IP Library Granted Patent US 12,493,078
Granted Patent B2
US 12,493,078 · App. 18/913,656 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

System and method for degradation based battery control

Inventors: Patrick Asinger (San Francisco, CA); Evan Murphy (San Francisco, CA); Mark Tobenkin (San Francisco, CA); Yumeng Gao (San Francisco, CA); Daniel Vickery (San Francisco, CA); Sandy Yuan (San Francisco, CA); Emily Zhang (San Francisco, CA); Shyam Srinivasan (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Zitara Technologies, Inc.
G01R31/392G01R31/367H01M10/425H01M10/441H01M10/443H01M10/46H01M10/482H01M10/486H02J7/0048H02J7/005H01M2010/4271
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,493,078
App. No.
18/913,656
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method can include receiving battery sensor measurements, determining a state of the battery (e.g., SoH, SoC, SoE, SoP, etc. or information correlated therewith such as internal resistance, open circuit voltage, etc.), estimating an aging profile or degradation of the battery for one or more operating conditions, and determining operating conditions for the battery based on the estimated degradation.

Claims (61)

1 . A method comprising:

for each battery of a plurality of batteries:

measuring sensor measurements comprising at least one of voltage, current, or temperature of the respective battery using a set of sensors; and

determining a state of health of the respective battery using a state estimator to process the sensor measurements;

aggregating the state of health for each battery of the plurality of batteries, wherein aggregating the state of health comprises:

aggregating the state of health for batteries from the plurality of batteries with at most a threshold utilization time to form a first aggregated dataset; and

independently aggregating the state of health for batteries from the plurality of batteries with greater than the threshold utilization time to form a second aggregated dataset; and

based on the aggregated states of health, determining operating instructions for each battery of the plurality of batteries; wherein the second aggregated dataset is used to determine operating instructions for batteries associated with the first aggregated dataset.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the operating instructions minimize a total degradation of the plurality of batteries.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the operating instructions comprise one or more battery operation condition selected from:

charging rate;

discharging rate;

charging voltage;

depth of discharge range;

operating temperature;

operating voltage;

storage temperature;

storage voltage;

battery operating lifetime;

accumulated charge at a given voltage load; and

total charge throughput.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein when the operation instructions for a battery of the plurality of batteries comprises a change in one battery operation condition, subsequent operation instructions for the battery do not comprise a change in the one battery operation condition.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the operation instructions comprise instructions for operating a subset of batteries of the plurality of batteries in a diagnostic mode configured to improve observability into the state of health of the subset of batteries.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the diagnostic mode comprises a pulse diagnostic mode wherein a current pulse of at least 0.1 A/s is applied to the batteries of the subset of batteries and sensor measurements are recorded contemporaneously with or subsequent to the current pulse.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the state estimator comprises at least one of: a Kalman filter, an unscented Kalman filter, an extended Kalman filter, Schmidt-Kalman filter, a Gaussian process, or a particle filter.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the state estimator uses one or more model selected from: battery pack geometry model, sensor model, electrical components model, thermal transport model, battery cell heat generation model, battery cell heat transport model, equivalent circuit model, or battery cell electrochemical model.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the model is a parameterized model, wherein the parameterized model is parameterized as a function of one or more of: temperature, current, voltage, resistance, state of charge, battery age, time, or combinations thereof.

10 . A system comprising:

a battery comprising one or more battery cell;

a sensor configured to measure sensor measurements comprising one or more of a voltage, current, temperature, or resistance of the battery; and

a processor configured to:

receive the sensor measurements;

estimate a state of health of the battery using the sensor measurements;

aggregate the state of health of the battery with a plurality of states of health for a plurality of batteries, wherein aggregating the state of health comprises:

aggregating the states of health for the battery and batteries from the plurality of batteries with at most a threshold utilization time to form a first aggregated dataset; and

independently aggregating the states of health for the battery and batteries from the plurality of batteries with greater than the threshold utilization time to form a second aggregated dataset; and

determine a current degradation of the battery based on the state of the battery; and

determine operating conditions for the battery to achieve a target degradation based on the current degradation of the battery; wherein the second aggregated dataset is used to determine operating instructions for the battery when the battery is associated with the first aggregated dataset.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the state of the battery is estimated using a state estimator comprising one of: a Kalman filter, an unscented Kalman filter, an extended Kalman filter, Schmidt-Kalman filter, a Gaussian process, or a particle filter.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the state estimator uses one or more model selected from: battery pack geometry model, sensor model, electrical components model, thermal transport model, battery cell heat generation model, battery cell heat transport model, equivalent circuit model, or battery cell electrochemical model.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the model is a parameterized model, wherein the parameterized model is parameterized as a function of one or more of: temperature, current, voltage, resistance, state of charge, battery age, time, or combinations thereof.

14 . The system of claim 10 , wherein determining the operating conditions further comprises determining operating conditions that improve an accuracy or observability of the state of the battery.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein operating conditions that improve an accuracy or observability of the state of the battery comprise operating the battery in a slow cycle mode or current pulsed mode.

16 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the system further comprises a remote computing system configured to:

receive battery states from a plurality of batteries;

generate operating instructions across the plurality of batteries based on the battery states from the plurality of batteries and an optimization goal; and

transmit the operating instructions for the battery to the processor.

17 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the operating instructions comprise one or more battery operation condition selected from:

charging rate;

discharging rate;

charging voltage;

depth of discharge range;

operating temperature;

operating voltage;

storage temperature;

storage voltage;

battery operating lifetime;

accumulated charge at a given voltage load; and

total charge throughput.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein when the operation instructions comprise a change in one battery operation condition, subsequent operation instructions for the battery do not comprise a change in the one battery operation condition.

19 . The system of claim 17 , wherein determining the operation instructions comprises evaluating at most five of the battery operating conditions.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: ZITARA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: FORTESCUE ZERO LIMITED
Reel/Frame 074158/0058 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2025
From: ASINGER, PATRICK; MURPHY, EVAN; TOBENKIN, MARK; GAO, YUMENG; VICKERY, DANIEL; YUAN, SANDY; ZHANG, EMILY; SRINIVASAN, SHYAM
To: ZITARA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 069797/0615 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63543698 · Oct 11, 2023
Related Publication 20250123333A1 · Apr 17, 2025
References Cited (122)
US 6656234B2 · Dexter et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7554294B2 · Srinivasan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7847558B2 · Runkle et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7894512B2 · Beadle et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8723527B2 · Kudo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8961004B2 · Srinivasan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9593952B2 · Goodall et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9726730B2 · Gross · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9989595B1 · Wang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10153521B2 · Beaston · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10209314B2 · Garcia et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10295606B2 · Mccoy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10310022B2 · Park et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10422834B2 · Tang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10446879B2 · Povey et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10489731B2 · Fife · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10656209B2 · Jeon · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10818981B2 · Srinivasan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10969752B1 · Brink · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11097633B1 · Kohn et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11181587B1 · Srinivasan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11774504B2 · Murphy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20030204328A1 · Tinnemeyer · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040024559A1 · Down et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050057255A1 · Tate et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050269991A1 · Mitsui et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060217152A1 · Fok et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070035307A1 · Schoch · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070220A1 · Darilek · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110196633A1 · Abe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110246013A1 · Yee et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120098481A1 · Hunter et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120175953A1 · Ohkawa et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120249053A1 · Seethaler et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130030737A1 · Okada · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130069660A1 · Bernard et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130221916A1 · Kelty et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140167705A1 · Chang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140218040A1 · Kim · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244225A1 · Balasingam et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140333265A1 · Kinjo · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150046108A1 · Akamine · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150256003A1 · Yonetani · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150268309A1 · Kim · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150280294A1 · Shin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150304772A1 · Risberg et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150369875A1 · Ishii · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160036272A1 · Wartena et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160039419A1 · Wampler et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160041231A1 · Lee · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160172886A1 · Keates · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160202324A1 · Biletska et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160209472A1 · Chow et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170003352A1 · Barre et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104332A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170123009A1 · You et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170199247A1 · Joe · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170244137A1 · Guo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170288414A1 · Klein et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170350944A1 · Pajovic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180083461A1 · Ravi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180095140A1 · Park et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180095141A1 · Wild et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180111599A1 · Wang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136285A1 · You et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180254632A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180292465A1 · Osara et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180337536A1 · Li et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180358663A1 · Yonemoto et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190036356A1 · Subbaraman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190120908A1 · Naha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168617A1 · Ling et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190173283A1 · Epel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190235027A1 · Sugiura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339330A1 · Bryngelsson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369626A1 · Lui et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200070682A1 · Hellgren · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200164763A1 · Holme · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200203780A1 · Mandli et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200284846A1 · Pajovic et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200355749A1 · Takahashi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200376968A1 · Wang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200379049A1 · Gray et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200386820A1 · Harper · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210033675A1 · Ukumori · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210055348A1 · Kim et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210055353A1 · Yazami · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210152004A1 · Basehore et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210280920A1 · Rinaldo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210349155A1 · Srinivasan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220057454A1 · Kunisch et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220170993A1 · Woll · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220229114A1 · Altaf · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220373609A1 · Baumann · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220416548A1 · Killian et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230046787A1 · Kroener · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230184839A1 · Murphy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240010100A1 · Atukalp et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 111438077A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 112017004755T5 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019111956A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019111958A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019111976A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019111979A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019121461B3 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016030967A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017167777A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019017991A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020036775A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021044134A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022058416A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023052521A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
“Meta-Model Mechanism”, https://www.cs.wmich.edu/˜ooda/metamodel.html. [cited by applicant]
Foran, Daniel , et al., “System and Method for Battery Cell Balancing”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/933,906, filed Oct. 31, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Gima, Zachary , et al., “Optimal Sensor Selection for an Electrochemical Li-Ion Battery Model”, 2020 ECS—The Electrochemical Society, vol. MA2020-01, A04: Student Battery Slam 4. [cited by applicant]
Lambert, Fred , “Tesla explains why it limits Supercharging speed after high Nos. of DC charges”, Electrek, Tesla Supercharger, May 7, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lambert, Fred , “Tesla listens to customers and walks back all software performance reductions tied to frequent use of max power”, Tesla, Tesla Model S, Jan. 17, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Merkle, Lukas , et al., “Architecture of a Digital Twin for Enabling Digital Services for Battery Systems”, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS), Taipei, Taiwan, May 6-9, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Russell, Matthew B., et al., “Stochastic modeling for tracking and prediction of gradual and transient battery performance degradation”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 59 (2021) 663-674. [cited by applicant]
Severson, Kristen A., “Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation”, Nature Energy, 4, pp. 383-391 (2019), Mar. 25, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Uddin, Kotub , et al., “Characterising Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation through the Identification and Tracking of Electrochemical Battery Model Parameters”, Batteries 2016, 2, 13; doi: 10.3390/batteries2020013, www.mdpi… [cited by applicant]
Xiong, Rui , et al., “Critical Review on the Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods for Electric Vehicles”, IEEE, vol. 6, 2018, published Dec. 6, 2027. [cited by applicant]