IP Library Granted Patent US 12,373,940
Granted Patent B2
US 12,373,940 · App. 18/851,561 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Method and device for evaluating a welding quality of a weld seam between end sections of two conductor elements

Inventor: Laurens Schmid (Neckartenzlingen, DE)
Assignee: Gehring Technologies GmbH + Co. KG
G06T7/001G01N21/8851G01N2021/8887G06T2207/20021G06T2207/30136
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,373,940
App. No.
18/851,561
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for evaluating a welding quality of a weld seam with which the end sections of conductor elements are welded to one another by irradiating their end faces. The method includes capturing an image of the end faces and dividing the image into a first subset of pixels whose intensity levels are greater than a specified intensity level threshold value and into a second subset of pixels whose intensity levels are less than or equal to the intensity level threshold value. The method includes assessing the welding quality of the weld seam based on a comparison of a number and/or position of the pixels of the first subset and/or of the second subset with a pixel target value of a number and/or a pixel target range of a position of pixels of the first subset and/or of the second subset that correspond to a weld seam of desired quality.

Claims (21)

1. Method ( 40 ) for evaluating a welding quality of a weld seam ( 14 ) with which the end sections of at least two elongated conductor elements ( 12 ) are welded to one another by irradiating their end faces ( 13 ), wherein the method ( 40 ) comprises the following steps:

(a) capturing an image ( 20 ) of the end faces ( 13 ) of the conductor elements ( 12 ) welded to one another by means of the weld seam ( 14 ), wherein the image ( 20 ) is recorded from the end faces ( 13 ) of the conductor elements ( 12 ) and the environment recorded by the image ( 20 ) comprises at least an entire surface of the weld seam ( 14 ), and wherein the image ( 20 ) is recorded with different intensity levels in pixels of the image ( 20 ), wherein the intensity levels are an indicator of the amount of light that was locally reflected from the recorded position when the image ( 20 ) was recorded, and the indicator is thus a measure of a local orientation of the surface of the weld seam ( 14 ), in particular wherein the weld seam is illuminated with light parallel to the direction in which the image was recorded,

(b) dividing the image ( 20 ) into at least one first subset ( 30 ) of pixels whose intensity levels are greater than a specified intensity level threshold value and into at least one second subset ( 32 ) of pixels whose intensity levels are less than or equal to the intensity level threshold value, and

(c) assessing the welding quality of the weld seam ( 14 ) based on a comparison of a number and/or position of the pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) and/or of the second subset ( 32 ) with at least one pixel target value of a number and/or a pixel target range of a position of pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) and/or of the second subset ( 32 ) that correspond to a weld seam of desired quality.

2. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein the intensity levels are gray levels and the intensity level threshold value is a gray level threshold value.

3. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein the conductor elements ( 12 ) are plug-in coils, in particular hairpins and/or I-pins, of a stator ( 10 ) of an electrodynamic machine.

4. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein a higher-level image ( 20 ) is captured which comprises a plurality of weld seams ( 14 ) of at least two end sections of conductor elements ( 12 ) in each case, and assessing the welding quality is carried out for each of the weld seams ( 14 ).

5. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein the welding quality of a weld seam ( 14 ) is evaluated, by which the end sections of at least three conductor elements ( 12 ) are welded to one another at their end faces.

6. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein a central region ( 34 ) of the image ( 20 ), which corresponds to the center of the intended position of the weld seam, in particular weld bead, is not taken into account in the assessment according to step (c).

7. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 6 , wherein the central region ( 34 ) is a round or elliptical region having a predetermined size, into which a predetermined minimum number of pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) or the second subset ( 32 ) fall when the weld seam ( 14 ) is properly made.

8. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein the pixel target value of the number and/or the pixel target range of the position is determined by a selection of a minimum connection cross-section as a quality feature of the welding quality.

9. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 8 , wherein data relating to a plurality of weld seams deemed to be good are used for determining the pixel target value of the number and/or the pixel target range of the position, in order to ascertain the pixel target value or the pixel target range by correlating the position and/or the number of individual intensity levels of pixels with connection cross-sections of weld seams ( 14 ).

10. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein assessing the welding quality of the weld seam ( 14 ) comprises assessing a symmetry of the weld seam ( 14 ) based on the number and position of the pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) and/or the second subset ( 32 ).

11. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein the weld seam ( 14 ) is rewelded depending on the number and position of the pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) and/or the second subset ( 32 ).

12. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 11 , wherein a weld power for the rewelding is selected depending on the number and/or position of the pixels of the first subset ( 30 ) and/or the second subset ( 32 ).

13. Method ( 40 ) according to claim 1 , wherein a welding quality of a weld seam ( 14 ) and welding of a different weld seam ( 14 ) on the same component ( 10 ) having a plurality of conductor elements ( 12 ) are evaluated simultaneously.

14. Device ( 200 ) for evaluating a welding quality of a weld seam ( 14 ) between end sections of at least two elongated conductor elements ( 12 ) which are welded to one another by irradiating their end faces ( 13 ), the device ( 200 ) comprising:

an image capturing device ( 116 ) having a beam path ( 118 ), which is designed to carry out step (a) of the method according to claim 1 ; and

at least one data processing system ( 202 ) which is configured to carry out steps (b) and (c) of the method according to claim 1 .

15. Device according to claim 14 , wherein the device comprises an illumination source ( 112 ) configured to illuminate the end faces ( 13 ) of the conductor elements ( 12 ) from a direction along the beam path ( 118 ) of the image capturing means ( 116 ).

16. Device according to claim 14 , wherein the device further comprises a laser beam source ( 102 ) with a beam path ( 114 ) of the laser beam for carrying out the welding process for connecting the conductor elements ( 12 ) at their end face ( 13 ), in particular wherein the beam path ( 118 ) of the image capturing means ( 116 ) and the beam path ( 114 ) of the laser beam are coupled into one another, in particular by means of a beam splitter ( 106 ).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2024
From: SCHMID, LAURENS
To: GEHRING TECHNOLOGIES GMBH + CO. KG
Reel/Frame 069686/0845 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2022 107 886.8 · Apr 1, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250111496A1 · Apr 3, 2025
References Cited (44)
US 5061841A · Richardson · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5920014A · Waschkies · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 8110774B2 · Huonker · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9077927B2 · Miyagawa · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10036731B2 · Edwards, II · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10239154B2 · Ciampolini · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20110142326A1 · Shinoda · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130075371A1 · De Souza · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160139593A1 · Willett · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20220048137A1 · Kallage · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220126405A1 · Maslar · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220263390A1 · Bapp · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230068733A1 · Bocksrocker · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240181513A1 · Ono · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 104977305A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 108596880A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 105976352B · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 112548321A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 19935777B4 · 2006 [cited by examiner]
DE 102008062866A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011102010A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
DE 102021002917A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 102020210419A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 102020213109B3 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 102020214125B3 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 0996091A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 3900870A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
JP 2014238387A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019120650A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 102165261B1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020129617A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023170570A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
A. Mayr, L. Hauck, M. Meiners and J. Franke, “Prediction of the Joint Cross-Section of Laser-Welded Hairpin Windings Based on 2D Image Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks,” 2020 10th International Electric Drives P… [cited by examiner]
J. Hassan, A. M. Awan and A. Jalil, “Welding Defect Detection and Classification Using Geometric Features,” 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2012, pp. 139-1… [cited by examiner]
Examination Report for DE 10 2022 107 886.8 dated Dec. 8, 2022 with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Ninomiya et al.,, Automatic 21/2D Shape Inspection System for Via-Hole Fillings of Green Sheets By Shadow Image Analysis Proceedings of the International Conference On Robotics and Automation. Scottsdale, May 15-19, 198… [cited by applicant]
Mayr et al., “Evaluation of Machine Leaming for Quality Monitoring of Laser 1-16 Welding Using the Example of the Contacting of Hairpin Windings”, Dec. 4, 2018, BNSDOCID, XP, 3526174A 1,978-1-7281-0148-4/18/$3l.00 ©2018… [cited by applicant]
Vater, et al. “Quality Control and Fault Classification of Laser Welded Hairpins in Electrical Motors”, Dated Dec. 18, 2020, 14:19:39 UTC from IEEE Xplore, EUSIPCO 2020,978-9-0827-9705-3. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT/EP2023/058131 dated Jun. 22, 2023, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion for PCT/EP2023/058131 dated with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Takanori et al.: “Automatic 2½ 0 shape inspection system for via-hole fillings of green sheets by shallow image analysis”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Scottsdale, May 15-19, 1… [cited by applicant]
EP Communication for Application No. 23 714 758.2 dated Jan. 15, 2024, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
EP Decision to Grant for Application No. 23714758.2 dated May 10, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action for application No. 202380029376.2 dated Mar. 1, 2025 with English translation. [cited by applicant]