IP Library Granted Patent US 12,380,502
Granted Patent B2
US 12,380,502 · App. 18/973,748 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Auctioning mechanisms for dark order block trading

Inventors: Alicia Suminski (Paris, FR); Anais Fabienne Christiane Dony (Vincennes, FR)
Assignee: NYSE Holdings LLC
G06Q40/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,380,502
App. No.
18/973,748
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Auctioning mechanisms adapted to improve the integrity of dark order block trading are provided.

Claims (35)

1. A computer system comprising:

a processor operatively coupled to a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

monitor market data in an electronic market;

initiate an online auction responsive to at least one predetermined market condition based on the monitored market data;

receive, via at least one network, one or more firm limit orders from one or more market participants;

prevent storage, in an order book, of a first portion of the one or more firm limit orders based on one or more of a duration of the online auction and an order size;

store, in the order book, a second portion of the one or more firm limit orders to form stored orders;

screen, from the order book, the stored orders by comparing order data in the stored orders against a reference price to identify eligible stored orders and ineligible stored orders;

remove, from the order book, the ineligible stored orders;

sort the eligible stored orders remaining in the order book according to at least one predetermined parameter; and

execute, from the order book, the sorted eligible stored orders.

2. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one predetermined market condition comprises a predetermined level of liquidity associated with the market data.

3. The computer system of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined level of liquidity is associated with bid and ask prices of the market data.

4. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the online auction is initiated solely responsive to the at least one predetermined market condition.

5. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the online auction is initiated with no auction initiation request.

6. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein a limit order of the first portion of the one or more firm limit orders is received after the duration of the online auction.

7. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more firm limit orders comprise a dark order, the dark order not being visible to a broader market.

8. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the ineligible stored orders have a price that is higher than the reference price.

9. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the ineligible stored orders have a price that is lower than the reference price.

10. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the reference price is calculated from the monitored market data received during the duration of the online auction.

11. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the online auction is initiated at a pre-determined time that is unknown to the one or more market participants.

12. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the duration of the online auction is unknown to the one or more market participants.

13. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the computer system is further configured to determine, via a randomized timer, a randomized time for the duration of the online auction.

14. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the computer system is further configured to transmit a notification of the online auction to the one or more market participants, the notification excluding information as to the duration of the online auction.

15. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one predetermined parameter comprises one or more of the order size and an order time.

16. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the computer system is further configured to designate a buy-side or a sell-side as a light-side or a heavy-side in the online auction, wherein the buy-side or the sell-side with a lowest total number of shares is defined as the light-side, and wherein the buy-side or the sell-side with a highest total number of shares is defined as the heavy-side.

17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the computer system is further configured to calculate a maximum execution size, the maximum execution size representative of a number of shares to be distributed to each firm limit order on the heavy-side.

18. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the calculation comprises comparing two values, a first value representative of a smallest firm limit order size on the heavy-side and a second value representative of a computational value yielded by dividing a total number of shares on the light-side by a number of firm limit orders on the heavy-side, the maximum execution size being a minimum of the first value and the second value.

19. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein a first distribution of shares is distributed to each firm limit order on the heavy-side, each firm limit order on the heavy-side receiving the first distribution of shares equal to the maximum execution size calculated.

20. The computer system of claim 19 , wherein a second distribution of shares is distributed to each firm limit order on the heavy-side that has not been completely filled, the second distribution representative of a remaining balance of shares on the light-side after the first distribution of shares to each firm limit order on the heavy-side, the remaining balance of shares being distributed proportionally to each firm limit order on the heavy-side that has not been completely filled by the first distribution of shares.

21. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the computer system is further configured to calculate a number of firm limit orders eligible to receive a fill on the heavy-side.

22. The computer system of claim 21 , wherein the calculation comprises comparing two values, a first value representative of a number of firm limit orders on the heavy-side and a second value representative of a computational value yielded by dividing a total number of shares on the light-side by a minimum fill size, the number of firm limit orders eligible to receive a fill on the heavy-side being a minimum of the first value and the second value.

23. The computer system of claim 22 , wherein one or more firm limit orders on the heavy-side are eliminated when the minimum of the first value and the second value is less than the number of firm limit orders on the heavy-side.

24. The computer system of claim 23 , wherein a first distribution of shares is distributed to each firm limit order remaining on the heavy-side after the one or more firm limit orders on the heavy-side is eliminated, each firm limit order remaining on the heavy-side receiving the first distribution of shares equal to the minimum fill size.

25. The computer system of claim 24 , wherein a second distribution of shares is distributed to each firm limit order remaining on the heavy-side that has not been completely filled, the second distribution representative of a remaining balance of shares on the light-side after the first distribution of shares to each firm limit order remaining on the heavy-side, the remaining balance of shares being distributed proportionally to each firm limit order remaining on the heavy-side that has not been completely filled by the first distribution of shares.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2024
From: SUMINSKI, ALICIA; DONY, ANAIS FABIENNE CHRISTIANE
To: NYSE EURONEXT
Reel/Frame 069525/0025 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 9, 2024
From: NYSE EURONEXT
To: NYSE EURONEXT HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 069525/0188 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 9, 2024
From: NYSE EURONEXT HOLDINGS LLC
To: NYSE HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 069525/0276 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation 18765703 · Jul 8, 2024
Continuation 18512219 · Nov 17, 2023
Continuation 18135824 · Apr 18, 2023
Continuation 17848492 · Jun 24, 2022
Continuation 17378908 · Jul 19, 2021
Continuation 17218493 · Mar 31, 2021
Continuation 14542726 · Nov 17, 2014
Continuation 14191765 · Feb 27, 2014
Continuation In Part 14139724 · Dec 23, 2013
Provisional Application 61784222 · Mar 14, 2013
Provisional Application 61746486 · Dec 27, 2012
Related Publication 20250104147A1 · Mar 27, 2025
References Cited (35)
US 7873561B1 · Adcock et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7921054B2 · Balabon · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8108299B1 · Waelbroeck et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8271375B2 · Mahoney et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8380610B1 · Nagle et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8442859B1 · Broms et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8620759B1 · Virgilio et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 11023971B2 · Lutnick et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20060026090A1 · Balabon · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060031157A1 · Gianakouros et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060259391A1 · Schoen et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080015974A1 · Balabon · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080306864A1 · Foley et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090024512A1 · Reid · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090070250A1 · Adcock et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090144187A1 · Borkovec et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090210337A1 · Mahoney et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259584A1 · Waelbroeck et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100076886A1 · Adams et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100174654A1 · Foley et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120022994A1 · Conary et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078775A1 · Callahan · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120246055A1 · Schlifstein et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130006828A1 · Dale et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130013487A1 · Sellberg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140136395A1 · Dowling · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140149273A1 · Angell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150095209A1 · Adcock et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356678A1 · Shmitt · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010085746A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
Luke Jeffs, “Dark pools of liquidity come into the light”, Financial News, pp. 1-6, Oct. 1, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Scotti, Michael, “At Deadline”, Traders Magazine pp. 1, May 1, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Singapore Written Opinion dated Mar. 27, 2017 for corresponding Singapore Application No. 10201501404Y. [cited by applicant]
Steven Wallman, “Technology takes to securities trading”, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 60-65, Feb. 1997. [cited by applicant]
Johnson, K.N., “Regulating Innovation: High Frequency Trading in Dark Pools,” Journal of Corporation Law, 42(4), 2017, Retrieved from https://dialog.proquest.com/professional/docview/2036280484?accountid=131444. [cited by applicant]