IP Library Granted Patent US 12,486,017
Granted Patent B2
US 12,486,017 · App. 19/079,138 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Additive manufactured integral fastening system for mission adaptable unmanned aerial vehicles

Inventor: Ian Muceus (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Firestorm Labs, Inc.
B64C7/00B64C1/26B64U20/40B64C2211/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,486,017
App. No.
19/079,138
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are specialized airframe structures for mission-adaptable unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that are fabricated by rapid, low-cost additive manufacturing techniques. In some embodiments, an integral fastening system for a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle includes a first airframe section, a second airframe section, and a bayonet mount system that comprises one or more passageways produced on a first end region of the first airframe section to include a first channel and second channel, and one or more protrusions produced on a second end region of the second airframe section, such that, when the first and second airframe sections being assembled, the one or more protrusions are first aligned with an entry region of the first channel to be translated and then aligned with the second channel of the one or more passageways to be rotated to securely connect the first and second airframe sections together.

Claims (52)

1 . An integral fastening system for a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, comprising:

a first airframe section having a first end region and a second end region on an opposing side with respect to the first end region;

a second airframe section having a first end region and a second end region on an opposing side with respect to the first end region; and

a bayonet mount system, comprising:

one or more passageways produced on the first end region of the first airframe section to include a first channel and second channel, and

one or more protrusions produced on the second end region of the second airframe section configured to be connected to the first end region of the first airframe section, such that, when the first and second airframe sections are being assembled, the one or more protrusions are first aligned with an entry region of the first channel to be translated and then aligned with the second channel of the one or more passageways to be rotated to securely connect the first and second airframe sections together,

wherein the bayonet mount system further includes a locking assembly comprising:

one or more deflection tabs disposed at one or both of the first end region of the first airframe section and the second end region of the second airframe section; and

a corresponding slot disposed at one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section,

wherein the one or more deflection tabs is configured to deflect radially when depressed by a contact surface of the one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section when the one or more protrusions is translated and rotated within the first channel and the second channel, respectively, such that when the one or more deflection tabs is aligned with the corresponding one or more slots, the one or more deflection tabs is returned to an initial projection state to project into the corresponding one or more slots, thereby locking the first airframe section and the second airframe section together.

2 . The integral fastening system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more deflection tabs is structured to have a ramp angle protrusion height, a tab thickness, and a tab width and structured to include material properties including modulus of elasticity, elongation at break, and flexural modulus to render a ramp protrusion portion of the one or more deflection tabs as depressible when undergoing a contact force and returnable to its initial position when the contact force is removed.

3 . The integral fastening system of claim 2 , wherein the tab thickness of a wall of the one or more deflection tabs is at least 1 mm or is in a range of 1 mm to 25 mm.

4 . The integral fastening system of claim 2 , wherein the tab width of the one or more deflection tabs is in a range of 5 mm to 50 mm.

5 . The integral fastening system of claim 2 , wherein a ramp angle of the one or more deflection tabs is in a range of between 5° to 60°.

6 . The integral fastening system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more protrusions and the one or more passageways are integrally produced through an additive manufacturing technique as part of the first airframe section and the second airframe section, thereby facilitating toolless connection and securement of the first airframe section and the second airframe section.

7 . The integral fastening system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more protrusions includes at least one of a lug, a pin, a nub, or other projection component.

8 . The integral fastening system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more passageways includes an open volume in a wall structure of an airframe structure that forms a slot, a channel, or other cavity.

9 . The integral fastening system of claim 1 , wherein the first and second airframe sections are configured to be tightly and securely connected based on physical and material properties of structures comprising the one or more protrusions and the one or more passageways through at least one of tight tolerances, fillets, smooth surfaces, or surface draft angles.

10 . A mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, comprising:

a fuselage assembly, wherein the fuselage assembly comprises one or more fuselage sections;

a wing assembly reversibly attachable to the fuselage assembly, wherein the wing assembly comprises at least one wing section;

a nose cone assembly reversibly attachable to the fuselage assembly, wherein the nose cone assembly comprises at least one nose cone section; and

a tail assembly reversibly attachable to the fuselage assembly, wherein the tail assembly comprises at least one tail section,

wherein at least one of the fuselage assembly, the wing assembly, the nose cone assembly, or the tail assembly includes a bayonet mount system,

wherein the bayonet mount system comprises:

one or more passageways produced on a first end region of a first airframe section to include a first channel and second channel, and

one or more protrusions produced on a second end region of a second airframe section configured to be connected to the first end region of the first airframe section, such that, when the first and second airframe sections are being assembled, the one or more protrusions are first aligned with an entry region of the first channel to be translated and then aligned with the second channel of the one or more passageways to be rotated to securely connect the first and second airframe sections together,

wherein the bayonet mount system further includes a locking assembly comprising:

one or more deflection tabs disposed at one or both of the first end region of the first airframe section and the second end region of the second airframe section; and

a one or more slots disposed at one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section,

wherein the one or more deflection tabs is configured to deflect radially when depressed by a contact surface of the one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section when the one or more protrusions is translated and rotated within the first channel and the second channel, respectively, such that when the one or more deflection tabs is aligned with corresponding one or more slots, the one or more deflection tabs is returned to an initial projection state to project into the corresponding one or more slots, thereby locking the first airframe section and the second airframe section together.

11 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 10 , wherein the one or more deflection tabs is structured to have a ramp angle protrusion height, a tab thickness, and a tab width and structured to include material properties including modulus of elasticity, elongation at break, and flexural modulus to render a ramp protrusion portion of the one or more deflection tabs as depressible when undergoing a contact force and returnable to its initial position when the contact force is removed.

12 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 11 , wherein:

the tab thickness of a wall of the one or more deflection tabs is at least 1 mm or is in a range of 1 mm to 25 mm, or

the tab width of the one or more deflection tabs is in a range of 5 mm to 50 mm.

13 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 11 , wherein a ramp angle of the one or more deflection tabs is in a range of between 5° to 60°.

14 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 10 , wherein the one or more protrusions and the one or more passageways are integrally produced through an additive manufacturing technique as part of the first airframe section and the second airframe section, thereby facilitating toolless connection and securement of the first airframe section and the second airframe section.

15 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 10 , wherein the one or more protrusions includes at least one of a lug, a pin, a nub, or other projection component.

16 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 10 , wherein the one or more passageways includes an open volume in a wall structure of an airframe structure that forms a slot, a channel, or other cavity.

17 . The mission-adaptable aerial vehicle of claim 10 , further comprising:

a propulsion unit at least partially contained in at least one of the tail assembly or the fuselage assembly and configured to drive flight of the aerial vehicle; and

an electronics unit comprising a wireless transceiver device and a data processing unit in communication with a control unit of or interfaced with the propulsion unit.

18 . A method of manufacturing interconnecting airframe structures for a mission-adaptable aerial vehicle, comprising:

additively manufacturing a first airframe section to include one or more passageways on the first airframe section, wherein the one or more passageways comprises a first channel and second channel; and

additively manufacturing a second airframe section to include one or more protrusions on the second airframe section, wherein the one or more protrusions are able to initially be aligned with an entry region of the first channel and translated into the first channel, and then be aligned with the second channel and rotated in the second channel, so as to securely connect the first airframe section and the second airframe section together,

wherein the first airframe section and the second airframe section each includes one section of a fuselage assembly, a wing assembly, a nose cone assembly, or a tail assembly of an aerial vehicle,

wherein the additively manufactured first airframe section and the additively manufactured second airframe section includes a locking assembly comprising:

one or more deflection tabs disposed at one or both of a first end region of the first airframe section and a second end region of the second airframe section; and

a corresponding slot disposed at one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section,

wherein the one or more deflection tabs is configured to deflect radially when depressed by a contact surface of the one or both of the second end region of the second airframe section and the first end region of the first airframe section when the one or more protrusions is translated and rotated within the first channel and the second channel, respectively, such that when the one or more deflection tabs is aligned with the corresponding one or more slots, the one or more deflection tabs is returned to an initial projection state to project into the corresponding one or more slots, thereby locking the first airframe section and the second airframe section together.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the additively manufacturing the first airframe section and the second airframe section includes 3D-printing the first airframe section and the second airframe section.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the additively manufacturing the first airframe section and the second airframe section includes injection molding the first airframe section and the second airframe section.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2025
From: FIRESTORM LABS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 071763/0195 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 10, 2025
From: MUCEUS, IAN
To: FIRESTORM LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 071667/0027 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63564964 · Mar 13, 2024
Related Publication 20250289561A1 · Sep 18, 2025
References Cited (187)
US 2019652A · Brookley · 1935 [cited by applicant]
US 3218005A · Alvarez Calderon · 1965 [cited by applicant]
US 4494940A · Gretz · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US D278728S · Ninomiya · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US D280007S · Benneche et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4786008A · Corbett · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5322243A · Stoy · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5395073A · Rutan et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6065720A · Ash · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7059566B2 · Byers et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7165772B1 · Camacho · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7219861B1 · Barr · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US D596267S · Colgren et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US D628528S · Cabezas Carrasco · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8068949B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8068950B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8082074B2 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8103398B2 · Duggan · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8355834B2 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8380425B2 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8700306B2 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D706678S · Earon · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8768555B2 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8882560B2 · Sofman · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D725548S · Herald et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US D729694S · Earon · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9108729B2 · Duggan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9254363B2 · Levien · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9308462B1 · Huang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9555873B1 · Alley et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9713675B2 · Levien · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10137982B1 · Dormiani et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10767624B2 · Monreal Lesmes et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11027584B1 · Kiceniuk, Jr. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D931757S · Liu · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11187203B2 · Badger · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11358700B1 · Poe · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11450233B2 · Becker · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11521512B2 · Marquinez Torrecilla et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11590854B1 · Wiegman · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11597490B1 · Gundlach · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11721231B2 · Becker · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11981460B2 · Muceus · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US D1030555S · He et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US D1031516S · He et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US D1035547S · He et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12202634B1 · England · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12236494B1 · Melgar · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12240634B1 · Muceus · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20040248496A1 · Harvey · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080149758A1 · Colgren et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090026321A1 · Sarh · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090166477A1 · Bousfield · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100159434A1 · Lampotang · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100178966A1 · Seydoux · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110036939A1 · Easter · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110130913A1 · Duggan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110221692A1 · Seydoux · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123628A1 · Duggan · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130345920A1 · Duggan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140025229A1 · Levien · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140234116A1 · Cussac et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140324253A1 · Duggan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150003991A1 · Bagepalli et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150292477A1 · Kratmann et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160121992A1 · Saroka et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129984A1 · Tryaki et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160332722A1 · Harding · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170008611A1 · Murta et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170066135A1 · Cohen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170152014A1 · Gould · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170185081A1 · Steele · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170253316A1 · Benthien et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170349281A1 · Quinlan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180067476A1 · Engelbart et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180086458A1 · Sartorius · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180104863A1 · Cottrell et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180162540A1 · Iliopoulos · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180273158A1 · Courtin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180290725A1 · Koessler et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180297698A1 · Dhall · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180312252A1 · Yates · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180334248A1 · Neiser · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180355842A1 · Badger · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190051051A1 · Kaufman · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190077098A1 · Riley et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190077496A1 · Livieratos et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190106192A1 · Woodworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190106195A1 · Wilkerson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190135403A1 · Perry et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190143596A1 · Fiechter et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190193829A1 · Schlueter · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190224909A1 · Riha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190255777A1 · Fiechter et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190322032A1 · Riha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190322047A1 · Riha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190374868A1 · Russell · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190381530A1 · Beaudoin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190389555A1 · Guering · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200032665A1 · Propheter-Hinckley · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200047867A1 · Griess et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200180760A1 · Richardson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200188732A1 · Kruger · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200216196A1 · Sohmshetty · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200247561A1 · Rivera · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200310408A1 · Carper · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200407039A1 · Sanders · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210031912A1 · Yates · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210046694A1 · Rowe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210070419A1 · Decker et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210082304A1 · Daley · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210174695A1 · Clark · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210197965A1 · Kunz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210222809A1 · Chung · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210232873A1 · Kothari · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256875A1 · Sakhnini · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210331789A1 · Wardlaw · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210347462A1 · Haack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372366A1 · Merzhaeuser et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210403143A1 · Alley et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220017204A1 · Helou · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220111956A1 · Jordan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220152758A1 · Jones · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220153452A1 · Smith et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230166828A1 · Makarchuk · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230192267A1 · Gundlach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230339596A1 · Baxter et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240085929A1 · He et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240092510A1 · Muceus · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240185736A1 · Prodzenko · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240294279A1 · Muceus · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240339046A1 · Paull · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240371290A1 · Kane · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250021101A1 · Koch · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250026506A1 · Robbins-Rothman · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250033809A1 · Jiang · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250058904A1 · Muceus · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250108943A1 · Sekiguchi · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250153871A1 · Liu · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250155785A1 · Tian · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 102923296A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 105771269A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106671402A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 112061372A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112158323A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3525259A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
FR 3025491A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
FR 3109369A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
IN 201941005768 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017207874A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019125159A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019212553A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020264115A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023220447A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
USAF Invests $100M in Firestorm Labs for 3D Printed UAS. by Anyer Tenorio Lara. dated Feb. 12, 2025. found online [Apr. 21, 2025] https:113dprintingindustry.com/news/usaf-invests-100m-in-firestorm-labs-for-3d-printed-ua… [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2023/022151 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 27, 2023, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Eric Tegler, “UAS Startup Firestorm's Ambition To Crank Out Combat Drones Fast, Cheap And En Masse Is A 4 Lesson For DoD”, article, Apr. 27, 2023, 6 pages, US. [cited by applicant]
Scott Sevcik, “Where's the real value in additive?—An AM Perspective (Part 2)”, LinkedIn Article, Dec. 5, 2022, 5 pages, US. [cited by applicant]
Troy Mcmillan, “How to build Exlipson Model V—RC 3D Printed Airplane” YouTube Video, Feb. 25, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Robert M. Taylor, Nicholas Lira, Gavin Sabine, Joakim Lea, Craig Conklin, Bijan Niakan, and Sangram Advirkar, “Design Optimization, Fabrication and Testing of a 3D Printed Aircraft Structure Using Fused 9 Deposition Mod… [cited by applicant]
Aaron Pearson “World's first jet-powered, 3D printed UAV tops 150 mph with lightweight Stratasys materials” blog Mar. 24, 2020, 3 pages, Stratasys.com. [cited by applicant]
Luca De Vivo, Danny Tran, and Falko Kuester, “Towards Design of a 3D Printable Prandtl Box-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle”, 2018, 17 pages, CISA3 DroneLab Jacobs School of Engineering. [cited by applicant]
Kelsey Muller, “Flying from Protoypring to Mainstream: 3D Printed Aircrafts Top Out at Speeds of 150mph”, Technology and Operation Management MBA Student Perspectives Assignments, Nov. 12, 2018, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Henry Tucher, “How U.S. Marine Rhet McNeal Designed a 3D Printable Drone to Cost 200X Less at Autodesk's Pier 9” Autodesk News Article, Aug. 22, 2017, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhuo Wei Wong, Yunus Govdeli, and Erdal Kayacan, “Additive Manufacturing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Current Status, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives”, 2016, 1 pages, Research Publishing, Singapore. [cited by applicant]
Daniel O'Connor, “Game of Drones”, TCT Magazine Feb. 29, 2016, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
G.D. Goh, S. Agarwala, G.L. Goh, V. Dikshit, S.L. Sing, and W.Y. Yeong, “Additive manufacturing in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Challenges and potential”, Aerospace Science and Technology Forum, Aug. 25, 2016, 12 pa… [cited by applicant]
Robert P. Dahlgren, Juan J. Alonso, and Matthew M. Fladeland, “Progress on Modular Unmanned Aircraft Technology”, ASPRS 3rd UAS Symposium, Sep. 12-14, 2016, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chris Banfield, James Kidd, and Jamey Jacob, “Design and Development of a 3D Printed UAV”, Aerospace Science and Technology Forum, Jan. 4-8, 2016, 79 pages. [cited by applicant]
Newco, “Local Motors: Driving Innovation with Micro-Manufacturing”, Medium Magazine Article, Oct. 12, 2016, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aurora Flight Sciences, “Aurora Successfully Flies Subscale X-Plane Aircraft ” YouTube Video, Apr. 18, 2016, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
University of Virginia, “The Razor: UVA's 3D-printed U.A.V.”, YouTube Video, Aug. 29, 2014, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Press, “Aurora Flight Sciences 3D printed wing”, sUAS News the business of drones Article, Nov. 9, 2015, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pedro Santos, Joaquim Sousa, and Pedro Gamboa, “Variable span wing development for improved flight performance” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2015, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Palanivel, H. Sidhar, and R.S. Mishra, “Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing: Route to High Structural Performance”, Article in JOM: the journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society Jan. 13, 2015, 7 pages, vol… [cited by applicant]
Michael Molitch-Hou, “Feasibility of Hovering Aircraft Demonstrated with 3D Printing”, web article, May 4, 2016, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
BUSINESSWIRE A Berkshire Hathhaway Company, “Aurora Flight Sciences and Stratasys Deliver World's First Jet-Powered, 3D Printed UAV in Record Time”, Nov. 9, 2015, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carl Muldal, Edward Kolb, Graham Robertson, Aaron Parkinson, Osvaldo M. Querin, Robert W. Hewson and Vassili V. Toropov, “The use of MDO and Advanced Manufacturing to Demonstrate Rapid, Agile Construction of a Mission O… [cited by applicant]
Steven Easter, Jonathan Turman, David Sheffler, Michael Balazs, and Jonathan Rotner, “Using Advanced Manufacturing to Produce Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Feasibility Study'” May 22, 2013, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
N.A. Ahmed and J.R. Page “Manufacture of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Advanced Project Design using 3D Printing technology”, 2013, 11 pages, vols. 397-400, pp. 970-980, Applied Mechanics and Materials. [cited by applicant]
UVAtoday, “Student Engineers Design, Build, Fly ‘Printed’ Airplane”, Web Article, Oct. 5, 2012, pages. [cited by applicant]
AMRC Design and Prototyping Group, “Rapid Manufactured Fixed Wing Powered UAV”, Case Study, UK, retrieved online Oct. 10, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
AMRC Design and Prototyping Group, “FDM Printed Fixed Wing UAV”, Case Study, UK, 2014, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
North, et al., “Design and Fabrication of the Langley Aerodrome No. 8 Distributed Electric Propulsion VTOL Testbed”, Journal, US, Jan. 2021, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ferraro, et al., “Design and flight test of a civil unmanned aerial vehicle for maritime patrol: the use of 3D-printed structural components”, Jan. 2014, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Joe Hiemenz, “Additive Manufacturing Trends in Aerospace”, Stratasys Article, 2013, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2025/019771 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 16, 2025, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]