IP Library Granted Patent US 12,640,642
Granted Patent B2
US 12,640,642 · App. 18/752,488 · Granted May 26, 2026

Submodule fault tolerance in modular multilevel converters

Inventors: ZohRob Hovsapian (Tallahassee, FL); Yashodhan Prakash Agalgaonkar (Lakewood, CO); Herbert L. Ginn (Columbia, SC); Dhiman Chowdhury (Columbia, SC)
Assignees: Alliance for Energy Innovation, LLC; University of South Carolina
H02M1/325H02M1/08H02M7/4835
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,640,642
App. No.
18/752,488
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example device includes at least one processor configured to receive an indication of a fault in submodules in a first arm of a first phase leg of a modular multilevel converter (MMC), cause it to bypass an equal number of healthy submodules in a second arm of the first phase leg, determine a zero-sequence voltage for each phase leg, and determine, for each phase leg, based at least in part on the zero-sequence voltage, a respective modified phase leg reference signal. The respective modified phase leg reference signal for the first phase leg may be determined further based in part on a reduced utilization factor for the first phase leg. The processor is further configured to determine, based on the respective modified phase leg reference signal for each phase leg, gate driver signals for submodules in the MMC and cause it to operate using the signals.

Claims (149)

1 . A device comprising:

at least one processor configured to:

receive an indication of a fault in one or more submodules (SMs) that are in a first arm of a first phase leg of a modular multilevel converter (MMC);

cause the MMC to bypass an equal number of healthy SMs in a second arm of the first phase leg;

determine, a zero-sequence voltage for each phase leg;

determine, for each phase leg, based at least in part on the zero-sequence voltage, a respective modified phase leg reference signal, the respective modified phase leg reference signal for the first phase leg being determined further based in part on a reduced utilization factor (RUF) for the first phase leg;

determine, based on the respective modified phase leg reference signal for each phase leg, gate driver signals for SMs in the MMC; and

cause the MMC to operate using the gate driver signals.

2 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

determine, based on the number of healthy SMs in the first arm, a reduced carrier phase shifted pulse-width modulation (CPS-PWM) signal for the first leg; and

determine the gate driver signals for SMs in the first leg based additionally on the reduced CPS-PWM signal.

3 . The device of claim 1 , wherein determining the zero-sequence voltage comprises determining V ZS =0.5V dc (1−2σ)+(1−σ)V min +0V max , wherein:

V zs represents the respective zero-sequence voltage;

V dc represents the DC link voltage of the MMC;

σ represents a generalized distribution coefficient;

V min represents an instantaneous maximum voltage value; and

V max represents an instantaneous minimum voltage value.

4 . The device of claim 3 , wherein σ is determined by

σ

=

2

(

N

-

N

f

m

N

-

0.5

)

+

(

1

-

m

3

)

2

-

m

3

,

wherein:

N represents the number of SMs in each phase arm;

N fm represents the larger of the number of faulty SMs in the first arm or the number of faulty SMs in the second arm; and

m represents an original modulation index.

5 . The device of claim 3 , wherein σ is selected to be a value between 0 and 1.

6 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine the RUF for the first phase leg by determining

R

U

F

=

N

-

N

f

m

N

,

wherein:

N represents the number of SMs in each phase arm; and

N fm represents the larger of the number of faulty SMs in the first arm or the number of faulty SMs in the second arm.

7 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the device comprises a control module of the MMC.

8 . A method comprising:

receiving an indication of a fault in one or more submodules (SMs) that are in a first arm of a first phase leg of a modular multilevel converter (MMC);

causing, by a device comprising at least one processor, the MMC to bypass an equal number of healthy SMs in a second arm of the first phase leg;

determining, by the device, a zero-sequence voltage;

determining, by the device, for each phase leg, and based at least in part on the zero-sequence voltage, a respective modified phase leg reference signal, the respective modified phase leg reference signal for the first phase leg being determined further based in part on a reduced utilization factor (RUF) for the first phase leg;

determining, by the device and based on the respective modified phase leg reference signal for each phase leg, gate driver signals for SMs in the MMC; and

operating the MMC using the gate driver signals.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining, based on the number of healthy SMs in the first arm, a reduced carrier phase shifted pulse-width modulation (CPS-PWM) signal for the first leg; and

determining the gate driver signals for SMs in the first leg based additionally on the reduced CPS-PWM signal.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the zero-sequence voltage comprises determining V ZS =0.5V dc (1−2σ)+(1−σ)V min +0V max , wherein:

V ZS represents the respective zero-sequence voltage;

V dc represents the DC link voltage of the MMC;

σ represents a generalized distribution coefficient;

V min represents an instantaneous maximum voltage value; and

V max represents an instantaneous minimum voltage value.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein σ is determined by

σ

=

2

(

N

-

N

f

m

N

-

0.5

)

+

(

1

-

m

3

)

2

-

m

3

,

wherein:

N represents the number of SMs in each phase arm;

N fm represents the larger of the number of faulty SMs in the first arm or the number of faulty SMs in the second arm; and

m represents an original modulation index.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein σ is selected to be a value between 0 and 1.

13 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising determining the RUF for the first phase leg by determining

RUF

=

N

-

N

f

m

N

,

wherein:

N represents the number of SMs in each phase arm; and

N fm represents the larger of the number of faulty SMs in the first arm or the number of faulty SMs in the second arm.

14 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the device comprises a control module of the MMC.

15 . A method performed by a modular multilevel converter (MMC), the method comprising:

monitoring operation of the MMC for faults occurring in one or more of a plurality of submodules (SMs) positioned in the MMC;

when a faulty SM is detected in a first phase of the MMC, isolating the faulty SM;

when the faulty SM is detected in the first phase of the MMC, bypassing a non-faulty SM;

a first calculating of a reduced utilization factor (RUF) due to the faulty SM in the first phase;

a second calculating of a respective zero-sequence voltage (ZSV) for each phase; and

an injecting the ZSV into the phase voltages, resulting in the modifying of a reference signal for each phase (U a_ref , U b_ref , U c_ref ), wherein:

the MMC comprises a leg comprising a first arm and a complementary arm, and each arm comprises at least one of the plurality of SMs,

the faulty SM is positioned in the first arm,

the bypassed non-faulty SM is positioned in the complementary arm,

the first calculating, the second calculating, and the injecting are performed in a control module of the MMC, and

the control module operates the MMC using the modified reference signals, resulting in at least one of a suppression of a circulating current, a balanced leg voltage, a balanced arm current, a stable phase current, or a stable DC-bus current in the MMC.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, LLC
To: ALLIANCE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION, LLC
Reel/Frame 073993/0276 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 26, 2024
From: ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, LLC
To: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 068400/0728 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2024
From: AGALGAONKAR, YASHODHAN PRAKASH; HOVSAPIAN, ZOHROB
To: ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 067981/0001 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63509808 · Jun 23, 2023
Related Publication 20250167667A1 · May 22, 2025
References Cited (17)
US 10734804B2 · Aramaki · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11336169B2 · Kajiyama · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 12413156B2 · Fujiwara · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12463551B2 · Alvarez Valenzuela · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20260036644A1 · Lee · 2026 [cited by examiner]
Farzamkia et al., “Improved Fault-Tolerant Method for Modular Multilevel Converters by Combined DC and Neutral-Shift Strategy”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Mar. 2019, vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 2454-2462. [cited by applicant]
Farzamkia et al., “Fault-Tolerant Method to Reduce Voltage Stress of Submodules in Postfault Condition for Regenerative MMC-Based Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Jun. 2021, vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 4718-… [cited by applicant]
Hammond et al., “Enhancing the reliability of modular medium-voltage drives”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Oct. 2002, vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 948-954. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., “Energy-balancing Control Strategy for Modular Multilevel Converters Under Submodule Fault Conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Sep. 2014, vol. 29, No. 9, p. 5021-5030. [cited by applicant]
Kucka et al., “Optimised operating range of modular multilevel converters for AC/AC conversion with failed modules”, 2015 17th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'15 ECCE—Europe), pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Kucka et al., “Enhancing the Reliability of Modular Multilevel Converters Using Neutral Shift”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Dec. 2017, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 8953-8957. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A zero-sequence voltage injection control scheme for modular multilevel converter under submodule failure”, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2016, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Fault-Tolerant Control of MMC With Hot Reserved Submodules Based on Carrier Phase Shift Modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Sep. 2017, vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 6778-6791. [cited by applicant]
Ojo, “The generalized discontinuous PWM scheme for three-phase voltage source inverters”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Dec. 2004, vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1280-1289. [cited by applicant]
Son et al., “Design and Control of a Modular Multilevel HVDC Converter With Redundant Power Modules for Noninterruptible Energy Transfer”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Jul. 2012, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 1611-1619. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “A Postfault Strategy to Control the Modular Multilevel Converter Under Submodule Failure”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Dec. 2016, vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 2453-2463. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Seamless Fault-Tolerant Operation of a Modular Multilevel Converter With Switch Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis in a Distributed Control Architecture”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Aug. 2018, vol. … [cited by applicant]