IP Library Granted Patent US 12,677,821
Granted Patent B2
US 12,677,821 · App. 18/706,448 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

System and method to determine condition of nozzles of an agricultural implement

Inventors: Sara Collins (Tremont, IL); Ryan Knuffman (Tremont, IL)
Assignee: Precision Planting LLC
A01M7/0096G06T7/0002G06T7/97G06T2207/30252
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,677,821
App. No.
18/706,448
Filed
May 1, 2024
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2661
USPC
382/103
Abstract

In an aspect of the disclosure there is provided a system including nozzles disposed along an implement, a camera disposed on the implement to capture images of a spray from a nozzle of the nozzles over a time period and a processor to assign a rating to the images to account for the nozzle intermittently being off and not counting the nozzle as plugged. The processor to determine a running average for a condition of the nozzle using the assigned rating for the images.

Claims (25)

1 . A system comprising:

a plurality of nozzles disposed along an implement;

a camera disposed on the implement to capture a plurality of images of a spray from a nozzle of the plurality of nozzles over a time period; and

a processor to assign a rating to the plurality of images to account for the nozzle intermittently being off and not counting the nozzle as plugged and to determine a running average for a condition of the nozzle using the assigned rating for the plurality of images.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the nozzle is actuated with a pulse width modulation (PWM) actuator to open and close the nozzle.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein a number of images captured for the running average is determined based on a time period of at least one cycle of the PWM nozzle.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the camera captures images at a frequency that is more than twice of a PWM frequency of the PWM nozzle to avoid aliasing.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor to compare the running average of the condition of the nozzle to a predetermined fluid flow threshold indicator to indicate whether the nozzle has proper flow, low flow due to partial blockage, or no flow due to full blockage.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the processor to determine that the nozzle has proper flow when the running average of the condition of the nozzle is equal to or greater than the fluid flow threshold indicator and determine that the nozzle has low flow when the running average is less than the threshold indicator.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor to determine a frequency of a pulse width modulation (PWM) of the nozzle is 10 to 35 Hz.

8 . A computer-implemented method, comprising:

capturing, with a camera, a plurality of images of one or more spray patterns from a nozzle of an agricultural implement;

assigning a rating to each captured image to account for the nozzle intermittently being off and not counting the nozzle as plugged; and

determining a running average for a condition of the nozzle using the assigned rating for the plurality of images.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the nozzle comprises a pulse width modulation (PWM) nozzle.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein a number of images captured for the running average is determined based on a time period of at least one cycle of the PWM nozzle.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the camera captures images at a frequency that is more than twice of a PWM frequency of the PWM nozzle to avoid aliasing.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

comparing the running average of the condition of the nozzle to a predetermined fluid flow threshold indicator to indicate whether the nozzle has proper flow, low flow due to partial blockage, or no flow due to full blockage.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , further comprising:

determining that the nozzle has proper flow when the running average of the condition of the nozzle is equal to or greater than the fluid flow threshold indicator; and

determining that the nozzle has low flow when the running average is less than the threshold indicator.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

displaying, with a display device, an amount of plugging if any for the nozzle.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the plugging is displayed as a numerical amount, a color, or a combination of a color and numerical amount.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2024
From: COLLINS, SARA; KNUFFMAN, RYAN
To: PRECISION PLANTING LLC
Reel/Frame 067279/0536 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63265508 · Dec 16, 2021
Related Publication 20250000079A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (27)
US 8078367B2 · Sauder et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 11219912B2 · Bharatiya · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11738362B2 · Stanhope · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12369575B2 · Maurer · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12543633B2 · Stoller · 2026 [cited by examiner]
US 20090322822A1 · Kneezel · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20130101153A1 · Kohashi · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150002677A1 · Peret · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190358660A1 · Paralikar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190358661A1 · Bharatiya · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200037519A1 · Wonderlich et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210178752A1 · Johnson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210308708A1 · Stanhope · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210325868A1 · Allgaier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220117151A1 · Lamprecht · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220151216A1 · Stuber et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220153417A1 · Faers et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220202003A1 · Schmitz · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220379599A1 · Nakano · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230015683A1 · Miyata · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230112376A1 · Strnad · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230131770A1 · Stoller · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230255128A1 · Wildermuth · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240278577A1 · Nakajima · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250000079A1 · Collins · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250146854A1 · Takeda · 2025 [cited by examiner]
European Patent Office, International Search Report related to International Patent Application No. PCT/ IB2022/057558, mail date Nov. 11, 2022, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]