IP Library Granted Patent US 12,417,694
Granted Patent B2
US 12,417,694 · App. 18/746,880 · Granted Sep 16, 2025

Personalized fall detector

Inventor: Warner Rudolph Theophile Ten Kate (Waalre, NL)
G08B29/185G01P13/00G08B21/0446
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,417,694
App. No.
18/746,880
Granted
Sep 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for training a fall detection classifier using subject-specific movement data. Movement data responsive to a subject's movements during everyday activities are obtained over a predetermined data collection period. For each detected event in the movement data, values for one or more parameters that may (together or individually) indicate a fall are obtained. The obtained values are used to generate a subject-specific probability distribution for non-fall events. A fall event probability distribution is obtained using the non-fall event probability distribution. This fall event probability distribution can then be subsequently processed, with reference to a threshold value, to distinguish fall events from non-fall events.

Claims (36)

1. A computer-implemented method executed on data processing hardware that causes the data processing hardware to perform operations comprising:

obtaining movement data representing movement of a subject over a predetermined data collection period, the movement data comprising one or more parameters, each respective parameter comprising a corresponding value;

detecting an event based on the movement data;

determining a non-fall event probability distribution based on a combination of the one or more parameters and the corresponding values, the non-fall event probability distribution indicating a probability of a non-fall event;

obtaining a threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution, the threshold value distinguishing between the non-fall event and a fall event; and

configuring an automatic fall detector with the threshold value, the automatic fall detector configured to use the threshold value to distinguish between the fall event and the non-fall event for subsequently obtained movement data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise:

for each respective parameter of the one or more parameters, determining a corresponding parameter specific probability distribution,

wherein determining the non-fall event probability distribution is further based on a product of each corresponding parameter specific probability distribution.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises determining a difference between the non-fall event probability distribution and a predicted fall event probability distribution.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises determining an inverse or a complement of the non-fall event probability distribution.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises dividing a predetermined estimation of a fall event probability distribution by the non-fall event probability distribution.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise determining, based on a predetermined estimation of a fall event probability, the combination of the one or more parameters.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the combination of the one or more parameters comprises determining that the predetermined estimation of the fall event probability satisfies a threshold value.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the combination of the one or more parameters comprises identifying a group of the one or more parameters having the greatest corresponding values.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the threshold value comprises processing the non-fall event probability distribution and a fall event probability distribution.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the threshold value is further based on a false alarm rate representing a rate of incorrectly classified non-fall events.

11. A system comprising:

data processing hardware; and

memory hardware in communication with the data processing hardware, the memory hardware storing instructions that when executed on the data processing hardware cause the data processing hardware to perform operations comprising:

obtaining movement data representing movement of a subject over a predetermined data collection period, the movement data comprising one or more parameters, each respective parameter comprising a corresponding value;

detecting an event based on the movement data;

determining a non-fall event probability distribution based on a combination of the one or more parameters and the corresponding values, the non-fall event probability distribution indicating a probability of a non-fall event;

obtaining a threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution, the threshold value distinguishing between the non-fall event and a fall event; and

configuring an automatic fall detector with the threshold value, the automatic fall detector configured to use the threshold value to distinguish between the fall event and the non-fall event for subsequently obtained movement data.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

for each respective parameter of the one or more parameters, determining a corresponding parameter specific probability distribution,

wherein determining the non-fall event probability distribution is further based on a product of each corresponding parameter specific probability distribution.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises determining a difference between the non-fall event probability distribution and a predicted fall event probability distribution.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises determining an inverse or a complement of the non-fall event probability distribution.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the threshold value based on the non-fall event probability distribution comprises dividing a predetermined estimation of a fall event probability distribution by the non-fall event probability distribution.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise determining, based on a predetermined estimation of a fall event probability, the combination of the one or more parameters.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein determining the combination of the one or more parameters comprises determining that the predetermined estimation of the fall event probability satisfies a threshold value.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein determining the combination of the one or more parameters comprises identifying a group of the one or more parameters having the greatest corresponding values.

19. The system of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the threshold value comprises processing the non-fall event probability distribution and a fall event probability distribution.

20. The system of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the threshold value is further based on a false alarm rate representing a rate of incorrectly classified non-fall events.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2024
From: LIFELINE SYSTEMS COMPANY; ANELTO, INC.; 100PLUS, INC.; INSTANT CARE, INC.
To: TCW ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 069164/0414 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
To: LIFELINE SYSTEMS COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067777/0175 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2024
From: TEN KATE, WARNER RUDOLPH THEOPHILE
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 067777/0490 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 1921267 · Nov 29, 2019 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16953487 · Nov 20, 2020
Related Publication 20240339025A1 · Oct 10, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 10980491B1 · Jones et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 12027035B2 · Ten Kate · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20060214806A1 · Clifford et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090224925A1 · Gannot · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120106782A1 · Nathan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138395A1 · Baggen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20180174420A1 · Clark et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180336773A1 · Hanson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175074A1 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 106407996A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109166275A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008049194A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009090584A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, relating to Applicaiton No. PCT/EP2020/083679, dated Jun. 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, relating to Applicaiton No. PCT/EP2020/083660, dated Jun. 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, T. et al., “Fall Detection by Wearable Sensor and One-Class SVM Algorithm”, ICIC 2006, LNCIS 345, pp. 858 363, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Yu, M. et al., “Fall Detection for the Elderly in a Smart Room by Using an Enhanced One Class Support Vectro Machine”, 2011, Advanced Signal Processing Group, Electronic and Electrical Engineering Department, Loughborou… [cited by applicant]
Pierleoni, P. et al., “A High Reliability Wearable Device for Elderly Fall Detection”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 15, No. 8, Aug. 2015. [cited by applicant]
USPTO. Office Action relating to U.S. Appl. No. 16/953,487, dated Sep. 7, 2023. [cited by applicant]