IP Library Granted Patent US 12,524,727
Granted Patent B1
US 12,524,727 · App. 18/957,727 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Apparatus and method for displaying and modifying assessment data through a graphical user interface (GUI)

Inventors: Blake Browder (Dallas, TX); Joy Figarsky (Little Rock, AR)
Assignee: Behavioral Health Operations, LLC
G06Q10/067G06Q10/06375G06Q30/018G16H40/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,524,727
App. No.
18/957,727
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

An apparatus including a graphical user interface (GUI) for adjusting its display based on image data, the apparatus includes a processor and a memory, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the processor to receive input data objects including image data of an environment using a machine vision system, and modify a GUI based on the input data objects and the assessment score, wherein modifying the GUI includes automatically generating context-sensitive command inputs that trigger analysis routines within the GUI based on at least a geographic location received from the input data objects, and reconfiguring the GUI to adjust a display hierarchy of interactive elements based on the assessment score.

Claims (74)

1 . A method for displaying and modifying assessment data through a graphical user interface (GUI), the method comprising:

receiving, by a computing device, input data objects;

generating, by the computing device, through an assessment module, simulated assessment data sets;

generating, by the computing device, an assessment score of the input data objects and simulated assessment data sets as a function of a machine-learning algorithm; and

modifying, by the computing device, a GUI based on the input data objects and the assessment score, wherein modifying the GUI comprises:

automatically generating context-sensitive command inputs that trigger analysis routines within the GUI based on at least a geographic location received from the input data objects;

reconfiguring the GUI to adjust a display hierarchy of interactive elements based on the assessment score;

evaluating, using a rule-based algorithm, compliance associated with the input data objects;

training a machine learning model in accordance with at least one of: historical data and compliance data;

predicting, using the trained machine learning model, a compliance outcome associated with the input data objects; initiating a simulation module configured to run multiple hypothetical modification scenarios associated with the input data objects, predict assessment scores for each scenario using the machine learning model, and iteratively identify facility modifications that maximize the assessment score;

filtering, using an autoencoder comprising an unsupervised neural network using at least one of: dimensionality reduction and denoising, the input data objects;

compressing, using an encoder associated with the autoencoder, the input data objects;

reconstructing, using a decoder associated with the autoencoder, the input data objects from the compressed input data objects;

wherein the GUI updates to present an optimized compliance outcome and

configures a display device, using the reconfigured GUI to initiate the simulation module.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the input data objects comprises employing a machine vision system configured to extract visual inputs from image data of an environment from the input data objects.

3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

classifying the visual inputs; and

converting the visual inputs into structured environmental data for further processing by the assessment module.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the input data objects comprises implementing Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) configured to:

send a request to an external endpoint based on a geographic location of a facility; and

obtain structured data from third-party platforms for further processing by the assessment module.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least a processor is further configured to implement a geographical mapping module configured to:

receive the input data objects;

employ a geospatial analysis algorithm to map a facility's location based on the input data objects;

classifying the facility location to regulatory requirements; and

output regulatory requirements based on the facility's location.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein initiating a simulation comprises employing a grid-based layout algorithm to segment a facility into specific areas where modifications are to be modeled.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising recalculating the assessment score based on a modification to the simulation received through user input.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the GUI is further configured to display a heatmap using color-coded indicators to represent areas of compliance and non-compliance within a facility based on at least the assessment score, wherein generating the heatmap comprises:

processing the input data objects to identify environmental data;

calculating a plurality of compliance scored based on the environmental data; and

employing a grid-based layout algorithm to map a layout of the facility layout into a structured grid format, wherein each cell in the grid is assigned a compliance score.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the GUI based on the input data objects comprises employing an adaptive layout engine configured to automatically scale and adjust the GUI based on a display device such that the GUI is responsive across heterogeneous platforms.

10 . A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

imposing, by a constraint satisfaction algorithm operably communicative with the at least a processor, at least one limit associated with the input data objects.

11 . An apparatus comprising a graphical user interface (GUI) for displaying and modifying assessment data, the apparatus comprising:

at least a processor; and

a memory configuring the at least a processor to:

receive input data objects;

generate, through an assessment module, simulated assessment data sets;

generate an assessment score of the input data objects and simulated assessment data sets as a function of a machine-learning algorithm; and

modify a GUI based on the input data objects and the assessment score, wherein modifying the GUI comprises:

automatically generating context-sensitive command inputs that trigger analysis routines within the GUI based on at least a geographic location received from the input data objects;

reconfiguring the GUI to adjust a display hierarchy of interactive elements based on the assessment score;

evaluating, using a rule-based algorithm, compliance associated with the input data objects;

training a machine learning model in accordance with at least one of: historical data and compliance data;

predicting, using the trained machine learning model, a compliance outcome associated with the input data objects; initiating a simulation module configured to run multiple hypothetical modification scenarios associated with the input data objects, predict assessment scores for each scenario using the machine learning model, and iteratively identify facility modifications that maximize the assessment score;

filtering, using an autoencoder comprising an unsupervised neural network using at least one of: dimensionality reduction and denoising, the input data objects;

compressing, using an encoder associated with the autoencoder, the input data objects;

reconstructing, using a decoder associated with the autoencoder, the input data objects from the compressed input data objects;

wherein the GUI updates to present an optimized compliance outcome and

configures a display device, using the reconfigured GUI to initiate the simulation module.

12 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein receiving the input data objects comprises employing a machine vision system configured to extract visual inputs from image data of an environment from the input data objects.

13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the at least a processor is further configured to:

classify the visual inputs; and

convert the visual inputs into structured environmental data for further processing by the assessment module.

14 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein receiving the input data objects comprises implementing Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) configured to:

send a request to an external endpoint based on a geographic location of a facility; and

obtain structured data from third-party platforms for further processing by the assessment module.

15 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the at least a processor is further configured to implement a geographical mapping module configured to:

receive the input data objects;

employ a geospatial analysis algorithm to map a facility's location based on the input data objects;

classifying the facility location to regulatory requirements; and

output regulatory requirements based on the facility's location.

16 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein initiating a simulation comprises employing a grid-based layout algorithm to segment a facility into specific areas where modifications are to be modeled.

17 . The apparatus of claim 11 , further comprising recalculating the assessment score based on a modification to the simulation received through user input.

18 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the GUI is further configured to display a heatmap using color-coded indicators to represent areas of compliance and non-compliance within a facility based on at least the assessment score, wherein generating the heatmap comprises:

processing the input data objects to identify environmental data;

calculating a plurality of compliance scored based on the environmental data; and

employing a grid-based layout algorithm to map a layout of the facility layout into a structured grid format, wherein each cell in the grid is assigned a compliance score.

19 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein modifying the GUI based on the input data objects comprises employing an adaptive layout engine configured to automatically scale and adjust the GUI based on a display device such that the GUI is responsive across heterogeneous platforms.

20 . An apparatus as claimed in claim 11 , further comprising:

a constraint satisfaction algorithm, operably communicative with the at least a processor, for imposing at least one limit associated with the input data objects.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 72292 FRAME 767. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
To: BH OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073992/0817 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2025
From: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
To: BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 072292/0767 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 23, 2024
From: BROWDER, BLAKE; FIGARSKY, JOY
To: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069387/0635 →
References Cited (26)
US 11062327B2 · Biswas et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11948114B2 · Samples et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20050028005A1 · Carson et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078685A1 · Krebs · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20160335731A1 · Hall · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190098126A1 · Shuttleworth · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190341140A1 · Nachmany et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200057824A1 · Yeh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200126092A1 · Glaser · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200184556A1 · Cella · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210011443A1 · Mcnamara · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210192639A1 · Dalal · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210381861A1 · Brown · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210390812A1 · Chaurasia · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220019716A1 · Kiarashinejad · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220227536A1 · Kainz · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220359048A1 · Patil et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230401591A1 · Janani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240169193A1 · Bews · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2011106843A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
Quitaba et al, “Integrate Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Occupant Characteristics Simulator to Assess the Effectiveness of Emergency Requirements”, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol.… [cited by examiner]
Smith et al, “Rapid Prototyping a Virtual Fire Drill Environment using Computer Game Technology”, Fire Safety Journal, vol. 44, Issue 4, May 2009, pp. 559-569, doi: 10.1016 (2009) (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Streamline Healthcare Compliance With ZetaSafe Zestasafe website https://try.zetasafe.com/healthcare-compliance/?utm_term=hospital%20compliance&utm_campaign=healthcare&utm_source=google&utm_medium=ppc&gad_source=1&gclid… [cited by applicant]
Behavioral Health Nash Healthcare Conmsulting website https://nashhealthcareconsulting.com/behavioral-health?gad_source=1&gclid=EAlalQobChMIspy-ivzpiQMVX21HAR1VdCb4EAAYAiAAEgl2zfD_BWE. [cited by applicant]
Behavioral Health Management: Improving Psych Operations with a Mock Survey Horizon health website https://horizonhealth.com/behavioral-health-management-improving-psych-operations-with-a-mock-survey/. [cited by applicant]
Mock Survey Services Courtemanche & associates website https://www.courtemanche-assocs.com/services/survey-readiness/survey-support/mock-survey. [cited by applicant]