DETERMINING A SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN BASED ON CONFIDENCE

1 . An enterprise system comprising:

one or more devices configured to perform one or more respective operations of an enterprise; and

a sustainability platform system configured to:

obtain a sustainability model representative of a state of operations of the enterprise;

obtain a sustainability action plan associated with improving one or more sustainability parameters of the enterprise;

determine confidence data associated with a likelihood that the sustainability action plan will improve the one or more sustainability parameters;

simulate an effect of the sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over a period of time based on the sustainability model and the confidence data to generate one or more simulated sustainability parameters;

determine a selection of the sustainability action plan or an alternate sustainability action plan based on the one or more simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to the selection of the sustainability action plan, send one or more commands to the one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust the one or more respective operations according to the sustainability action plan.

2 . The enterprise system of claim 1 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to provide the simulated sustainability parameters and the confidence data for the sustainability action plan to a user device.

3 . The enterprise system of claim 2 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to determine the selection of the sustainability action plan by receiving a user selection of the sustainability action plan or by receiving an approval of the sustainability action plan from the user device.

4 . The enterprise system of claim 1 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to determine the selection of the sustainability action plan by:

determining whether the sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters based on a comparison of the one or more simulated sustainability parameters to sustainability target data, wherein the sustainability target data comprises one or more threshold limits, one or more ranges, or both; and

in response to determining that the sustainability action plan is effective, selecting the sustainability action plan.

5 . The enterprise system of claim 4 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to, in response to determining that the sustainability action plan is not effective:

obtain the alternate sustainability action plan;

determine second confidence data associated with the alternate sustainability action plan;

simulate a second effect of the alternate sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over the period of time based on the sustainability model and the second confidence data to generate one or more second simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to determining that the alternate sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters, determining the selection of the alternate sustainability action plan and sending one or more other commands to the one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust the one or more respective operations according to the alternate sustainability action plan.

6 . The enterprise system of claim 1 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to obtain the sustainability model by:

receiving enterprise data indicative of the state of operations of a portion of the enterprise associated with a geographical region, wherein the state of operations of the portion of the enterprise comprises a listing of the one or more devices and emissions data associated with the one or more devices; and

generating the sustainability model based on the enterprise data.

7 . The enterprise system of claim 1 , wherein the sustainability platform system is configured to obtain the sustainability action plan by:

identifying one or more engineering workflow systems correlating with the sustainability model and associated with the one or more sustainability parameters; and

generate, via the identified one or more engineering workflow systems, the sustainability action plan based on an estimated improvement to at least one sustainability parameter of the one or more sustainability parameters based on the sustainability model.

8 . The enterprise system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more sustainability parameters comprise a carbon footprint of the one or more devices, a water usage of the one or more devices, a waste output of the one or more devices, a greenhouse gas emission of the one or more devices, or any combination thereof.

9 . A method comprising:

obtaining, via a computing system, a sustainability model representative of a state of operations of an enterprise;

obtaining, via the computing system, a sustainability action plan associated with improving one or more sustainability parameters of the enterprise;

determining, via the computing system, confidence data associated with a likelihood that the sustainability action plan will improve the one or more sustainability parameters;

simulating, via the computing system, an effect of the sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over a period of time based on the sustainability model and the confidence data to generate one or more simulated sustainability parameters;

determining, via the computing system, a selection of the sustainability action plan or an alternate sustainability action plan based on the one or more simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to the selection of the sustainability action plan, sending, via the computing system, one or more commands to one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust one or more respective operations according to the sustainability action plan.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the selection of the sustainability action plan comprises:

determining, via the computing system, whether the sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters based on a comparison of the one or more simulated sustainability parameters to sustainability target data; and

in response to determining that the sustainability action plan is effective, selecting, via the computing system, the sustainability action plan.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the sustainability target data comprises one or more threshold limits, one or more ranges, or both, and wherein the one or more sustainability parameters comprise a carbon footprint of the one or more devices, a water usage of the one or more devices, a waste output of the one or more devices, a greenhouse gas emission of the one or more devices, or any combination thereof.

12 . The method of claim 9 , comprising providing, via the computing system, the simulated sustainability parameters and the confidence data for the sustainability action plan to a user device.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein determining the selection of the sustainability action plan comprises receiving a user selection of the sustainability action plan or receiving an approval of the sustainability action plan from the user device.

14 . The method of claim 9 , comprising:

determining, via the computing system, that the sustainability action plan is not effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters based on a comparison of the one or more simulated sustainability parameters to sustainability target data;

obtaining, via the computing system, the alternate sustainability action plan;

determining, via the computing system, second confidence data associated with the alternate sustainability action plan;

simulating, via the computing system, a second effect of the alternate sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over the period of time based on the sustainability model and the second confidence data to generate one or more second simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to determining that the alternate sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters, determining, via the computing system, the selection of the alternate sustainability action plan and sending one or more other commands to the one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust the one or more respective operations according to the alternate sustainability action plan.

15 . The method of claim 9 , wherein obtaining the sustainability action plan comprises:

identifying, via the computing system, one or more engineering workflow systems of the computing system that correlate with the sustainability model and are associated with the one or more sustainability parameters; and

generating, via the identified one or more engineering workflow systems, the sustainability action plan based on an estimated improvement to at least one sustainability parameter of the one or more sustainability parameters based on the sustainability model.

16 . A non-transitory, machine-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

obtaining a sustainability model representative of a state of operations of an enterprise;

obtaining a sustainability action plan associated with improving one or more sustainability parameters of the enterprise;

determining confidence data associated with a likelihood that the sustainability action plan will improve the one or more sustainability parameters;

simulating an effect of the sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over a period of time based on the sustainability model and the confidence data to generate one or more simulated sustainability parameters;

determining a selection of the sustainability action plan or an alternate sustainability action plan based on the one or more simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to the selection of the sustainability action plan, sending one or more commands to one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust one or more respective operations according to the sustainability action plan.

17 . The non-transitory, machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein determining the selection of the sustainability action plan comprises:

determining whether the sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters based on a comparison of the one or more simulated sustainability parameters to sustainability target data, wherein the sustainability target data comprises one or more threshold limits, one or more ranges, or both, and wherein the one or more sustainability parameters comprise a carbon footprint of the one or more devices, a water usage of the one or more devices, a waste output of the one or more devices, a greenhouse gas emission of the one or more devices, or any combination thereof; and

in response to determining that the sustainability action plan is effective, selecting the sustainability action plan.

18 . The non-transitory, machine-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining that the sustainability action plan is not effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters based on a second comparison of the one or more simulated sustainability parameters to the sustainability target data;

obtaining the alternate sustainability action plan;

determining second confidence data associated with the alternate sustainability action plan;

simulating a second effect of the alternate sustainability action plan on the one or more sustainability parameters over the period of time based on the sustainability model and the second confidence data to generate one or more second simulated sustainability parameters; and

in response to determining that the alternate sustainability action plan is effective to improve the one or more sustainability parameters, determining the selection of the alternate sustainability action plan and sending one or more other commands to the one or more devices associated with the enterprise to cause the one or more devices to adjust the one or more respective operations according to the alternate sustainability action plan.

19 . The non-transitory, machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein:

obtaining the sustainability model comprises:

receiving enterprise data indicative of the state of operations of a portion of the enterprise associated with a geographical region, wherein the state of operations of the portion of the enterprise comprises a listing of the one or more devices and emissions data associated with the one or more devices; and

generating the sustainability model based on the enterprise data; and

obtaining the sustainability action plan comprises:

identifying one or more engineering workflow systems that correlate with the sustainability model and are associated with the one or more sustainability parameters; and

generating, via the identified one or more engineering workflow systems, the sustainability action plan based on an estimated improvement to at least one sustainability parameter of the one or more sustainability parameters based on the sustainability model.

20 . The non-transitory, machine-readable medium of claim 19 , wherein different data sources of the enterprise data are associated with different amounts of uncertainty, and wherein the confidence data is based on the different amounts of uncertainty of the different data sources.