IP Library Granted Patent US 12,433,692
Granted Patent B2
US 12,433,692 · App. 18/731,573 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Biopsy needle visualization

Inventors: Shawn St. Pierre (The Hills, TX); Stephen Grantz (Pelham, NH); Thomas Fisk (Newton, MA); Mark Guetersloh (Bedford, MA)
Assignee: Hologic, Inc.
A61B34/20A61B8/0841A61B8/4488A61B8/463A61B8/485A61B8/5215A61B10/0275A61B17/3403A61B34/25A61B90/39G01S7/52073G01S15/8906G06N20/00G16H10/40G16H20/40G16H30/40G16H40/63A61B8/0825A61B8/481A61B2017/3413A61B2034/2063A61B2034/2065A61B2090/378A61B2090/3925A61B2090/3983
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,433,692
App. No.
18/731,573
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems providing guidance for operation of a biopsy needle based on ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasonic waves are emitted and detected by a ultrasonic transducer to generate image data. A biopsy needle is identified within the generated image data, and the biopsy needle may be in a pre-fire configuration. Based on the identification of the biopsy needle, the methods and systems may determine a predicted location of the biopsy needle based at least in part on biopsy needle properties. The predicted location of the biopsy needle may be the predicated location of the biopsy needle in its post-fire configuration. At least one indicator may be displayed indicating the determined predicted location.

Claims (43)

1. A method for providing guidance for operation of a needle having an inner member having a sharp tip configured to extend from the needle, the method comprising:

emitting an array of ultrasonic sound waves from an ultrasonic transducer of an ultrasound probe;

detecting reflected ultrasonic sound waves by the ultrasonic transducer, wherein the reflected ultrasonic sound waves include at least a portion of the array of ultrasonic sound waves after being reflected from an interior of a patient and the needle within the interior of the patient;

generating image data from the reflected ultrasonic sound waves;

identifying, by a processor, within the generated image data, at least a portion of the needle within the interior of the patient;

based at least in part on the identification of the portion of the needle, determining, by the processor, a predicted location of the inner member of the needle based at least in part on one or more needle properties stored in memory operatively connected to the processor, the needle properties comprising at least one of a needle length, a needle size, a needle wall thickness, a needle material composition, a needle geometry, and a needle extension mechanism;

displaying, on a display operatively connected to the processor, an ultrasound image based on the generated image data;

determining a deflection probability for an extended inner member location based on at least one of: (1) experimental data for a type of the needle, and (2) the one or more stored properties of the needle; and

displaying a deflection probability indicator on the ultrasound image, wherein the deflection probability indicator indicates a range for the extended inner member location based on the determined deflection probability, wherein the deflection probability indicator depicts a probability distribution for the extended inner member location, and wherein the deflection probability indicator is based at least in part on a standard deviation of the extended inner member location.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least a portion of the needle includes identifying the needle in a pre-extended configuration, and the predicted location of the inner member of the needle is a predicted location of the inner member in a post-extended configuration.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying at least one indicator for the predicted location of the inner member of the needle that includes displaying at least one of a tip indicator indicating a predicted tip location or an aperture indicator indicating a predicted aperture location.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least a portion of the needle comprises receiving a user input identifying the needle in the ultrasound image.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least a portion the needle comprises analyzing, by the processor, the generated image data by image analysis techniques to identify the needle.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the deflection probability is further based on tissue properties of the interior of the patient along an extension trajectory for the needle.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the tissue properties are based on an input identifying the tissue properties.

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising determining the tissue properties by:

determining, by the processor, the extension trajectory for the needle based on the generated image data;

receiving elastography data for tissue along at least a portion of the extension trajectory for the needle; and

determining the tissue properties based on the received elastography data.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that the needle has diverted out of an imaging plane of the ultrasound image; and

in response to determining that the needle has diverted out of the imaging plane for the ultrasound image, performing at least one of the following operations:

displaying an alert indicating that the needle has diverted out of the imaging plane for the ultrasound image; or

altering a beamform emitted from the ultrasound probe to compensate for the needle diversion out of the imaging plane.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining that the needle has diverted out of the imaging plane for the ultrasound image further comprises:

determining a first apparent depth for the needle at a first time;

determining a second apparent depth for the needle at a second time subsequent to the first time, the second apparent depth being greater than the first apparent depth;

determining a third apparent depth for the needle at a third time subsequent to the second time, the third apparent depth being less than the second apparent depth; and

based on the third apparent depth being less than the second apparent depth and the second apparent depth being greater than the first apparent depth, determining that the needle has diverted out of the imaging plane for the ultrasound image.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises obtaining the experimental data for the needle.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the experimental data comprises one of:

passing the inner member through dense tissue and passing the inner member through adipose tissue; and

inserting the needle in a replica of a breast.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the deflection probability indicator depicts a likelihood of the extended inner member location.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the deflection probability indicator comprises a heatmap.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising overlaying the deflection probability indicator on the ultrasound image.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing the needle, the needle being a biopsy needle and the inner member being an inner cannula.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the deflection probability indicator is one of an ellipse, a rectangle, a square, a triangle, or a circle.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a maximum pre-extended needle depth for which a predicted post-extended inner member location remains within the ultrasound image; and

displaying a maximum needle depth indicator, wherein the maximum needle depth indicator indicates the determined maximum pre-extended needle depth.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the maximum needle depth indicator is a line segment perpendicular to an extension trajectory of the needle.

20. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying a tip indicator, the tip indicator a graphical element having a shape based on a geometry of the sharp tip of the inner member of the needle.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 069172/0436 Recorded Apr 28, 2026
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 075503/0086 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2026
From: BIOTHERANOSTICS, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; GEN-PROBE PRODESSE, INC.; CYTYC CORPORATION; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; GYNESONICS, INC.; BOLDER SURGICAL, LLC; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC; HEALTH BEACONS, INC.; HOLOGIC, INC.
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075462/0440 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2024
From: HOLOGIC, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 069172/0436 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2024
From: ST. PIERRE, SHAWN; GRANTZ, STEPHEN; FISK, THOMAS; GUETERSLOH, MARK
To: HOLOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 067624/0486 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17041087
Provisional Application 62666869 · May 4, 2018
Related Publication 20240398487A1 · Dec 5, 2024
References Cited (250)
US 4821727A · Levene et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4907156A · Doi et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5078142A · Siczek et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5129911A · Siczek et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5133020A · Giger et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5219351A · Teubner · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5240011A · Assa · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5280427A · Magnusson · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5289520A · Pellegrino et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5343390A · Doi et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5386447A · Siczek · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5415169A · Siczek et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5426685A · Pellegrino et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5491627A · Zhang et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5594769A · Pellegrino et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5609152A · Pellegrino et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5735264A · Siczek et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5769086A · Ritchart et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5773832A · Sayed et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5803912A · Siczek et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6022325A · Siczek et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6101236A · Wang et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6102866A · Nields et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6245028B1 · Furst et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6293282B1 · Lemelson · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6459925B1 · Nields et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6468226B1 · McIntyre, IV · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6480565B1 · Ning · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6620111B2 · Stephens et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6626849B2 · Huitema et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6638235B2 · Miller et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6683934B1 · Zhao · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6733458B1 · Steins · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6758824B1 · Miller et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6987331B2 · Koeppe · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7123684B2 · Jing et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7245694B2 · Jing et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7466795B2 · Eberhard et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7577282B2 · Gkanatsios et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7606801B2 · Faitelson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7616801B2 · Gkanatsios et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7697660B2 · Ning · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7702142B2 · Ren et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7760924B2 · Ruth et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7787936B2 · Kressy · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7831296B2 · DeFreitas et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7869563B2 · DeFreitas · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7991106B2 · Ren et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8532745B2 · DeFreitas et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8594274B2 · Hoernig et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9020579B2 · Smith · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9901309B2 · DeFreitas et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10092358B2 · DeFreitas · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10335094B2 · DeFreitas · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10357211B2 · Smith · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10456213B2 · DeFreitas · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10595954B2 · DeFreitas · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 12029499B2 · St. Pierre · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20010038681A1 · Stanton et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020113681A1 · Byram · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030018272A1 · Treado et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030073895A1 · Nields et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030135115A1 · Burdette et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040077938A1 · Mark et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040081273A1 · Ning · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040127789A1 · Ogawa · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040171933A1 · Stoller et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040171986A1 · Tremaglio, Jr. et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040267157A1 · Miller et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050049521A1 · Miller et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050080355A1 · Mark · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050084060A1 · Seppi et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050089205A1 · Kapur · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050111718A1 · MacMahon · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050113681A1 · DeFreitas et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050113715A1 · Schwindt et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050124845A1 · Thomadsen et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060009693A1 · Hanover et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060025680A1 · Jeune-Lomme · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060030784A1 · Miller et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060098855A1 · Gkanatsios et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129062A1 · Nicoson et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149194A1 · Conston · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060155209A1 · Miller et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060257009A1 · Wang · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060269040A1 · Mertelmeier · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070016067A1 · Webster · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070019846A1 · Bullitt et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070114424A1 · Danielsson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070167822A1 · Webler · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070225600A1 · Weibrecht et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070263765A1 · Wu · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080019581A1 · Gkanatsios et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080045833A1 · DeFreitas et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080101537A1 · Sendai · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080152086A1 · Hall · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080187095A1 · Boone et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080198966A1 · Hjarn · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090003519A1 · DeFreitas · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090080604A1 · Shores et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143674A1 · Nields · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090171244A1 · Ning · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090296882A1 · Gkanatsios et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100034348A1 · Yu · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100098214A1 · Star-Lack et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100135558A1 · Ruth et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100152570A1 · Navab · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100208037A1 · Sendai · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100305439A1 · Shai · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110019891A1 · Puong · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110069808A1 · Defreitas et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110087132A1 · DeFreitas et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110110576A1 · Kreeger · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110112549A1 · Neubach · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110182402A1 · Partain · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110237927A1 · Brooks et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110237947A1 · Boctor · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245659A1 · Ma · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313288A1 · Chi Sing · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120014504A1 · Jang · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120134464A1 · Hoernig et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120172722A1 · Chinowsky · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120238870A1 · Smith et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239087A1 · Field · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130022165A1 · Jang · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130044861A1 · Muller · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130108138A1 · Nakayama · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130259193A1 · Packard · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140064444A1 · Oh · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140073913A1 · DeFreitas et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140094695A1 · Jain · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160000399A1 · Halmann · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160022364A1 · DeFreitas et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235380A1 · Smith · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160324501A1 · Vignon · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170340352A1 · Stone et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180000446A1 · Lu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180132927A1 · Chen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180132944A1 · Yan · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180256118A1 · DeFreitas · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190008605A1 · Matsushima et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190015173A1 · DeFreitas · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190105017A1 · Hastings · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190110924A1 · Moreno · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190290221A1 · Smith · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200000442A1 · Vancamberg · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200046303A1 · DeFreitas · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200093562A1 · DeFreitas · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200205928A1 · DeFreitas · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200281662A1 · Cong · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200390404A1 · DeFreitas · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210000553A1 · St. Pierre · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 202161328 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102429678 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106687049 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107106126A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107666876A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011087127 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 2236085 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 2491863 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 1986548 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 2656789 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 3060132 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000107178 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003531516 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006519634 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007130487 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009522005 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009526618 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010137004 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012501750 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014507250 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015506794 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 9317620 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
WO 9406352 · 1994 [cited by applicant]
WO 199700649 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 0051484 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005110230 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005112767 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006055830 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006058160 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 08014670 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008054436 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010028208 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012068373 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012112627 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012122399 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013078476 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013123091 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015061582 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016103094 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016184746 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019213532 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
“Filtered Back Projection”, (NYGREN), published May 8, 2007, URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/˜elec539/Projects97/cult/node 2.html, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“SuperSonic Imagine holds 30 international patent families protecting its unique ultrasound imaging technology around the world”, obtained online on Dec. 21, 2023 at: https://www.supersonicimagine.com/Aixplorer-MACH2/TE… [cited by applicant]
“Supersonic to feature Aixplorer Ultimate at ECR”, AuntiMinnie.com, 3 pages (Feb. 2018). [cited by applicant]
“SuperSonic to feature Aixplorer Ultimate at ECR”; obtained online on Dec. 21, 2023 at: https://www.auntminnie.com/clinical-news/ultrasound/article/15619739/supersonic-to-feature-aixplorer-ultimate-at-ecr, published Feb… [cited by applicant]
Berg WA et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer”, JAMA 299:2151-2163, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Bushberg, Jerrold et al., “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging”, 3rd ed., In: “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Third Edition”, Dec. 28, 2011, Lippincott & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA, XP05579051, pp. 2… [cited by applicant]
Canadian Office Action in Application 2829349, mailed Oct. 15, 2018, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carriere, Jay et al., “Real-time needle shape prediction in soft-tissue based on image segmentation and particle filtering”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Banff, AB, Cana… [cited by applicant]
Carton AK, et al., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breasttom osynthesis—a feasibility study”, Br J Radiol. Apr. 2010;83 (988):344-50. [cited by applicant]
Chen SC, et al., “Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tom osynthesis”, Acad Radio. Feb. 2007 14(2):229-38. [cited by applicant]
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201480058064.5, mailed Jul. 16, 2019, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Diekmann F., et al., “Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement”, Invest Radiol 2005; 40:397-404. [cited by applicant]
Dromain C., et al., “Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multi-reader study”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting. [cited by applicant]
Dromain C., et al., “Contrast-enhanced digital mammography”, Eur J Radiol. 2009; 69:34-42. [cited by applicant]
Dromain, Clarisse etal., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results”, European Radiology, Sep. 14, 2010, vol. 21, pp. 565-574. [cited by applicant]
European Communication in Application 10707751.3, mailed Oct. 4, 2018, 5 pages. (corresponding to .0020USU1 matter). [cited by applicant]
European Communication in Application 10707751.3, mailed Aug. 7, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2014 in EP App 12754521.8, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14770362.3 mailed Sep. 28, 2016, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report in Application 14855181.5, mailed May 15, 2017, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
European extended Search Report in Application 18153706.9, mailed Jun. 1, 2018, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report in Application 21198835.7, mailed Feb. 17, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Mar. 23, 2009 European Search Report in connection with counterpart European U.S. Appl. No. 07/750,818. [cited by applicant]
European Office Action in Application 10707751.3, mailed Feb. 19, 2018, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Freiherr G., “Breast tomosynthesis trials show promise”, Diagnostic Imaging—San Francisco 2005, V27; N4:42-48. [cited by applicant]
Giger, M. et al., “An “Intelligent” Workstation for Computer-aided Diagnosis”, RadioGraphics, (1993), 13(3): 647-656. [cited by applicant]
Giger, M. et al., “Development of a “smart” workstation for use in mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, (1991), 45: 101-103. [cited by applicant]
Hologic, “Lorad StereoLoc II” Operator's Manual 9-500-0261, Rev. 005, 2004, 78 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Nov. 28, 2010, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Aug. 14, 2012, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection in Application 2016-526115, mailed Jun. 24, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jochelson M., et al, “Bilateral Dual Energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial Experience”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Jong, RA, et al., Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003; 228:842-850. [cited by applicant]
Kopans, et.al. Will tomosynthesis replace conventional mammography? Plenary Session SFN08: RSNA 2005. [cited by applicant]
Lehman CD, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303. [cited by applicant]
Lewin JM, et al., Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003; 229:261-268. [cited by applicant]
Lindfors KK, et al., Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2008; 246(3): 725-733. [cited by applicant]
Niklason, L., et al., Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. Nov. 1997; 205(2):399-406. [cited by applicant]
Observations by Third Party, Remarks concerning European patent application No. 10707751.3 according to Article 115 EPC, dated Apr. 24, 2014, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT Feb. 20, 2008 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with corresponding International patent application No. PCT/US2007/04006, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application PCT/US2019/030615, mailed Sep. 17, 2019, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application PCT/US2014/061994, mailed Apr. 26, 2016, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application PCT/US2010/025873, dated Aug. 2, 2010, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report in Application PCT/US2014/026164, mailed Jul. 28, 2014, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Written Report for International Application PCT/US2014/026164, mailed Jul. 28, 2014, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2014/061994, mailed Jan. 22, 2015, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US12/28334 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 5, 2012, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Poplack SP, et al, Digital breast tom osynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenology Sep. 2007 189(3):616-23. [cited by applicant]
Prionas ND, et al., Contrast-enhanced dedicated breastCT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. Sep. 2010 256(3):714-723. [cited by applicant]
Rafferty E. et al., “Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Full-Field Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone: Results” . . . presented at 2007 Radiological So… [cited by applicant]
Reynolds, April, “Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: A Review”, Radiologic Technology, vol. 80, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2009, pp. 447M-464M, XP055790574. [cited by applicant]
Shrading, Simone et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Experiences and Comparison with Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy”, the Department of Diagnostic and Intervent… [cited by applicant]
Smith, A., Full field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manage. Sep.-Oct. 2005; 27(5):25-31. [cited by applicant]
Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 324:1-8. [cited by applicant]
WeidnerN, The importance of tumor angiogenesis: the evidence continues to grow. Am J Clin Pathol. Nov. 2004 122(5):696-703. [cited by applicant]
Xia, et al., “Looking Beyond the Imaging Plane: 3D Needle Tracking with a Linear Array Ultrasound Probe”, Sci Rep 7, 3674 (2017), https:doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03886-4, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]