Granted Patent B2

US 8,359,039 · App. 12/816,120 · Granted Jan 22, 2013

Abstract

Claims (33)

1. A method for processing a control channel at a user agent (UA) to identify at least one of an uplink and a downlink resource allocated by a resource grant within a multi-carrier communication system wherein resource grants are specified by control channel element (CCE) subsets, wherein each CCE subset is a control channel candidate, the method comprising the steps of:

identifying, by the UA, a number of carriers used to communicate with an access device; and

based on the number of carriers used to communicate with the access device, identifying, by the UA, a number of control channel candidates to decode, wherein the UA is configured to use different control channel candidates for different numbers of carriers;

wherein there are first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels of control channel candidates, when only one carrier is used to communicate with the UA, the numbers of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels are A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 , respectively, and wherein, A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 are integers greater than or equal to zero, and when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, the numbers of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels are a function of the number of carriers used to communicate with the UA; and

wherein, when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, the numbers C 1 , C 2 , C 3 and C 4 of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels, respectively, are determined by solving the following equations:

C 1= A 1+ B 1×( N− 1)

C 2= A 2+ B 2×( N− 1)

C 3= A 3+ B 3×( N− 1)

C 4= A 4+ B 4×( N− 1)

where B 1 , B 2 , B 3 and B 4 are scaling parameters and N is the number of carriers.

2. The method of claim 1 further including the step of attempting to decode up to the identified number of control channel candidates.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein there are at least first and second aggregation levels of control channel candidates where the candidates include first and second different numbers of CCEs, respectively, and, wherein, the numbers of control channel candidates are different for the first and second aggregation levels.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein, when only one carrier is used to communicate with the UA, a first number of control channel candidates is identified and, when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, at least a second number of control channel candidates is identified where the second number is greater than the first number.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the identified number of control channel candidates for multi-carrier operation is at least equal to the number of candidates for single carrier operation.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein there are several aggregation levels of control channel candidates and the identified number of control channel candidates for multi-carrier operation corresponding to at least one of the aggregation levels is the greater of the number of carriers and the number of control channel candidates for single carrier operation.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 are 6, 6, 2 and 2, respectively.

8. An apparatus for processing a control channel at a user agent (UA) to identify at least one of an uplink and a downlink resource allocated by a resource grant within a multi-carrier communication system wherein resource grants are specified by control channel element (CCE) subset candidates, the apparatus comprising:

a processor programmed to perform the steps of:

identifying, by the UA, a number of carriers used to communicate with an access device; and

based on the number of carriers used to communicate with the access device, identifying, by the UA, a number of control channel candidates to decode, wherein the UA is configured to use different control channel candidates for different numbers of carriers;

wherein there are first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels of control channel candidates, when only one carrier is used to communicate with the UA, the numbers of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels are A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 , respectively, and wherein, A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 are integers greater than or equal to zero, and when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, the numbers of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels are a function of the number of carriers used to communicate with the UA; and

wherein, when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, the numbers C 1 , C 2 , C 3 and C 4 of control channel candidates for the first, second, third and fourth aggregation levels, respectively, are determined by solving the following equations:

C 1= A 1+ B 1×( N− 1)

C 2= A 2+ B 2×( N− 1)

C 3= A 3+ B 3×( N− 1)

C 4= A 4+ B 4×( N− 1)

where B 1 , B 2 , B 3 and B 4 are scaling parameters and N is the number of carriers.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the processor is further programmed to perform the step of attempting to decode up to the identified number of control channel candidates.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein there are at least first and second aggregation levels of control channel candidates where the candidates include first and second different numbers of CCEs, respectively, and, wherein, the numbers of control channel candidates are different for the first and second aggregation levels.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein, when only one carrier is used to communicate with the UA, a first number of control channel candidates is identified and, when two or more carriers are used to communicate with the UA, at least a second number of control channel candidates is identified where the second number is greater than the first number.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the identified number of control channel candidates for multi-carrier operation is at least equal to the number of candidates for single carrier operation.

13. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein there are several aggregation levels of control channel candidates and the identified number of control channel candidates for multi-carrier operation corresponding to at least one of the aggregation levels is the greater of the number of carriers and the number of control channel candidates for single carrier operation.

14. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 are 6, 6, 2 and 2, respectively.

Assignments (10)