braked wheel of a heavy-duty vehicle, the control unit comprising processing circuitry arranged to configure a default inverse tire model and a boost inverse tire model, where each inverse tire model represents a respective relationship between longitudinal wheel slip and longitudinal wheel force at the wheel, where the boost inverse tire model is associated with a higher maximum obtainable wheel slip value for the wheel compared to the default inverse tire model, obtain a motion request indicative of a desired longitudinal force to be generated by the wheel, select the boost inverse tire model as active inverse tire model in response to detecting a boost signal and selecting the default inverse tire model as active inverse tire model otherwise, wherein the boost signal is arranged to be manually triggered by operation of a trigger device, and control the at least one driven and/or braked wheel in dependence of the motion request and based on the active inverse tire model.

14 . A heavy-duty vehicle comprising a control unit according to claim 13 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2024
From: HENDERSON, LEON; SALIF, RAMADAN
To: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068499/0504 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 21203148 · Oct 18, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250242812A1 · Jul 31, 2025
References Cited (69)
US 12030477B2 · Subramanian · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12208799B2 · Salif · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12337696B2 · Arikere · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12358509B2 · Gao · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12391260B2 · Subramanian · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20090107748A1 · Luehrsen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20160368503A1 · Jonasson · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20210078582A1 · Murase · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220126799A1 · Arikere · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230047444A1 · Henderson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230063613A1 · Gao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230120062A1 · Henderson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230174029A1 · Subramanian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230174079A1 · Subramanian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240025267A1 · Arikere · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240182019A1 · Gao · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240286615A1 · Salif · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240359706A1 · Tagesson · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240383339A1 · Laine · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250026325A1 · Rydström · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250050851A1 · Salif · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250242812A1 · Henderson · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250289320A1 · Arikere · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 107291085A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
DE 102008032763A1 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
EP 0755821A2 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
EP 3398825A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3851346A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 4140839A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 4166368A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 4190598A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 4190651A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 3851346B1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 4166368B1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 4140839B1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 4190598B1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 4244105B1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 4190651B1 · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 4330097B1 · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 4347302B1 · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 4419366B1 · 2025 [cited by examiner]
JP 2023035900A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 2023552963A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 2024522517A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 7508563B2 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2024531489A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2024541857A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
KR 20220125810A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
KR 20230033589A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
KR 20230035388A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
KR 20240016280A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
KR 20240054985A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
KR 20240093520A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2013186208A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017215751A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 21144065A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021144010A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021144065A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022100907A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022228653A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022253411A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023030615A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023066527A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023098991A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2024251347A1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2022/052223 mailed Jul. 22, 2022 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report in corresponding European Application No. 21203148.8 dated Apr. 20, 2022 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Hans Pacejka; “Tyre and vehicle dynamics”; Elsevier Ltd. 2012, ISBN 978-0-08-097016-5 (621 pages). [cited by applicant]
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese application No. 2024522678 dated Nov. 6, 2025 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]