IP Library Granted Patent US 12,240,634
Granted Patent B1
US 12,240,634 · App. 18/936,906 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Mission-adaptable aerial vehicle and methods for in-field assembly and use

Inventors: Ian Muceus (San Diego, CA); Daniel Magy (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Firestorm Labs, Inc.
B64U10/70B64U20/75B64U20/87B64U2201/104
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,240,634
App. No.
18/936,906
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for mission-adaptable aerial vehicle. In some aspects, a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle includes a configuration having swappable, manipulatable, and interchangeable sections and components connectable by a connection and fastening system able to be modified by an end-user in the field. In some embodiments, a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle can be configured to include a main center body extending along a longitudinal direction, a wing with a lateral cross-sectional airfoil shape, and/or stabilizer and control surface structures with corresponding cross-sectional airfoil shapes.

Claims (36)

1. A method for customizing a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, comprising:

receiving, at a data processing system, an input to obtain or access a library of data files associated with one or more mission-adaptable aerial vehicles;

processing, at the data processing system, the input to identify the library of data files associated with the one or more mission-adaptable aerial vehicles;

providing, by the data processing system, the identified library of data files associated with one or more mission-adaptable aerial vehicles to an entity associated with the received input;

facilitating, at the data processing system, a modification of the library of data files based on data provided by the entity that provided the input, wherein the facilitating the modification of one or more data files of the library includes verifying a technical feasibility of a proposed change to an airframe component of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, wherein the modification of the library of data files includes a change, an addition, or an omission to data in at least one data file of the library of data files;

simulating, at the data processing system, a performance of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle having the airframe component with the proposed change incorporated to evaluate the proposed change to the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle's flight performance; and

producing, at the data processing system, a new or an updated library of data files based on the modification of one or more data files of the library of data files associated with one or more mission-adaptable aerial vehicles.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request is sent by a client computer device associated with an additive manufacturing system.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request is sent by a computer device in data communication with an existing mission-adaptable aerial vehicle.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the processing the input includes searching a database of one or both of a plurality of libraries and a plurality of data files to identify the requested library of data files.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein a search is conducted based on at least one of (i) one or more keywords, (ii) an index or a reference values, or (iii) one or more parameters associated with at least one of an aerial vehicle, one or more airframe segments or components, or one or more aerial vehicle mission constraints.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the facilitating the modification of the library of data files includes creating a tentative or pending library.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proposed change includes at least one of modification data associated with a weight, a balance, a performance, and/or a dimensional measurement, a material, a material property, and/or another parameter of the airframe component of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle.

8. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

repeating one or both of the facilitating step and the simulating step based at least on results of a simulated performance of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle having the airframe component with the proposed change incorporated.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the produced library of data files includes a manufacturing protocol to account for design changes to the airframe component.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

creating an additively manufacture protocol to physically render the airframe component the proposed change incorporated therein.

11. A method for customizing a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, comprising:

modifying, at a data processing system comprising a processor and a memory, a library of data files associated with a mission adaptable aerial vehicle to create an alteration to a design feature of an airframe component of the mission adaptable aerial vehicle based on input data provided by a user;

simulating, at the data processing system, a flight performance of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle having the airframe component with the alteration incorporated therein; and

producing, at the data processing system, a new or an updated library of data files based on one or more modified data files of the library of data files associated with the mission adaptable aerial vehicle.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the mission adaptable aerial vehicle is manufacturable through manufacturing, and wherein the producing the new or the updated library of data files includes generating one or more manufacturing parameters of a manufacturing protocol of the airframe component.

13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

creating, at the data processing system, a manufacturing protocol including instructions storable on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by a data processing unit to control a manufacturing apparatus to physically render the airframe component with the alteration to the design feature.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

verifying, at the data processing system, a technical feasibility of one or more of a proposed change, a proposed addition, or a proposed omission to the airframe component of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle based on the input data.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the proposed change, proposed addition, or proposed omission is associated with one or more of: a weight, a size dimension, and/or a material property of the airframe component of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, or a balance, a flight operation factor, a take-off operation factor, and/or a landing operation factor of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the modifying the library of data files includes one or more of changing, adding, or omitting data in at least one data file of the library of data files.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the modifying the library of data files includes creating a tentative or pending library.

18. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving, at the data processing system, the input data from a client computing device of the user in data communication with a manufacturing apparatus; and

processing, at data processing system, the received input data to identify the library of data files associated with the one or more mission adaptable aerial vehicles.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the manufacturing apparatus is located in a remote or transportable container that comprises (i) one or more additive manufacturing devices, one or more subtractive manufacturing devices, and/or one or more hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing devices; (ii) one or more storage units for raw materials, processing materials, and/or components of the manufacturing apparatus; and (iii) one or more computing devices for controlling the manufacturing apparatus.

20. The method of claim 11 , comprising:

repeating one or both of the modifying step and the simulating step based at least on results of a simulated performance of the mission-adaptable aerial vehicle having the airframe component with the alteration incorporated therein.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2025
From: FIRESTORM LABS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 071763/0195 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2024
From: MUCEUS, IAN; MAGY, DANIEL
To: FIRESTORM LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069132/0347 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 18655221 · May 3, 2024
Continuation 18510592 · Nov 15, 2023
Continuation In Part PCTUS2023022151 · May 12, 2023
Provisional Application 63429506 · Dec 1, 2022
Provisional Application 63366119 · Jun 9, 2022
Provisional Application 63341647 · May 13, 2022
References Cited (135)
US 2019652A · Brookley · 1935 [cited by examiner]
US 3218005A · Alvarez Calderon · 1965 [cited by examiner]
US 6065720A · Ash · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 8068949B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8068950B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8082074B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8103398B2 · Duggan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8355834B2 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8380425B2 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8700306B2 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8768555B2 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9108729B2 · Duggan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9254363B2 · Levien · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9555873B1 · Alley · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9713675B2 · Levien · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10767624B2 · Monreal Lesmes · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11027584B1 · Kiceniuk, Jr. · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11187203B2 · Badger · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11358700B1 · Poe · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11450233B2 · Becker · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11521512B2 · Marquinez Torrecilla · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11597490B1 · Gundlach · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20080149758A1 · Colgren · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090026321A1 · Sarh · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090166477A1 · Bousfield · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110036939A1 · Easter · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110130913A1 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120123628A1 · Duggan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130345920A1 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140025229A1 · Levien · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140234116A1 · Cussac · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140324253A1 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150003991A1 · Bagepalli · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150292477A1 · Kratmann · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160121992A1 · Saroka · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160129984A1 · Tiryaki · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170008611A1 · Murta · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170066135A1 · Cohen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170152014A1 · Gould · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170185081A1 · Steele · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170253316A1 · Benthien · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170349281A1 · Quinlan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180067476A1 · Engelbart · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180104863A1 · Cottrell · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180162540A1 · Iliopoulos · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180273158A1 · Courtin · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180297698A1 · Dhall · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180312252A1 · Yates · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180334248A1 · Neiser · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180355842A1 · Badger · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190051051A1 · Kaufman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190077098A1 · Riley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190077496A1 · Livieratos · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190106192A1 · Woodworth · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190106195A1 · Wilkerson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190135403A1 · Perry · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190143596A1 · Fiechter · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190193829A1 · Schlueter · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190224909A1 · Riha · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190255777A1 · Fiechter · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190322032A1 · Riha · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190322047A1 · Riha · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190374868A1 · Russell · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190381530A1 · Beaudoin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190389555A1 · Guering · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200032665A1 · Propheter-Hinckley · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200047867A1 · Griess · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200180760A1 · Richardson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200247561A1 · Rivera · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200310408A1 · Carper · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200407039A1 · Sanders · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210031912A1 · Yates · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210046694A1 · Rowe · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210070419A1 · Decker · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210082304A1 · Daley · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210232873A1 · Kothari · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210256875A1 · Mosier · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210331789A1 · Wardlaw · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210347462A1 · Haack · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210372366A1 · Merzhaeuser · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210403143A1 · Alley · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220017204A1 · Helou, Jr. · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220111956A1 · Jordan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220152758A1 · Jones · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220153452A1 · Smith · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230192267A1 · Gundlach · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240185736A1 · Prodzenko · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240339046A1 · Paull · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240371290A1 · Kane · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 102923296A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 105771269A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106671402A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 112061372A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112158323A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3525259A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
FR 3025491A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
FR 3109369A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
IN 201941005768 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019125159A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019212553A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020264115A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2023/022151 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 27, 2023, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
AMRC Design and Prototyping Group, “Rapid Manufactured Fixed Wing Powered UAV”, Case Study, 11 page (s), UK. [cited by applicant]
AMRC Design and Prottyping Group, “FDM Printed Fixed Wing UAV”, Case Study, 7 pages, UK. [cited by applicant]
Eric Tegler, “UAS Startup Firestorm's Ambition to Crank Out Combat Drones Fast, Cheap and En Masse Is a Lesson for DoD”, article, Apr. 27, 2023, 6 pages, US. [cited by applicant]
Scott Sevcik, “Where's the real value in additive?—An AM Perspective (Part 2)”, LinkedIn Article, Dec. 5, 2022, 5 pages, US. [cited by applicant]
David D. North, Ronald C. Busan, and Greg Howland, “Design and Fabrication of the Langley Aerodrome No. 8 Distributed Electric Propulsion VTOL Testbed”, Journal, 19 pages, US. [cited by applicant]
De Vivo Nicoloso and Luca Gabriele, “Data driven systems engineering for bioinspired integrative design” peer reviewed thesis/dissertation, 2021, 240 pages, San Diego, CA, US. [cited by applicant]
Troy McMillan, “How to build Exlipson Model V—RC 3D Printed Airplane” YouTube Video, Feb. 25, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Robert M. Taylor, Nicholas Lira, Gavin Sabine, Joakim Lea, Craig Conklin, Bijan Niakan, and Sangram Advirkar, “Design Optimization, Fabrication, and Testing of a 3D Printed Aircraft Structure Using Fused Deposition Mode… [cited by applicant]
Aaron Pearson, “World's first jet-powered, 3D printed UAV tops 150 mph with lightweight Stratasys materials” blog, Mar. 24, 2020, 3 pages, Stratasys.com. [cited by applicant]
Akhilesh Kulkarni, “Static Response Calibration of 3D Printed Thin Walled Structures Using Fused Deposition Modelling” Thesis/Dissertation, Dec. 2019, 63 page(s), Arlington, TX, US. [cited by applicant]
Luca De Vivo, Danny Tran, and Falko Kuester, “Towards Design of a 3D Printable Prandtl Box-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle”, 2018, 17 pages, CISA3 DroneLab Jacobs School of Engineering. [cited by applicant]
Kelsey Muller, “Flying from Protoypring to Mainstream: 3D Printed Aircrafts Top Out at Speeds of 150mph”, Technology and Operation Management MBA Student Perspectives Assignments, Nov. 12, 2018, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Henry Tucher, “How U.S. Marine Rhet McNeal Designed a 3D Printable Drone to Cost 200X Less at Autodesk's Pier 9” Autodesk News Article, Aug. 22, 2017, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhuo Wei Wong, Yunus Govdeli, and Erdal Kayacan, “Additive Manufacturing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Current Status, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives”, 2016, 11 pages, Research Publishing, Singapore. [cited by applicant]
Daniel O'Connor, “Game of Drones”, TCT Magazine, Feb. 29, 2016, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
G.D. Goh, S. Agarwala, G.L.. Goh, V. Dikshit, S.L. Sing, and W.Y. Yeong, “Additive manufacturing in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Challenges and potential”, Aerospace Science and Technology Forum, Aug. 25, 2016, 12 p… [cited by applicant]
Robert P. Dahlgren, Juan J. Alonso, and Matthew M. Fladeland, “Progress on Modular Unmanned Aircraft Technology”, ASPRS 3rd UAS Symposium, Sep. 12-14, 2016, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chris Banfield, James Kidd, and Jamey Jacob, “Design and Development of a 3D Printed UAV”, Aerospace Science and Technology Forum, Jan. 4-8, 2016, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Newco, “Local Motors: Driving Innovation with Micro-Manufacturing”, Medium Magazine Article, Oct. 12, 2016, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aurora Flight Sciences, “Aurora Successfully Flies Subscale X-Plane Aircraft” YouTube Video, Apr. 18, 2016, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
University of Virginia, “The Razor: UVA's 3D-printed U.A.V.”, YouTube Video, Aug. 29, 2014, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Press, “Aurora Flight Sciences 3D printed wing”, SUAS News the business of drones Article, Nov. 9, 2015, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pedro Santos, Joaquim Sousa, and Pedro Gamboa, “Variable-span wing development for improved flight performance” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2015, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Palanivel, H. Sidhar, and R.S. Mishra, “Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing: Route to High Structural Performance”, Article in JOM: the journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Jan. 13, 2015, 7 pages, vo… [cited by applicant]
Michael Molitch-Hou, “Feasibility of Hovering Aircraft Demonstrated with 3D Printing”, web article, May 4, 2016, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Businesswire a Berkshire Hathhaway Company, “Aurora Flight Sciences and Stratasys Deliver World's First Jet-Powered, 3D Printed UAV in Record Time”, Nov. 9, 2015, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Christipher P. Banfield, “Design and Development of a 3D Printed UAV”, Thesis/Dissertation, 2015, 160 pages, volume-issue number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published. [cited by applicant]
Mario Ferraro, Andrew Lock, James P, Scanlan, and Andy J. Keane, “Design and flight test of a civil unmanned aerial vehicle for maritime patrol: the use of 3D-printed structural components”, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carl Muldal, Edward Kolb, Graham Robertson, Aaron Parkinson, Osvaldo M. Querin, Robert W. Hewson and Vassili V. Toropov, “The use of MDO and Advanced Manufacturing to Demonstrate Rapid, Agile Construction of a Mission O… [cited by applicant]
Joe Hiemenz, “Additive Manufacturing Trends”, Stratasys Article, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Steven Easter, Jonathan Turman, David Sheffler, Michael Balazs, and Jonathan Rotner, “Using Advanced Manufacturing to Produce Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: a Feasibility Study”, May 22, 2013, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
N.A. Ahmed and J.R. Page, “Manufacture of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Advanced Project Design using 3D Printing technology”, 2013, 11 pages, vols. 397-400, pp. 970-980, Applied Mechanics and Materials. [cited by applicant]
UVAToday, “Student Engineers Design, Build, Fly ‘Printed’ Airplane”, Web Article, Oct. 5, 2012, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (5)
US 1,127,682 US 12,371,198 US 12,454,375 US 12,486,017 US 12,591,247