IP Library Granted Patent US 12,470,292
Granted Patent B2
US 12,470,292 · App. 18/738,226 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Feedforward motion compensation for FSOC terminals

Inventors: Paul Csonka (Sunnyvale, CA); Baris Ibrahim Erkmen (Sunnyvale, CA); Devin Brinkley (Redwood City, CA)
Assignee: TAARA CONNECT, INC.
H04B10/11
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,470,292
App. No.
18/738,226
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The technology relates to free-space optical communication systems that correct for errors in tracking and pointing accuracy to maintain connection integrity. Such systems can both proactively and reactively correct for errors in tracking performance and pointing accuracy of terminals within the system. An aspect includes receiving information indicative of at least one external disturbance associated with a communication device. A determination is made for a proactive estimation indicative of a first error associated with an effect of the at least one external disturbance at a current timestep. A determination is made for a reactive estimation indicative of a second error associated with the effect of the at least one external disturbance at a previous timestep. A final control signal is determined based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation. A controller is able to actuate an optical assembly of the communication device based on the determined final control signal.

Claims (35)

1 . A method for adjusting an optical link alignment of a first communication device with a remote communication device, the method comprising:

determining, by one or more processors of the first communication device, a proactive estimation based on at least one external disturbance at a first timestep, wherein determining the proactive estimation includes use of a feedforward gain scheduling approach;

determining, by the one or more processors of the first communication device, a reactive estimation based on the at least one external disturbance at a second timestep; and

actuating, by a controller, an optical assembly of the first communication device based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation, the actuating including determining, by the one or more processors, a final control signal based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first timestep is a current timestep and the second timestep is a previous timestep.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the feedforward gain scheduling approach is defined by:

u _FF( t )= G _FF( m ),

where u_FF(t) is the proactive estimation, t is time, G_FF is a feedforward function, and m is information indicative of the at least one external disturbance from the first timestep.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the reactive estimation based on the at least one external disturbance at the second timestep includes use of a feedback gain scheduling approach.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the feedback gain scheduling approach is defined by:

u _FB( t )= G _FB( m ),

where u_FB(t) is the reactive estimation, t is time, G_FB is a feedback function, and m is information indicative of the at least one external disturbance from the second timestep.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the proactive estimation is a first error; and

the reactive estimation is a second error.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the final control signal is determined by summing the first error and the second error.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein actuating the optical assembly of the first communication device based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation includes adjusting a target location or a setpoint location.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising instructing the remote communication device to adjust a target location or a setpoint location based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reactive estimation is based on behavior information of the remote communication device from the second timestep.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the behavior information includes one or more factors associated with the remote communication device.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more factors include at least one of a setpoint of the remote communication device, a pose of the remote communication device, an angular velocity of the remote communication device, acceleration of the remote communication device, or a target location of the remote communication device.

13 . A communication device comprising one or more processors configured to:

determine a proactive estimation based on at least one external disturbance at a first timestep, wherein determining the proactive estimation includes use of a feedforward gain scheduling approach;

determine a reactive estimation based on the at least one external disturbance at a second timestep; and

cause an optical assembly of the communication device to actuate based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation, the actuation including a determination of a final control signal based on the proactive estimation and the reactive estimation.

14 . The communication device of claim 13 , wherein the first timestep is a current timestep and the second timestep is a previous timestep.

15 . The communication device of claim 13 , wherein the feedforward gain scheduling approach is defined by:

u _FF( t )= G _FF( m ),

where u_FF(t) is the proactive estimation, t is time, G_FF is a feedforward function, and m is information indicative of the at least one external disturbance from the first timestep.

16 . The communication device of claim 13 , wherein the determination of the reactive estimation based on the at least one external disturbance at the second timestep includes use of a feedback gain scheduling approach.

17 . The communication device of claim 16 , wherein the feedback gain scheduling approach is defined by:

u _FB( t )= G _FB( m ),

where u_FB(t) is the reactive estimation, t is time, G_FB is a feedback function, and m is information indicative of the at least one external disturbance from the second timestep.

18 . The communication device of claim 13 , wherein the communication device is stationary.

19 . The communication device of claim 13 , wherein the communication device is mobile.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2025
From: X DEVELOPMENT LLC
To: TAARA CONNECT, INC.
Reel/Frame 070631/0734 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2024
From: CSONKA, PAUL; ERKMEN, BARIS IBRAHIM; BRINKLEY, DEVIN
To: X DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 067701/0368 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17709544 · Mar 31, 2022
Related Publication 20240333385A1 · Oct 3, 2024
References Cited (29)
US 7343099B2 · Wirth · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7437077B2 · Wirth · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7457545B2 · Wirth · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 8060340B2 · Gao · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 10680710B1 · Lantz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10680712B2 · Boroson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10686521B1 · Lantz · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10887011B2 · Lantz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11009836B2 · Hoffmann · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11271645B2 · Lantz · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20050180753A1 · Wirth · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050196166A1 · Wirth · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060024061A1 · Wirth · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20170261949A1 · Hoffmann · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170264365A1 · Takahashi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CA 2520710C · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Gain scheduling—Wikipedia—Gain scheduling—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain_scheduling, retrieved from the internet Nov. 28, 2021, pp. 1. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/052508 dated Apr. 14, 2023 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Linear parameter-varying control—Wikipedia, Wikipedia, retrieved from the internet Nov. 28, 2021, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Anthonisamy, Arockia Bazil Raj , “Performance analysis of free space optical communication in open-atmospheric turbulence conditions with beam wandering compensation control”, IET Journals, vol. 10, Iss. 9, 2016, pp. 10… [cited by applicant]
Ding, Min , et al., “Gain Scheduling Control Design of an Erbium-Doped Fibre Amplifier by Pump Compensation”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference on Control Applications Toronto, Canada, Aug. 28-31, 2005, pp. 510-51… [cited by applicant]
Ho, Tzung-Hsien , “Pointing, Acquisition, and Tracking Systems for Free-Space Optical Communication Links”, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2007, pp. 1-220. [cited by applicant]
Kaushal, Hemani , et al., “Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques”, arXiv:1705.10630v1, 2017, pp. 1-41. [cited by applicant]
Leith, D.J. , “Survey of Gain-Scheduling Analysis & Design”, Dept. of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 2000, pp. 1-26. [cited by applicant]
Pasupathi, T. , et al., “Mitigation of low-order atmospheric turbulent effects using sensorless adaptive optics in terrestrial free space optical communication”, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7603064, 20… [cited by applicant]
Qin, Yixuan , et al., “Optimised optical burst aggregation by employing dynamic state-space feedback gain scheduling controller”, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5062457, 2009, pp. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Radisavljevic-Gajic, Verica, “Non-linear integral control of photon power transients in optical communication networks with erbiumdoped fibre amplifiers”, www.ietdl.org, 2014, pp. 412-420. [cited by applicant]
Raj, Arockia A. Bazil, et al., “Intensity feedback-based beam wandering mitigation in free-space optical communication using neural control technique”, Bazil Raj et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Net… [cited by applicant]
Stefanovic, Nem , et al., “An application of L2 nonlinear control and gain scheduling to erbium doped fiber amplifiers”, Control Engineering Practice, vol. 15, Issue 9, 2007, pp. 1107-1117. [cited by applicant]