IP Library Granted Patent US 12,257,056
Granted Patent B2
US 12,257,056 · App. 18/738,925 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Method and apparatus for measurement of neural response

Inventors: John Louis Parker (Macquarie Park, AU); Peter Scott Vallack Single (Macquarie Park, AU); Dean Michael Karantonis (Macquarie Park, AU)
Assignee: Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
A61B5/24A61B5/4848A61B5/6846A61B5/7285A61M5/1723A61N1/36071A61N1/36125A61N1/36135A61N1/36146A61B5/7203A61M2230/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,257,056
App. No.
18/738,925
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for measuring a neural response to a stimulus. Measurement circuitry is settled prior to a stimulus, by connecting a sense electrode to the measurement circuitry to allow the measurement circuitry to settle towards a bio-electrically defined steady state. Charge is recovered on stimulus electrodes by short circuiting the stimulus electrodes to each other. An electrical stimulus is then applied from the stimulus electrodes to neural tissue, while keeping the sense electrode disconnected from the measurement circuitry. After the stimulus, a delay is imposed during which the stimulus electrodes are open circuited and the sense electrode is disconnected from the measurement circuitry and from the stimulus electrodes. After the delay, a neural response signal present at the sense electrode is measured by connecting the sense electrode to the measurement circuitry.

Claims (38)

1. A method for measuring a neural response to an electrical stimulus, the method comprising:

applying the electrical stimulus from stimulus electrodes to neural tissue, while keeping a sense electrode disconnected from measurement circuitry;

imposing, after applying the electrical stimulus, a post-stimulus delay during which the sense electrode is kept disconnected from the measurement circuitry; and

amplifying, after the post-stimulus delay, a neural response signal present at the sense electrode by connecting the sense electrode to the measurement circuitry.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sense electrode is open circuited during the post-stimulus delay so as to be disconnected from the stimulus electrodes, to prevent charge transfer to the sense electrode from the stimulus electrodes.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stimulus electrodes are open circuited during the post-stimulus delay.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising settling the measurement circuitry prior to applying the electrical stimulus, by connecting the sense electrode to the measurement circuitry to allow the measurement circuitry to settle towards a bio-electrically defined steady state.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the settling, applying, imposing and amplifying comprises a measurement cycle, and wherein repeated measurement cycles are undertaken, and wherein the measurement circuitry is allowed to accumulate the bio-electrically defined steady state over the repeated measurement cycles without re-setting the bio-electrically defined steady state each measurement cycle.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein a period of the settling is sufficiently long to permit the sense electrode and the measurement circuitry to reach an equilibrium.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising recovering charge on the stimulus electrodes prior to applying the electrical stimulus, by short circuiting the stimulus electrodes to each other.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the post-stimulus delay is in a range of zero to 1 ms.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the post-stimulus delay is in a range of 50 to 200 μs.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the post-stimulus delay is set to a value which ensures the measurement circuitry is not saturated and therefore performs linearly at all times without experiencing clipping.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein a feedback loop is implemented to determine a suitable minimum post-stimulus delay which avoids saturation from the electrical stimulus.

12. The method of claim 4 , wherein during the settling, the sense electrode is connected to a sample-and-hold circuit at an input of the measurement circuitry.

13. The method of claim 4 , wherein a buffer or follower amplifier is provided between the sense electrode and the measurement circuitry.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the buffer amplifier is configured to give current gain to drive a storage capacitor of a sample and hold circuit.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein a series capacitor is interposed between the sense electrode and the buffer amplifier to avoid DC transfer with the neural tissue.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stimulus electrodes and the sense electrode electrodes are selected from an implanted electrode array.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amplifying comprises passing the neural response signal from the sense electrode to a single-ended amplifier.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amplifying comprises passing the neural response signal from the sense electrode and a second neural response signal from a second sense electrode to a differential amplifier.

19. The method of claim 7 wherein, while recovering charge, the sense electrode is disconnected from the measurement circuitry.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein the sense electrode is within 3 cm of at least one of the stimulus electrodes.

21. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using a measurement of the neural response to control the delivery of subsequent electrical stimuli.

22. An implantable device for measuring a neural response to an electrical stimulus, the device comprising:

a plurality of electrodes including a plurality of stimulus electrodes and one or more sense electrodes;

a stimulus source configured to provide the electrical stimulus to be delivered from the plurality of stimulus electrodes to neural tissue;

measurement circuitry configured to amplify a neural response signal sensed at the one or more sense electrodes; and

a control unit configured to control application of the electrical stimulus to the neural tissue and measurement of the neural response, the control unit configured to:

cause the stimulus source to apply the electrical stimulus from the plurality of stimulus electrodes to the neural tissue while keeping the one or more sense electrodes disconnected from the measurement circuitry;

impose, after applying the electrical stimulus, a post-stimulus delay during which the one or more sense electrodes are disconnected from the measurement circuitry; and

amplify, after the post-stimulus delay, the neural response signal present at the one or more sense electrodes by connecting the one or more sense electrodes to the measurement circuitry.

23. The device of claim 22 , wherein the plurality of stimulus electrodes are open circuited during the post-stimulus delay.

24. The device of claim 22 , wherein the control unit is further configured to:

settle the measurement circuitry prior to the electrical stimulus by connecting the one or more sense electrodes to the measurement circuitry to allow the measurement circuitry to settle towards a bio-electrically defined steady state.

25. The device of claim 22 , wherein the control unit is further configured to:

recover charge on the plurality of stimulus electrodes by short circuiting each stimulus electrode of the plurality of stimulus electrodes to each other stimulus electrode of the plurality of stimulus electrodes.

26. The device of claim 22 , wherein the control unit is further configured to open circuit the one or more sense electrodes during the post-stimulus delay so as to disconnect the one or more sense electrodes from all other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes, to prevent charge transfer to the one or more sense electrodes from the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070518/0710 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2024
From: PARKER, JOHN LOUIS; SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK; KARANTONIS, DEAN MICHAEL
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 067735/0115 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2011901817 · May 13, 2011 · national
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17729158 · Apr 26, 2022
Continuation 16391181 · Apr 22, 2019
Continuation 15184787 · Jun 16, 2016
Continuation 14117144
Related Publication 20240324928A1 · Oct 3, 2024
References Cited (28)
US 5702429A · King · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5758651A · Nygard · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5792212A · Weijand · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5814092A · King · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5913882A · King · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6473649B1 · Gryzwa et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7171261B1 · Litvak et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7283877B1 · Litvak et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7447549B2 · Litvak et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 11259732B2 · Parramon et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050101878A1 · Daly et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070225767A1 · Daly et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070244410A1 · Fridman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100100153A1 · Carlson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004021885 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009046764A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010032132A4 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011159545A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
Al-ani et al., “Automatic removal of high-amplitude stimulus artefact from neuronal signal recorded in the subthalamic nucleus”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 198, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 135-146. [cited by applicant]
Blum, A. R., “An Electronic System for Extracellular Neural Stimulation and Recording”, Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Aug. 2007, Retrieved from http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/16192 on Jan. 30, 2… [cited by applicant]
Budagavi et al., “Modelling of compound nerve action potentials health and disease”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. vol. 6. IEEE, 1992. pp. 2600-2601. [cited by applicant]
Dillier, N, et al., “Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system”, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., vol. 111, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 407-414. [cited by applicant]
Gnadt et al., “Spectral Cancellation of Microstimulation Artifact for Simultaneous Neural Recording In Situ”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 2003, Date of Publication: Sep. 23, 2003, vol. 50, No. 10, … [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “A Wavelet-Based Method for Action Potential Detection From Extracellular Neural Signal Recording With Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio”, IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering, Aug. 2003, vol. 50. No. 8, pp. … [cited by applicant]
McGill et al., “On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surface Electrodes”, IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-29, No. 2, Feb. 1982. [cited by applicant]
Mens, Lucas, “Advances in Cochlear Implant Telemetry: Evoked Neural Responses, Electrical Field Imaging, and Technical Integrity”, Trends in Amplification, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 2007 143-159. [cited by applicant]
Shepherd et al., “Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties”, Hearing Research, 1999, 130, 171-188. [cited by applicant]
Yuan, S. et al., “Recording monophasic action potentials using a platinum-electrode ablation catheter”, Europace. Oct. 2000; 2(4):312-319. [cited by applicant]