IP Library Granted Patent US 12,705,676
Granted Patent B2
US 12,705,676 · App. 19/043,317 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

AI-augmented auditing platform including techniques for automated document processing

Inventors: Chung-Sheng Li (Scarsdale, NY); Winnie Cheng (West New York, NJ); Mark John Flavell (Madison, NJ); Lori Marie Hallmark (Xenia, OH); Nancy Alayne Lizotte (Saline, MI); Anand Srinivasa Rao (Lexington, MA); Kevin Ma Leong (Randolph, NJ); Di Zhu (Jersey City, NJ); Timothy Delille (New York, NY); Maria Jesus Perez Ramirez (New York, NY); Yuan Wan (Irvine, CA); Ratna Raj Singh (Mumbai, IN); Vishakha Bansal (Mumbai, IN); Shaz Hoda (New York, NY); Amitoj Singh (New Delhi, IN); Siddhesh Shivaji Zanj (Mumbai, IN)
Assignee: PwC Product Sales LLC
G06Q40/12G06F16/3347G06F16/353G06F16/93G06N5/022G06N5/041G06N5/045G06Q10/0635G06Q30/018G06V30/412G06V30/416
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,705,676
App. No.
19/043,317
Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2168
USPC
707/736
Abstract

Systems and methods for automated document processing for use in AI-augmented auditing platforms are provided. A system for determining the composition of document bundles extracts substantive content information and metadata information from a document bundle and generates, based on the extracted information regarding a composition of the document bundle. A system for validating signatures in documents extracts data representing a spatial location for respective signatures and generates a confidence level for respective signatures, and determines, based on location and confidence level, whether signature criteria are met. A system for extracting information from documents applies a set of data conversion processing steps to a plurality received documents to generate structured data, and then applies a set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps to the structured data to generating output data extracted from the plurality of electronic documents.

Claims (73)

1 . A system for validating signatures in documents, the system comprising one or more processors configured to cause the system to:

receive an electronic document comprising one or more signatures;

process the electronic document to generate a set of signature criteria for the received electronic document:

apply one or more signature-extraction models to the electronic document to generate, for each of the one or more signatures in the electronic document, data representing a spatial location for the respective signature and a confidence level for the respective signature; and

determine, based on the data representing the spatial location and the confidence level, whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more signature-extraction models comprise a first signature-extraction model configured to recognize signatures regardless of spatial location.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more signature-extraction models comprise a second signature-extraction model configured to recognize signatures based on in-document spatial location.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein applying the second signature- extraction model comprises:

determining a predicted spatial location within the electronic document based on one or more of a structure, format, and type of the electronic document; and

extracting a signature from the predicted spatial location.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria comprises determining whether a signature appears in the electronic document at a required spatial location.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria comprises determining whether the confidence level exceeds a predefined threshold.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria comprises determining whether a signature appears in the electronic document within a required spatial proximity to a component extracted from the document.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria comprises generating an association score indicting a level of association between a signature extracted from the electronic document and signature-context data generated based on the electronic document.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system is configured to determine the set of signature criteria based at least in part on context data, wherein the context data indicates one or more of: document type, document structure, and document format.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system is configured to determine the set of signature criteria based at least in part on the one or more signatures detected in the document.

11 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for validating signatures in documents, the instructions configured to be executed by a one or more processors of a system to cause the system to:

receive an electronic document comprising one or more signatures;

process the electronic document to generate a set of signature criteria for the received electronic document:

apply one or more signature-extraction models to the electronic document to generate, for each of the one or more signatures in the electronic document, data representing a spatial location for the respective signature and a confidence level for the respective signature; and

determine, based on the data representing the spatial location and the confidence level, whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria.

12 . A method for validating signatures in documents, wherein the method is performed by a system comprising one or more processors, the method comprising:

receiving an electronic document comprising one or more signatures;

processing the electronic document to generate a set of signature criteria for the received electronic document;

applying one or more signature-extraction models to the electronic document to generate, for each of the one or more signatures in the electronic document, data representing a spatial location for the respective signature and a confidence level for the respective signature; and

determining, based on the data representing the spatial location and the confidence level, whether the electronic document satisfies the set of signature criteria.

13 . A system for extracting information from documents, the system comprising one or more processors configured to cause the system to:

receive a first data set comprising a first plurality of electronic documents;

apply a set of data conversion processing steps to the first plurality of electronic documents to generate a first processed data set comprising first structured data generated based on the first plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models;

train a knowledge-based deep learning model trained based on the first structured data and a first plurality of data labels indicated by one or more user inputs;

receive a second data set comprising a second plurality of electronic documents;

apply the set of data conversion processing steps to the second plurality of electronic documents to generate a second processed data set comprising second structured data generated based on the second plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models; and

apply a set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps to the second structured data, wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises:

applying the knowledge-based deep learning model to the second structured data; and

generating output data extracted from the second plurality of electronic documents by the deep learning model.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises, before applying the one or more deep-learning-based OCR models, applying an automated orientation correction processing step.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises, before applying the one or more deep-learning-based OCR models, applying a denoising function.

16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the one or more deep-learning-based OCR models comprises:

applying a text-detection model; and

applying a text-recognition model.

17 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises, after applying the one or more deep-learning-based OCR models, generating the structured data based on an image-level feature engineering step.

18 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying a post-processing method that uses morphology to parse structural relationships amongst words.

19 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises, before receiving the user input indicating the plurality of data labels, generating the structured data based on one or more feature engineering processing steps.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more feature engineering processing steps comprise predicting word groups based on morphology.

21 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises applying a model trained based on user used for user-defined feature engineering.

22 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises applying fuzzy matching, wherein the system is configured to consider a partial match sufficient for labeling purposes, to automatically label documents on a word-by-word basis.

23 . The system of claim 13 , wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises automatically correcting one or more text-recognition errors during a training process.

24 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises a loss function that is configured to accelerate convergence of the knowledge-based deep learning model.

25 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises one or more layers using natural language processing (NLP) embedding such that the model learns both content information and related location information.

26 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model is trained using an adaptive feeding method.

27 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises an input layer that applies merged embedding.

28 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises an input layer that is configured for variant batch sizes.

29 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises an input layer that applies a sliding window.

30 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises one or more fully-dense layers disposed between an input layer and a prediction layer.

31 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the knowledge-based deep learning model comprises a prediction layer that generates one or more metrics for presentation to a user.

32 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for extracting information from documents, the instructions configured to be executed by one or more processors of a system to cause the system to:

receive a first data set comprising a first plurality of electronic documents;

apply a set of data conversion processing steps to the first plurality of electronic documents to generate a first processed data set comprising first structured data generated based on the first plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying the set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models;

train a knowledge-based deep learning model trained based on the first structured data and a first plurality of data labels indicated by one or more user inputs;

receive a second data set comprising a second plurality of electronic documents;

apply the set of data conversion processing steps to the second plurality of electronic documents to generate a second processed data set comprising second structured data generated based on the second plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models; and

apply a set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps to the second structured data, wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises:

applying the knowledge-based deep learning model to the second structured data; and

generating output data extracted from the second plurality of electronic documents by the deep learning model.

33 . A method for extracting information from documents, wherein the method is executed by a system comprising one or more processors, the method comprising:

receiving a first data set comprising a first plurality of electronic documents;

applying a set of data conversion processing steps to the first plurality of electronic documents to generate a first processed data set comprising first structured data generated based on the first plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models;

training a knowledge-based deep learning model trained based on the first structured data and a first plurality of data labels indicated by one or more user inputs;

receiving a second data set comprising a second plurality of electronic documents;

applying the set of data conversion processing steps to the second plurality of electronic documents to generate a second processed data set comprising second structured data generated based on the second plurality of electronic documents, wherein applying set of data conversion processing steps comprises applying one or more deep-learning-based optical character recognition (OCR) models; and

applying a set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps to the second structured data, wherein applying the set of knowledge-based modeling processing steps comprises:

applying the knowledge-based deep learning model to the second structured data; and

generating output data extracted from the second plurality of electronic documents by the deep learning model.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: LI, CHUNG-SHENG
To: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Reel/Frame 072048/0750 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ADVISORY SERVICES LLC
To: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Reel/Frame 072049/0336 →
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: ZHU, DI
To: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ADVISORY SERVICES LLC
Reel/Frame 072475/0388 →
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: PEREZ, MARIA JESUS
To: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Reel/Frame 072509/0270 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
To: PWC PRODUCT SALES LLC
Reel/Frame 072509/0570 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2025
From: CHENG, WINNIE; FLAVELL, MARK JOHN; HALLMARK, LORI MARIE; LIZOTTE, NANCY ALAYNE; RAO, ANAND SRINIVASA; LEONG, KEVIN MA; DELILLE, TIMOTHY; WAN, YUAN; SINGH, RATNA RAJ; BANSAL, VISHAKHA; HODA, SHAZ; SINGH, AMITOJ; ZANJ, SIDDHESH SHIVAJI
To: PWC PRODUCT SALES LLC
Reel/Frame 072556/0400 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 17854348 · Jun 30, 2022
Provisional Application 63217123 · Jun 30, 2021
Provisional Application 63217119 · Jun 30, 2021
Provisional Application 63217134 · Jun 30, 2021
Provisional Application 63217131 · Jun 30, 2021
Provisional Application 63217127 · Jun 30, 2021
Related Publication 20250182217A1 · Jun 5, 2025
References Cited (202)
US 6564263B1 · Bergman et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6778946B1 · Chang et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 8857710B1 · Kowalchyk et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8930295B2 · Campbell · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9053516B2 · Stempora · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9483532B1 · Zhang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9710544B1 · Smith et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9785793B2 · Lacey · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10210518B2 · Alnajem · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10303770B2 · Belov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10628152B2 · Chandramouli et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10657530B2 · Smith et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10896357B1 · Corcoran · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10943196B2 · Li et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11315353B1 · Cahn · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11361532B1 · Martin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11443212B2 · Kishimoto et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11651039B1 · Soubbotin · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11829332B1 · Nayar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11860950B2 · Wyle · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11862305B1 · Sethi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12056771B1 · Contryman · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20050134935A1 · Schmidtler et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090276370A1 · Olson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114628A1 · Adler et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114629A1 · Adler et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110219035A1 · Korsunsky · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140173411A1 · Sekharan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150363405A1 · Biswas · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160321278A1 · Naqvi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170018034A1 · Wainman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170357631A1 · Desai et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170359362A1 · Kashi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180315141A1 · Hunn · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180336404A1 · Hosabettu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190156428A1 · Ghatage et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190171944A1 · Lu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190385704A1 · Oster · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200034842A1 · Ponniah · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200067969A1 · Abbaszadeh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200074169A1 · Mukhopadhyay et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200097717A1 · Young et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184278A1 · Zadeh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200210817A1 · Chatterjee et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210012103A1 · Bassu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210081819A1 · Polleri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210104234A1 · Zhang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210142169A1 · De et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210173905A1 · Kursun · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210248514A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220097228A1 · Schaefer et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220171967A1 · Reisswig · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220222049A1 · Lin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220301072A1 · Wang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220405623A1 · Cheng et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230004590A1 · Li et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230004845A1 · Li et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230004888A1 · Li et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230005075A1 · Li et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240305461A1 · Li et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240330323A1 · Li et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240331056A1 · Li et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240346418A1 · Li et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250209092A1 · Li et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CA 3120601A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 110023970A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 115496058A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 113518962B · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 3709222A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016183229A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019060468A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020212940A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021096571A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., “Signature Detection and Matching for Information Retreival”, Nov. 2009, IEEE.pp 2015-2031 (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Adak et al. (Jun. 2022). “Placing (Historical) Facts on a Timeline: A Classification cum Coref Resolution Approach,” doi:arXiv:2206.14089v1; 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Amplayo et al. (Jun. 2018). “Translations as Additional Contexts for Sentence Classification,” doi:arXiv:1806.05516v1; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Beltagy et al. (Sep. 2019). “SciBert: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text,” doi:arXiv:1903.10676v3; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bhattacharjee et al. (Jan. 2021). “BanglaBERT: Combating Embedding Barrier for Low-Resource Language Understanding,” doi:arXiv:2101.00204v1; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bhattacharjee et al. (May 2022). “BanglaBERT: Language Model Pretraining and Benchmarks for Low-Resource Language Understanding Evaluation in Bangla,” doi:arXiv:2101.00204v4; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brack et al. (Feb. 2021). “Sequential Sentence Classification in Research Papers Using Cross-Domain Multi-Task Learning,” doi:arXiv:2102.06008v1; 34 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brack et al. (Mar. 2022). “Cross-Domain Multi-Task Learning for Sequential Sentence Classification in Research Papers,” doi: arXiv:2102.06008v2; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brown. (May 2023) “What is an Array in Math?,” located at https://www.learner.com/blog/what-is-an-array-in-math. (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Burdisso et al. (Jul. 2020). “PySS3: A Python Package Implementing a Novel Text Classifier with Visualization Tools for Explainable AI,” doi:arXiv:1912.09322v2; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Burdisso et al. (May 2020). “T-SS3: A Text Classifier with Dynamic n-Grams for Early Risk Detection Over Text Streams,” doi: arXiv:1911.06147v2; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Castelli et al., (Jun. 2003). “CSVD: Clustering and Singular Value Decomposition for Approximate Similarity Search in High-Dimensional Spaces,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(3): 671-685. [cited by applicant]
Chang et al. (Jun. 2020). “Taming Pretrained Transformers for Extreme Multi-Label Text Classification,” doi: arXiv:1905.02331v4; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al. (Oct. 2021). “Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model,” doi: arXiv:2110.01256v1; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chi et al. (Apr. 2021). “mT6: Multilingual Pretrained Text-to-Text Transformer with Translation Pairs,” doi: arXiv:2104.08692v1; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chi et al. (Sep. 2021). “mT6: Multilingual Pretrained Text-to-Text Transformer with Translation Pairs,” doi: arXiv:2104.08692v2; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cho et al. (Sep. 2019). “Investigating an Effective Character-Level Embedding in Korean Sentence Classification,” doi:arXiv:1905.13656v3; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cohan et al. (Sep. 2019). “Pretrained Language Models for Sequential Sentence Classification,” doi: arXiv:1909.04054v2; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cohan et al. (Sep. 2019). “Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publications,” doi: arXiv:1904.01608v2; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Conneau et al. (Jul. 2018). “What You Can Cram Into a Single $&!#* Vector: Probing Sentence Embeddings for Linguistic Properties,” doi:arXiv:1805.01070v2; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Croce et al. “GAN-BERT: Generative Adversarial Learning for Robust Text Classification with a Bunch of Labeled Examples,” Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 5-1… [cited by applicant]
Dai et al. (Jul. 2015). “Document Embedding with Paragraph Vectors,” arXiv:1507.07998v1; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
de Guevara et al. (Jan. 2021). “Multimodal Word Sense Disambiguation in Creative Practice,” doi: arXiv:2007.07758v2; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dernoncourt et al. (Dec. 2016). “Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification in Medical Paper Abstracts,” doi:arXiv:1612.05251v1; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dernoncourt et al. (Oct. 2017). “PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstracts,” doi:arXiv:1710.06071v1; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Devlin et al. (May 2019). “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” doi: arXiv:1810.04805v2; 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ding et al. (Feb. 2018). “Densely Connected Bidirectional LSTM with Applications to Sentence Classification,” doi: arXiv:1802.00889v1; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 11, 2024, directed to European Application No. 22834414.9; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 22, 2025, directed to EP Application No. 22834412.3; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fruhlinger. (Feb. 2020). “The CIA Triad: Definition, Components and Examples,” located at https://www.csonline.com/article/3519908/the-cia-triad-definition-components-and-examples.html. (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fukukawa et al. (2012). “Auditors' Evidence Evaluation and Aggregation Using Beliefs and Probabilities,” located at https://bfasociety.org/Belief2010/html/papers/p50.pdf; (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Guo et al. (May 2019). “Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Study,” doi: arXiv:1905.08941v1; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hagiwara. (2019).“Sentence Classification in NLP,” Real-World Language Processing, located at https://freecontent.manning.com/sentence-classification-in-nlp/; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Halterman et al. (May 2021). “Corpus-Level Evaluation for Event QA: The IndiaPoliceEvents Corpus Covering the 2002 Gujarat Violence,” doi:arXiv:2105.12936v1; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hirlea et al. (Mar. 2022). “Contextual Sentence Classification: Detecting Sustainability Initiatives in Company Reports,” doi:arXiv:2110.03727v2; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 5, 2022, directed to International Application No. PCT/US2022/073277; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 5, 2022, directed to International Application No. PCT/US2022/073279; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 21, 2022, directed to International Application No. PCT/US2022/073280; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 21, 2022, directed to International Application No. PCT/US2022/073290; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 21, 2022, directed to International Application No. PCT/US2022/073292; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jain et al. “Entity at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Weakly Supervised Token Labelling for Toxic Spans Detection,” Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Aug. 5-6, 2021, Bangkok, Thailand (online)… [cited by applicant]
Jang et al. (Oct. 2018). “Paraphrase Thought: Sentence Embedding Module Imitating Human Language Recognition,” doi:arXiv:1808.05505v3; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al. (Apr. 2020). “Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval with BERT,” doi:arXiv:2004. 13005v1; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jin et al. (Aug. 2018). “Hierarchical Neural Networks for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Scientific Abstracts,” doi:arXiv:1808.06161v1; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jin et al. (Jun. 2020). “Discrete Latent Variable Representations for Low-Resource Text Classification,” doi: arXiv:2006.06226v1; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jung et al. (May 2020). “Posterior Calibrated Training on Sentence Classification Tasks,” doi:arXiv:2004.14500v2; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jurgens et al. (Jun. 2018). “Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field Through Citation Frames,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 6; pp. 391-406. [cited by applicant]
Jørgensen et al. (Sep. 2021). “mDAPT: Multilingual Domain Adaptive Pretraining in a Single Model,” doi: arXiv:2109.06605v1; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim. (Sep. 2014). “Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification,” doi:arXiv:1408.5882v2; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lange et al. (Oct. 2020). “Adversarial Learning of Feature-based Meta-Embeddings,” doi:arXiv:2010.12305v1; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lange et al. (Oct. 2021). “FAME: Feature-Based Adversarial Meta-Embeddings for Robust Input Representations,” doi:arXiv:2010.12305v2; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al. (Sep. 2019). “BioBERT: A Pre-trained Biomedical Language Representation Model for Biomedical Text Mining,” Bioinformatics 2019; pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. (Dec. 1999). “Framework for Efficient Processing of Content-Based Fuzzy Cartesian Queries,” Storage and Retrieval for Media Databases 2000, International Society for Optics and Photonics, (vol. 3972); pp. 64-7… [cited by applicant]
Li et al. (Jun. 2015). “A Hierarchical Neural Autoencoder for Paragraphs and Documents,” arXiv:1506.01057v2; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. (May 2021). “Improving BERT with Syntax-aware Local Attention,” doi: arXiv:2012.15150v2; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,329, filed Jun. 30, 2022, for “AI-Augmented Auditing Platform Including Techniques for Automated Assessment of Vouching Evidence.” [A copy is not submitted herewith pursuant to the waive… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,337, filed Jun. 30, 2022, for “AI-Augmented Auditing Platform Including Techniques for Automated Adjudication of Commercial Substance, Related Parties, and Collectability.” [A copy is no… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,338, filed Jun. 30, 2022, for “AI-Augmented Auditing Platform Including Techniques for Applying a Composable Assurance Integrity Framework.” [A copy is not submitted herewith pursuant to… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,352, filed Jun. 30, 2022, for “AI-Augmented Auditing Platform Including Techniques for Providing Al-Explainability for Processing Data Through Multiple Layers.” [A copy is not submitted … [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2024, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,337; 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,329; 30 pages . [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2024, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,348; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,352; 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2024, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,338; 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2024, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,329; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. (Aug. 2018). “An Attention-Gated Convolutional Neural Network for Sentence Classification;” 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. (May 2019). “Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understanding,” arXiv:1901.11504v2; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. (May 2021). “UIUC_BioNLP at SemEval-2021 Task 11: A Cascade of Neural Models for Structuring Scholarly NLP Contributions,” doi:arXiv:2105.05435v1; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu. (Mar. 2017). “Automatic Argumentative-Zoning Using Word2vec,” doi:arXiv:1703.10152v1; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lorenz et al. (Feb. 2021). “QNLP in Practice: Running Compositional Models of Meaning on a Quantum Computer,” doi:arXiv:2102.12846v1; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Madabushi et al. (Mar. 2020). “Cost-Sensitive BERT for Generalisable Sentence Classification with Imbalanced Data,” doi:arXiv:2003.11563v1; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Meng et al. (May 2020). “Glyce: Glyph-vectors for Chinese Character Representations,” doi:arXiv:1901.10125v5; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mollá et al. (Aug. 2021). “Query-Focused Extractive Summarisation for Finding Ideal Answers to Biomedical and COVID-19 Questions,” doi:arXiv:2108.12189v2; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Montero et al. (Sep. 2021). “Sentence Bottleneck Autoencoders from Transformer Language Models,” doi:arXiv:2109.00055v2; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Munkhdalai et al. (Feb. 2017). “Neural Tree Indexers for Text Understanding,” doi:arXiv:1607.04492v2; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Munkhdalai et al. (Jan. 2017). “Neural Semantic Encoders,” doi:arXiv:1607.04315v3; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Murahari et al. (Feb. 2022). “DataMUX: Data Multiplexing for Neural Networks,” doi:arXiv:2202.09318v1; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Namboodiri et al. (2007). “Document Structure and Layout Analysis,” located at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.884.6373&rep=rep1&type=pdf; (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Nangia et al. (Apr. 2018). “ListOps: A Diagnostic Dataset for Latent Tree Learning,” doi:arXiv:1804.06028v1; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Natsev et al. (Aug. 2001). “Supporting Incremental Join Queries on Ranked Inputs,” VLDB (vol. 1): 281-290. [cited by applicant]
Nonnenmacher et al. (Jan. 2021). “Unsupervised anomaly detection for internal auditing: Literature review and research agenda,” The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, vol. 21: 1-22. [cited by applicant]
Norwich University Online. (Jul. 2018). “The 5 Pillars of Information Assurance,” located at https://online.norwich.edu/academic-programs/resources/the-5-pillars-of-information-assurance. (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Peris et al. (Aug. 2018). “NMT-Keras: a Very Flexible Toolkit with a Focus on Interactive NMT and Online Learning,” doi:arXiv:1807.03096v3; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pham et al. “Convolutional Neural Network Language Models,” Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Nov. 1-5, 2016, Austin, Texas; pp. 1153-1162. [cited by applicant]
Prasanna et al. (Apr. 2019). “Zoho at SemEval-2019 Task 9: Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation Using Tri-training for Suggestion Mining,” doi:arXiv:1902.10623v2; 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pömsl et al. (Oct. 2020). “CIRCE at SemEval-2020 Task 1: Ensembling Context-Free and Context-Dependent Word Representations,” doi:arXiv:2005.06602v3; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Qian et al. (Mar. 2020). “An Approach for Process Model Extraction by Multi-Grained Text Classification,” doi: arXiv.1906.02127v3; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Raunak et al. (May 2020). “On Dimensional Linguistic Properties of the Word Embedding Space,” doi: arXiv:1910.02211v2; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rei et al. (Nov. 2018). “Jointly Learning to Label Sentences and Tokens,” doi:arXiv:1811.05949v1; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ruder et al. (Sep. 2016). “Character-level and Multi-channel Convolutional Neural Networks for Large-scale Authorship Attribution,” doi:arXiv:1609.06686v1; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ruggeri et al. (Sep. 2021). “Tree-Constrained Graph Neural Networks for Argument Mining,” doi: arXiv:2110.00124v1; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Russell. (Aug. 2019) “Arrays in Mathematics,” located at https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-arrays-in-mathematics-2312362, visited on Oct. 23, 2023. (2 pages). [cited by applicant]
Sanh et al. (Mar. 2020). “DistilBERT, a Distilled Version of BERT: Smaller, Faster, Cheaper and Lighter,” arXiv:1910.01108v4; 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schröder et al. (Mar. 2022). “Revisiting Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with Transformers,” doi:arXiv:2107.05687v2; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schumann et al. “Active Learning via Membership Query Synthesis for Semi-supervised Sentence Classification,” Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Nov. 3-4, 2019, Hong Kong, Chi… [cited by applicant]
Sharma. (Dec. 2021). “Dependency Parsing in Natural Language Processing with Examples,” located at https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2021/12/dependency-parsing-in-natural-language-processing-with-examples/; (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Shieh et al. (Oct. 2019). “Towards Understanding of Medical Randomized Controlled Trials by Conclusion Generation,” doi:arXiv:1910.01462v1; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Singh et al. (Oct. 2020). “Voice@SRIB at SemEval-2020 Task 9 and 12: Stacked Ensembling method for Sentiment and Offensiveness detection in Social Media,” doi:arXiv:2007.10021v3; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Song et al. (Nov. 2019). “Bivariate Beta-LSTM,” doi:arXiv:1905.10521v3; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tutubalina et al. (Apr. 2020). “The Russian Drug Reaction Corpus and Neural Models for Drug Reactions and Effectiveness Detection in User Reviews,” doi:arXiv:2004.03659v1; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vadapalli. (Mar. 2021). Dependency Parsing in NLP [Explained with Examples], located at https://www.upgrad.com/blog/dependency-parsing-in-nlp/; (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Veyseh et al. (Apr. 2020). “A Joint Model for Definition Extraction with Syntactic Connection and Semantic Consistency,” doi:arXiv:1911.01678v4; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “EANN: Event Adversarial Neural Networks for Multi-Modal Fake News Detection,” Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Aug. 19-23, 2018, London, Unit… [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. (Sep. 2021). “Counterfactual Adversarial Learning with Representation Interpolation,” doi: arXiv:2109.04746v1; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wei et al. (Jun. 2022). “SynWMD: Syntax-aware Word Mover's Distance for Sentence Similarity Evaluation,” doi: arXiv:2206.10029v1; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wieting et al. (Jan. 2019). “No Training Required: Exploring Random Encoders for Sentence Classification,” doi: arXiv:1901.10444v1; 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilie et al. (Oct. 2020). “IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understanding,” doi:arXiv:2009.05387v3; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Williams et al. (Feb. 2018). “Do Latent Tree Learning Models Identify Meaningful Structure in Sentences?,” doi: arXiv:1709.01121v2; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. (Nov. 2020). “CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark,” doi: arXiv:2004.05986v3; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yao et al., “UJNLP at SemEval-2020 Task 12: Detecting Offensive Language Using Bidirectional Transformers,” Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Dec. 12, 2020, Barcelona, Spain (Online)… [cited by applicant]
Ye et al. (Aug. 2021). “Understanding Human Reading Comprehension with Brain Signals,” doi:arXiv:2108.01360v2; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al. (Dec. 2019). “Neural Simile Recognition with Cyclic Multitask Learning and Local Attention,” doi: arXiv:1912.09084v1; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (Apr. 2016). “A Sensitivity Analysis of (and Practitioners' Guide to) Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification,” doi:arXiv:1510.03820v4; 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (Apr. 2018). “Word Embedding Perturbation for Sentence Classification,” doi:arXiv:1804.08166v1; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (Dec. 2016). “Active Discriminative Text Representation Learning,” doi:arXiv:1606.04212v4; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (Jun. 2021). “CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark,” doi: arXiv:2106.08087v1; 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (Mar. 2022). “CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark,” doi: arXiv:2106.08087v6; 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2025, directed to EP Application No. 22834419.8; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 14, 2025, directed to EP Application No. 22834417.2; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 5, 2025, directed to EP Application No. 22834413.1; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,337; 57 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated May 28, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,338; 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chrisman. (2015) “Deontic Modals,” article summary, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, located at www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/deontic-modals/v-1; 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,352; 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2026, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,337; 57 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,352; 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,329; 35 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2025, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,337; 62 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2026, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/854,338; 33 pages. [cited by applicant]