IP Library Granted Patent US 12,314,536
Granted Patent B1
US 12,314,536 · App. 18/957,744 · Granted May 27, 2025

Method and system for generating a user-sensitive user interface

Inventors: Blake Browder (Dallas, TX); Joy Figarsky (Little Rock, AR)
Assignee: Signet Health Corporation
G06F3/0482G06Q50/265G16H40/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,314,536
App. No.
18/957,744
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system for generating a user-sensitive user interface, wherein the system includes a display device; at least a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises: a memory; and at least a processor connected to the memory, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least a processor to: generate an execution operation as a function of a task module; display the execution operations in a user interface; receive, through the user interface, user response data corresponding to one or more of the execution operations; determine, as a function of the user response data, an assigned status corresponding the one or more execution operations using a machine-learning model; generate a second execution operation and an assigned node as a function of the assigned status; generate an updated user interface as a function of the second execution operation and the assigned status; and transmit the updated user interface to the assigned node.

Claims (47)

1. A system for generating a user-sensitive user interface,

wherein the system comprises:

a display device, wherein the display device is configured to display a graphical user interface;

at least a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises:

a memory; and

at least a processor communicatively connected to the memory, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least a processor to:

generate execution operations as a function of a task module;

display, through the display device at a first node, the execution operations in the graphical user interface, wherein the execution operations each comprise an input event handler;

receive, through the graphical user interface and one of the input event handlers, user response data corresponding to one or more of the execution operations;

determine, as a function of the user response data, an assigned status corresponding to the one or more execution operations using a machine-learning model;

generate a second execution operation and an assigned node as a function of the assigned status;

generate an updated user interface as a function of the second execution operation and the assigned status; and

transmit the updated user interface to the assigned node, wherein the assigned node is configured to display the updated user interface.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein generating the second execution operation comprises a rating interface element, wherein the rating interface element may be configured to receive a rating datum.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the user interface is updated as a function of the rating interface element.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining the assigned status comprises analyzing user response data using at least a tonality machine-learning model to determine tone data.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the at least a tonality machine-learning model is iteratively trained based on system feedback.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the at least a tonality machine-learning model comprises an encoder configured to generate a plurality of textual encodings as a function of the user response data and a classifier configured to classify the plurality of textual encodings into a tone classification.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the encoder is trained using a self-supervised training process wherein:

an output of the encoder is input into a decoder which is configured to output estimated user response data; and

the encoder is trained as a function of the estimated user response data appended with a tone label.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least a processor is configured to display the second execution operation through the display device at the first node.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user interface comprises a plurality of interactive elements for each execution operation of the one or more execution operations.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein generating the second execution operation and the assigned node as a function of the assigned status comprises:

classifying the second execution operation to an end user pool; and

selecting an end user from the end user pool, wherein the end user has an association with the assigned node.

11. A method for generating a user-sensitive user interface, wherein the method comprises:

generating, by at least a processor, execution operations as a function of a task module;

displaying, through a display device at a first node, the execution operations in the graphical user interface, wherein the execution operations each comprise an input event handler;

receiving, through a graphical user interface and one of the input event handlers, user response data corresponding to one or more of the execution operations;

determining, by the at least a processor, as a function of the user response data, an assigned status corresponding to the one or more execution operations using a machine-learning model;

generating, by the at least a processor, a second execution operation and an assigned node as a function of the assigned status;

generating, by the at least a processor, an updated user interface as a function of the second execution operation and the assigned status; and

transmitting, by the at least a processor, the updated user interface to the assigned node, wherein the assigned node is configured to display the updated user interface.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating the second execution operation comprises a rating interface element, wherein the rating interface element may be configured to receive a rating datum.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the user interface is updated as a function of the rating interface element.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the assigned status comprises analyzing user response data using at least a tonality machine-learning model to determine tone data.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the at least a tonality machine-learning model is iteratively trained based on system feedback.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the at least a tonality machine-learning model comprises an encoder configured to generate a plurality of textual encodings as a function of the user response data and a classifier configured to classify the plurality of textual encodings into a tone classification.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the encoder is trained using a self-supervised training process wherein:

an output of the encoder is input into a decoder which is configured to output estimated user response data; and

the encoder is trained as a function of the estimated user response data appended with a tone label.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least a processor is configured to display the second execution operation through the display device at the first node.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the user interface comprises a plurality of interactive elements for each execution operation of the one or more execution operations.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating the second execution operation and the assigned node as a function of the assigned status comprises:

classifying the second execution operation to an end user pool; and

selecting an end user from the end user pool, wherein the end user has an association with the assigned node.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 72292 FRAME 767. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
To: BH OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073992/0817 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2025
From: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
To: BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 072292/0767 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 23, 2024
From: BROWDER, BLAKE; FIGARSKY, JOY
To: SIGNET HEALTH CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069387/0711 →
References Cited (11)
US 10972479B2 · Clark · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11106331B1 · Porter · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11841109B2 · Gold et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12046359B2 · Durlach et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20150154528A1 · Kharraz Tavakol · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190213509A1 · Burleson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20230334389A1 · Dalley, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 113988577A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016110375A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
English Translation of JP 2016110375 published on Jun. 20, 2016 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Brian Tilow; Using Technology to Maintain Behavioral Health Safety Rounding and Nursing Workflows; Cleveland Clinic Nursing Informatics and Emerging Clinical Solutions Center Oct. 2017. [cited by applicant]