IP Library Granted Patent US 12,618,805
Granted Patent B2
US 12,618,805 · App. 18/793,196 · Granted May 5, 2026

System and method for real-time visualization of foreign objects within a material

Inventors: David A. Jack (Waco, TX); Nathaniel J. Blackman (Hewitt, TX); Benjamin M. Blandford (Waco, TX)
Assignee: Baylor University
G01N29/0645G01N29/043G01N29/048G01N29/069G01N2291/044
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,618,805
App. No.
18/793,196
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a system and method for real-time visualization of a material during ultrasonic non-destructive testing. The system is capable of producing A-scans, B-scans, and C-scans of the test object and automatically highlighting potential foreign objects within the test object based on the scan data. The system includes a graphical user interface (GUI) capable of displaying a three-dimensional (3-D) image of a composite laminate constructed of a series of two-dimensional (2-D) cross sections. In one embodiment, the system includes an artificial intelligence module capable of highlighting foreign objects in order to provide size data, shape data, and/or depth data of the foreign object.

Claims (39)

1 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

a transducer housing assembly in communication with a processor and a display means;

wherein an ultrasonic transducer within the transducer housing assembly is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object to produce scan data;

wherein the processor is operable to generate an average A-scan for the test object based on the scan data;

wherein the processor is operable to determine a number of plies and a depth for each of the plies for the test object based on the average A-scan;

wherein the processor is in communication with a material database containing information regarding a plurality of materials, and wherein the processor matches a material of at least one foreign object in the test object to at least one of the plurality of materials; and

wherein the processor generates a list including the at least one of the plurality of materials, wherein each material on the list is automatically assigned a probability value corresponding to a likelihood that each material in the list matches the at least one foreign object.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is operable to determine a depth of at least one foreign object within the test object based on at least one B-scan.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the probability value for each material on the list is determined by an artificial intelligence module.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the information regarding the plurality of materials includes a characteristic A-scan signal for each of the plurality of materials.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a frequency greater than 2.25 MHz.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is operable to generate a characteristic length and/or a surface area for the at least one foreign object.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor generates at least one C-scan for at least one depth of the test object, and wherein boundaries of the at least one foreign object at the at least one depth are determined by mapping the gradient of amplitude data for the at least one C-scan.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein an artificial intelligence module automatically detects boundaries of the at least one foreign object on the at least one C-scan and automatically provides a surface area of the at least one foreign object based on the detected boundaries.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor generates a three-dimensional (3-D) graphical representation of the test object, including the at least one foreign object, and the 3-D graphical representation is displayed via the display means.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the test object includes less than about two lamina between a testing surface of the test object and the at least one foreign object.

11 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

a transducer housing assembly in communication with a processor and a display means;

wherein an ultrasonic transducer is disposed within a sealed fluid chamber within the transducer housing assembly;

wherein the ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object to produce scan data;

wherein the processor is in communication with a material database containing information regarding a plurality of materials, and wherein the processor matches a material of at least one foreign object in the test object to at least one of the plurality of materials based on a characteristic A-scan signal for the at least one of the plurality of materials;

wherein the processor generates a list including the at least one of the plurality of materials, wherein each material is automatically assigned a probability value corresponding to a likelihood that each material in the list matches the material of the at least one foreign object.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is operable to generate an average A-scan for the test object based on the scan data, and wherein the processor is operable to determine a number of plies and a depth for each of the plies for the test object based on the average A-scan.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the probability value for each material on the list is determined by an artificial intelligence module.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the information regarding the plurality of materials includes a speed of sound for each of the plurality of materials and/or a density of each of the plurality of materials.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a frequency greater than 2.25 MHz.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor generates at least one C-scan for at least one depth of the test object, and wherein boundaries of the at least one foreign object at the at least one depth are determined by mapping the gradient of amplitude data for the at least one C-scan.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein an artificial intelligence module automatically detects boundaries of the at least one foreign object on the at least one C-scan and automatically provides a surface area of the at least one foreign object based on the detected boundaries.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one foreign object has a characteristic length smaller than 3 mm.

19 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

a transducer housing assembly in communication with a processor and a display means;

wherein an ultrasonic transducer is disposed within a sealed fluid chamber within the transducer housing assembly;

wherein the ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object to produce scan data;

wherein the processor is operable to generate at least one B-scan based on the scan data;

wherein the processor is operable to determine a depth of at least one foreign object within the test object based on the at least one B-scan;

wherein the processor is in communication with a material database containing information regarding a plurality of materials, and wherein the processor is operable to match a material of the at least one foreign object to at least one of the plurality of materials;

wherein the processor generates a list including the at least one of the plurality of materials, wherein each material on the list is automatically assigned a probability value corresponding to a likelihood that each material in the list matches the at least one foreign object; and

wherein the probability value for each material on the list is determined by an artificial intelligence module.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a frequency greater than 2.25 MHz.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 13, 2024
From: JACK, DAVID A.; BLACKMAN, NATHANIEL J.; BLANDFORD, BENJAMIN M.
To: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 068264/0530 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 13, 2024
From: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
To: VERIFI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 068264/0626 →
Continuity (13)
Continuation 17396174 · Aug 6, 2021
Continuation In Part 17336937 · Jun 2, 2021
Continuation In Part 17188559 · Mar 1, 2021
Continuation In Part 17184061 · Feb 24, 2021
Continuation In Part 17172723 · Feb 10, 2021
Continuation In Part 17149320 · Jan 14, 2021
Continuation In Part 17148205 · Jan 13, 2021
Continuation In Part 17123970 · Dec 16, 2020
Continuation In Part 17122410 · Dec 15, 2020
Continuation In Part 17108472 · Dec 1, 2020
Continuation In Part 17091774 · Nov 6, 2020
Provisional Application 63001608 · Mar 30, 2020
Related Publication 20240393295A1 · Nov 28, 2024
References Cited (79)
US 3239801A · Mcgaughey · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 4184373A · Evans et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4215583A · Botsco et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5009104A · Johnson · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5088327A · Gammell · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 5408882A · McKinley et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5494038A · Wang et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5631425A · Wang · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 6490501B1 · Saunders · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6945111B2 · Georgeson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6959602B2 · Peterson, Jr. et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7010980B2 · Meier · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7017422B2 · Heyman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7574915B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7895895B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7975549B2 · Fetzer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8234924B2 · Saxena et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8265886B2 · Bisiaux et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8347723B2 · Questo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8522615B1 · Brady et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9121817B1 · Roach et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9207639B2 · Ratering · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9297789B2 · Djordjevic et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9360418B2 · Georgeson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9494562B2 · Lin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10161910B2 · Dehghan Niri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10302600B2 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10330645B2 · Huang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10345272B2 · Holmes et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10444195B2 · Bingham · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10605781B2 · Grewal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10697941B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10761067B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10801998B2 · Giurgiutiu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11346816B2 · Ashrafi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030089171A1 · Kenefick et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040020296A1 · Moles et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040031337A1 · Masaniello et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060225508A1 · Sfeir · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070175282A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070258858A1 · Rasnow et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080000299A1 · Georgeson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100251822A1 · Isobe et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110274369A1 · Smith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120250970A1 · Tsubaki · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130031979A1 · Bergman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130228015A1 · Wimplinger · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140216158A1 · Martin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150377839A1 · Jack · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160320344A1 · Spencer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170284971A1 · Hall · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170299381A1 · Bingham · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180101944A1 · Sakai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180120268A1 · Georgeson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180231502A1 · Kahmann et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190004013A1 · Choi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187107A1 · Asadollahi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190257799A1 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293610A1 · Campbell et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200047425A1 · Jahanbin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200072796A1 · Fiseni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200173964A1 · Hudson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200230899A1 · Tyson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200232951A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210078177A1 · Troy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210128102A1 · Negishi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210302374A1 · Jack · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302375A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302376A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302378A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302385A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210310994A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210349058A1 · Jack · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210364472A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372969A1 · Giurgiutiu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220107290A1 · Jin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Beatriz Larrañaga-Valsero, Robert A. Smith, Rostand B. Tayong, Antonio Fernández-López, Alfredo Güemes, Wrinkle measurement in glass-carbon hybrid laminates comparing ultrasonic techniques: A case study, Aug. 15, 2018, … [cited by applicant]
Full 3D characterisation of composite laminates using ultrasonic analytic signals by Smith et al. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Nelson Luke, Smith Robert, Fibre Direction and Stacking Sequence Measurement in Carbon Fibre Composites using Radon Transforms of Ultrasonic Data, Mar. 2019, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 11… [cited by applicant]